Can someone explain to me why the economic development of Indian states does not correlate with skin colour, as it does with most other countries?
I have read about differences in skin colour with regards to the caste system, but I am still unsure as to why states like Tamil Nadu, Kerala (+ Sri Lanka when considering their genetic similarities) end up so developed.
And also why Pakistan/Afghanistan are comparatively underdeveloped.
Other urls found in this thread:
qz.com
sbm.gov.in
m.timesofindia.com
livemint.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Kerala seems pretty fucking nice
would visit
Northern Indians are dirty, superstitious, inbred, low IQ, violent subhumans
Anyone who’s ever been to South Asia will tell you this
Daily reminder that India is developing at an insane pace
Dumb nazi
aryans are true subhumans
Modi is a great leader
...
North Indian states are poor for the same reasons why many Eastern European countries are poor. Its a largely agrarian and ultra-conservative society. While, sothern states have a history of maritime trade and are used to foreign cultures.
>why the economic development of Indian states does not correlate with skin colour, as it does with most other countries
t. brainlet
Modi is an economically illiterate retard with a fake degree.
lol no. India is notorious for fudging GDP figures. Countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam will have a much better future than Indian thanks to their booming Manufacturing industry.
Why do people on Sup Forums hate India so much? Even Sup Forums is more respectful
it's the end result of european fuckery
some regions got shafted, others didn't
seems like street shitting is mostly an east indian disorder, excluding bengalis and those eastern states which are mostly non indian ethnically
>Even Sup Forums is more respectful
The only reason Sup Forums tolerates India is because Modi and his right wing fanbois dream about genociding muslims, like he did in 2002.
In reality, India replaced a Cambridge and Oxford educated PM with a hindu nationalist simpleton.
Indians love him though, and the economy is doing great. Fuck off you imbecile
that's because Sup Forums has the meme flags were Indians can pretend to not be Indian and roleplay as respectful individuals towards India.
I don't believe those stats. Show me a source
>Indians love him though,
No shit. 3rd world countries love authoritarian strongmen who promise miracles.
>and the economy is doing great
retarded policies like demonetization and lack of reforms in the manufacturing sector have started to take a toll on their economy. Even the IT sector is suffering
qz.com
That Cambridge educated PM hated India and himself though.
>That Cambridge educated PM hated India
Well, anyone that's educated does.
Oh now I see, you're mad because muh authoritarianism
lol cry me a river faggot
southern india is browner but richer,basically this
This
The economy is tanking for the past two years actually and job growth is in the negative.
India has a government program that gives people toilets. Problem is they don't like using them.
i don't want to be pedantic but having a toilet doesn't mean the population is using them. you don't just build a toilet and say that you've fixed open defecation when people don't use it.
I hope that's true, but it sounds too good to be real.
India develops despite its government, not becaue of it
Because skin color causing development is a fucking meme
Meanwhile India is a total shithole growing maybe 6% a year
GDP growth doesn't mean an economy is strong. Australia's economy has shown consistent growth for the longest period in history, but anyone can tell you we're heading for an imminent crash
The economy is growing slower than China’s and China is like 10 times richer
>I hope that's true
Its not. One of the states that is reported to have 100% toilets also has the largest tribal populations in India.
Because almost everywhere else in the world (notably excluding East Asia) a lighter skin tone indicates a higher degree of European admixture.
But it does correlates in India, and still the southern, less-euro admixed states are better off
europeans aren't genetically superior in any way, they just lived in conditions that were conducive to the development of complex societies
Ancient Indo-European mixture isn't the same as colonial mixture.
dumb cunt
>conditions
Such as?
Not being niggers or sandniggers
livestock and domesticable animals
arable land and a climate to allow storage of carbohydrate vegetation
geography that encouraged communication and trade as well as building disease resistance
etc
That doesn't mean anything. 70000 people got laid off earlier this year. Agriculture on which 605 population depends is in the fucking dump. More people are losing jobs than gaining them.
I think it has to do with the caste system in northern India being older.
