Britain for the British! No Islam, no Judaism, no coloureds, no Slavs, no Meds, no Spaniards!
William Martin
Rooooooooooooo
Colton Lopez
So what's your opinion on Trident lads?
In my opnion I would rather the funds go towards the conventional army it seems like we are spending money on a deterrent for a country which hasen't existed in over 25 years. While our Army is seriously underfunded.
We ought to fund both, paid for by a reduction in foreign aid (lowering tariffs on their goods like CAP will help the 3rd world more anyway)
Hudson Brown
Oh shit nigga two of my OC, God speed based Anglo who fixed my png, and God bless my Entente bro here's to 100 anniversary of shitting on Germans
Nicholas Hall
Proletariat thread
Eli White
...
Juan Smith
FUCK OFF
Christopher Foster
Don't need a big army if you have nukes unless you're a Blairite interventionist
Julian Stewart
I agree that we should reduce our foreign aid budget but why not just have a few planes with hydrogen bombs for about 100x less the price.
Andrew Ramirez
>authority = strict immigration >liberty = taxing workers and giving it to scroungers
Fuck these political tests
Jonathan Nguyen
>splitting threads kys
Jayden Richardson
"no"
Gabriel Long
It's much easier to shoot down/track a plane than a submarine. Plus by using missles rather than bombs, we have the ability to potentially launch a nuclear strike at any time.
Oliver Myers
Belgium is a non country
Landon Roberts
He's not ded m8t
Zachary Baker
The logistics of getting a plane airborne with nuclear shit is far to slow and cumbersome, Subs are a great way to deliver it, less able to be targeted too (like with missile silos)
Connor Price
What good will nuclear weapons do you when most wars are fought through national armies. Without sounding like a hitchensbot It's like covering for an alien invasion and forgetting fire damage.
Luke Cox
Planes can get intercepted and launch from conspicuous airbases
The Trident subs can be anywhere anytime and kill you in over 700 ways.
Seriously though, a missile from the sea plummeting from the upper atmosphere is much harder to intercept and you don't want the slightest margin for failure with nuclear weapons.
Cooper White
No one cares. Stop shitposting all day long you nasty cunt
Tyler Wood
...
Bentley Wilson
Bourgeoisie detected
Aaron Butler
Shit wrong reply meant was meant for
Parker Roberts
>tfw spending my Friday nights shitposting on a Vietnamese finger painting forum with fellow autists, shut ins, virgins and NEETs
Who else never expected to end up here?
Owen Rivera
>Nigel will die in your lifetime >Lefties will dance in the streets and celebrate his death just like they did with Maggies
Parker Evans
i'm pretty much just fucking about with the engine at the moment """borrowed""" some duke nukem textures while i was at it
>>Cat’s out of the bag as Treasury reveals Whitehall arrival Gladstone Boris is down with the cat meme
Connor Hernandez
>they will never realise that he saved us all
Joshua Brown
I have made a ballon of nitrous and instead of inhaling it I have tied it off so the cat can play with it. She's only just over a year old, and has never seen a ballon before. Well, at least a proper balloon, not one that was being breathed in and out of.
Gavin Gutierrez
Nige is immortal now m8t. His name will live on through the ages
Christian Foster
>What good will nuclear weapons do you when most wars are fought through national armies
But no one is likely to want to go to war if you have nukes. I'm not saying no army- just a smaller specialised force
Dylan Moore
Fuck off Sadiq, isn't it time to pray? Fuck off Philby, don't you have German rape babies to be making?
Leo Cruz
What's wrong with you, mate? Stop playing with balloons.
Cooper Hernandez
As far as technology is going the so called undetectability of trident is going to be irrelevent very soon. While nuclear war is not ever going to happen in the foreseeable future. Seems like an insane waste of money to me.
William Harris
Apart from every Arabic terrorist group under the sun. What good did nukes do there?
Jordan Martin
the second you lose your nukes argentina is making a run on the falklands
Jonathan Hughes
Yeah this. There is a truism, probably a Churchill quote or something, that says
>The problem with military planning, is that the military is always preparing for the last war.
Thats Trident. We should be thinking about modern security for an independent island state, not some obsolete cold war bull shit.
Invading Iraq was pointless anyway and the terror groups wouldn't exist if Saddam was still in charge. We created that problem (or America did and we joined in)
Asher Sanders
It won't be able to do that if we could actually pay money for a ships to patrol the Island unlike now which would actually make it much easier to invade
Leo Cruz
Conventional warfare results in more death and destruction then pointing a possible apocalypse at somebody.
Trident doesn't need to exist, we just need to pretend it does. This is something lefties fundamentally don't understand, they actually think anyone will ever use Trident.
Theresa May was predictably criticised for saying "yes I will use nukes" with nearly no hesitation, which was the correct response.
Something nobody realises is that in the scenario we would be retaliating, we probably wouldn't have a Prime Minister left (or any politicians, or London, or anything), just isolated military officials who will have the sole decision of where MAD goes ahead or not.
As long as anyone else in the world has nuclear weapons, we should have our own. It's that simple, and as said before, it prevents warfare on the soil of nation states.
