Your cunt

>Your cunt
>Number of aircraft carriers
America
11 Active

Other urls found in this thread:

mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/gallery/ships/dd/hyuga/181.html
mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/gallery/ships/dd/izumo/183.html
hotair.com/archives/2007/11/10/chinese-sub-pops-up-in-the-midst-of-a-us-carrier-battle-group/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Airsoft not popular here

failipenis
0

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second's realm of New Zealand
0

Headless Federal Republic of Mexico
0

Sopaland
0

The land of the rising sun of Nippon
0 Active
many retiring on the bottom of the Pacific

Russia
0

Russia has one in service bud, just like us

Officially it's not an aircraft carrier, it's a "aircraft carrying cruiser" as a loophole of the Montreux Convention

You do have helicopter carriers.

Are Izumo and Hyūga?

These aren't aircraft carriers.
These are helicopter destroyer.

We Japanese don't have aircraft carriers.
Japan is a rabbit which is little and cute and very weak. :3

>Japan is a rabbit which is little and cute and very weak. :3
That is why we want to protect you.

cringed

all this and we cant have free healthcare

cringe, pay for your own shit you plebeian, stop expecting handouts

Plz gib subs

I know that, my master.

1

ayyyy

One. Which is more than the rest of the region save China.

Carriers are literally a liability

We sank this. Absolute travesty.

>Carriers are literally a liability
This meme again.

gets shot

Not an argument

well he's not wrong, a carrier needs a whole carrier fleet to defend it, it literally is a floating runaway

i honestly think that a barrage of land based missiles is cheaper then the cost of an entire carrier and the support fleet.

Oh, did I say something wrong?
If I did, I'm sorry. :3

>If I did, I'm sorry. :3
Don't apologize to Russia. They are just jealous of our relationship.

>we japanese

a barrage of land based missiles isn't capable of mass force projection you fucking idiot

2 of these helicopter carriers. They may decide to operate F-35 from it.

But if the carrier is protected you have air support in that region in minutes and it can linger for a long time. Beats flying thousands of miles from an air base if you don't have one near by, and also helpful to capture one. It's a big capability for air support away from home.

The Emu Republic
Whatever US + Britain's count is because you have to defend us :^)

yeah but what's the point of force projection if you can only pick on weak countries? against a country that can have a mass of land based missiles then carriers are floating targets. it's also a lot easier to export those missiles then it is for a country to buy a carrier + logistics.

how many icebreaker corvettes murica have

does Gotland count?

>his carriers have ramps

Sure thing, my master. :3

Yes

holy fuck he solved it, land based missiles, forget aegis they have LAND BASED MISSILES those carriers are fucked now lmao

Åland counts,since its unsinkable and filled with faggots haha

Don't be so rude to him. You can't expect a country with a standing army of 70k to be able to into warfare.

can't we have a conversation? even with aegis, the time it takes to resupply a ship is far longer then it would to resupply a land based missile system. even if aegis knocks down every offensive missile, the next volley would be quicker to reload then it would for the fleet to either continue attacking without a resupply, or they'd have to fall back to resupply.

they did burn your capital back in the day,Cletus

>helicopter destroyer
Nice meme. They're one (relatively easy) conversion away from being aircraft carriers. You can't fool me, Nippon.

but it's not ours

We haven talk had a real war since WWII

3 in active service.

do they have vls cells?

i forgot to add, if you include decoys into the equation, it makes missile defence even less effective in attrition. since a missile defence must assume every missile is armed while the attacker merely has to absorb as my interceptors as possible before launching a even more saturated salvo.

All US icebreakers are unarmed,

Just like we have to go to for example north korea if it goes down :^)

I've never fool you. :_3
These are written in the page of Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force.

mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/gallery/ships/dd/hyuga/181.html
護衛艦(艦艇)ひゅうが型 (DDH"HYUGA"Class)

mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/gallery/ships/dd/izumo/183.html
護衛艦(艦艇) いずも型 (DDH"IZUMO"Class)

>It has been speculated that future modifications may allow the operation of VTOL/STOVL fixed-wing aircraft, such as Harriers or F-35 Lightning II.[1][6][7][8][9]

>Yeah you aren't allowed to even question our military spending to defend Israeli and Saudi interests! How dare you actually want something in return for your taxes!

