To all non-US countries, come share your wisdom regarding the US presidential elections

To all non-US countries, come share your wisdom regarding the US presidential elections.

Which US presidential candidate is better for your country?

From our national point of view, Hillary will be detrimental to Japan, while Trump will be good for our country. Hillary will sign TPP, which will devastate the agriculture of our country and destroy anime and manga, the very thing that helps our nation improve diplomatic relations with the west. Also, Hillary will ruin US-Japan relations by saying "Muh comfort women are sex slaves". Meanwhile, Trump will oppose the TPP and vows to make Best Corea "disappear"; both things are beneficial to our country.

Other urls found in this thread:

rt.com/news/320002-japan-manga-porn-ban/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Neither because, UAE is a monarchy.

I will let you decide.

Trump, if Clinton comes into power WW3 will start my friends and family in Lithuania will die, my father in Russia will die.

Godspeed user

Proxyfag or English teacher detected. Japanese opinion polls are very low, and the Abe admin has shit all over Trump for saying he would US military out of Japan, saying he doesn't understand US-Japanese relations.

Trump. Same as you, the TPP would fuck even more with our shitty medical system.
I only hope he doesn't fuck up the visa waiver program, but Chile is pretty chill so i doubt it.

Trump has a decent amount of support in Japan, don't be an idiot.

I always imagine Chile as earthquake hell.

Better for my country?
Hillary, no shit. TPP will benefit us in every way. Dirt cheap currency, dirt cheap labor. Country's government is more corrupt than Clinton, so doesn't matter.
Still keeping my values and assuming I'm from US?
Trump. Ignoring own labor force is a weird move.

US is already in numerous wars without their citizens being aware of it nor caring about it. adding more countries into the bucket is easy at this point.

Trump by far.

Women are not fit to be leaders of countries. Look at South Korea or Germany. That is what awaits the US if they elect that ugly cunt.

Also, Trump wants a wall. As a chinaman, I feel an affinity for walls.

>Not realizing that Japan, like the US, has mass media that's dominated and owned by liberals
>implying our PM did not jump into "Trump is racist" bandwagon meme to uphold its reputation
って俺はガチで日本人やからwww

You are not wrong. You get used to it.
I have like 2 weeks worth of bottled water in case of one.

Trump by far.

God bless our Lithuanian friends. Let's hope Trump emerges as the victor of the election.

>って俺はガチで日本人やからwww
If you support Trump and live in Japan, you should be learning Chinese.

Trump is best for Canada since dissolving Nafta will let us actually charge companies a decent amount to strip mine the north and if he gets in Trudeau will be guaranteed out since the faggot is incapable of being a dignified leader

Trunp beats China all the time. Glorious nippon has nothing to fear

Trump.

No, seriously. If illegal immigration to the US is made much harder, less of our best people will leave, and less of our worst people will leave just to end up in poverty and in a gang in the US to subsequently be deported and keep on their criminal life, now back home.

Clinton is better for Baltic States. Although, i kinda like Trump.

>Hillary will sign TPP
No she won't

The threat of China is the very reason why our PM wants to repeal the national disgrace called Article 9 of the Japanese constitution. If this becomes a reality, we would be able to built a military capable of countering the threat.

You know, I've always been curious how South Americans view each other. You all speak the same language and generally have the same culture, how do you perceive one another? Do you hate each other or what?

Trump (britbong in Germany), trump will favour trade deals to the British over the eu. Much better for our post brexit economy

If Trump is REALLY for better relations with Russia, then him, because good relations with Russia means more growth for Europe and especially for Eastern Europe.

But there's no doubt Hillary will rig the election, so there was no hope to begin with.

>hah, only weaboos post from Japan

Next you'll say all Swedish posters aren't cucks.

I don't care which candidate wins in the US elections.
(I just hate Hillary Clinton. That has nothing to do with politics. Its just a personal thing. I hate that bitch.I like Obama though)

I am, however amused by the large number of non US posters on this board that act like its THEIR election.
The hyperventilation has to be seen to be believed.

Trump won't attack any more cunts, meaning lesser """refugee""" pressure but either way my beautiful little country won't be affected

Yeah she will because she's crooked and she will sign it when she receives the shekels from major (((corporations)))

Do you really believe this?

I'm Polish, living in Suedi. It would likely be better for Europe, such as it is, for Clinton to win, because Poland needs NATO more than NATO needs Poland.

However these are American elections for the president of the USA, so whoever is the better candidate for America should be elected. That person is clearly Trump.

With all that said I don't envy you burgers this year. Neither of them is someone I would be proud voting for.

Shes been for TPP since the beginning
She called it the gold standard
Her running mate is pro-TPP
and she has yet to say she would stop TPP

>the national disgrace called Article 9 of the Japanese constitution
What would be the effects of repealing that anyway? Would it violate some treaty with the US? I know Korea and much of Asia would disapprove, still considering Japan a threat, but what does that matter? Does the UN have any say in the matter?

Definitely Trump. Hillary is a second Obama, and Obama has proven himself prejudicial for my country's sovereignty.

TPP isn't ratified in stone. It's still negotiation in the negotiation phrase. Everybody involved has been pro-TPP at one point or another, or else they wouldn't be involved. In the end, probably nobody be will for it.

>the large number of non US posters on this board that act like its THEIR election
Those are Trump's paid shills. He outsources them like he does his ties.

Repealing it would mean that Japan will be able to make 'offensive' armaments, such as aircraft (no, not helicopter) carriers and nuclear-powered submarines. Most of these are banned according to the Japanese constitution, a constitution made by the US after WWII. Why it matters is because having a stronger military will allow us to maintain security in Asia, which is currently done by the US stationed in Japan and worst corea. As far as I know, I haven't seen an article where the UN is opposing the move, and even if they did censure the move, we know the UN is a meme organization. Here's an example of UN's pathetic move:
rt.com/news/320002-japan-manga-porn-ban/

this, despite all that SHILLING

I know that, I'm asking what would be the negative effects/reproductions/etc.

Article 9 was a term of your surrender to the US, so there must be some US-Japan treaty or non-US treaties you would break by repealing.

I've been trying to redpill my family and friends about Trump (just for fun since obviously they can't vote over there), I honestly think Clinton will start WW3, while Trump will do the contrary, focus on internal affairs and """isolationism""" for the first time. Besides, leftards here always contradicted themselves, since they hate globalism, which is exactly what Trump is against.

1992-2000 were the worst years of Israel-US relation.
The Clinton crime family is the most anti-semetic, racist and xenophobic group of people on earth.

Trump. Hillary is WW3.
Though perhaps this time we could fucking stay out of it for once. But knowing my countrymen, we probably will find some reason to go to war with someone.

Literally nothing. In fact, Obama wants the very opposite: he wants Japan to repeal it. Why? Because currently, if Japan were to be attacked by a foreign nation, the US will have to come to the aid. However, if the US were to be attacked by another nation, Japan won't be able to protect the US because of the constitution. In other words, this constitution is cucking your country. If article 9 were to be repealed, then our military will be able to join your side of the war.

Trump. He might be a retard (or really good at pretending to be one) with little experience on foreign politics but that means he'll stay more focused on domestic politics and won't meddle with the world like other Murrican presidents love to. I don't want more shit in the middle east bringing even MORE sandniggers to Europe.

Meanwhile Hillary is a warmongling psycho who might just as well start WW3 because muh evil Russians. I doubt she'd give a fuck if it destroys Europe for good. Fuck her.