Do you like capitalism?

Do you like capitalism?

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/29/headteacher-defends-policy-of-putting-pupils-in-lunch-isolation
abcnews.go.com/US/vegetable-garden-brings-criminal-charges-oak-park-michigan/story?id=14047214
youtube.com/watch?v=NUkU18MrBzU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

What the fuck is lunch isolation.
Just bring your own damn food to school wtf

Your text and image do not fit together. Try better next time.

if this is a private school, then it's a shitty one that wont last
if this is a public school, then this is an example of socialism, because the free market didnt provide it

It's a charter school.

Seems like a nice school. I basically went through high school going through "Lunch Isolation" everyday and didn't even receive a "Sandwhich," or a piece of fruit.

No. The people who make the lunches should be forced to work for free.

>look! hey guys look!
>somebody did something bad here!! and it involves capitalism!
>OMG CAPITALISM IS SO BAD I'M NOW A COMMUNIST! INSTEAD OF MY CHILD NOT EATING LUNCH NO CHILDREN WILL EAT LUNCH! THIS SURELY WILL FIX THE PROBLEM!

lol, capitalism is the fucking best, commie

A what school?
Why is it trading in pounds?

In the UK from secondary onward kids are expected to buy lunch from the canteen. The kids from poor families are given tokens that can be used to buy food at the canteen.

Poor people shouldn't be supported by anyone, it's like feeding rats. The swarm needs to be thinned.

eh, then it prolly wont be around long, or it will have to change its policy thanks to the free market. but yeah, you'd totally rather have massive starvation and forced labor tho, amirite?

>In the UK from secondary onward kids are expected to buy lunch from the canteen. The kids from poor families are given tokens that can be used to buy food at the canteen.

What is wrong with having poorfags bring their own sammies? Also, are Britain's school lunches still as shit as that Jamie Oliver show depicted it years ago?

Of course I do, without capitalism I wouldn't be able to browse a Norwegian lumberjack board.

so how is that capitalism? ignorant here, serious question

In my old public school we had free lunches if you couldn't pay

You probably have to pay to go to that school anyways

This has nothing to do with capitalism

Having to pay for anything is capitalism it seems.

>you did not pay for things that your child ate
>if you continue to avoid payment your child will eat shitty food

Seems like a pretty lax policy to me. Beggars can't be choosers.

Presumably OP's idea is that it's because in a socialist system, the lunches would (likely) be paid for with tax money.

Although since capitalism isn't fundamentally incompatible with a certain degree of tax funded ventures and welfare system, it's not entirely accurate.

To be honest, I find the social isolation the far more disturbing part. It should be entirely possible to opt out of these meals without the school facilitating your child being ostracized.

well, now i get it
but isn't it more accurate to say that in socialist system, nothing would be 'paid' and- oh wait thats communism.

so socialist system means public services would be done with tax money, but why should school cafeteria be such? school is for learning. true socialism might feed the poor, but won't give schools money on the side just to make lunch for students. or am i wrong?

£15 for lunch?
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?

>tfw got free lunch in school
>bought extra almost everyday even though I wasn't supposed to
Fuck I miss my school's breakfasts and lunch

Holy shit I just noticed that.
In my school you could buy an extra meal for a dollar, and that was just a few years ago

Honestly, socialism as a concept is pretty vague, but most of the people who lean towards it today would probably argue that it isn't fair for the children to suffer from their parents' lack of wealth or poor decisions, and that free school meals are a good way to ensure that everybody gets proper nutritioning growing up, as well as ensuring they have the necessary energy to concentrate during class.

These people want school to even the odds in society and give everybody the same chance of success regardless of background, and this informs their stance.

Is a 'term' in UK schools 1 week? I kind of assumed it was 75,- per semester or something, not per week..

The solution for that is to only charge those who cannot afford it, which should be everyone. If the parents can afford things like alcohol, their lunches should absolutely not be subsidized.

>pay or we shame your child for being poor

God Bless America.

Well, you can lay that kind of responsibility at the feet of a working adult, but I do think there's something to the idea that it isn't really the fault of the child if their parent is a drunken layabout. Although if that means the parents are protected from the consequences of their poor decisions as a result, we do have a problem, and there needs to be some way of incentivizing proper behavior and punishing poor behavior on the part of the parents in this regard.

Don't have children if you can't afford to feed them.

>Pay up, or face free lunch

Also

>Not packing your kids lunch to save money and provide better nutrition

>would probably argue that it isn't fair for the children to suffer from their parents' lack of wealth or poor decisions
school cafeteria is for everyone tough, if they want just poor people to get help they need to feed the poor directly. why letting the education system cut extra profits with it? if they really must regulate kids nutrinial intake, why not do it with people bent on this task, like a new govermental body that is responsible for the food of the citizans?
well, i'd be happy if socialists could definee what they want, would make it easier to point out their flaws. demending social justice without claryfing how and what really ticks me off.

