2016

>2016
>still falling for "trickle down" economics

>2016 thinking the lower class deserves anything

>2016
>still thinking this doesn't happen naturally because that's how money moves eventually

wew lad, wouldn't it be great if you all read a book on economics

>still thinking this doesn't happen naturally because that's how money moves eventually

How the fuck does that make it okay?

How does percentage of wealth translate into goods and services?

You can look at the graph and see that income equality exploded under Reagan and the during the 1920s under Republicans. Basically whenever Republicans get in they fuck over the country.

>implying economy is zero-sum game

It makes it inevitable and therefore is whining about it pointless.

It only 'moves this way naturally' because of current policies.

Reading Wealth of Nations doesn't make you an economic genius dutchy, give up the game.

Shot up the most under Clinton and Obama. Actually stalled during Bush Jr. Under most of Reagan's reign, both classes were going up

>still falling for "trickle down" economics


Looking at the graph Regan years actually disproves your theory.
Might want to work on your assumptions there, Murat.

>still not exterminating the bottom half of the population

>kill all the jews
>give their money to the state/make it not exists
>this deflates the currency
I see no problem with this.
You're forgetting that the top 1% of the 1% is mostly bankers and financeers.
Who are jewish.

The rich get richer
>this surely means products don't get cheaper
>this surely means more people will be unemployed
Wealth inequality is a meme issue because the economy isn't static, this is why you don't listen to young people
20 year olds are poorer than 40 year olds cause they lack skills, but in their youth they're all "SOCIALISM NOW, MY DAD HAS A HOUSE BUT I DONT"

>they still think this isn't a problem.
The us economy will soon collapse and only the poor will take the bill.
>the 50's and 60's, when the inequality was lowest, saw the greatest growth in the economy
>Sup Forums glosses over this era and doesn't know low income inequality was the cause for such good economy.

Don't look at differences in wealth or income, look at differences in law/ legal priviledges you idiots.

At this point it shouldn't be a secret that wealth is made only thanks to the legal framework. The more political it is, the worse the outcome. The more trully ethical it is, the more prosperity to fucking everyone.

Agreed. It'll correct again.

>2016
>Still not realizing that socioeconomic classes are a meme
>Not realizing they're mostly the same people in different stages of life

"Trickle down economics" doesn't exist.

Correlation=/=causation, pic related. Labor arbitrage was still yet a thing in the 50s and 60s so workers had the ability to demand more from their labor. Additionally, there was an added boon to the economy from using America's productive capacity to help rebuild Europe.

In other words, the differences in income growth and wealth are the result of something, not the cause.

>class doesn't exist

Most Americans really believe they'll be J.P. Morgan in just a couple of years

>the poor get richer
>the rich get richer faster because they have more skill and more capital

>expecting anything other than inequality

why is this a problem? the poor are not getting poorer. And the only way to quickly improve their situation is to increase their skill because they waste wealth that is handed out to them

Nice meme

In many cases the overwhelming majority of wealth produced is going to the upper class, so it's not like everyone is better off in every way.

Why does this look like my country

Ya Sup Forums are the biggest fucking suckers on the planet. Trump has MASSIVE tax cuts for the rich. Seriously I feel sorry for you losers.

Enjoy your $250 you right wing retards. Meanwhile millionaires get back tons of money they don't need and the national debt goes up $30 TRILLION. AHAHAHA fucking morons.

So the inequality in the US increased a lot during the government of a Marxist democrat? Really makes you think huh

You end up moving towards a rentier economy as the ratio of wealth concentrates faster and faster and the poor have to borrow from the wealthy at interest and your economy ends up becoming centrally planned by the people who under-write, analyze, trade, and sell securities.

>Marxist
wew lad

>during the worst: hyperinflation, production crises, international incidents, and massive unemployment since WW2, wealth inequality was at its least
>STUPID REAGAN LOL

Underrated they think they gone do it and so they dont want a real change

Whos falling for it? When liberals werent a bunch of cunts fighting to keep everyone stupid and on welfare they were right about this being a horrible idea.

Regean was a failure as a conservative and republicans were assholes.

There's no such thing as trickle down economics in economy books