It seems we’re entering another of those stupid seasons humans impose on themselves at fairly regular intervals. I am sketching out here opinions based on information, they may prove right, or may prove wrong, and they’re intended just to challenge and be part of a wider dialogue.
My background is archaeology, so also history and anthropology. It leads me to look at big historical patterns. My theory is that most peoples’ perspective of history is limited to the experience communicated by their parents and grandparents, so 50–100 years. To go beyond that you have to read, study, and learn to untangle the propaganda that is inevitable in all telling of history. In a nutshell, at university I would fail a paper if I didn’t compare at least two, if not three opposing views on a topic. Taking one telling of events as gospel doesn’t wash in the comparative analytical method of research that forms the core of British academia. (I can’t speak for other systems, but they’re definitely not all alike in this way).
Trump isn't Hitler, he's LITERALLY HITLER
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
So zooming out, we humans have a habit of going into phases of mass destruction, generally self imposed to some extent or another. This handy list shows all the wars over time. Wars are actually the norm for humans, but every now and then something big comes along. I am interested in the Black Death, which devastated Europe. The opening of Boccaccio’s Decameron describes Florence in the grips of the Plague. It is as beyond imagination as the Somme, Hiroshima, or the Holocaust. I mean, you quite literally can’t put yourself there and imagine what it was like. For those in the midst of the Plague it must have felt like the end of the world.
But a defining feature of humans is their resilience. To us now it seems obvious that we survived the Plague, but to people at the time it must have seemed incredible that their society continued afterwards. Indeed, many takes on the effects of the Black Death are that it had a positive impact in the long term. Well summed up here: “By targeting frail people of all ages, and killing them by the hundreds of thousands within an extremely short period of time, the Black Death might have represented a strong force of natural selection and removed the weakest individuals on a very broad scale within Europe,“ …In addition, the Black Death significantly changed the social structure of some European regions. Tragic depopulation created the shortage of working people. This shortage caused wages to rise. Products prices fell too. Consequently, standards of living increased. For instance, people started to consume more food of higher quality.”
But for the people living through it, as with the World Wars, Soviet Famines, Holocaust, it must have felt inconceivable that humans could rise up from it. The collapse of the Roman Empire, Black Death, Spanish Inquisition, Thirty Years War, War of the Roses, English Civil War… it’s a long list. Events of massive destruction from which humanity recovered and move on, often in better shape.
At a local level in time people think things are fine, then things rapidly spiral out of control until they become unstoppable, and we wreak massive destruction on ourselves. For the people living in the midst of this it is hard to see happening and hard to understand. To historians later it all makes sense and we see clearly how one thing led to another. During the Centenary of the Battle of the Somme I was struck that it was a direct outcome of the assassination of an Austrian Arch Duke in Bosnia. I very much doubt anyone at the time thought the killing of a minor European royal would lead to the death of 17 million people.
My point is that this is a cycle. It happens again and again, but as most people only have a 50–100 year historical perspective they don’t see that it’s happening again. As the events that led to the First World War unfolded, there were a few brilliant minds who started to warn that something big was wrong, that the web of treaties across Europe could lead to a war, but they were dismissed as hysterical, mad, or fools, as is always the way, and as people who worry about Putin, Brexit, and Trump are dismissed now.
Then after the War to end all Wars, we went and had another one. Again, for a historian it was quite predictable. Lead people to feel they have lost control of their country and destiny, people look for scapegoats, a charismatic leader captures the popular mood, and singles out that scapegoat. He talks in rhetoric that has no detail, and drums up anger and hatred. Soon the masses start to move as one, without any logic driving their actions, and the whole becomes unstoppable.
That was Hitler, but it was also Mussolini, Stalin, Putin, Mugabe, and so many more. Mugabe is a very good case in point. He whipped up national anger and hatred towards the land owning white minority (who happened to know how to run farms), and seized their land to redistribute to the people, in a great populist move which in the end unravelled the economy and farming industry and left the people in possession of land, but starving. See also the famines created by the Soviet Union, and the one caused by the Chinese Communists last century in which 20–40 million people died. It seems inconceivable that people could create a situation in which tens of millions of people die without reason, but we do it again and again.
