How did the Med man manage to so thoroughly btfo Northerners throughout history?
How did the Med man manage to so thoroughly btfo Northerners throughout history?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>inb4 armenoidreeks claiming roman heritage
Because of Yakub
>mediterranean "race"
stop pushing this meme, that's like saying bering strait race
There is a Bering Strait race though, they stretch from eastern coastal Russia, across the Bering Strait, into Alaska and Canada ending in Greenland. They are called Eskimos
eskimos are technically the bering strait race
>Who would win?
>The most STRONK POWERFUL empire in human history
>A few uncivilised Germanic farmers
Was it really the Germanics or was it that western Rome collapsed on its own weight? People love to use the fall of Rome for ego or through scapegoat. On one hand you have Sup Forums Nazis taking pride in how Germanics allegedly destroyed Rome only to demonize the Christians for allegedly destroying Rome.
>Was it really the Germanics or was it that western Rome collapsed on its own weight?
The second one.
Rome ran out of rich lands to conquer, the Roman generals then turned to conquer Rome itself, since there were no riches beyond their borders.
The one that existed prooved to be impossible for romans to conquer (Parthia)
>Bering Strait race
it exist, just like the med race exist.
en.m.wikipedia.org
No such med race exist only southern European European race North African Race and Middle Eastern race, northbAfricans are nowhere related to middle easterners let alone Southern Europeans, the med sea is for advanced civilization trading in recent history not ancient history of farmers and hunter gatherers with no writing, writing invented 3,000BCE
>No such med race exist only southern European European race North African Race and Middle Eastern race,
WRONG.
North Africans aren't related to Middle Easterners nor Europeans same for Middle Easterners.
What you are talking of "med" isn't really a race but a recent admixture of the different populations more exemplied in places close to recent conquest settlement from North Africa or Middle East to Europe, concentrated solely in some populations of sicily and naples.
I wonder what it's like to be bereft of even a single correct notion about history the way Americans are?
Must be like living in the Matrix. Nothing happened more than 40 years ago.
Tunisians are only 4% Arab
But that's wrong. First George Washington invented freedom, then Abraham Lincoln invented freedom again, then Wyatt Earp became a legend at OK Corral and then America saved the world twice.
lol butthurt whitoid
Genetic relationship between med groups clearly exist.
T. Assblasted Northie
b*Ringoids btfo
If you aren't blind you can see 0 affinity of Southern Europeans and Middle Easterners, only European, South Europeans are much closer to Germans than any Middle Eastern population, you have trouble distinguishing Ethnic Southern Europeans and any Europeans whatsoever thus White Race.
>Greeks and Italians overlap with Jews
>Cypriots are more levantine than jews
>"""no affinity"""
ok
They are mixed race populations, Balkans Greeks natural population or North Italians Natural Southern European populations are nowhere near middle easterners, Byzantine empire along with the hellenistic ages of failed assimilations distanced Greeks from their historical population native to Greece, Southern Italians are not natives but large populations mixed race.
This is what happens when you declare independence without a plan in mind. If only France and Spain didn't bail them out.
Christianity broke barriers of distinction of non mixed Greeks with other populations converted to the Yeshuahist sect of Yahwahism.
>They are mixed race populations
they've always been like that. since humans first settled the region. The med wasn't a barrier but an area of human transportation. If anything the think forest of Europe acted as a barrier between Med Europeans and other Europeans.
>Yeshuahist sect of Yahwahism
making up bullshit doesn't make you come off as intelligent, brainlet.
No they have not, Greeces natural populations near them away from State induced mixture of policies are not like that, they race mixed due to 400 year Ottoman conquest the Byzantine era or the Hellenistic eras.
They are completely detached from European history. What they learn in school is WW2 and muh six billion. They are suggested from birth to a culture of McDonalds, negro rappers, judaic pornography and servitude to Israel.
The western roman empire fell because the west wasn't as rich as the east and had a longer frontier towards migranting germanics, and as tribes moved in the romans couldnt defend their own lands against them so instead they leased the lands to the invading barbarians in exchange for the barbarians taking on the protection of that land themselves.
This was the beginning of the feudal system - barbarians held land that rome was no longer able to tax, which lead to rome being unable to field enough armies to protect what they had remaining, which lead to them accepting more barbarians within their borders in a downward spiral until there was nothing left to tax and until the western empire almost had no armies of their own.
In the end, these barbarians, or feodorati became more powerful than the roman empire itself, with the last emperors being nothing more than puppets to germanic kings.
Except people who aren't pseuds know that the Greek race was preceded by populations such as Pelasgians whom they mixed with to form Greek society.
en.wikipedia.org
The Greek language came from north and previous inhabitants would be like Bosnians.
Yes. But the Greeks themselves assimilated culturally with the Pelasgians and other pre-Indo-European Med groups. They even took loan words from them en.wikipedia.org
>Anatolian substrate
Thus proving that Meds were always Meds, autonomous race of the Mediterranean.
Wrong you idiot, anatolians are across the ocean, only traversable by boat, pre indo euro Greeks would be of balkan population such as Bosnians Serbs etc..
>Was it really the Germanics or was it that western Rome collapsed on its own weight?
