Why are so few women nationalists?

why are so few women nationalists?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0taenIB_RHA
youtube.com/watch?v=cTCvQDnnj7M
explicite-art.com/tour/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism#Varieties
twitter.com/AnonBabble

because all women want to be raped

so they subconsciously work towards putting themselves into positions where they give up power over themselves

Historically women belonged to who ever conquered a region; any who didnt just submit were just killed, thus having any form of loyality was bred out of them.

And why do the ones that are do porn

Electre does porn?

majority of people just want to belong to the group

the group is currently left
most people want to be part of the group, so it attracts more in a feedback loop

US would be majority brony if they just made it cool to be a brony

most of the population has no critical thinking skills at all

we tatooed women so turks cant take em

Because it's not a leftist thing. If it were leftist they would support it.

youth have always been liberal
women always agree with the majority because they fear conflict and want nothing more than to fit in

It's allowed in islam to have sex with women who are tattooed. Tatoos are just sinful.

yes

link?

yea, but the tats remind them who they truly are, forever

Thank god for Le Pen.

we did that too, in Dobrogea, where event today there are a shitload of turks

More important question, why did capes go out of style? What were we thinking?

Useful spam: youtube.com/watch?v=0taenIB_RHA

...

her videos are pretty good
youtube.com/watch?v=cTCvQDnnj7M

>tfw no electre gf

because nationalism has a cringe-inducing reputation nowadays and women naturally want to be with alphas

Most women here in Poland are nationalistic

spoken like a true modern-day cuck-german who has lost the connection to his heritage and racial blood.
Snap out of it and reclaim your place, European!

a real qt

Women are extremely malleable. The number of female nationalists is dependent on the number of male nationalists. If it were a mainstream movement, there would be tons of nationalist women

Nationalism is a retarded old idea from the 19th century.

If you still believe in nationalism, you're retarded and backwards af.

I'm not saying globalism is great either, but the idea the your nation is better than others is just a bunch of 19th century bulshit, which was useful back then for some states to obtain their independence or to abolish monarchy.

Today, nationalism is just plain ridiculous. If the right/far-right clings to nationalism as a possible solution to the problems Europe has, then it's a failed cause. It makes no sense in this day and age, when peoples are already past that infantile age of national emancipation.

I'm not sure why you guys don't believe in a regional European identity, with particular national roots. An identity that doesn't erase your roots, but it aims are being part of a bigger and stronger entity, which can be a powerful economic and, maybe at some point, millitary union.

Nationalism is stupid as shit, because it further increases fragmentation of international relations, it screws with trade costs, it sends peoples back into the isolation of their own "identity". Regional integration is a much better idea. Nationalism would only weaken Europe and play in the hands of Russia.

If you support nationalism in Europe, you support Russia's plans to conquer Europe slowly or to make it as weak as possible by fragmenting it. So, basically you're a traitor of white interests if you support a weaker Europe.

explicite-art.com/tour/

She has two scenes. Really nice tits on that girl

There's nothing feminine about that bitch.

Stop living in a fantasy.

Nationalism is for underdeveloped baboons. Look at these fucking vermin. They're just as subhuman as most dune coons and niggers.

All westerners share the same culture anyway. Nationalism doesn't make sense in that regard. The real problem are cultures that are incompatible with our values - i.e. islam. We need a Culturalist movement, not a nationalist one.

>We need a Culturalist movement, not a nationalist one.

You already have the EU

>muh Europa

c'mon leafbros quit the shitposting and let citizens of countries with actual existing nationalism talk about this matter

Loyalty is not in their genes

Nationalism is literally political autism. It's like an autistic kid throwing a tantrum: I'm better than everyone, everyone else should recognise that!

This goy doesn't realize that culture and genetics are deeply intertwined and it is not possible to have one without the other.

Women are followers by nature. Not leaders. If they're told to do something, they do it.

That's just another argument for racemixing tbqh familia.

>but the idea the your nation is better than others

But that's not what nationalism is, you fucking moron.

>I'm better than everyone, everyone else should recognise that!

You don't understand what nationalism is. It basically means putting the interests of your country and citizens above those of anyone else. Racial superiority isn't essential to nationalism

>nationalism is dumb, goy!
>preserving a culture and history that has existed for centuries is immature and infantile!
>you should willingly submit your country to the cooperation (((read: domination))) of a regional or global entity, goy!

What the fuck would you know about nationalism leaf

Women are herd animals by nature. They are capable of independant thought but it terrifies them, so they just do whatever everyone around them is doing in search of safety in numbers.