This is the headmaster

LOL are you as cucked as new zealand?

jesus christ i have like more types of food on my property than i care to remember.

grow a fucking apple, bring one for the teacher, and one for you. WHY ARE PEOPLE PAYING FIAT FOR FUCKING SHIT THAT GROWS ON GOD DAMN TREEZ WHAT ARE YOU IDIOTS EATING, CHILD BLOOD?

Then it should be included in the fee for the school and be a requirement for every school in the nation that they provide lunch free.

They still get fed? Jesus fucking Christ stop whining you fucking faggot, maybe don't buy your next car on HP and actually control the number of handbags your wife buys and you might be able to afford a measly £75

I'm all for capitalism but when it comes to schools i think it should be extremely socialistic. I think a good way to ween people off of welfare is to just make their kids go to school longer, feed them at least two meals a day, provide them with materials, and do a dress a code. This way niggers wont get their welfare checks to get their nails did and feed their kids cheetos

Holy shit this woman sounds like a complete cunt:

theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/29/headteacher-defends-policy-of-putting-pupils-in-lunch-isolation

They get a sandwich and a piece of fruit even if they don't pay, in places where every other person doesn't need a mobility scooter that's absolutely fine for lunch

Oh so I spent my entire youth in lunch isolation
Haha I thought it was because everybody ignored me and I had no friends
Thanks for clearing things up OP

>As cucked as new zealand
what did he mean by this?

With socialism all the kids can have the sandwich and piece of fruit only.

Yes I like capitalism, it's free and voluntary trade with no coercion. It's the most moral system of economics we have.

It's very simple: if you income is above a certain amount, you have to pay for lunch for your child if he or she is in a state school, and you have to send your child to school.

Kek, the lunch merchant

People in education know damn well that punishing the kid is the surest way to get the parents to react, calling them on the phone and yelling shit at them doesn't achieve anything.

Also, the kid is still given something to eat, it's not like the school lets him starve. The parents are to blame if they're not able to afford food for their kid and pay on time. If the school doesn't punish profiteers firmly, nobody has any incentive to pay for the food.

it's illegal in new zealand to grow your own food in a garden or whatever.

yeah that triggered the piss outa me

Sounds nutritional.

Well again, there are lots of different schools of thought. It's easiest if you have someone belonging to a certain party, because then you can use their party program as a basis.

But in a more socialist oriented country, schools themselves would probably be owned and directed by the state wholesale, or - like in Sweden - all schools are provided by the government with a certain amount of money per student for which they are expected to provide adequate education, these schools being both privately owned and state owned (strictly speaking municipally owned, but you get the point.) In this kind of system all kids, regardless of how well off their parents are, get free school and one free meal as part of going to school each weekday. These meals are regulated so as to contain all the various types of nutrition children need as part of a healthy diet.

Why cant Americans bring their own food to school? Doesnt your mothers love you?

>These meals are regulated so as to contain all the various types of nutrition children need as part of a healthy diet.

Jamal's semen.

>don't pay for optional school lunches
>instead of bringing your own lunch you whine and complain and demand not to have to pay for the extra service the school provides
Wew. In America all the niggers and spics got coupons for free school lunches. I assume it works similarly in yurop.

Hell yeah, the poor should be isolated.

Rofl we had our own apple and fejoa trees and we lived 5 mins drive from city centre, nobody gives a shit

Sounds nice.
How much are the taxes rates in those states?

That is considered adequately satisfied during the mandatory shower after each P.E. class.

the 'eat-and-dash' people should.

>> mendatory schooling is capitalism

Go away leddit gaf

Isn't Denmark overrun with muslims and rapefugees? How are we a homogenous country?

I'd just tell my kid to eat lunch in isolation because who the fuck cares and save all that money on lunch. All they need is a sandwich and piece of fruit anyway.

because most poor people where who are on benefits just buy alcohol or things they dont need, and it depends from school to school

I can only speak for Sweden in this regard. Here, schools are either owned privately, or by municipalities. These are funded by the municipalities (obviously), but municipal tax rate varies wildly across the country.

We pay taxes on three levels, municipal, region, and state, and each level is responsible for different things. School is one of, if not the, biggest expense for municipalities, and therefore immigrant dominated cities like Malmö have much, much higher tax rates than more well-off areas, because of the immense costs associated with that along with the much lower incomes you have to tax.

The system is kind of falling apart, though it isn't because it is inherently bad, but rather because of rampant immigration. It worked decently well before.

There's another aspect to it though, which is the regulations private schools are subject to. They're far too lenient with regards to solvency and profits, and a lot of multinational businesses have systematized setting up schools, sucking out profits, and then selling or entering bankruptcy having moved all the money to other companies. Then those students are left going to municipal schools, which ends up making it very difficult for them.

Also, the shift from state owned (which we had before) to municipally owned schools was a disaster as well. The municipalities frankly don't know what they're doing and don't have the resources.

But in theory it's a very nice system, because any child can pursue good grades with which to go to the university, get a good degree, and a well paid job. It's still possible for any decently motivated child to work their way through it and become successful even today, this I know from personal experience.

had or have?
sorry, i don't care if a law is not enforced, i care only what laws are on the books.

