How can we convince normies that she's corrupt...

How can we convince normies that she's corrupt? Browsing news of her nomination on social media it's clear most of them don't even realize there's been a very incriminating email leak. These people are so out of touch, I just don't know if we'll be able to reach them.

Other urls found in this thread:

clintonkainesuck.com/democrat-narrative-russians-hacked-us.html/
youtu.be/12mJ-U76nfg
redstate.com/joesquire/2016/07/25/another-movie-blame-violence-democrats-ask-florida-theaters-show-hillarys-america/
youtube.com/watch?v=syEjkPyqRew
nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
google.com/maps/place/Nevada National Security Site, N2S2/@37.2534211,-116.472724,5618m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xc10ce0a6c8403682!8m2!3d37.2627825!4d-116.490612
rulers.org/usgovt.html#parties,
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

you can't convince a normie

Most seem to already know and be perfectly fine with it.

I'm not even kidding, her supporters are fully aware she's a crook and they do not give a fuck at all. Nothing you can do, they are a cult that will follow her into hell if she asks.

normies are a lost cause. there is no reasoning with them

My faggot wannabe-normie friend said "they're both evil but at least Trump is honest with his evil".

He disgusts me these days.

Anyway, the problem with normies is that they just have a total different perspective on life. Even if you somehow could teach them about the emails etc and Benghazi, it just doesn't pack as much of a punch as le first womyn president meme.

You can try but I'm starting to think it's mostly hopeless

I think they know, but they just think trump is worse cause he can't string a coherent sentence together

They choose to believe that she will keep the gravy train rolling.
Nothing else matters.

name one thing shes done thats corrupt WITH proof

Clinton Foundation in Haiti, Anything to do with the DNC and HFA in regards to funding, and etc.

clintonkainesuck.com/democrat-narrative-russians-hacked-us.html/

Remind them of this

>name one thing shes done thats corrupt WITH proof

youtu.be/12mJ-U76nfg

Heres one example of her changing positions on an issue she disagreed and knew was bad for the American people due to money/corporate influence. Literally the definition of being corrupted.

Go ahead and defend it though, I'll wait

>name one thing shes done thats corrupt WITH proof

youtu.be/12mJ-U76nfg

>very incriminating email leak

What's this now?

bump for important point..

post links to the recent Clinton cash video and recommend D'Nesh D'Sousa's film Hillary's America


redstate.com/joesquire/2016/07/25/another-movie-blame-violence-democrats-ask-florida-theaters-show-hillarys-america/

This thread has really got my hippocampus going

I feel like they're starting to know

Hillary has no supporters and the not miss hate her

You have to get them to stop seeing the democrats and republicans as separate sides to cure this ill. The democrats I know want to vote against Trump, just like they would want to vote against Cruz or Rubio had they been successful. Trump's independence from financial backers scares them rather than assures them that he won't be beholden to the establishment. I've no idea where to begin combatting such ignorance.

They think it's all lies to ruin her image. I've tried everything. It's a lost cause for them, specifically the women.

>First female nominee
>Needs the corrupt backing of the party behind the scenes to barely beat a no-name socialist opponent

This really is a victory for women!

They already know she's corrupt, they just don't give a fuck, because they've cemented in their minds that Trump must undeniably be worse, so they won't even read any proof even if it's right in front of their eyes

The only way to get anywhere close to convincing them is to relate her to Bernie, not to Trump

>Frank Giusta pays Bill and Hillary
>Bill helps Giustra get mining rights in Kazakhstan by praising its dictator as a human rights leader (appalled the international human rights community when he did this)
>Giustra basically creates a new company for the deal, Uranium One
>Uranium One gets mining rights throughout the US for up to 50% of our uranium mining
>Russian nuclear agency Rosatom wants to buy Uranium One
>Rosatom shell company Salida Capital pays Bill and Hillary
>Hillary approves the deal and conceals crucial facts about the nature of Russia's involvement so that others will approve it too
youtube.com/watch?v=syEjkPyqRew
nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

If selling a vital strategic resource to the Russian government because they paid you isn't corruption, I don't know what is.

