Alright boys, Time to rev up those shit posting engines!

Alright boys, Time to rev up those shit posting engines!

>go to isidewith.com/
>take the fuggin test
>post some results

No cheating either you faggots, post your actual results, here's mine

Other urls found in this thread:

isidewith.com/poll/1566865877/962379
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

Did it a while ago:

52% Trump

68% Bernie

92% Hillary

And yet I would still vote for the God Emperor if I was murican

all about that johnson

>cucks, cucks everywhere

How can you even "agree" with Trump? He has no policies, only random talking points that he backs out of the next day.

How does open borders johnson and build a wall trump score the same on immigration...

And you only agree with trump on 7 points and Johnson on 9

So CTR is pushing Johnson as well.
Thanks for the confirmation.

...

...

Idk why it went Spanish after I wanted less immigration

How come Trump and Johnsons pictures arent in the same location as Stein Sanders and Clinton?

You guys fucking suck at photoshop.

And pretty sure your job might be illegal.

Das rite.

Oh and fuck Hillary, to be crystal clear.

Similar to the nebulous blob of Hillary's random talking points.

Hmmm, I'm really thinkin' now

Get fucked niggers

Illiterates everywhere

I'm surprised

>Should the Senate hold hearings and a vote on President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee?
>Yes, the Senate should follow their Constitutional responsibility

how come liberals are incapable of reading and understanding the constitution at every fucking turn?
It's like a fucking mental disorder.

>and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court,
WHERE DOES IT SAY RESPONSIBILITY?
They don't have to do jack or shit. If they don't give consent, too fucking bad.

Johnson is a waste of a vote, so Trump it is.

Wtf i hate trump now

wowee

How did I do?

Wanting to fund NASA means I'm a Jillshill? shieeeeet

oh well

>how come liberals are incapable of reading and understanding the constitution at every fucking turn?
>It's like a fucking mental disorder.
They're stupid.

>people unironically getting johnson as #1 or #2
he's a liberal that doesn't want to pay taxes

this is also an intelligence test. you failed

Looks like wanting clean energy is what did it for me, but w/e.

Test seems accurate.

the test is retarded in that regard

Wanting to legalize and tax marijuana put me in the Jill and Hillary category when it came to criminal issues

easy.

it means you're retarded

add weight to your issues you dips

also
isidewith.com/poll/1566865877/962379
>19% of libertarians want to ban muslims from entering
>same exact % as democrats
this is why people make fun of lolbertarians

these cucks probably want to fund illegal immigration and import more muslims

These two results are within months of eachother. I got redpilled

This will probably load up sideways cause mobile

>leaf is less cucked than most americans in this thread
don't even know what to say

I have failed you, Sup Forums.

Am I cucked?

Albertan so that helps
>voted wild rose in provincial
>voted conservative in federal
Just fuck my country up senpai

it just means you're a pussy and misinformed.

minimum wage isnt a free market component
common core is wrong
nobody should be forced to pay for abortions or illegal aliens
nobody should be forced to pay for the welfare of refugees
when you give government permission to spend money, they waste and lose the vast majority of it

the more you read, the more you research, the more you find out im right.

Relax, friend. There's no need to be upset.

>Economic and Social issues
Bruh, pro-tip: gibs destroyed the black family in America. It incentives single mothers which causes high crime rates and low scholastic interests

truth, welfare doesnt only put money in play, to be lost and stolen by government - but it ruins the recipients by making them do-nothing cunts

I don't support unemployment benefits, but I do support redistribution schemes like Rubio's plan to increase tax benefits to low paid full time workers. Unfortunately the test is too simplistic to allow that level of policy specification.

less than him

thank god you're just a kiwi

>Liberally biased political quiz is overly simplistic
Not completely shocking

That's true. Also, I don't think it is completely fair on candidates like Trump. e.g., I thought government should increase funding to NASA and rated it my highest answer, because space is the future, and it aligned far more strongly with Jill and Hillary than it did Trump. They have Trump as saying space is not important, even though we know he has spoken positively of it 3 times.

Damn, wanted Hilary to be lower.