>Nationalism is a retarded old idea from the 19th century.
>If you still believe in nationalism, you're retarded and backwards af.

Nice parroted left wing statement

>I'm not sure why you guys don't believe in a regional European identity, with particular national roots.

Maybe because not all of Europe speaks the same language or has the same cultural norms?

>If you support nationalism in Europe, you support Russia's plans to conquer Europe slowly or to make it as weak as possible by fragmenting it.

That's why NATO exists. By the way, you basically just described the EU as the ideal state. Not sure if that was what you intended, but it's fucking retarded if you did

More than you do, idiot

EU was a good idea that was executed poorly.

Can you really argue against a more efficient inner market?

>the idea the your nation is better than others is just a bunch of 19th century bulshit

Belgium is a meme country, the retarded step-child between France and Germany. Of course you don't like nationalism - the EU is in Brussels. You don't understand what it is to love your country, since your country is a placeholder for the European Union. Once the EU collapses, your best bet is Benelux.

>All westerners share the same culture anyway

No we don't danebro. But we share many values.

nice non-comeback there, leaf.

Because North America was never fucked. There was never war on their soil. Nationalism like you see coming from americans, canucks and australians is backwards as fuck. Islam is our enemy, we have to fight them off TOGETHER

This goy never heard of recessive genes.

The middle east used to be christian and white, then they mixed with arabs.

Now what are they?

A happy medium?

No, they are shitskin and muslim.

But, I can tell you are a paid shill, so I won't entertain you too much, you need to earn your money like a good whore.

ROMANIA
R
O
M
A
N
I
A

because they are morally vacant

Women instinctively respect and desire violent and aggressive alien men, particularly those of distinct racial appearance. Historically such beings only appeared in successful mass migrations or invasions that overcame dozens of layers of men like their own.

Some people may argue that encounters between racially distinct peoples are too new a phenomenon for anyone to have undergone selection for intuitions about them, but I think the record now shows otherwise. The earliest modern human settlers of Europe for instance (as represented by the genome of Oase 1) have no detectable continuity into any group on Earth today, there were multiple replacement events involving sharply differentiated groups in Ice Age Europe (doi:10.1038/nature17993), dark-skinned blue-eyed Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were stomped by Anatolian farmers as different from them as modern East Asians are from modern Europeans, the Middle Neolithic Europeans who resulted from that were in turn brutally supplanted by steppe pastoralists likely corresponding to Indo-Europeans at the end of the Neolithic/dawn of the Bronze Age. When the racial order is doomed, women have more of a chance of surviving to see the new world than their men. And it's not through loyalty to them.

>Belgium is a meme country, the retarded step-child between France and Germany. Of course you don't like nationalism - the EU is in Brussels. You don't understand what it is to love your country, since your country is a placeholder for the European Union. Once the EU collapses, your best bet is Benelux.
American education lads. Fucks sake

>Belgium is a meme country
>Belgium

user, I...

Women, barring some notable exceptions, only choose popular ideologies. It's a social thing for them not an intellectual one. If their social group is national socialist they would be nazis.

I would be opposed to nationalism too if I was a gypsy.

Most women on far right are HUGE sluts, or ugly as fuck. But that's from my limited experience of hanging out with skinheads, before we got that craze about jailing anyone suspicions when it came to it.

Nationalism is for edgelords

There are far more dumb males than dumb females therefore more males support nationalism


There are far more genius males than genius females therefore men rule the Earth.

Looks like a walking billboard for mental illness

Yes, having to deal regularly with continentals.

because most women are whores.

I'm not from Belgium.

>Nice parroted left wing statement
I actually studied 19th century nationalism in Europe. You probably have no idea how nationalism even came into being and what role did it server. Protip: it wasn't about preserving values, it was about abolishing monarchy and replacing the political source of legitimacy which during monarchy was "god" with "the people/the nation". This idea first appeared during the French revolution. Even the term "la nation" was something completely unused before the French Revolution. It became common after the revolution.

The meaning of "nation" was defined based on the meaning of "people" (or Volk). It had many things in common with literary Romanticism which praised traditional sources of culture.

It's a very complex subject and it surely belongs to our history/past, not our present. Nationalism in the age of drones, internet, satellites, AI, etc, is retarded as fuck. It just plays no role in the political reality of today. Because there is no people to emancipate from a monarchy or previous state of oppression (like it was during the French Revolution).