Have you tried screaming in rage at them?

I think a two pronged approach could be effective:
1. spam videos and quotes from Trump that show he's not a racist/sexist/homophobic
2. spam evidence that the DNC was using it's corrupt influence over the media to falsely portray him as such.

point 1 will get them all feel-goody about what he's saying, even if they still don't trust him or believe him, while point 2 will give them a reason to entertain the idea that he might be misrepresented. The two points will feed off each other as they realize more and more what's going on.

>How can we convince normies that she's corrupt?
Most of them don't care. At some who do, still consider her lesser evil than LITERALLY A HITLER

Everyone realizes she's corrupt, but she's the status quo whereas Trump wants to flip the chess board over and let the pieces fall where they may. I have a career and a family, that approach doesn't work for me, regardless of how I feel about Shillary as a person.

>I have a career and a family
>therefore I will vote for a globalist shill who will continue to fuck the middle class and import more shitskins

Democrats, everyone.

I like how they call Trump LITERALLY HITLER when he's advocating things that would have been mainstream for even Democrats like 10 or 15 years ago, while Hillary's commonalities with actual dictatorship are growing by the day.

FBI cleared her though.

but I guess you gonna claim its true anyways because it suits your agenda.

they all corrupt bla bla, fucking women, tyranny etc.

Normies are completely convinced it is better to elect a corrupt and likely criminal politician than a "bigot." There is no refuting that kind of blind emotional conviction. Identity politics are used for a reason...they are extremely effective.

who cares. she's perfect for America. disgusting country breeds disgusting people.

>globalism
>bad for the middle class
Nice meme, globalization directly benefits me financially, and benefits our economy over all. The big losers to globalization are people who thought they could get by with no marketable skills and just work as a factory cog their entire lives. If they'd paid attention in high school, they might've realized that they needed to learn to do something that a glorified microwave couldn't do better.

>import more shitskins
Trump hasn't offered a viable plan to change the US's demographic trends either (b-but muh wall!), so this is a wash. Also, unless these immigrants can get into college and grad school and perform exceptionally well there, they won't be getting my job any time soon.

You are Netherlands. No one cares about your opinion of Hillary. Take your "progressive" muh women can do everything just as well as a man shit outta here. Hillary has proven herself incompetent at foreign policy and will not be able to effectively act as Commander-in-Chief.

Leftists support all kinds of tyrannical policies, because they fundamentally believe in the force of the state for the use of good. Too bad their good is a sham and a lie and will never work.

Hillary is practically the definition of corrupt, her and slick Willy have done shady shit consistently for the last 50 years in the pursuit of power (and pussy).

Liberal shills and asspained Democrats are fucking all over this board right now, stop apologizing for them or get the fuck out faggot.

Crooked Hillary for a reason.

I didn't clear Hillary, the FBI did.

learn2debate
learn2logic

fucking retard

They will tell you Trump is worse and he's dangerous - besides "they are all crooks" right!

That's what their treasonous leader tells them to say and they cannot think otherwise.

>blue collar workers don't deserve to exist, good thing I was smart enough to go to college
>millions more Mexicans and job outsorcing for everyone in the name of higher profits is fine!

literally fucking race traitor scum, you liberal cunts can fuck right off of this board

>address every single thing you said, your sentence about the FBI was only a statement of fact

Hillary was never cleared
They just chose not to prosecute

I've told my family about the shady death list and their response isn't to disbelieve the assassinations but to treat it as par for the course

Baby Boomers are truly the worst generation

>>address every single thing you said, your sentence about the FBI was only a statement of fact

based on OP claiming she is corrupt because of mailgate, which was cleared.

which only leaves my previous comments

>but I guess you gonna claim its true anyways because it suits your agenda.

>they all corrupt bla bla, fucking women, tyranny etc.

full circle, and still no logic in sight.

Forget to put on your proxy?

>blue collar workers don't deserve to exist
Most blue collar jobs can't be outsourced (because they're either in the service sector, or require skills that are most prevalent in developed nations, or both), and many of those fields are doing quite well at the moment.