But at the time people don’t realise they’re embarking on a route that will lead to a destruction period. They think they’re right, they’re cheered on by jeering angry mobs, their critics are mocked. This cycle, the one we saw for example from the Treaty of Versaille, to the rise of Hitler, to the Second World War, appears to be happening again. But as with before, most people cannot see it because:
1. They are only looking at the present, not the past or future
2. They are only looking immediately around them, not at how events connect globally
3. Most people don’t read, think, challenge, or hear opposing views
Trump is doing this in America. Those of us with some oversight from history can see it happening. Read this brilliant, long essay in the New York magazine to understand how Plato described all this, and it is happening just as he predicted. Trump says he will Make America Great Again, when in fact America is currently great, according to pretty well any statistics. He is using passion, anger, and rhetoric in the same way all his predecessors did—a charismatic narcissist who feeds on the crowd to become ever stronger, creating a cult around himself. You can blame society, politicians, the media, for America getting to the point that it’s ready for Trump, but the bigger historical picture is that history generally plays out the same way each time someone like him becomes the boss.
On a wider stage, zoom out some more, Russia is a dictatorship with a charismatic leader using fear and passion to establish a cult around himself. Turkey is now there too. Hungary, Poland, Slovakia are heading that way, and across Europe more Trumps and Putins are waiting in the wings, in fact funded by Putin, waiting for the popular tide to turn their way.
We should be asking ourselves what our Archduke Ferdinand moment will be. How will an apparently small event trigger another period of massive destruction. We see Brexit, Trump, Putin in isolation. The world does not work that way—all things are connected and affecting each other. I have pro-Brexit friends who say ‘oh, you’re going to blame that on Brexit too??’ But they don’t realise that actually, yes, historians will trace neat lines from apparently unrelated events back to major political and social shifts like Brexit.
Brexit—a group of angry people winning a fight—easily inspires other groups of angry people to start a similar fight, empowered with the idea that they may win. That alone can trigger chain reactions. A nuclear explosion is not caused by one atom splitting, but by the impact of the first atom that splits causing multiple other atoms near it to split, and they in turn causing multiple atoms to split. The exponential increase in atoms splitting, and their combined energy is the bomb. That is how World War One started and, ironically how World War Two ended.
An example of how Brexit could lead to a nuclear war could be this:
Brexit in the UK causes Italy or France to have a similar referendum. Le Pen wins an election in France. Europe now has a fractured EU. The EU, for all its many awful faults, has prevented a war in Europe for longer than ever before. The EU is also a major force in suppressing Putin’s military ambitions. European sanctions on Russia really hit the economy, and helped temper Russia’s attacks on Ukraine (there is a reason bad guys always want a weaker European Union). Trump wins in the US. Trump becomes isolationist, which weakens NATO. He has already said he would not automatically honour NATO commitments in the face of a Russian attack on the Baltics.
With a fractured EU, and weakened NATO, Putin, facing an ongoing economic and social crisis in Russia, needs another foreign distraction around which to rally his people. He funds far right anti-EU activists in Latvia, who then create a reason for an uprising of the Russian Latvians in the East of the country (the EU border with Russia). Russia sends ‘peace keeping forces’ and ‘aid lorries’ into Latvia, as it did in Georgia, and in Ukraine. He annexes Eastern Latvia as he did Eastern Ukraine (Crimea has the same population as Latvia, by the way).
A divided Europe, with the leaders of France, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and others now pro-Russia, anti-EU, and funded by Putin, overrule calls for sanctions or a military response. NATO is slow to respond: Trump does not want America to be involved, and a large part of Europe is indifferent or blocking any action. Russia, seeing no real resistance to their actions, move further into Latvia, and then into Eastern Estonia and Lithuania. The Baltic States declare war on Russia and start to retaliate, as they have now been invaded so have no choice. Half of Europe sides with them, a few countries remain neutral, and a few side with Russia. Where does Turkey stand on this? How does ISIS respond to a new war in Europe? Who uses a nuclear weapon first?
This is just one Arch Duke Ferdinand scenario. The number of possible scenarios are infinite due to the massive complexity of the many moving parts. And of course many of them lead to nothing happening. But based on history we are due another period of destruction, and based on history all the indicators are that we are entering one.