Jayden White
I'm a fairly social heir to a yuge sum and I do enjoy Brit/pol/ as a political forum where you can deliver anonymously. I'm also on a train to Moscow and I have nothing else to do, since m'lady is sleeping.
Michael Powell
Degenerate troglodyte.
Noah Campbell
I'm not that surprised, at least sort of talking about politics is kind of good right?
Christian Morgan
Out of date. We need a new system.
Kayden Watson
When you become a Russian oligarch, put in a good word for us at the Kremlin
Alexander Rogers
>tfw
Sebastian Hill
If you have a large army you can treat isolated incidents far better than if you have a small and underfunded force. There is not going to be a wide spread war of any kind that was seen during the second world war face it. A huge number of other european countries do just fine without them and the reason for keeping nukes is the fact that we will not use them? Then what's the point in that.
nuclear is the only way to go, they cost a lot but make up for it in stability, it's only been 71 years since WW2 ended and I have cars older than that.
Eli Sullivan
>REMMYYYYND HIM OF ANEHBODDYYYY???
Samuel Parker
I never stated my support for the Iraq War i'm just stating that they where useless in that campaign.
Joshua Myers
There are about a dozen Blairites here and 1 Tory, if I was Corbyn I could've killed them all.
Nathan Bailey
My boss at my old work, who admittedly wa s stpuid cunt, said that he heard an interview with a retired captain of one of the Polaris subs, and he was asked if he could press the button. He said
>I would first phone her Majesty the Queen.
Armed forced serve the Crown, not the Goverment- and you can be sure Elizabeth and her brood will be 50 ft underground.
Thomas Lewis
>There is not going to be a wide spread war of any kind that was seen during the second world war face it.
And before the world wars happened people thought there was no chance of a war on the scale of the 7 years war happening again...
Name one possible dictator who would be willing to go to war with NATO.
Luke Moore
...
Jaxson Walker
Well yeah of course they're useless for invasions, they're for protection and deterrence
Joseph Roberts
It's a form of terrorism, tbphwy
Jeremiah Gomez
Anyone loving the fact that Germany has committed suicide?
Nicholas Price
Protection and deterrence from what a country that dosen't exist anymore
James Stewart
A weapon doesn't need to be able to be used in all combat situations to be worthwhile. Artillery isn't very useful in counter-terrorism operations, that doesn't mean we should get rid of our artillery
Ryder Flores
>Protection and deterrence from what Continentals.
Eli Lee
Corbryn still would have shot the blairites and spared the Tory if given the choice.
pls don`t tred on snek
Sebastian Gomez
I do have some property in Russia, but I'm a Norwegian-Anglo upper classman, not some insane oil moneyzs Russian bonzo. Get rid of the Trident, forget about Britain being Great.
Joseph Morris
oh shit, did russia poof and vanish and I didn't hear about it?
Samuel Hall
I'm not going to make predictions for what the world will look like in 2050, that would be daft
The point is its unknowable and things can change very fast
Josiah Brown
>wanting a chaotic failed state in one's backyard Be sensible, laddie
Caleb Baker
Theres a rather large difference between artillery and something which costs £100 billion to replace.
Kayden Price
>Protection and deterrence from what
Any country that would want to attack the UK, doesn't have to be specific. And it gives diplomatic power.
Lincoln Powell
When is the last time an aggressor has ended up fighting "just England"? (Falkland training exercise not included).
Charles Allen
You actually think Russia wants to start a nuclear war with 28 Nations?
Joseph Allen
When did you first accept in your heart Kim Jung Un was your lord and saviour
Seeing as Wales was part of england since about the 13th century then the current area we call england hasn't fought a war on its own in hundreds and hundreds of years
Jackson Carter
WE WUZ WARLORDS N SHIEET GET REKT NAPOLEON BRITAIN (+WHOLE EUROPE) > FRANCE
Christopher Barnes
Give me one country and a reason as to why it would want to start a nuclear war with the UK? That's all I ask.
Dominic Johnson
MUH WE BRITS ARE THE GREATEST WARLODS WE CREATED THE WURLD BY CONQUERING NIGGERS
Camden Rodriguez
GOOD MORNING
Matthew Young
I guess so m8. I like talking about politics but I'm too timid to do it IRL and most of my "friends" don't care for politics anyway
Thomas Martinez
>There is not going to be a wide spread war of any kind that was seen during the second world war face it.
Because they have nukes or are allied with countries that also have nukes.
Every country loves nukes because having smaller armies is cheaper and you don't need many people to fight pointless proxy wars in third world shitholes.
The only time nukes will become obsolete is when technology advances to the point where physical defense is literally stronger than any physical offense, at which stage every attack will just be on a cyber level.
For now, nukes are everything. People think the reason WW3 hasn't happened is the fucking EU, they don't realise it's because if you threaten a country the risk of retaliation is 100 times worse than the rewards of invading.
Aiden Kelly
The point is that the world is unpredictable and a lot can chance before 2050
If you wait until you've identified the threat in order to start building you nuclear submarines you're a bit fucked aren't you
Grayson Brooks
It was just a meme lad, stop spurging out, calm down