*teleports behind you
hotair.com/archives/2007/11/10/chinese-sub-pops-up-in-the-midst-of-a-us-carrier-battle-group/

That fleet quite literally means the world to us.
I don't think you appreciate what would happen if we downsized.

Ummm.....

Yes, but that isn't what I said.
That is what is said by Japanese Maritime Force said.

I didn't fool you. :3

>Flag
>We'd rather waste money on leaking submarines than waste it on aircraft carriers

We can still afford a modern developed country style healthcare system instead of pretending that health is an insurable commodity—one of the most retarded ideas ever conceived of by the American mind

>His carriers replace a simple ramp with an expensive, potentially breakable, massive space consuming catapult system

Never got this retarded ramp meme.

A missile strike that lands on the right spot of the carrier deck could do zero damage to the super structure but render your catapult system, and thus your ability to launch planes, completely null.

You'd have to blow the entire front off a ramped carrier to achieve the same.

>ramp

aircraft carriers are overrated. nuclear submarines and lots of tanks are the only things that matter

>t. Carrierlet

1, nuclear propulsion for the memes

Put one F-35B onboard and it's automatically a carrier.

Currently not a fixed wing aircraft carrier but can be converted.

0.5

Wow those are some ugly ships.
Still more than Russia.

fuck dude, if you want free healthcare, come to Poland
we got everything free, too bad u gotta wait YEARS for a specialist like ophtalmologist or endocrinologist
also people tend to die in queves, but what do i know

2 ghetto heli carrier.

They don't turn active sonar when not at war since it will mess up the fish and ruin local fishermen. In actual war their path would have Poseidon throwing sonar buoys and sinking the subs from a hundred km away.

Australia
2

fucking hideous. good ridance.

Number of NUCLEAR POWERED BATTLECRUISERS countries have:

Russia: 1, soon to be 2
The rest of the world combined: 0

Number of nuclear icebreakers:

Russia: 5, soon to be more

Rest of the world combined: 0

>lots of tanks
>2017
One squadron of A-10's could destroy an entire armored division. One A-10 alone could do that if it got lucky enough.

>many retiring on the bottom of the Pacific
r

and one s-300 can destroy an entire carrier worth of aircraft

not to mention most of Russia's tanks are cold war relics

Your Abrams are yet to receive even active protection, not to mention their engines being fuel hogs and fucking up in the desert, not to mention that they are also too heavy to go through swampy terrain

They also can't shoot long range missiles from their main gun

The piece of lard you have in your head instead of a brain, that is a cold war relic.

PAINT OT RED

If you can land a helicopter on it it's definitely an aircraft carrier, right, guys? Please?

sure

not when it has AEGIS support

>boogarijan navy

this

AEGIS is useless against hypersonic and swarms of intelligent high-supersonic missiles like Granit but I was talking about the aircraft themselves you fucking retard, can you even read

Mmm...
But now Japanese government can't tell that "We'll have air aircraft carriers"

And in Japan, Izumo and Hyuga aren't destroyers.
They are escort ships.

mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/gallery/ships/dd/hyuga/181.html
護衛艦(艦艇)ひゅうが型 (DDH"HYUGA"Class)

escort ship = destroyer in Japan. :3

>le ebin !!1!1 hypersonic meme

well it's a meme for you since you are incapable of producing such weapons yet, but in other parts of the world it's very real

don't be jealous of the superior Russian rocket engineering

>the leaf fails to realise that ramps are not necessary to launch aircraft, but rather allows for aircraft to be equipped with more munitions/fuel/etc for a broader range of sorties.

How ashamed are you live an a country that doesn't have a single active aircraft carrier?

>le ebin!!1!11 russia meme
youre just mad that you bought all that cold war garbageware from them

anyone here play NavyField?

actually I am mad that we had to destroy an enormous amount of excellent weapon systems we got from the Russians once we joined NATO

The old f-16s that you are trying to sell to us, now that is garbageware

none

Norway
probably 0 even though we wuz vikangs

HMS Queen Ramp currently active with HMS Prince Ramp due in around 2020

Why does every carrier threat on Sup Forums have this one really stupid Canadian who thinks he knows more than the experts?

It most certainly is not yours either.