It will come in ways we can’t see coming, and will spin out of control so fast people won’t be able to stop it. Historians will look back and make sense of it all and wonder how we could all have been so naïve. How could I sit in a nice café in London, writing this, without wanting to run away. How could people read it and make sarcastic and dismissive comments about how pro-Remain people should stop whining, and how we shouldn’t blame everything on Brexit. Others will read this and sneer at me for saying America is in great shape, that Trump is a possible future Hitler (and yes, Godwin’s Law. But my comparison is to another narcissistic, charismatic leader fanning flames of hatred until things spiral out of control). It’s easy to jump to conclusions that oppose pessimistic predictions based on the weight of history and learning. Trump won against the other Republicans in debates by countering their claims by calling them names and dismissing them. It’s an easy route but the wrong one.
Ignoring and mocking the experts , as people are doing around Brexit and Trump’s campaign, is no different to ignoring a doctor who tells you to stop smoking, and then finding later you’ve developed incurable cancer. A little thing leads to an unstoppable destruction that could have been prevented if you’d listened and thought a bit. But people smoke, and people die from it. That is the way of the human.
So I feel it’s all inevitable. I don’t know what it will be, but we are entering a bad phase. It will be unpleasant for those living through it, maybe even will unravel into being hellish and beyond imagination. Humans will come out the other side, recover, and move on. The human race will be fine, changed, maybe better. But for those at the sharp end—for the thousands of Turkish teachers who just got fired, for the Turkish journalists and lawyers in prison, for the Russian dissidents in gulags, for people lying wounded in French hospitals after terrorist attacks, for those yet to fall, this will be their Somme.
What can we do? Well, again, looking back, probably not much. The liberal intellectuals are always in the minority. See Clay Shirky’s Twitter Storm on this point. The people who see that open societies, being nice to other people, not being racist, not fighting wars, is a better way to live, they generally end up losing these fights. They don’t fight dirty. They are terrible at appealing to the populace. They are less violent, so end up in prisons, camps, and graves. We need to beware not to become divided (see: Labour party), we need to avoid getting lost in arguing through facts and logic, and counter the populist messages of passion and anger with our own similar messages. We need to understand and use social media. We need to harness a different fear. Fear of another World War nearly stopped World War 2, but didn’t. We need to avoid our own echo chambers. Trump and Putin supporters don’t read the Guardian, so writing there is just reassuring our friends. We need to find a way to bridge from our closed groups to other closed groups, try to cross the ever widening social divides.
(Perhaps I’m just writing this so I can be remembered by history as one of the people who saw it coming.)
tl;dr
you disinformation is curious, but not worth my time.
So what's Sup Forums's take on this?
Is Sup Forums wrong again, once again absolutely BTFO beyond all repair as you faggots are on a daily basis?
*sips tea*
tl;dr
but the headline sounds like good news
Oh look, ANOTHER stormweenie refuses to even educate himself because he can't fucking even read hahaha go back to your mom's fucking basement loser!!
>being slightly nationalistic is LITERALLY HITLER
signed - The Globalist Jew
Oh god I'm drowning in your fucking tears hahahahahahahahaha fucking stormshits lmfao
NE CEST PAS UNE ARGUMENT LMAO
shill
sage
Why should I care that he is Hitler 2.0?
People keep going OMG HE IS RACIST PROOF IS HERE!
So WHY is that a bad thing?
...
>Hillary is such a terrible candidate that she can't even beat literally Hitler.
i've literally never been on stormfront.
Why do progressives view any non-progressive movement as a movement that leads towards death and destruction?
To the minds of a progressive Brexit can't just be a people leaving a supranational Union - no, to them, it has to be the precursor to death and destruction.
I want to know how the progressive mind works - it's fucked up
Wow you guys are fucking retarded Hitler killed millions and you act like it's a good thing? He ruined Europe and set us back like 100 years as far as equality goes, read a fucking book
>evidence can't convince me because I'm RETARDED!!!!!!
lmao you guys are so funny
why the fuck is there a pic of Marx in this bih
Go away Reddit
Mind posting some evidence that the 6million were killed by Hitler?
Bump the thread
Nice """""insult"""""
Every history book ever written more or less
American Government killed TENS of millions in the Native American circle of things. Then on top of that the slavery. As well as civil war atrocities. The US Government is literally worse than Hitler.
Stalin and Mao are literally worse than Hitler too, and you need me not to point that out either.
So Hitler killed a few million people, small time. He also ruined Germany by going to War with Russia, which cost both sides millions too, but prevented a Stalin victory across Europe... which was coming.