If you believe that you're entitled to an obsolete job to the point that you won't even try to take advantage of the multifarious avenues towards getting a better one, then why the fuck should I feel sorry for you?

>millions more Mexicans and job outsorcing for everyone in the name of higher profits is fine!
lol, go back on your meds, Cletus. Nothing I said even remotely infers this.

Your previous comment was dismantled here: The "reasoning" you were applying was a strawman of the right's actual positions. I've since set you straight and you try to dodge around without addressing anything and claiming you won the debate.

The e-mail thing could go away today and there would still be a cornucopia of reasons not to vote for Hillary. Eat shit you dishonest liberal cunt.

There is literally no proof

You cannot break cognitive dissonance.

The FBI didn't clear her, they laid out a solid case that she broke the law and State Dept. protocol, but that they would not pursue charges due to what they found to be lack of intent and precedent. Either way it's irrelevant, because the FBI case wasn't about corruption, it was just smoke.

Clinton's private server wasn't in itself corruption, but given all the other allegations against her (backed by substantial evidence) it seems very likely that it was set up in order to protect herself from investigation, since such a server would be immune to government transparency laws.

This. To a normie, conformity and social acceptance are the highest priorities, and Hillary is the candidate that offers the highest value in that regard.

>have a broad social circle due to being a public figure for several decades
>know or be connected to some people who have died in that time (more than, say, someone with a smaller social circle)
>the vast majority of them under exceedingly unremarkable circumstances (being in their 80s, being morbidly obese in their 50s, etc.)
>"DURR I BED SHE GILLED EM!"
Jesus, get back in bed with your cousin and stay off the internet.

The point is corporations and financial institutions, such as Wall street investment banks, international banks, and the Federal Reserve, are too consolidated and have too much economic power currently to outsource jobs to third-world countries. The jobs aren't "obsolete", they're literally hiring people in the other countries to do the same jobs. Do you liberal cunts listen to yourselves? No understanding of even basic shit like outsourcing.

I thought you faggots were the ones that cared about other people. You should sympathize with the plight of the American worker fucked over by corporatists, but instead you shrug and say "I got mine." Let's mark it right here as the point in history where liberals became the party of selfish economic interest as politic. Supporting rugged individualism as the ideal, even as hordes of non-whites come across the border and forever dilute us down, genetically and economically.

google.com/maps/place/Nevada National Security Site, N2S2/@37.2534211,-116.472724,5618m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xc10ce0a6c8403682!8m2!3d37.2627825!4d-116.490612

they know already they literally just are her cult following so it doesn't matter if she punches pregnant women fetuses out then eats them, they're still "with her" (c)

They don't care about emails.

Remind them the Bill Clinton presidency, the Glass-Steagall act, the Wall Street deregulation and that Bill Clinton is directly responsible for the subprime crisis. That they don't care about the poors or the middle class but are banker rats.

Usually they will say what, huh, no it was during Bush presidency. Then link proof.

>The point is corporations and financial institutions, such as Wall street investment banks, international banks, and the Federal Reserve, are too consolidated and have too much economic power currently to outsource jobs to third-world countries.
By what metric?

>The jobs aren't "obsolete", they're literally hiring people in the other countries to do the same jobs.
For less money, ergo those same positions at much higher rates of pay are obsolete. Do you redneck cunts listen to yourselves? No understanding of even basic shit like economics.

Please tell me what practices that contributed to the housing crash would/could've been prevented by Glass-Steagall.

Don't worry, I'll wait.

Never Trump has been ingrained into their heads, it really doesn't matter what she does they just refuse to have Trump be an option.

By the metric of millions of jobs outsourced, look up the fucking studies yourself. You libshits and your "academic studies." Christ I am a fucking scientist and I know pretty much everyone is full of shit and no one really knows. Occasionally someone does but those studies are only rarely cited in politics.

>For less money, ergo those same positions at much higher rates of pay are obsolete. Do you redneck cunts listen to yourselves? No understanding of even basic shit like economics.

