Facebook could face extra $5bn tax bill after US investigation

>Facebook could be liable to pay between $3 to $5bn in extra US tax after an extensive investigation by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) into the way the tech company transferred assets to Ireland.

>The tax agency has been exploring whether Facebook deliberately deployed complex financial processes designed to minimize the amount of US tax it paid.

>The IRS began investigating Facebook in 2013 over assets it had transferred in 2010 to its base in Dublin. Ireland is known for its corporation-friendly tax structures; it has a corporate tax rate of 12.5%, compared to the US rate of 35% and 21% in the UK.
theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/29/facebook-us-tax-investigation-irs-ireland

Cuckerberg is finished

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_arrangement
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_Lerner#2013_controversy
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

If only.

They won't pay it

>The tax agency has been exploring whether Facebook deliberately deployed complex financial processes designed to minimize the amount of US tax it paid.

You know, that is one of the questions that didn't even need to be asked.

Facebook is too valuable, the governments love spreading propaganda and having everybody's information without doing any investigations at their fingertips

Facebook will be fine

dat ass

How it's actually going to work:

>IRS finds Facebook hasn't paid shit, owes billions.
>Proves it
>Makes a big stink about it publicly.
>Quietly accepts a ~$10M dollar payment.
>Closes up the case.
That's how this happens, every fucking time. Our government has never, nor will it ever, bare its fangs against these kinds of faggots.

They'll get off for pennies on the dollar and go right back to doing the same exact thing.

>>The tax agency has been exploring whether Facebook deliberately deployed complex financial processes designed to minimize the amount of US tax it paid.
Since when does tax avoidance by this means constitute tax evasion?

>Ireland is known for its corporation-friendly tax structures; it has a corporate tax rate of 12.5%, compared to the US rate of 35% and 21% in the UK.
There are plenty of countries with corporate tax rates below 12.5%. Why not transfer assets there?

>Since when does tax avoidance by this means constitute tax evasion?
Since FACTA was passed.

Because potato niggers had giant loopholes m8. They grossly understate how friendly the tax structure is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_arrangement

The poor children.

Move along folks, nothing to see here.

>the coo of facebook endorsed hillary
>they literally don't even pay taxes

top kek

fuck taxes

As long as they are following the law, literally nothing wrong with it. It's the IRS's own fucking fault for having loopholes, and every corporation has a duty to minimize their payments to the government as much as possible.

Mate, literally nobody in history got away from the IRS. It's not a meme when people say if the IRS is after you you're done.

Hell if you'd really want Hilary gone, forget the FBI, you should put the IRS after her, see what happen...

>zuckberg goes to China
>takes everything with him
>China give it back
>no

Why?
This way they can get a few extra billion shekels or seize it and run it themselves

The IRS is headed by Obama appointees who protect their political friends.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_Lerner#2013_controversy

By the way, this means the group being investigated for deleting tons of emails that could have implicated them also happens to be the groups investigating the Clinton Foundation.

But there are countries with zero corporate tax.

Kikeberg von Coinblatt avoiding tax?

Color me surprised

>the state is going to seize a social media platform

>Dat ass