The Brahmins obviously have all the genes for intelligence while the casteless have genes for pooping on the streets and begging. The latter make up the majority of Indians.
Tamil kingdoms and spice trade basically.
Leb baby was offered guns germs and steel for Christmas
it's a good book
Wait you mean like the incredibly fertile land in Rhodesia and Mediterranean-esque climate in our Cape? What about the Middle-East and Levant too? That's where most of our civilisation started and yet they never reached the same heights.
Too bad it’s the only one you ever read
we have a winner here
africa had some of the required conditions but lacked a lot of the others which made progress impossible
the middle east had more, which is why society did develop there
I'd love to here you disprove its arguments beyond calling me a lebo
The book isn’t wrong it’s uncomplete because the main factor of progress is culture
We humans live in a world of ideas
It’s Europe’s ideas that allowed them to do get on top, nothing else
And what about Africa today? They have been in touch with European society for almost half a millennium and yet most of them still struggle to grow their own food. And before you say "oppression", most of the continent has seen nothing but foreign investment for the past 50 years and has only deteriorated.
And then you have the Americas where the environment was particularly conducive, but still they were thousands of years behind before colonisation.
Friendly reminder that the most developed state in India has been dominated by the communist party since the 1960s.
>And then you have the Americas
I’ll stop you right there. First of all, civilizations did develop you stupid shit. Second of all, not having horses or any animals capable of work was a massive barrier.
He didn’t say there were no civilizations in the americas you braindead beaner
Based Irmão
t. Goan
I bet you post on r/india
>Goa
>76.22
>Gujarat
>100
Go fuck yourself faggot. I’m an Indian and this is absolutely bullshit.
The book has heavily been criticized by historians and anthropologists particularly for the environment factor and broad generalizations you are arguing for.
Anthropologist Jason Antrosio describes Guns, Germs, and Steel as a form of 'academic porn'. Diamond’s account makes all the factors of European domination a product of a distant and accidental history and has almost no role for human agency–the ability people have to make decisions and influence outcomes. Europeans become inadvertent, accidental conquerors. Natives succumb passively to their fate. "Jared Diamond has done a huge disservice to the telling of human history. He has tremendously distorted the role of domestication and agriculture in that history. Unfortunately his story-telling abilities are so compelling that he has seduced a generation of college-educated readers."
And it's core is basically a 19th century theory used as proof for eugenics.
Maybe coast lines that were long associated with trade and shiet (including trade outposts) plus maritime resources are more developed than inner regions.
That Kerala region get a lot of revenue remmitances according to some Indian anons from people working overseas specially in some gulf arab countries and bringing the money home.
All indian states are black skinned, every indian I've seen here was black skinned.
Wasn't Kerala governed by commies for decades?
Good to know they're getting on that shit
>Pakistan/Afghanistan are comparatively underdeveloped.
Corruption. Plus they've both been at war. Afghanistan in particular hasn't been in stable state for almost 40 years now.
Available loos != pooing in the loo
India is making progress but it is absurd to expect people who always shitted in the streets to suddenly start pooing in the loo.
>surges
Meanwhile Singapore is growing almost as fast as India. A far richer country per capita.
south indians have a purer pajeet culture and are also very autistic
north indians have more invader culture (islamic and horsenegro before them) so they're more prone to just shitting on the floor and raping.
t. north indian
r/China is worse. Mad sexpats and cringy english teachers + HK.
Yes, Singapore is richer than India, what are you trying to prove by that? What is your point? I don't understand you.
Sup Forums is full with sandniggers
Liberate South India from Muslim rape babies!
>>Bangladesh
>>Vietnam
>>Better future than India
This is a HOT take.
...
Ah yes, those "Intelligence genes" that have... yet to be identified...
Because not all toilets are made the same.
>And what about Africa today? They have been in touch with European society for almost half a millennium and yet most of them still struggle to grow their own food. And before you say "oppression", most of the continent has seen nothing but foreign investment for the past 50 years and has only deteriorated.
Are you legit retarded?