>They have Trump as saying space is not important,
wat
he literally has buzz aldrin and newt 'moonase' gingrich as advisors
he's repeatedly said he loves space exploration

>Should the government fund space travel?
>Donald Trump’s answer: No, the government should leave human space travel to private companies.

Because they don't have a private space company question, it means he is classified as anti-space exploration. Moreover, every other candidate is pro-space exploration despite the fact that (as you mentioned) he's been probably more pro-space than any other candidate.

NASA is pretty shit though
I hate all the circlejerk it gets when it doesn't get fucking shit done anymore
fun fact: NASA's ""small"" budget is bigger than the entire EU + Canada + AUS + NZ space program budget combined.

here you go guys.

>NASA is pretty shit though

It's a remarkable agency with a very small budget. Space is only a part of its remit, it is an aeronautical agency, it conducts research that contributes to civilian and USAF industries.

If you want ot look at the boss of all government agencies, check out the Department of Energy.

They are the special forces of all agencies.

How is nobody here matching with the paleoconservative Constitution Party?

NASA doesn't do anything anymore.
They still have people employed that were there when we had people on the moon. This is what happens with government jobs.

It was my top match.
I'm surprised they even fielded a candidate this year, their 2012 candidate endorsed Trump last October.

>le stealth drumpf XDDXDDXXDXD

Castle seems more right-libertarian than anything else.

83% trump and Johnson

Muh results

>NASA doesn't do anything anymore.

I suggest you take a look at NASA's website to review its current programme.

>They still have people employed that were there when we had people on the moon

This is not true.

During the Apollo Program NASA's budget was nearly 5% of the US's GDP; they employed an army of technnicians, engineers, scientists, etc...

probs, our libertarian party is just an anti-poor people liberal party

>I suggest you take a look at NASA's website to review its current programme.
List some things they've done lately that are half as impressive as what's being done in the free market on tinier budgets.
>During the Apollo Program NASA's budget was nearly 5% of the US's GDP; they employed an army of technnicians, engineers, scientists, etc...
adjusted for inflation the budget has barely changed
surprise, our economy grew.

Well shit

Do you understand that the free market you speak of like space x only exists because of nasa contracts and partnerships? Do you want this taken away? Elon Musk wants to go to Mars. His first ship is going to rely on nasa comm sats and nasa Mars survey sats.

>New grounds
Man 2004 was 186 years ago. Feels bad

That Gary "meme" Johnson tho

Well, that was expected.

Voting for Trump

>88% Trump
>tfw even on that KEK is with trump

>List some things they've done lately that are half as impressive as what's being done in the free market on tinier budgets.

"Free market"????

Where?

NASA is currently developing the SLS: this is an explorer class rocket that can place thirty metric tons of payload anywhere in the solar system.

That was a fucking shit-ton of questions.

Gary Johnson is my number one pick anyways.
But contrary to this listing, I'd have trump over Stein or Hillary any day of the week.

hmmm

GOVERNMENT OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I wish Trump respected the environment and science.

no u

noice

...

...

...

Hmm. How about that. I was planning on voting for Johnson, so it's good that my gut works out. Too bad about the Emperor, I love his immigration stuff (could never vote for Stein or Hills due to their stances).

I'll probably vote Trump anyway, so I don't totally waste my vote.

Who the fuck is Darrell Castle? Is he a ((()))?

Not too bad

I have no idea

...

I actually filled this out honestly. I'm amazed how well Trump and I match.

#MAGA

>implying that supporting the Constitution is bad
pic related

Reasonable people like you are hard to find.

Done

...

Hey do they calculate how much you align with Trump if Trump has no policies?

That's funny, last time I took this it came up Sanders and at the time I supported him and Trump. Now I'm most likely to vote Stein as I'm registered in CA and it came up Trump.

I did notice that none of the questions related to getting corporations out of the political process which is the most important issue for me

Just build that wall up.

BOI

Nice.

Am I a Nazi?

If you expand the sections so you can "answer more questions about X" and expand the "additional answers" one of them was about corporations being unable to donate money to any political campaign because they're not people.

If you look under "Candidates you side with by issue" and click the main topics, you can compare your answers to the test with the candidates' answers.

Voting Trump.