Check m8, amerilards

How is your 2nd amendment gonna protect you from government tyranny when the government has tanks, jets and nukes?

Same way it has since it was written.

someone post the screencap of the dude who organized red games for the dod that said civil war would destroy the us govt

former red team planner covered up this topic, read it

>the government will use tanks, jets, and nukes against its own populace in an attempt to disarm us
>therefore, we should get rid of our guns

Thanks for posting.

That's a good reason for disarming the state, not a good reason for abrogating the Second Amendment.

a well placed shot is enough to take down any transgressor, even if they have superior weaponry

i'd rather have a slim chance of success by virtue of firearms than no firearms

By forcing the government to use the military in the first place, retard.

Because, genius, if the FEDS get out of control and use tanks, nukes bombs etc against us. The rebellion will probably be armed with some as well.

Like how we are ISIS and Israel

>this thread again

check the archive, niggerlover

better than your bootlicking will

The crewman have to sleep sometime. The officers have families, they all have to eat.

Not to mention, nothing stopping people from stealing them. Or from the operators switching sides.

USA's record versus guerilla warfare is pretty shitty

Eat my ass

The US government has shown itself ineffective against poorly armed guerillas

Lol and who will ride these tanks?Fat sjw?Who will shoot rockets?Leslie Jones?Alex Soros?
Even in the scenario of full-scale war government loses by landslide

>Implying our military would do such a thing
Eurocucks sure are funny.

>1 post by this ID
SAGE
SLIDING IN EFFECT

>1 post by this ID

All those things are operated by people, and they can't stand on a street corner and go door to door. Also are you suggesting the government wins by nuking it's own populace?

>How is your 2nd amendment gonna protect you from government tyranny when the government has tanks, jets and nukes?

rusty mud filled AK-47s worked well enough for the Vietnamese, Iraqis and afghan's.

>this thread again
mods

>the army is going to nuke and bomb the country their own families live in instead of revolting
T O P K E K M 8
O
P
K
E
K
M
8

How many times are we going have this thread?

Wanted to post this, thank you

>Government starts using drones in its own airspace against its own civilians
>Suddenly Russian SAM systems all over the country
>Politicians wake up to find their young children dead and placed in bed with them
>Random Norwegian man found to have committed suicide with 5 gunshots to the back of his head

...

Only if you're a qt3.14 girl with a nice one :^)

P.S. just look at the civil war in syria. How well is tanks planes drones and helos helping them out?

How did those planes and tanks work in Turkey?

If the gooks could beat us with a couple of AK47s and some booby traps while the US military napalmed them, then we could probably beat the government.

The government isn't going to nuke it's own people, that's fucking retarded. Also, most military guys are republican and would be against a coup of any kind, and would thus join the people.

You defeatist faggots really are cucks

so the governament is gonna nuke the buildings whitch, the governament built. with the money from the people he is trying to kill

>implying when all infrastructure breaks down government will have any of this shit

Most of the military is red-pilled. Both you and Sup Forums keep ignoring that.

Look at all those dangerous flares the F-22 is dropping. They might start a brush fire.

...

>what is waco siege

I also wanted to post this... Thanks

Here's an infographic showing how outgunned the government really is

>the government is THIS close to using taxpayer funded drones tanks and attack helicopters against US citizens on US soil

wow u rllyh made me think i'm giving up the guns now since we obviously dont need them #mentallyhill

Yeah those tactics have worked so well against dirt farmers with ak-47's from the 70's

The government will fail for the same reason they failed in Vietnam. You cannot use nukes and missles against guerilla warfare, especially not if they blend into your own populace

a right keep and bear nuclear arms

>Afghanistan
>Iraq

Still not secure after more than a decade of the best the US army could throw at it,

Kind of proving the point,

Based Lebanon coming in with logic... Who woulda thunk it

Relations with civilians they bomb aren't stellar either.

Nice quads, BTW.