Sometimes you have to have a bad egg to stop an even worse egg from ruining your whole fucking house.
I am totally aware of what Hitler did, I've read books about it. I agree 100% that he did everything you say he did. I'm just saying it is literally NOTHING compared to Stalin or even the US Govt.
And were in those history books did it say Hitler killed those people? Who wrote the books? Post details.
To long. Op is using to many proxies.
Also don't care.
The article explicitly says that the Black Plague was ultimately a good thing for humanity...
I don't get it... Is this guy pro-Trump?
OP, the there are many facts that are blatantly ignored in whatever this masturbatory piece of "I'm right because I've cherry picked some aspects of history and simplified them to fit my argument."
The author cited Mugabe as an example of populist rhetoric causing the downfall of a nation. That is plain manipulation of a narrative to fit a leftist view. Rhodesia split from Britain before majority rule would be enforced. All around Rhodesia, former British territories that had been self governing for years were forced to allow the majority blacks to rule. Needless to say, and the author admits it, they went into a chaos. The Rhodesians wanted to avoid that fate, but were downplayed by a Labor government in Britain and forced to fight communist backed insurgents (Mugabe) with little to no support from other nations. The end result being the Rhodesians winning in from a military aspect, but loosing the political side of insurgencies. This put Mugabe into power, and the whites were painted as blood thirsty racists by the kind of people who wrote the article you dumped.
Ah yes the victor of war. Totally not exaggeration to fluff up the allied power
Hitler was one person, therefore your argument doesn't hold water.
I don't need citations to tell you that water is wet.
Have fun in Trump's interment camps
He's saying that humans are fucking idiots, especially ones that vote for Trump
>American Government killed TENS of millions in the Native American circle of things.
M8 there were probably like a ten million native americans in NA at their peak.
>Long ass copypasta post written in advance attempting to sound intellectual.
>Immediately replies with "Storm Weenie".
Why torpedo your won credibility so quickly?
>implying I'm going to read some bullshit about how Brexit and Trump are going to start a world war
i'm not reading all that bullshit. i'm betting it glosses over the negative events that lead up to national socialism and assumes everything would be just fine if the people had done nothing at all which would render it irrelevant. typical "da nazis r bad" crap. fuck off "intellectual".
>set us back like 100 years as far as equality goes
lol
>>LITERALLY HITLER
>So I feel it’s all inevitable. I don’t know what it will be, but we are entering a bad phase.
So the argument comes down to literally "I have a bad feeling about this"
feels > reals
>The people who see that open societies, being nice to other people, not being racist, not fighting wars, is a better way to live, they generally end up losing these fights. They don’t fight dirty. They are terrible at appealing to the populace. They are less violent, so end up in prisons, camps, and graves.
A future worth looking forward to.
Wtf is this cuck really comparing the collapse of the roman empire and the black death to the spanish inquisition???
>racism guy who get's upset on stage
>Glorious leader who changed the world
come on dad
>loosing
Almost had me convinced you could argue correctly.
Howard Zinn wasn't a victor of any war, except the way on ignorant fucks like you maybe
>we won't accept GOP fear-mongering
>IF YOU VOTE GOP THE UNIVERSE IMPLODES
Lefties are genuinely crazy psychos
Its seems to be making the assumption that trump and brexit supporters are:
a) Angry and unable to make clear choices
b) Blind to global events
Even though a lot are only scared because of global events happening over and over again, the Muslim minority's aren't integrating well and racial divisions have been opened wide by the minority's themselves. The examples are all a bit incoherent too
This is a very different beast than "water is wet" there were many factors at work during WWII I'm asking where in the books it says Hitler himself threw over a million people into the gass chambers and with his own two hands turned the valve.
The article also ignores the recently uncovered informed of the Comey testimony and DNC emails. We know Clinton is in contempt of congress because of her false testimony, we know she had SAP level information on her poorly protected server. We also know that the democratic primary was rigged from the start.
There is no way you can ignore those facts and say she is a accountable and honest person. Your author, and entire argument ignores multiple facts to say "lol trump is worse than hitler and will start WWIII, so go with her."
That last bit is just Marxist propaganda that ignores how poorly muslims are integrating into Europe.
You are a tremendous faggot.