For Arabs/Muslism nationalism failed precisely because they cannot replace Allah as a source of law with the will of the people. For this reason, Muslims cannot into political modernity, their forms of government are backward theocracies with Medieval beliefs.

>I'm better than everyone, everyone else should recognise that!

Not at all. This is the typical globalist rhetoric.
Nationalism consists to protect its own way of life, and encourage others to do the same. Actually, nationalism encourages diversity in its true nature: pic related.

The EU is a retarded concept where a couple countries, namely France and Germany, sit at the top and make all the decisions, and countries like Poland and Romania whore themselves in order to leech money like parasites. Their young population all immigrates to the rich countries and infests them while leaving a void in their home country. It begins a cycle of economic slavery, where they give loans to Greece that they know Greece won't pay off, then introduces austerity measures when Greece isn't able to pay the debts. There is no equality whatsoever amongst countries, and there is cultural and linguistic differences everywhere. It's a stupid concept, the same way multiculturalism is a stupid concept. It oversimplifies the variables, assumes that everyone will just get along. Nationalism accepts that countries and cultures are different. It doesn't have a naive 'progressive' attitude towards everything. It doesn't rule out cooperation though. Alliances like NATO can continue to exist

Women are conditioned to go for the general consensus. It's a survival strategy that is deeply ingrained. They try to avoid deviating from the acceptable norm and expulsion from the group as it would mean death for them and their children.

Which means whoever controls the MSM controls the mayority female vote.

>Portugal
your people are ''tanned'' as fuck.

don't be rude pls

>You probably have no idea how nationalism even came into being and what role did it server.

What qualifies you to make that judgement? As to the rest of your blog post, historical nationalism isn't the same as the bare concept of nationalism. I hate you pricks that act as if a historical application of a concept is the only way that concept can be applied. You're a fucking charlatan

Nobody forces you to mix/marry with people from another country. You are free to marry whoever you want. If you're French, you're free to marry a French woman. It's not the EU that is forcing you to dilute your origins. There's no EU law which asks you to marry only outside your country or to call yourself European before French.

You don't need nationalism to protect your values. You can just do it without holding 19th century beliefs. All you have to do is learn your language properly, practice your traditions, your cuising, marry a French woman. Really, it's not that hard. You don't need to go into Crusader mode and wave the flag of nationalism to protect your Frenchiness.

Wow, what's the bare concept of nationalism? Putting your nation above all others? But here wasn't even an idea of nation before the ethnic revolutions. You were a peasant for the empire or a decadent aristocrat with no allegiances.

I have a degree in political science so I studied this shit for years. Meaning I read, for example, nationalistic literature from 18th-19th century up to 20th century sometimes in their original language (French).

We don't want her if she does porn

>Women
>Nationalists

Pick one

I do.

>But here wasn't even an idea of nation before the ethnic revolutions. You were a peasant for the empire or a decadent aristocrat with no allegiances.

How is that relevant in any way? Again, you're speaking in the same terms as that romanian moron. The basis of nationalism isn't completely unfounded. Tribalism has existed far longer than nationalism, and it certainly still exists today. I just see nationalism as a larger application of tribalism.

Nice toilet paper degree. What's it good for? Shitposting on Sup Forums?

I know because my country (Romania) also had a nationalistic phase after the fall of Communism. That was a really retarded phase in our post-communist development. It held us back from accepting foreign investment of any kind. Would you support the idea that your economy should be 100% owned only by people from your own ethnic group?

How do you think that would work? Maybe it would work for you, if you already are a developed country. But for a backwards, undeveloped country like Romania was 26 years ago, nationalism brought us only stagnation. We were our biggest enemies for not allowing at least some foreign investors to buy some companies here.

For example Renault bought a car production facility, created lots of jobs and so, our number one export product is cars. How could this hurt our Romanian identity if the biggest producer of cars in our country is owned by a French company?

Is this bad "globalism" or just good regionalism?

>Nice toilet paper degree. What's it good for? Shitposting on Sup Forums?
It's not the only degree I have.

I also have some banking training and a computer degree.

So I'm currently a programmer.

A crusade is an invasion, it is not nationalistic, rather the opposite. And it is exactly what we are fighting: an invasion.
Of course nobody forces me to marry a foreigner, but what will happen when the foreigners will be the majority? We will disapear as a culture, no matter how much I celebrate it.

>Would you support the idea that your economy should be 100% owned only by people from your own ethnic group?

