Why do burgers use maps for non-map data so much?

Why do burgers use maps for non-map data so much?

Like here for elections we just have a chart with maybe turnout or something about the voters; and they have it not just with elections

>russian "elections"

RUSSSSSSSSSSSSIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Because statehood comes before country. It isn't just a texan thing

this is true.
But has absolutely nothing to do with this thread

He just asked why we make maps for data that doesn't need a map faggot. It's because we want to know where the data comes from on a state by state basis. It's a part of our state tribalism

How are regional distributions of elections not interesting and not worth putting on maps?

In Russia if region does not vote for Putin they get terrorist attack

>Russian doesn't know what an election looks like
Very depressing

t. 2 party system

>t. one party system.

USA isn't a normal country, we are a union of states

>"election"
2 party system lol

Faggot there's been elections where states have voted for third parties.

murica is cuck'd

>Having a party that represents less than 50% of the country rule

2.5 party system lol

30 party system lol
Too many options

And never has that actually mattered, but we's freedom to vote n shieeeet

>Dixiecrats
>When you're still so assblasted about losing the civil war that you have to create a new regional political party just to forward your backwards neo-Confederate ideology 100 years later.

Kek

Roosevelt created the progressive party as a big fuck you to the republican party, guaranteeing them a loss by splitting the vote.

We don't know who will win ahead of time, so we like to track how a state will turn out as it tells us how their electoral college delegate will vote.

>1968
>still relevant in any way at all

>elections
>russia

County level results is very relevant data.

Clinton became president because of Ross Perot running.

They more clearly allow us to see how god awful the south is.

No but it's still interesting. I know that third party splits are unlikely today. Hell, we let a socialist run as a dem and a authoritarian nationalist run as a republican, one of which won the presidency!

It's funny how pol always talks about how California is a tumor and the rest of the country supports it when it's really the other way around.

Sup Forums are generally massive hypocrites. The same way they try to justify it when Whites chimp out, but loose their shit because Star Wars casted a Black actor.

California is a tumor though. Unless you are some uber capitalist who cares about MUH FEDERAL GOVMENT, who cares how much fedbux those states get?

How is California a tumor? We're the largest generator of economic activity, contribute more than any other state and have the largest industrial and agricultural bases in the country even though we are more regulated than the rest of the county.

Why is this a problem? We still get to pick who the parties put up to run in the general. For better or worse, somebody like Trump winning is a clear testament to the fact that American elections are definitely NOT controlled by our deep state. We are given the full right of making idiotic bad decisions.

How is california is tumor when it's running the american econony? I don't get it

implying trump AND hillary arent run by the same people

>Like here for elections

Does it really matter what kind of graphs or statistic they show you?

No. Trump is a populist who has shit on the deep pockets that fund hilldawg. He can do this because he's a billionaire himself. They're both still pretty shitty tho

>when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and make a garbage Reddit-tier post about it anyway

Really, I think I nailed it spot on. The Dixiecrats were formed because the national mainline Democratic party was getting too cozy with the nigs for the liking of the Southern Democratic establishment.

>Hillary would have axed TPP
>Hillary would have put a right-leaning judge on the Supreme Court
>Hillary would have gutted Obamacare in the tax bill
>Hillary would have instated a Muslim travel ban
>Hillary would have pulled us out of the Paris climate agreement
>Hillary would have moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and then cut funding to the UN for trying to block the move

“no”
We’d probably be at war with Syria right now if Hillary was president.

no shit. Doesn't have anything to do with the civil war or "neo-Confederates" though. Northern autism doesn't permit anything to happen here without it being tied to it somehow, but we're always accused of being obsessed with it.

Because you're fucking Dixiecrat politicians were trying to push Black vs White non-equality bullshit just like they were during the Confederacy.

Economic activity is less important than mental and spiritual health. California drags the entire country down with sjw policies and the encouragement of mass migration.

California actually pours it's own money into mental health programs while Republicans from your bible belt hellholes actively cut budgets from public health programs. As far a "spiritual health" goes you fuckers don't practice what you preach. There's more corruption, graft, suicide, inequality and substance abuse bullshit going on in your part of the country too.

there is nothing wrong with that

>Mass migration
Reminder that even poor Mexican migrants here have a higher average income and standard of living than the average D*xieshits.

>Russian election maps

All the businesses are leaving California for places like Texas though.

D. Medvedev (Russian president 2008-2012) (Blue)
Baykonur (I don’t know)
Territoriya za Predelami Rf (Territory * President *)
Basically the map is trying to show that Medvedev won with 100% (t. North Korea)

Translate the rest of the words ruski

Medvedev won with 71%, including every constituency as well as Baikonur and the votes abroad

The upper map shows the winning party vote in the territorial election commissions, the lower map shows the party of the winner and his vote in the single mandate constituencies.

Predelami - means "outside". Territory outside Russian Federation

That's been debunked. There was a short time for a few months where that was true, but that hasn't been the case for more than a few years. Texas isn't Dixie either, never refer to it as anything other than Texas. Dixie doesn't even begin to compare to Padre Tejas.

>For better or worse, somebody like Trump winning is a clear testament to the fact that American elections are definitely NOT controlled by our deep state.
AAAAHHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA
*inhales*
AHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAAAAAAA

You assume that a one-year glimpse at a state's deficit is a good model for judging it's spending habits.

It is not.

California is a net drain.

Forgot image

>We're the largest generator of economic activity,
That has more to do with your high population and strategic location than anything else.
>contribute more than any other state
That hasn't been true in 40 years.
>have the largest industrial and agricultural bases
Not largest. Most profitable. There is a difference. California focuses on the the production of luxury goods rather than on staples. Your total yeild is lower than many other states, but that is more that made up for by higher profit margins.