>i accept history told by a white man with no question
fucking moron OP. what about the world's owners? also you got hitler all wrong lol.
go back to studying history.
Haha most of you doing even want to read it, proving the author's point.
You're all fucking sheep. Trump is the next Hitler and anyone who thinks otherwise is a stupid uneducated fucking caveman. Lmao I love winning arguments against you fucking knuckle-draggers
Does this take into account the NWO's metaplan?
Disease wiped out millions of Natives.
Real Americans never even got close to that death toll.
>lol there is a spelling error so i'll just address that instead of the argument
kys
>spanish inquisition?
No nos lo vamos a quitar de encima en la puta vida.
haha most of you amerifats still think people on here take offense to trump being called hitler. lmao i love watching amerifats stroke their cock to their own ego.
>argument
What argument? There's nothing to argue here. The author is fucking RIGHT and all of you are ignorant fucks!
I mean your not wrong OP. Anyone who has ever picked up a history book knows this. It won't matter who wins this election though. Shillary will do the exact same thing Trump does. Nothing. We're moving into a period of isolationism again. Shillary is just as much Hitler, if not more so than Trump.
>implying we wouldnt vote for Hitler if he was reincarnated
OP is a fool if he thinks mentioning the Fuhrer will have any negative effect here
saged and keked
>Haha most of you doing even want to read it, proving the author's point.
that if you don't want to give clicks to partisan propaganda you're LITERALLY HITLER?
Speaking of Hitler, guys, please do read this article. This completely changed my view on him.
I'm an Asian studying at UIUC, but I have dual citizenship. Nice try, Snoreway. I grew up in HK, which is why I'm way the fuck smarter than most of the morons here.
The argument is that the author is cherry picking history to fit his narrative.
He tried to sum up forty years of conflict in Africa in two sentences and severely fucked up doing it.
You say the author is right and then tell us to fuck off when we ask for proofs.
Wait... I thought you liberals all say Trump is the Doomsayer that is pulling on the strings of peoples fears? It looks like the liberals are the real Doomsayers spreading fear now.
trump is a racist fascist. i know what that leads to. its exactly what i want and its perfectly reasonable.
You are a pathetic mess user. Get your fucking shit together.
>blah blah blah everyone is hitler
Why would I be sent to a camp? I'm a disabled vet,who's donated to Trump,and both my wife and her son are voting Trump in November. Only traitors get sent off to a relaxing luxurious day camp.
tl;dr;saged
and why do you have a problem with Hitler 2.0 ?
are you a jew or something?
>Hitler was one person, therefore your argument doesn't hold water.
>hitler gassed 600 billion jews by himself
wut?
Le Hitler Bogeyman LMAOO
asians to go american colleges and become brainwashed, fearful liberal cucks
you need to stop drinking the 老外 koolaid
丢脸
>lol im in college so im the only educated person on Sup Forums let me educate those shitlords
This is spot on and the logical conclusion one comes to when zooming out and looking at this whole situation as an observer.
It almost makes me think that the future is already prewritten and that everyone is just playing their part guided by the karma of their past and thoughts that aren't their own.
Whether you're concious of it or not, doesn't matter. There's nothing you can do to stop the wheel of suffering, except pick a side and live out your destiny. In the long term view, this is just another event in history, another era that passed and with it the stories of people who were in it.
Just another lesson for humanity as a whole and for historians to study and analyze.
Oh, and Include me in the screencap.
like anyone care what the fuck you are. hitler was a good guy and you owe it to yourself and others to know the truth about ww2 so why don't you fuck off cumming all over our board with your winning and look into some historical claims and study their source. HK sounds like a fucking terrible place to grow up I'm honestly sorry for you friend.
Didn't read lol
Also fuck off with the multiple ID you fucking shill.
Lmao whatever you stupid cavemen you'll never see things the right way
Btw when Trump causes WWII everyone will suffer because he'll be the first to launch nukes and everyone knows this.
Oh and you retards asking for proof, just look at the original article since the author has plenty of links even though I'm sure you won't read them because YOU'RE ALL FUCKING STUPID LOL
>muh if only people listened to liberal bullshit
I don't know how someone could pretend that it wasn't the left's lunacy and ethno-masochism that led to this mess in the first place. Push hard and somebody will push back.