Essentially, you support zero intervention by the government to protect its workers from having third-worlders perform the same jobs Americans could be. All so (((everyone))) at the top can keep more profits for themselves. You shrug your shoulders to hordes of illegals coming across the border, and think voting for someone who will do nothing about that is okay.

Like I said, you can fuck right off of the board at anytime, you will never not be called out for posting this shitty liberal doublethink.

She could literally decapitate a puppy on live TV and people would still vote for her because "MUH FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT" and "At least she's not Trump!"

Spoke with a friend that was gonna vote bernie before the bernout

Hes voting Hillary now and when I asked him about this his reasoning was "Well, trump did bad stuff too they are equally bad I'm just voting for the better of the 2 evils"

Asked him about all the flip-flopping shes done and his reply is "Thats what ALL politicians do, its not THAT surprising that she changed her opinions"

Its brainwashing, Yuri Bezmenov level subversion

>By the metric of millions of jobs outsourced
You have yet to explain why this is a sufficient number to merit curtailing trade and economic independence, Mr. Scientist. Why is propping up a comparatively small number of obsolete jobs for people who refuse to adapt to the modern economy at the cost of foreign trade that is enormously beneficial to our economy a good idea?

You're describing my liberal friend to a T

It seems to be a pretty common thing. I guess our only hope is to show them that Trump is the lesser of two evils

Vote Johnson

I just want her to win so I can see the massive butthurt for Trump supporters, lol.

I've been working on it.

I don't tend to try and convince people of anything around here; no real use to it. I try and learn what I can to give persuasive arguments in real life.

The largest stumbling block is mass/social media inundation of Trump's rallies and other impromptu, non-scripted events. I'm firmly in his camp and I'll concede that he has said some rather silly things in those venues.

This publicity of rallies and certain tweets, while his scripted policy speeches remain untouched aside from those that would likely vote for him anyway is my largest obstacle.

I've been somewhat easily able to convince folks that Hillary is corrupt as all hell, with plenty of evidence to back it up. What is not at all as easy is convincing people that Trump isn't some mentally unbalanced guy raving about things.

Just last night, I was talking to a guy about this; he firmly held the belief that Trump is much more likely to pull the nation into a foreign war. I wasn't able to make my case strongly enough to convince him otherwise.

Unfortunately, his belief doesn't seem to be based in fact. It seems to be based on Trump's character; that he's simply careless and would be likely to, for example, send a large battlegroup to the South China Sea and fire upon Chinese vessels there as a show of force.

Any tips on combating this almost-argument?

Fuck sake, I spent several years convincing my group of friends and peers to throw their votes behind the Johnson, and now I'm having a hell of a time undoing my own work.

Least most of them won't dream of voting Clinton, either.

Pro-tip, don't attempt to back up a claim with YouTube videos.

And when outsourcing jobs won't do, they import H1B1 workers to displace American workers at a fraction of their wages.

>Essentially, you support zero intervention by the government to protect its workers from having third-worlders perform the same jobs Americans could be.
lol, how, in your mind, does it follow that broad support for international trade should logically lead to opposition to domestic labor standards? I mean, if you're going to assume a causal relationship, wouldn't it at least make more sense the other way around?

>All so (((everyone))) at the top can keep more profits for themselves.
Which is better for you, to pay more or less for consumer goods? If you answered less, you benefit from globalization. Out of work? Then you REALLY benefit from low prices. Which is better for you, a large foreign currency pool that ensures future exports, or a small foreign currency pool that does not ensure future exports? If you answered a stronger currency, you benefit from globalization. Looking for a new career? Then you REALLY benefit from stronger future export prospects, you fucking globalist scumbag.

>You shrug your shoulders to hordes of illegals coming across the border,
Not at all, but unfortunately there's not a candidate in this election offering a viable solution to this problem (b-b-but MUH WALL!).

>and think voting for someone who will do nothing about that is okay.
If your plan to "do something about it" is to waste a huge heap of money on something with minimal long-term impact, then yes, by all means, I would prefer inaction.