Again, you're confusing fucking 19th century ethnic nationalism as being the only type of nationalism, which is false

It is my duty as you fellow countryman to inform you that you will need to further educate yourself before speaking.

that is not a belgian.

its a frenchman who has soaked his flag in urine

Then don't allow migrants. The EU should close borders completely to migrants from areas it deems to be very risky, such as Africa and the Middle East.

We should have like a list of risk areas in the world and rate refugees/migrants based on that. And reject any refugee/migrant from Africa and the Middle East.

But we need proper leaders that have the balls to decide that.

Also all the current refugees which came from Africa and Middle East should be sent back. There's not international organisation that can force us to accept an increase in the crime rate in our countries, just because of their feelings.

I-I didn't find her...

Back to the cuckshed, hans

Back to the tulip fields, lars

You're right, I wasn't paying attention to the flag, gypsy. Not Belgian.

>You probably have no idea how nationalism even came into being and what role did it serve

A political philosophy adapts within its context - it would be different in Rosseau's day than ours.

You're filtering nationalism through a post-communist lens. You can be a nationalist and a capitalist.

You don't really understand pride, do you?

There's no other modern form of nationalism, unless you mean National Socialism. But even that one, considering it was conquering many countries, based on an ideology of racial purism, it was not actually a nationalistic movement. It was more like an attempt at creating a "Aryan" empire, a sort of modern Roman Empire, based in Germany.

It's pretty much what the EU has achieved with peaceful means. The EU is basically what Hitler wanted to achieve by military means. Except the EU is not a country, ofc, it's just a case of regional integration.

>There's no other modern form of nationalism

Wrong.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism#Varieties

We totally agree then.
And this is the main concern to nationalists... If you can figure the threat posed by immigration, you are nationalist Nicolae.

You needed half an hour to write this, DeAndre?

>AMERICAN EDUCATION LADS

Way to time my posts with German efficiency.
Do you calculate how long between turns for your wife's arab gangbangs?

Pipe down, relax, and just let your country fall apart around you Hans.

How is that 60% whiteness working for you mate?

Pipe down, relax...

google "electre volcanic" and youll find the videos.

You don't need nationalism to think that African and Middle East migration are bad for Europe. Nationalism would just divide Europe again, which would make it weaker as a whole, not stronger. Having 27 countries divide their borders and protecting them separately will increase the costs for each European country, since it will need to close borders with other European countries too.

It's just not a good idea. Are you afraid that Danish people are free to come and visit your country?

What's the point of a nationalist resurgence here? You're in no danger from other European countries. All you have to do is fight to protect your own country from shitty migration inside Europe, not outside it. Europe is stronger if it fights as one, as a culture that was built on christian values and science. No point in destroying or making Europe weaker by going back to a Europe of smaller states.

We should also build our own European Army. We have the resources, we have the people, all we need is political decision. We don't have to wait on the Americans to protect Europe. We should make sure we have enough nuclear weapons too. Europe should become a force to be reckoned with again. We used to have the biggest empires in the world. Why should we be so modest?

In a world in which Islamism is trying to expand itself in the entire world, why should we kick ourselves in the foot and not expand ourselves? I think it's time for Europe to go back to expansionist policies, at least in terms of economic power and political influence.

America is a big country, lad.

It must feel weird, watching your countrymen purposefully genocide yourselves. Like none of you have any will to live left.

Like watching a car accident in slow-motion.

I have a feeling that the next Nationalist movement will begin as a ridiculous meme in response to an equally ridiculous but serious feminist/BLM/pedo/LGBTQA+ party.

It's all going to become a joke, but once the meme Nationalist gets in people are still going to the camps.

im here

So you basically want a right wing version of the EU?

I want an imperialist version of the EU, basically. I want the EU to act like the USA is acting in the entire world. We need to be as expansive and imperialist as they are. And make sure the world is dominated by the EU and USA. The rest of the world should be our bitches or territories we ignore as no man's land (Middle East, Africa).

>t.jew

This is why people call us gypsies here. This is why we never progress. Because everytime we follow some "regional" or "global" interests instead of ours. Germany came and said to follow them in war and we did so. Russians came and said to become communists and we did so. EU came and said to become a EU member and we did so. Can you see the pattern here? How that got us?

Nobody is saying hate other people or close tour country or believe you're superior to others. It's just about taking pride in your country and your tradition.

Something called the Sexual Revolution.

Feminazis pushed the whole "Women need men like fish need a bike" narrative and women bought it.

They don't follow what men say anymore, and it hurts nationalist causes.