>and the Nazi reproductive policies were among the motivating factors behind their campaign against smoking, and this campaign was associated with both antisemitism and racism.[11]
He played with his people like barbie dolls.
>I'll explain how this leads to nuclear war
>Uhm.. actually it just leads to Russia absorbing Baltic States
And?
>There's a reason "bad guys" hate the EU
You're a pretty good example of how low the academic community has fallen.
>Trump causes WWII
Wew lad
You seem bothered friend
just read through your text and although I do not agree with all of it you are right in a couple of places.
1. we are entering a bad phase
2. its not going to be pretty for anyone involved
however I actually do not see EU as a great savior of peace in Europe. If you knew how many northern European people who hates and fears the EU you would not consider it such a "peaceful" thing. If anything the fact that the EU wants to build an army could lead to conflicts with NATO / Russia and then trigger a large war.
So could Brexxit lead to something bad? yes sure. Nearly everything can. Will it? I do not think so. I actually think Brexxit will lead to a more moderate EU and stable Europe (hopefully Denmark can leave the EU too soon). I think so since the EU have been moving in one direction for the last 30 years: The USA of Europe. As a historian I do not need to tell you what happens when people wants to build a new super union state? War and death always follow.
Now as for whether or not I actually do not want a war is something different. My kind (old fashion moderate democrats) are threaten to go extinct if something is not done. Muslim extremist, crazy leftist and fascists are all on the rise as we speak. Maybe a cruel and unkind war could at least make sure that there are a place for my grandchildren to grow up with the same values I hold.
Read all of it.
Here's the thing boyo, not everyone here is a humanitarian.
We want war or some massive happening. We don't care as long as the people we hate are dead and gone we will just keep watching and waiting for another.
That is the way of the Sup Forums. KEK
I appreciated that he was being fairly non-partisan until the last paragraph, but claiming that "liberal intellectuals" don't fight dirty, don't try as hard as possible to appeal the populace even if that means deceit, and are the ones who get sent to the camps is fucking laughable
The reason people are voting for populist, nationalistic candidates is because they fear or are tired of them doing exactly that
If the people don't feel under attack they generally take a live and let live attitude
Hitler killed almost 50 million people. He was the bad guy.
>i went to college and im so smart but I base all my feelings on this one article that someone else wrote
how many wars has hillary been involved in?
the fact that you think the president can launch nukes nilly willy even if he wants to shows how ignorant you are
So instead vote for Hillary Clinton who has a track record that shows complete and utter disregard for human life?
Her involvement in Libya alone demonstrates her capacity for remorseless violence and destruction. What has Trump done comparable to that?
The EU did not prevent anything. It was the west vs. east cold war order which stopped the escalation of a real war. Everyone was scared of nuklear weapons.
As soon as the USSR broke apart war came back to europe (jugoslavia) nearly immediately.
first OP is b8ing with a well written article and then starts to insult everyone Sup Forums style. I hope you are just a troll or a hillary shill, because otherwise you are a retard. Everyone on this board understands basic economics and knows that capitalism has to grow to survive. When there is no growth, we fuck shit up with a war to start rebuilding stuff and be fine for 50 years or so. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Everything is controlled by the Rothschilds and other jewish families. (Thats why switzerland is never touched) They need to keep the economy running to not lose the top. Thats what all of us dumb motherfuckers get for wanting to buy NIKEes.
Im out
>if b8 nice b8 r8 8/8 m8
> he'll be the first to launch nukes and everyone knows this.
everyone knows this.... everyone
Trump will nuke everyone! NUKES!!! HE ALONE WILL HAVE THE BUTTON AND POWAH TO DO SO!! STOP THE MADMAN!
>kill yourself faggot.
>Everything is controlled by the Rothschilds and other jewish families.
Lol OK whatever you retarded Nazi
>stupid seasons humans impose on themselves
>we humans have a habit of going into phases of mass destruction
>Wars are actually the norm for humans
>hen after the War to end all Wars, we went and had another one.
so fucking edgy. that alone makes me discard your opinion
good
>I'm an Asian studying at UIUC, but I have dual citizenship
youtube.com
A 5 column gook, we'll get around to reopening the camps and seizing your shit again too.
v=2XOzyBQ594E
Since you use "LOL" at the end of a sentence you are most probably a) a stupid leftist college slut, or b) a feminized cuck. Hurry you gotta suck more niggerdick (in both cases).