>Like I said, you can fuck right off of the board at anytime, you will never not be called out for posting this shitty liberal doublethink.
lol, well at least we know you can spell "fuck."

Nigger

Small number? It's in the millions, I wouldn't say that's a small amount of jobs.

More importantly our foreign trade deals are negotiated so the nation as a whole gets a good deal, meaning the people who own get an amazing deal and the average person in the public gets a sliver more than absolutely nothing. I don't like private economic interests dictating what is best for the American people in our trade agreements or the laws we pass. They have too much power in our federal and State governments through use of effective subversion tactics. I want their influence destroyed.

>"Its brainwashing, Yuri Bezmenov level subversion"
>references a quote from a subversive pinko
lyl

And NYT articles?

>convince

Most of them know they just don't care because they go by the logic of "lol all politicians are corrupt who cares if hillary is at least she isn't trump xD"

Every normie I talk to IRL or online already knows, I don't know A N Y O N E who supports her, all the libs I know are still hoping Bernie will win somehow lmao.

You have to keep in mind that American news is 100% corrupt and literally takes phonecalls from the whitehouse telling them what to say or they'll get their whitehouse press passes revoked and social media is entirely about virtue signaling which at the moment means showing how not right wing you are.

Literally all politicians are as corrupt as Hillary. She is just incompetent at hiding it because she is a woman.

>Small number? It's in the millions, I wouldn't say that's a small amount of jobs.
"COMPARATIVELY"

>More importantly our foreign trade deals are negotiated so the nation as a whole gets a good deal, meaning the people who own get an amazing deal and the average person in the public gets a sliver more than absolutely nothing.
Well, I don't disagree that the benefit is shared disproportionately, but if you agree that it benefits the average person as well, then isn't that a problem that is better fixed internally, rather than simply cutting off the money flow that benefits everyone (albeit disproportionately)?

>I don't like private economic interests dictating what is best for the American people in our trade agreements or the laws we pass. They have too much power in our federal and State governments through use of effective subversion tactics. I want their influence destroyed.
So, basically, you not only want to cut off your nose to spite your face, but you also expect my compliance as you cut off my nose, as well?

I think at this point it says a lot about the people who support her and want to vote for her.

They know what they are getting into and don't care or agree with her actions. Democrats are rats.

Trump definitely uses colorful speech, and there's not really much we can do about that one way or the other, either you like it or you don't

But as far as his positions go, even the most "extreme" examples were completely mainstream even for Democrats in the 90s and 2000s, and there's plenty of video and written evidence to back that up

Even Hillary held a lot of the same positions he currently does, including things like crime, immigration, and border security.

I think drawing attention to that fact will normalize him a little more for people who are afraid he's literally Hitler

The two are antithetical, no matter how you try to twist this into a "my argument is legitimate and yours is specious" scenario. It makes sense, read it again.

Yeah we really benefit from lower prices while shills convince everyone to keep burning gasoline and shitting up the entire planet for hundreds of thousands of years so they can keep the profit machine running. So every second cousin can get some useless shit he doesn't need for Christmas. Consumer CULTURE is degenerate.
This is what you're not getting, at the very top of our political culture the policy is naked greed, and our policy of the government interacting with the public is to indoctrinate them against their own interests. I want to change this situation.

>Which is better for you, a large foreign currency pool that ensures future exports, or a small foreign currency pool that does not ensure future exports?

This in reality depends on the entire distributed network of fractional reserves in banks all over the world and you know it. You can stop pretending to be educating me about economics at the same time you misrepresent and oversimplify the situation to fit your argument.

>b-b-but MUH WALL!

I personally think a literal wall will be more effective than the naysaying libs insist.

I had a debate just after Brexit with a (rich and posh) normie acquaintance who looks disturbingly similar to Carl the cuck. His arguments- he started the debate with great salt- were;

> I'm not British I'm European
> my dad lost £3000 on the forex so our economy is fucked forever, fuck anyone else's economic concerns btw
> 90% of Brexit voters were uneducated and poor
> so they shouldn't be allowed to vote
> I want globalism, no borders, free the love

He told me quite proudly "I'm a Globalist".