>1995
>Serbs and muslims go door to door mostly killing each other with rifles
>If civilians on either side were armed it would be a whole different deal

So then, if you're saying an AR-15 isn't enough to defend against a tyrannical government, then that would imply that you think we should be more armed so that we can defend against a tyrannical government? That is the only logical conclusion to your image. Because clearly disarming the populous would make it even harder.

the government cannot kill citizens and remain in power, because the entire nation would break down and leaders would be killed or run out

those powerful armaments are ultimately useless against civil unrest

which means that all engagements vs civilians will be with small arms fire

That's more of an argument for privately owned missiles than it is for taking away guns.

Insurrections of any size are incredibly expensive for the government. Not including the fact that the rest of the world doesn't like governments killing their own people

Yes anti tank RPG's should be legal.

>Tanks
Shit
>Planes, Drones
Can't bomb your own infrastructure buddy

We have this thread every day. US populace wins with little effort.

The military expects to lose 50% of the armed forces if a civil war against the government does happen. You think the deserters are just gonna let the military have the equipment they know how to use?

They are some militias have military grade rocket launchers

>laughing_vietnamese.jpg

Normies regurgitate what they're force fed, time and time again. It's the same reason 1984 was required reading in a lot of states - a novel about a tyrannical government that defeats the protagonist in the end.

(((They))) want to perpetuate the idea that the people are powerless, that they should surrender and never try. And these stupid millennial cucks lap it all up like the Chihuahuas they are

>3,796,742 sq mi
>324,045,364 people
I doubt the military has enough guns, ammunition, and rockets to cover it all.

:)

more like 75-80%. The military is not going to fight against civilians.

Funny, those tanks, jets and nukes didn't work against the 80 IQ sandniggers with rusty AKs and no formal training.

>statists think a rebellion would be uniform-on-uniform combat
>unironically
Kill yourself.

Im gonna post it again later from my yuro proxy

The military isn't automatically going to be okay with mowing down the civilian population with advanced weaponry. We're not Red China.

KEK silly citizen resistance is futile! Now just sit there and praise our glorious leader Hillary on the jumbotron.

>Dude Bros

Is this the left's version of merchants?

two words: guerilla warfare

It's shocking how stupid people can be.

>What is a front
>What is a supply train
>What is guerilla warfare
>What is the reason to repeal the second amendment when mass murder can be committed with a fucking truck

A civilian coup of the US government is a forgone conclusion if it ever comes down to it. Problem is, the government is doing such a great job of hiding and dumbing down half of the population that it would be very difficult to have a unified opposition of government forces. They are winning the infowars

America isn't the hottest at asymmetric warfare.

After the DC sniper incident I was no longer worried about the Feds. If they took that long to find the guy, they're fucked if there is a million of them out there, in sympathetic communities.

That was another huge fuck up on GW Bush's part, that should have been tip-top priority number 1.

You are a complete moron.
I’m going to say this once, just once, for all you stupid knuckle-dragging fucks in the world: YOU CANNOT CONTROL AN ENTIRE CONTRY AND ITS PEOPLE WITH TANKS OR JETS OR BATTELSHIPS OR ANY OF THAT SHIT.

A FIGHTER JET CANNOT STAND ON THE STREETCORNERS AND ENFORCE NO-ASSEMBLY EDICTS. A FIGHTER JET CANNOT KICK DOWN YOUR DOOR AT 3AM TO SERACH YOUR HOUSE FOR CONTRABAND MATERIELS OR ANTI-SOCIAL PROPAGANDA.
A FIGHTER JET IS USELESS FOR MAINTIAINING A POLICE STATE
POLICE ARE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A POLICE STATE.
AND NO MATTER HOW MANY POLICE YOU HAVE, THEY ARE ALWAYS OUT-NUMBERED BY THE PEOPLE, WHICH IS WHY IT’S VITAL FOR YOUR POLICE TO HAVE AUTOMATIC WEAPONS AND YOUR PEOPLE TO HAVE NOTHING BUT THEIR LIMP DICKS.
BUT WHEN EVERY RANDOM PEDESTRIAN MIGHT HAVE A GLOCK JAMMED IN HIS WAISTBAND ASKING FOR SOMEONE’S TRAVEL PAPERS CAN RESULT IN A GUT FULL OF LEAD. KICKING DOWN THOSE DOORS BECOMES A LOT FUCKING RISKIER WHEN A FULL SIZED BATTLE RIFLE CAPABLE OF PUNCHING THROUGH YOUR BODY ARMOR LIKE CARDBOARD MIGHT BE HIDING BEHIND EVERY COUCH.

