ITS OVER

...

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/22/75-percent-positive-response-to-donald-trump-speech-so-cnn-trashes-its-own-poll/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I trust CNN implicitly

(CNN)

Fuck off leaf

>I only listen to CNN when they confirm my bias
Kill yourselves

>trump supporters watch CNN and would actually respond to a CNN poll
>trump gives a negative speech. The question asks if you viewed it positively which makes you less likely to say yes.
Yup, you're right we're fucked dude

>trump this high on CNN
it's over

That funny, because I saw other polls that said that 75% of people had a positive view of Trumps speech.

CNN's network viewers are typically liberal. Of course they'd give it a 71%. The fact its only a 14 point gap says more than anything else.

THAT'S FUCKING IT

I have no other choice but to become a #Shill4Hill now

>poll which doesnt show what is being quantified
>blatant lie to "positive reaction"
>week old emails show collusion between cnn/hillary
>cherrypicked photos
What else is wrong with this picture?

oh shit looks like I'm #MentallyHill

It was over a long time ago..

Thats bogus the day of Trump's speech he scored 75%

But CNN is proven in bed with the Democrats by wikileaks, so..

wat

...

wtf i hate trump now

but once he re-takes the lead then i'll hate hillary

>Most important speech of her life

Here's hoping

2 out of 3 electronic voting machine companies are Clinton Foundation donors. Did you ever think there was actually a chance?

>71%
>57%

How?

just some guy cheaating by posting on 2 devices at hitting submit at the same time

yeah, people who watched it are selecting for people who would watch a Hilldawg speech.

Question is though, will Hillary get a post convention bounce? I'm hoping no, but my hopes don't really affect reality.

this

CNN is a left-wing news network. You're a dishonest, lying sack of shit if you deny this.

...

I guess I'm #MentallyHill now

Source

>They showed the two parts of the poll that Hillary had higher numbers than Trump in
>They ignored the third part where Trump BTFO Hillary in getting more people to vote for him.
>Literally, the only part of that actually matters

Such fairness. Such impartiality.

>CLINTON
>NEWS
>NETWORK

transported my consciousness into contemplative zen

An open letter to Hiroyuki Nishimura:

Dear Hiroyuki-san,

Please region block all of Canada from ever accessing Sup Forums again.


Best regards,

Anonymous

Jokes on your I never listen to CNN

It isn't a CNN viewership poll you dummy it's a focus group.

this is not something that can have a fraction over 100.

>it can only be up to 100% in this regard its not a net increase.

I wish I would have considered that was a tactic to bait (you)'s before allowing my paranoia to lead me to think it was a broken shillbot

They're lying. Blatantly
breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/22/75-percent-positive-response-to-donald-trump-speech-so-cnn-trashes-its-own-poll/
>inb4 breitbart
The point is the 57 number comes from the "would you vote for trump" question, but the "viewed the speech positively" question was 75%.

Nice bot/10

Wtf I hate trump now

I'm a #cruzmissile now

Just google Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital

She will

I didn't know the voter base consisted of 128 % total voters, in fact she has 49 and trump 51, fuck off Communist News Network

...

this

...

Wait are you the real Anonymous, like do not forgive and all that? You sir are awesome and I tip my trilby to you. Man, epic bread right here, someone screenshot this please

maybe BOTH had positive reactions...

What the fuck happened to Australia being the shitposting kings? When did Canada steal the crown away?

where this new meme come from?

...

...

...

when I started doing political operations and stopped drilling Sup Forums

>we are past the Primary, this is the General Now.

...

I was viewing the dnc convention on cnn (en español) they were shilling for her like the bitch was the next messiah.

...

...

cause w e are right beside you tards

>x is true
>just google it
I hate you and people like you

...

dagnabbit I'm now a turgid #Clintoris

...

Why because you're too fucking lazy to google something? Lemme ask you, how long have you been sat in that computer chair?

>It's a Reagan vs Carter rerun episode

...

Fucking seconding this shit right here

>83304333
HIDE ALL SHILL POSTS
SAGE ALL SHILL THREADS
DO NOT
DO NOT REPLY TO SHILL POSTERS

CNN literally sent a fucking message to my phone spouting anti-trump bullshit, and I wasn't even subscribed to them, nor have I ever watched CNN.

No one on Sup Forums ever listens to CNN. Even if they say Trump is winning, no one here would ever care. CNN is a sack of shit that likes to turn their viewers into sheeple.

Why do you think they even said that Trump was leading in the first place, and then end up saying "HILLARY'S SPEECH WAS THE GREATEST SPEECH OF HER LIFE, SHE TURNED THIS DIRE SITUATION RIGHT AROUND, LOOK AT OUR NUMBERS!"

It's fucking showmanship. It wouldn't be exciting if they said Hillary was cruising by without a problem, and it wouldn't be exciting if Hillary's speech didn't really do anything. They're turning her into the underdog, when Trump is really the underdog.

ANNND THE HOOOOOOOME OF THEEEE BRAAAAAAAAAAAVE!

Post them then you fuck ass whiteboi

Trump will win, he gets assassinated so Pence takes over and is essentially a puppet so the TPP gets passed as well gun control reform. Right Wing Death Squads never.

>If they say trump is winning no one would care

Fuck outta here

> 222

Yoooooooo, I gotta go its gettin to real

This is correct.

CNN was corroborated in the DNC leaks

Fuck off shill

>july 21

WTF I'm #hillaryforamerica now

what kind of butt-fuckery is this? has no one noticed the numbers in the supposed poll make no fucking sense? these add up to 128 what the fuck cnn?

It'll be massive. You racists are about to have a long, cold, dark winter.

If Trump wins, please do.
But you can keep your dindus.

Make United-State-n-Provinces gr8 again m8!

71% + 57% =/= 100%

something fishing about their math

Go watch the video with the poll. CNN even said before revealing the poll that it was from a group at the speech, so yeah, majority were Democrats.

It's two seperate polls.

Did you like the hillary clinton speech? Y/N
71% said yes

Did you like the Trump speech? Y/N
51% said yes

Is this legit? If it was actually a group at the speech then I'm not worried at all. They kicked out all the Bernouts so of course it would get this high.

...

American education ladies and gentlemen.

And here comes the ad hominem in 3, 2, 1....

There's more than one way to fight.

>Post con bump for Trump
>First poll back since the convention started was on day 1 and 2. Clinton was back up ahead by a point.

They didn't even get Obama's speech in.

CNN had the highest ratings for the DNC out of all the broadcasts, i bet the only people who tuned in were ultra liberals who dont know cspan exist

I just realized
>Poll of speech watchers

lol it's fucking nothing

...

THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING, I AM THE ONE IN CHARGE HERE

They got the "wrong" results last week, so they took careful measures to ensure this didn't occur again

Yeah especially when you factor in the fact that the DNC hired people to watch it and cheer for it

...

That was in the arena.

The ORC polls are of random people that watched the speeches, its to even of people that watched in on CNN.

>(((Clinton News Network)))

Wait this is a poll of CNN viewers? Kek it should be higher Clinton is boned

if the audience wasn't full of clinton interns it might have meant something.

CNN's poll was astounding for Trump because they over sample democrats. Hillary speech is expected to be high.

They call random people on the phone and ask if they watched the speech.