No real arguments of course, all parroted statements from the MSM that I've debunked 1000 times. Of course, there was no way to get through. The conditioning goes so deep...

It's a different world in their heads. Literal narcissism, they argue like children. Despite having just lost the referendum he still kept shouting over me because "you just don't get it omg my opinions are correct because they're in MY head"

The sad thing is we're the ones trying to save their dying world and they hate us. If they win, we all lose

> He thinks Americans will get paid $40/hour to build iPhones

Republicans, everyone

a lot of people know she (and every other politician) is corrupt, they just don't care because they think she is gonna benefit them too

They're afraid of changing the status quo.

can someone TL;DR me about what the actual fuck went down with her and the mails?
I know that she is corrupt, but I don't know the exact details and I wanna talk about the US elections and how Trump is basically turning the tides against Hillary on my Political Science class tomorrow.

It doesn't seem that the people I've spoken to are very opposed to his intended policy.

They're much more likely to say "HE HAS NO POLICY!" or play up the angle that he'll be a literal madman with his finger on the "NUKE EVERYONE" button 24/7 while POTUS.

Very difficult to convince someone otherwise when their opposition or ""arguments"" are mostly character-based.

/tread
I know there is more but I cba referencing them all.
>They know she is crooked
>They know it was rigged from the start etc
The media has done an excellent job smearing Trump enough that the progressive types will literally vote anyone but him. Also cant forget "muh women card" quite literally every media outlet is running this. I even pressed a person who is voting Hillary they said Trump is a facist, I asked them to explain how and I was told to fuck off. People know all this but they need to follow the narrative, the only hope now is that there are shy Trump voters or media manipulation of surveys. The media is the main point to take away from this, in fact Stefan did a video saying about illegitimate links between the Washington post and the DNC.

I think the best way is to compare her to George W. Bush. They hate that. Ask them to point out in what way she's different than him.

What is Hillary actually saying she's going to DO?

I've literally only heard meaningless platitudes from her

> we're going to make history

That could mean anything. That could mean nuking Moscow ffs

> united America

Yeah well done you took your slogan from the name of the fucking country itself

> muh inclusion, muh love, Trump is a meanie

Can anyone tell me her actual plans of action? Or is she literally trying to buzzword her way to the White house?

(btw is it Whitehouse or White house?)

>The two are antithetical, no matter how you try to twist this into a "my argument is legitimate and yours is specious" scenario. It makes sense, read it again.
"I can't explain how this illogical tripe I'm spouting makes sense, it just does, so fuck you."
fuggin jej

>Yeah we really benefit from lower prices
Are you saying that we don't?

>while shills convince everyone to keep burning gasoline and shitting up the entire planet for hundreds of thousands of years so they can keep the profit machine running.
If your solution to climate change is "let's just go ahead tank the global economy now," why not go all out and propose banning combustion and other processes that produce pollution? Why stop halfway?

>Consumer CULTURE is degenerate.
Having the freedom to decide what you spend your money on is degenerate? Lol, if that's how you feel, then I should inform you that continuing to pay your ISP bill is degeneracy, so you should stop at once!

>This is what you're not getting, at the very top of our political culture the policy is naked greed, and our policy of the government interacting with the public is to indoctrinate them against their own interests. I want to change this situation.
Do you actually think this is a new or unusual arrangement? Greed and corruption have existed as long as mankind and they aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Now, if you have (viable) thoughts on curtailing them, I'm all ears, but it'll take a little more than
1.) VOTE TRUMP
2.) BAN CAPITALISM
3.) ????????
4.) (DON'T) PROFIT!
>god emperor Trump, a capitalist, will ban capitalism and greed and make anime real!
You're a caricature, my man.

>This in reality depends on the entire distributed network of fractional reserves in banks all over the world and you know it.
And? Either those dollars get spent overseas (meaning they will make their way back into our economy sooner or later), or they get parked in a foreign bank, thereby expanding American soft power. Which of these do you think is a bad thing?