A combination of both. Look up how the Roman Empire in the West collapsed. Here's a
>quick rundown
for you:
>Gaul gets invaded by the Visigoths, later on the Franks repel them and found Francia for themselves (the Franks were already allowed to settle West of the Rhine [in modern day Belgium, though unrelated to modern day Belgium] as a sort of Roman vassal state of immigrants)
>Odoacer, the highest ranking General in the Roman Army, was at the time a Germanic tribesman. A Langobard to be precise (as with the Franks above, Rome had taken in a lot of Germanics who had chosen to settle West of the Rhine after being driven out of their own land because those "poor refugees" would just do the "jobs the Romans didn't want to do themselves" like fighting in the army. Sound familliar?) decided the empire was lost.
>ODOACER decided this. Not Romulus Augustulus, the reigning emperor
>Romulus Augustulus was deposed by Odoacer without any violence or civil war (the entire army filled with Germanics was loyal to Odoacer after all)
>Romulus Augustulus was dumped in a monestary and at this point deemed so irrelevant, we don't even know how and when he died
>Odoacer founds the Kingdom of the Langobards in Italy
There wasn't a massive invasion in which Rome was burned to the ground, but the Germanics did destroy Rome. Or better said, they ursurped it and let it wallow in its own filth. A lesson for modern Europe: even without the threat of war, a great empire can fall to the barbarian hordes.
Be honest with me, how accurate is historical education in Swedish high schools? What do you learn other than "Whitey is evil and responsible for everything bad in this world"?
>anatolians are across the ocean,
What ocean are you talking about? Retard. Also the bosporus strait, which divides Europe and Anatolia is like swimming distance away.
>is like a swimming distance away
Why don't you try swimming it?
Humans and all other great apes do not inherently know how to swim.
Its 4miles across, how would you have direction? How would you hydrate yourself for the 4 mile swim?
1588
They couldn't though
That's depressing but the Romans brought it on themselves.
>Bunch of snownigger barbarians ambush a Roman legion after not only allying Rome, but tricking them into believing there's an uprising in the north that was harming said ally
>Utterly failing to mention the Romans pushed Germania's shit in at the Weser
>Utterly failing to mention that the Romans reclaimed through force all three eagles the Germanians stole from them
But hey, a victory is a victory! Even if it is followed by a string of defeats...
There is a bit of relationship with Eastern Mediterranean people, but the genetic history of arabs and berbers is different to south east europeans.
So he is right there is no mediterranean race.
The moor meme is overplayed, and we know from population genetics it isn't true.
Taylor road
First official swim of the hellenespont is dated to 1810.
Well actually theres no evidence byron swam it in 1810.
>Be honest with me, how accurate is historical education in Swedish high schools? What do you learn other than "Whitey is evil and responsible for everything bad in this world"?
We learned none of that actually. I'm weirded out whenever I hear that's what they teach in mainland europe, like what's the atmosphere like in the classroom when they start accusing teh children of slavery? All we learned was that our Trälar were treated much better than regular slaves.
The problem with your (and his) theory is that it presumes Arabs and Turkics are Meds. They aren't, they are recent foreign admixture. Meds would include groups like Phoenicians, Copts, Pre-Arab Egyptians, Greeks, Italians, Jews ect. Groups such as Lebanese are genetically Med insofar as they still largely of pre-Arab admixture. But for all practical purposes Levantine Arabs are Meds. Peninsular Arabs on the other hand aren't Meds.
Deception is key in war
That was also THREE whole legions WIPED.
War isn't a K:D ratio. Rome wanted to consolidate and conquer Germania. Teutoberg Forest stopped that. This is no different that people who think the Vietnam War was an American victory because dead gooks lmao.
Rome's attempt to conquer Germania was slapped down, no contest.
Except they later conquered part of Germany and periodically raided the uncolonized part for slaves and loot
I'm mostly speaking as to Magna Germania, and the tribes that would later cross the Rhine and overrun the Western Roman Empire.
I'll concede Germania Inferior, but notice just how far we've diverged from LOL SNOWNIGS BTFO. This thread picked the one ethnic group the Meds really DIDN'T BTFO funny enough.
...
The answer is tolerance and multiculturalism. We took in the few good things we didn't invent from other civilizations/races (math, food, engineering, women) and we improved upon them substantially. The idiots ITT saying there's no Mediterranean race because we are so phenotypically diverse, but we all have a common core. The Mediterranean is a super-race comprised of multiple sub-races.
>vassalizing other states and taking their stuff is now "tolerance and multiculturalism"
If I were to accept your definition, this would be a far cry from the modern notion.
Historically the Portuguese were never numerous enough to populate our entire country. We made deals and welcomed with open arms the muslim and jewish peoples of the territories we conquered in the Reconquista, otherwise it would either be genocide or open revolts all across the land. We then made treaties with al-andaluz and similar Iberian muslim states to prevent any party from invading each other.
This was the reason why we turned to the seas and discovered the world. With cooperation of jews and muslims, we built the best ships the world had ever seen and massively improved upon astronomy and cartography. Then we negotiated with African Kings to know their wisdom, which itself allowed us to create new sea routes. The Portuguese people, as Mediterraneans, may have been exceedingly proficient warriors (most our battles were at a 10:1 disadvantage) but we knew war isn't the answer to everything and that eventually it would destroy our kingdom. Subjugation was, at most, a temporary and extremely localized measure.
This is just the Portuguese chapter of the Mediterranean accomplishments. I'm sure other Mediterraneans have similar stories to share about their countries.
Even the Kantabrian wars made Rome put 7 legions and the Cesar on the field ffs. Always the americans man. Mmuh History degree. Muh heritage
h-hi varg, don't spy on me
in reality romans and snowdwellers never really encountered each other