DUMB. FUCK. HEADS.

This. Lefties don't know shit about 4th generation warfare.

Milfag here, overwhelming majority of us would side with the civilians. Loyalist government would have tanks and jets, but so would the rebels. Difference is, the Loyalists would have insurgents in their midst poisoning their food, attacking them at night, and doing everything possible to stymie them.

You have to get out of that tank or land that jet to sleep and eat sometime.

The majority of the fighting would be military on military, the civilian insurgency would help do things like cut supply lines and damage logistics.

Every state has their own National Guard, including an Air Force, which is called the Air National Guard. It would only take the secession of one state for rebels to gain access to the same advanced weaponry they'd be up against.

You have a better chance with a gun than you would using fucking spoons.

I love the "The government is going to bomb its own citizens and infrastructure" meme

Every fucking day ((((((()))))))
These shill threads suck

>that picture
Holy fuck foreigners are fucking stupid.

You think the government is going to spend over $5 million (according to your picture) to kill 1 civilian?

And then multiply that civilian times millions?

THINK BEFORE POSTING

>implying 100% of the military/FBI/NSA/CIA are going to stay loyal to the govt
>implying the govt will nuke its own citizens
>implying i didn't take the bait

do we have to have this thread every day

One post by this ID

>Still using AR-15s
>Not AK-15s

>10 years of guerilla war in the US
>American military decides to pull out

You imply that the people controlling those aren't people under rule of the government too
Also
>heavily damaging your own infrastructure

>(((Kohn)))

THIS IS A PROXY VPN, DONT BELIEVE IN THESE SHILL THREADS.

Yeah tell that to people in Turkey who fucking stopped a coup against Tanks, Fighter jets, Attack helicopters.

THE POWER IS WITH THE PEOPLE, DONT BELIEVE THESE LIES.
SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED

>ak-15

sounds scary

fucking retards

The army requires a metric fuckton of logistics to function, how are they going to function with those logistics actively fighting them along with over half of the army.

American soldiers have been brainwashed into thinking they fight for FREEDOM, a lot of them will resist orders to kill civilians indiscriminately.

Either b8 or shill
Most of that shit is drastically less effective in guerilla warfare
Also implying that all of the military would comply or not defect is silly, the US would lack the man-power to defeat a revolution without full support of all branches of the military and its soldiers.

If they weren't concerned about an armed populace, they would not waste resources advocating a ban on firearms.

PREACH YOU CRAZY LEAF

>SHALL

>NOT

>BE INFRINGED

>mfw four nordic grandparents
You cucks are a shame on our proud heritage.

air nat'l guard is mostly transports and A-10s with a handful of 30+ year old F-16s and a few F-15s. The actual real deal Chairforce would clown their asses in any sort of conflict.

--- This...

Now thats a sexty weapon there. The magazines are cheap and lightweight... lotta firepower you can carry with that, and an effective round with a long barrel as well.

North Korean army is heavily unequipped. The country most likely does not even have an actual nuke and could be carpet bombed by America.

Americans can't do that because they would kill too many civilians. The country is mostly defended by more than a million chinks ready to fight with assault rifles and rpgs.

America would have to play by the rules and be liberating the country in which case they would lose at least 100.000 soliders

This is one of my favorite trolling pastas.

Kill yourself, you fucking eunuch

>believing the military can operate without the support of the nation as a whole
Because my cousin in the national guard will be so willing to shoot me with an M2 and then run me over with a Bradley. No problem.
Also look how many American gun owners there are vs the number of military personnel.

NIGS BTFO
HOW CAN THEY COMPETE WITH THEIR STOLEN .35 PISTOLS?!

Sounds like the government is fucked.

Your "The military has advanced weaponry so you can't defeat it" non-arguments have never been good. Commit suicide.