Time for some education on what is REALLY happening with Brexit.
1. We have not compromised on anything at all, in fact, to the contrary, we have gotten what we wanted. Remember that divorce bill being £70bn? Now it's £35bn. Remember Ireland saying NI would have to stay in the customs union? It's not now, and the EU accepted it.
2. We are closer to a free trade deal than you think. Our economies are economcially convergent, and as such, doing a trade deal will only take a matter of months.
3. The EU is the weaker part of these talks. Think it through, if we leave with no trade deal, we copy and paste EU trade deals into UK law and we'll make up the difference from loses with deals across the world. The EU takes YEARS to sign treaties and FTAs, because you have to go through 27 member states all with different interests
Jace Nelson
is /brit/ leaking
Andrew Howard
lol
James Stewart
So who really loses out if we leave with no deal? The EU suddenly loses its second largest contributor, its second largets economy and a MASSIVE hole in the budget. Which all of you cannot agree who fills it.
Meanwhile we make our losess up with a quick FTA with USA, China and Japan. The EU has no trade deal with China or the USA.
Liam Reyes
I love this picture so much. It's super well made for a meme.
Gabriel Parker
We'll just kick Poland and Hungary out to fill up the hole that Britain has created - mark my words.
Christopher Hughes
>Meaningful vote
Yeah mate, meaningful. As in, accept what we came back with after the talks, or we leave with WTO rules lmao
Isaiah Gonzalez
>Burns down a perfectly fine steel bridge >Rebuilds a rickery pooloo rope bridge and hand the UE scissors that they can use to cut it anytime they want Pip pip we won, old chaps.
Luke Jenkins
Kick out both of those contributors to the ECB and make the hole larger? Why?
Lincoln Allen
dont even know what irrelevant country you're from lmao
Benjamin Taylor
Poland and Hungary are the biggest money drains in the EU, the fuck are you talking about?
Elijah Brown
too drunk. anyway yeah i guess you could do that, but won't be much left after 3 member states are gone and you're down to the club 25. Hardly a resounding success is it?
Kayden Morgan
>he is surprised that a brit is full of delusion
What next? Will you call the news tomorrow when you see that the sky is blue?
Brandon Sanders
hi /p*l/
Elijah Sanchez
> Remember that divorce bill being £70bn? The EU intentionally overdrew its demands. This is common negotiation tactics. It also left room for you government to save face in front of your easily manipulated populace. And you personally just ate that crap right up. The EU got exactly what it wanted.
> Remember Ireland saying NI would have to stay in the customs union? It's not now, and the EU accepted it.
Because the UK agreed that if they found no other solution then it would stay within the customs union itself. No regulatory divergence between Ireland and Northern Ireland + no regulatory divergence between the UK and Northern Ireland equals no regulatory divergence between Ireland and the UK and thus none between the UK and the EU.
>2. We are closer to a free trade deal than you think. Our economies are economcially convergent, and as such, doing a trade deal will only take a matter of months. I sincerely doubt that and so does your own government. That's why it has already agreed to a multi-year transitioning period.
>3. The EU is the weaker part of these talks. Think it through, if we leave with no trade deal, we copy and paste EU trade deals into UK law and we'll make up the difference from loses with deals across the world. The EU takes YEARS to sign treaties and FTAs, because you have to go through 27 member states all with different interests I sincerely doubt that foreign countries would accept the same conditions they have negotiated with the EU with a country that has a fraction of its economical leverage. India for example has already announced that lifting restrictions on migration will be a basic requirement for a deal.
Andrew Wood
>The EU is the weaker part of these talks Ahh this is a nice deluded brit post as we love them. I'll open a nice cold beer and watch how the thread evolves.
Ethan Anderson
>The EU intentionally overdrew its demands. This is common negotiation tactics. It also left room for you government to save face in front of your easily manipulated populace. And you personally just ate that crap right up. The EU got exactly what it wanted.
No evidence at all to suggest this is what happened.
>Because the UK agreed that if they found no other solution then it would stay within the customs union itself. No regulatory divergence between Ireland and Northern Ireland + no regulatory divergence between the UK and Northern Ireland equals no regulatory divergence between Ireland and the UK and thus none between the UK and the EU.
Wrong. Divergence is not membership. The main difference in divergence is the fact that we are voluntarily mirroring customs arrangements to that of EU regulation to avoid a hard border. Once we leave, we will be within our rights again to tweak these restrictions at the moment and push these regulations purely for NI to avoid a hard border, thus not putting the UK inside the customs union
>I sincerely doubt that and so does your own government. That's why it has already agreed to a multi-year transitioning period.
The transition period is not related to the FTA agreement period. The transition is in order to give business time to adjust.
>I sincerely doubt that foreign countries would accept the same conditions they have negotiated with the EU with a country that has a fraction of its economical leverage. India for example has already announced that lifting restrictions on migration will be a basic requirement for a deal.
And we've rejected the deal with India because of those reasons. We vetoed it under the EU during trade talks with them. There is no FTA with EU and India at the moment, so it'll be a fresh start with India.
Noah Scott
Stop replying to these threads. This brit is a well known delusional retard. He forgot to take his pills this morning and is now going into an autistic tizzy. Do not reply. Do not give him the attention he craves. Simply report and ignore his threads.
Jaxson Robinson
>No evidence at all to suggest this is what happened. Apart from the fact that the EU literally increased its demands right before the start of the negotiations.
>The main difference in divergence is the fact that we are voluntarily mirroring customs arrangements to that of EU regulation to avoid a hard border. Once we leave, we will be within our rights again to tweak these restrictions at the moment and push these regulations purely for NI to avoid a hard border, thus not putting the UK inside the customs union 'Voluntary' adhering to EU legislation. Ah yes. Is this what returning to be a sovereign country was about?
Cooper Bell
>Apart from the fact that the EU literally increased its demands right before the start of the negotiations.
That's funny, because just after article 50 was triggered and during the summer, prior to talks, you made the same claim throughout the summer, into the talks, and then you backed down. This wasn't le epic tactic strats. This was you backing down after a review of how much we actually owed, so loons like Verhofstadt and Juncker were wrong. Your attack dogs in parliament were just showing their teeth to some extent, but you pushed this £70bn meme WELL into november. Then a month later, you backed down.
>'Voluntary' adhering to EU legislation. Ah yes. Is this what returning to be a sovereign country was about?
Again, once we leave the EU there is nothing stopping us from just making an act of parliament to narrow those regulations just for Northern Ireland, and just in relation to trade that barely affects northern ireland.