Pay for your kid's lunch, for god's sake. Do you think the people there work for free? Would you work for free?

That said, seems like a shitty school. Maybe enroll your kid at another one. If this isn't a private school then it has nothing to do with capitalism and you should literally commit suicide for posting this.

That's from The UK
But The US does this too, yeah.
You get free lunches if your family is poor though.

If primary education were truly capitalist, but the same amount of public money was available, there would be private entities out-R&Ding each other to come up with educational methods of turning out robotics engineers by age 12, and they'd still be delivering billions to shareholders.

Edgy

We sold the property, hell if I know if they're still there.
People everywhere grow their own shit, unlike america where it is legitimately illegal to have your own garden
abcnews.go.com/US/vegetable-garden-brings-criminal-charges-oak-park-michigan/story?id=14047214

Unlike america, new zealand isn't a police state that restricts your freedoms, we can even buy automatic weapons.

ok, sorry, shoudn't have asked.

To give a more concrete answer, municipal tax rate is usually roughly 30%, although it's subject to a certain degree of reduction depending on how much money you earn.

education is not a right. it's a privledge. don't know why everyone gets this so confused other than muh gibmedats4muhkidz

yeah that's cool you can cite for me. don't expect me to cite for you, especially with your denial of my accusation.
what's the courts followup on said cites?

I don't mind, the more people know what's gone wrong the better the chances of it being fixed or avoided.

The main thing to take away from this is that multiculturalism makes proper schooling all but impossible.

Why don't you just pay for the lunches, nigger?

I can't tell if you're some bored CTR shill on their lunch break shitposting for laughs at this point

Let me spell it out for you in baby words.
If you grow your own food in america you go to jail, if you grow your own food in new zealand you go to the markets.

How it is privilege instead of right? Explain to me.

AAhAHAHAhHAha oh fuck me, fucking brits man. ohhhh shit

I don't remember school lunches working like that at all, you either went into a line and paid, brought your own or got it free. Seems fake.

Besides, who the fuck eats from the school? The food is awful, they've put me off mash for life. Fucking mash was rock solid and cold.

Rights don't entitle you to stuff from others.

Not getting punched in the face is a right. Having food is not a right.

Whether you view it as a privilege or a right, what's important in my view is that giving every child a good basic education is beneficial to the economy, overall quality of life, and scientific progress.

The more people have good basic education, the more people are eligible for higher education. That means more engineers who can build up the country, more scientists who can find better ways of doing things, more qualified workers for well paid jobs who can contribute to the economy.

Rights and privileges are on a level with "muh feels" arguments. What's important is how to build a strong and successful society.

I agree with this. I would much rather pledge my allegiance to a psychotic occultist warlord, and prey on smug rich fucks.

youtube.com/watch?v=NUkU18MrBzU

no. what's important is chosing for your self what you want to do in life. your argument boils down to you need slaves.

It pretty much does, finland's a good example of this, we get free meals in school and no one bitches about it except edgy capitalists like you.

Actually every people in this world should have a right to eat healthy and nutrious food. But because selfish people like you we will never have good things, gg.

A term was about three months for me.

Fuck off commie

Capitalism is buying the ingredients to make your own lunch without having to rely on a system to feed you

Stop being so edgy you're scaring everyone.

Where you at cambro

The Deputy Head sounds like a fucking pussy with a faggoty ass name.

And this.

Is she Jewish?

What are you on? I never received school food and neither did my classmates. Bringing your own food is perfectly normal

But i received because i live in the best country in the world, deal with it.

It's not even a private/public school. What is going on. I'd expect it for that.
Also £75 for school dinners. That's called a monopoly. They should allow in private caterers who can charge reasonable prices for something more than a bit of pasta and a muffin.
Literally that is what is most incredible. What can they be eating that is worth £13 for a lunch? Caviar?

IDK sounds pretty based to me

>Katherine Birbalsingh, 43, is known for her speech at the 2010 Tory conference, in which she said the education system was 'broken' and 'blinded by leftist ideology'

>all this autists itt

I wonder why most of you don't have any friends irl

>They should allow in private caterers who can charge reasonable prices
So a cafeteria shuld be run for profit?

Your economy paid for your stupid food. Literally no free lunch

>Hello, welcome to the private school you voluntarily opted for. We offer a cafeteria service, would you like to use it or will you be preparing food for your child to bring from home?
>Cafeteria please
>That will be £75
>No
>Well all right, but your child won't be able to eat in the cafeteria
>STOP USING MAH POOR CHILD AS LEVERAGE HE IS INNOCENT AND YOU SHOULD GIVE HIM FREE FOOD YOU EVIL CAPUTALIST PIG

yes. you should have paid for what you got. now you go hungry faggot.

Yes because our system works you know, only sandniggers and other nignog lowlifes are trying to ruin it atm.

It worked at my school. Private caterers provided much of the food. It was generally decent food for an ok price and people still got free school meals. It was better than the not for profit primary school food I had. You also had the option of bringing packed lunch or going out in the village during lunch/free time and buying food there.