>at the same time you misrepresent and oversimplify the situation to fit your argument.
Examples?

>ctrl+f
>literally
>16 matches

Why are you guys talking like SJW's? Kek. Weird, don't do that shit even if it's ironic, you're shitting up the board.

Dnc colluding with media and coordinating an effort to supress Bernie is probably the biggest one.

The rest just show how deep the rabbit hole of corruption (and moloch worship) goes, but for some reason people seem to be totally OK with it.

>Normies

fuck off

Did I say ban capitalism? If I criticize it, I must be in favor of the most extreme position against it. How retarded.

Did I say ban fossil fuels? If I criticize it, I must be in favor of the most extreme position against it. How retarded.

People being clueless and apathetic about their own futures is degenerate. The globalists are winning the propaganda war. I'm sorry you disagree, you've already sold us out to (((everyone))) who seeks to turn Western civilization into an almost shithole, but just not shitholey enough that the whole thing stays together for the sake of profits.

Literally is literally just a word. Just because SJWs tend to overuse/ use it badly, doesn't mean it's not useful

> mfw I'm arguing with burgers at 3am on cuckchan about how to use my language because the gf is away for the night so I can't sleep

Ffs forgot to link

See

check this guys
OK, so we all know Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DWS) was the co-chair of Hillary's 2008 presidential run, where she lost the nomination to Obama. So, in order to lock down the nomination for 2016, Hillary was able to get DWS in charge of the DNC and manipulate it from within. That's the theory anyway, except....

In order for this to work, they would first have to, not only get the DNC chair to step down, but also get them to recommend DWS for the position. The Clinton's would have to promise something to that person, something more prestigious than being head of the Democratic party. So who was that person and what did they get in return?

It would appear that Donna Brazile was in-line to get the position, but she was only the interim chair after the previous chair left, served only one month. According to this, rulers.org/usgovt.html#parties, the previous chair of the DNC prior to DWS was Tim Kaine.

Eh. Kinda like how Sup Forums started saying triggered ironically to make fun of SJW's, now I can't go a thread without somebody saying that they're triggered, even if they are being ironic about it. I just don't want this place to become indistinguishable from Facebook.

I've been destroying liberals all week on youtube livestreams, then you faggots come in and start screaming faggot, nigger and trump wall emoticons.

Companies, public, private, and government, have been buying and selling the 'vital strategic resources' located in each others countries for centuries. Nothing new or corrupt there.

Show them the article about how she treats everyone, including people in her secret service.

This will make most people realize she's really vile and sociopathic.

Then maybe casually start adding in articles that show how she's a warmongerer as bad as any NeoCon, helping to lay waste to countries and creating vacuums that have led to the suffering of countless people. Go ahead and emphasize how many brown/foreign people suffer and die because of her and her crowd.

It started when congress was investigating the Benghazi attack and found that she kept a private email server in her home in NY and used that for official correspondence. A couple of issues immediately arise from this:

1. It makes it harder for FOIA requests to access emails
2. It was unsecured and prone to hacking
3. Classified information could have been taken from official channels, and possibly hacked
4. She has a history of scandals and hiding evidence

Following this she made a bunch of excuses, but the big one is that she didn't have any classified emails on there. This was found to be false. Then she said they weren't classified at the time. That was also false.

When she handed the server over to the FBI, her lawyers (who did not have security clearance) were said to have read all the emails and deleted the personal ones, but that no work related emails would be deleted. This was false. They did not read all the emails, and work related emails were deleted. The FBI was able to recover fragments, but presumably only enough to know that work related emails were deleted.

Bill Clinton then had a private closed door meeting with AG Loretta Lynch (the AG would be the one potentially prosecuting the case) and a few days later the FBI recommended no charges while at the same time laying out a very strong case against Hillary.

TL;DR - shady hillary kept a shady private server, then got off scott free after a shady meeting with her prosecutor even though there's proof she lied and broke the law