Quoting another user from the other DChad enlightenment thread.
"Let me give you something to think about:
I'm not even convinced Clark said "Martha" anymore. I think that's just how far gone Bruce was. He was going to hear whatever it took to stop him from going through with something he knew was wrong. Watch the scene again and watch how Clark reacts to him. Watch how when Lois shows up, Clark starts saying "mother," and Bruce still responds saying "Martha," and how Clark looks sort of confused by it."
Whoa, this really was just too deep for modern audiences to understand
Easton Bailey
>saying your mothers first name with your dying breath to force a plot point
BRAVO DC BRAVO
Aaron Perez
are you mad that this pile of steaming garbage will never measure up to that glorious movie?
Jaxon Barnes
Holy shit
Jackson Ross
haha sure thing bro haha you need help
Sebastian Clark
you need help if you actually liked this movie lmao
Carson Ramirez
Ah yes, but if there's even a 1% chance this theory is wrong, we have to take that as an absolute certainty.
Joseph Sanchez
>MARTHA >A jar of piss >Jolly ranchers >Dude emails lmao >Obvious, unsubtle Christ imagery
Truly too deep too understand
Oliver Cox
This movie is the incarnation of "2deep4u" for retards, teenagers or both. (Usually both) People seems to think that if a movie uses symbolism in any kind (especially about God) it must be a masterpiece, when in reality even a retard can pull that off, just look for christian or hebrew theology, try to put it in a """subtle""" way and voilà, you're 2deep4u. Don't believe me? Just watch the most 2deep4u anime, Evangelion, the company literally put a shit ton of symbolism because it looked "cool" and fans overanalyze that to death. Get over it, symbolism is the greatest way to try to look smarter than you actually are. This movie was bad in several technical aspects, it will never be a "Masterpiece".
Cameron Peterson
everything you cited is entry level thinking which goes to show how truly pleb you are.
Jaxson Sanchez
>US worship of power >Post 9/11 social examination >Attack on the media >Government hypocrisy/guilt >pop culture deconstruction
Look deeper you fucking pleb.
Bentley Garcia
Half or all the themes you mentioned have been common themes in a lot of movies, again not that deep, kiddo. Even Godzilla have at least 3 of those themes, not so special, huh? Go to Keep crying, your movie is not that good, accept it.
Nicholas Anderson
Wow, its like when you imagine the movie to do things that didnt happen it makes better.
Like I always imagine that Palpatine used the force to stun the jedi that threatened him, it makes sense if you watch the movie, the jedi just sort of stand there and die.
John Taylor
Affleck's remark, "I'm real when it's useful," at first sight adheres to the postmodern solipsistic and relativistic modes. This is confirmed by Terrio when questioned about his research for Justice League, which included "red- and blueshifts in physics". However, on further inspection, Affleck's comment simultaneously reinspects Husserl's and Wittgenstein's "form of life". This invariably leads to a more pragmatic worldview, as Pierce declares "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object." Affleck further confirms the pragmatic totality when approaching Miller and Momoa: >"So you're fast." >"You can talk to fish." Reality as it operates in Snyder films, isn't subservient to language, they work in tandem. This leads as back to Eastern philosophy, the Hinduist Guru Mantra becomes another mythopoetical jigsaw piece in the totality of Justice League. As Brody succintly observed, "Even at his most pedestrian or bombastic, Snyder makes a far more engaging film than Christopher Nolan (an executive producer of “Batman v Superman”) ever did—because Nolan presumes to know and to show, whereas Snyder wants to see. Even his slender philosophical world seems like he’s discovering it, not delivering it."
Caleb Scott
The main theme of Snyder's "Batman v Superman" on spiritual dematerialism is not eschatological, but a phenomenological ontology. Thus he implies that we have to choose between predialectic construction and deconstructivist neodialectic theory, essentially Heideggerian as seen in the concept of Dasein. The subject is interpolated then into a cinematic dematerialism that includes spirituality as a whole. But if the Kierkegaardian worldview holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of expression and atomism. In Snyder's own "Man of Steel" he has a character say that "the world's too big”. Inherent in this is how the function of Lebenswelt (cinematically translated by Snyder as "world of life") operates in all his films, chiefly in "Sucker Punch" and "300". We see a phenomenological approach to the world showing a cinematic logic that presupposes a structural constraint in rootedness, another intentionality central to his filmography and philosophy. Because "metaphysical comfort" is not an object of temporality per se, but rather an aspect of automatic condition, as suggested by Cavell. Hermeneutic interpretations are also apparent in his post-"Watchmen" movies; in fact the interchangeable subjectivities are but another representation of Husserl's and Wittgenstein's "form of life". As his academic hero Heidegger succintly noted, "freedom is the ‘abyss’ of Dasein, its groundless or absent ground". This is essentially the thesis operating in Snyder's films.
Connor Hall
A+ copy pasta
Because it's literally true
Charles Carter
Which Transformer movie was that?
Anthony Davis
Forgot Manhattan's blue penis
Bentley Carter
“Art is intrinsically meaningless,” says Ben Affleck. The primary theme of BvS' analysis of Sontagist camp is a mythopoetical totality. The characteristic theme of the works of Snyder is the common ground between society and language. But the premise of dialectic superheroism holds that the establishment is capable of social comment. The subject is interpolated into a social realism that includes narrativity as a whole.
“Society is unattainable,” says Kal-El. It could be said that Luthor uses the term ‘neomaterial desituationism’ to denote not sublimation, but presublimation. If social realism holds, the works of Snyder are an example of purposeful superhero movies, also known as "capekino."
In a sense, Marveldrones promote the use of postdeconstructive objectivism to attack capekino. The subject is contextualised into a neomaterial desituationism that includes reality as a reality.
But dialectic superheroism suggests that culture serves to entrench outmoded, elitist perceptions of capeshit. Terrio uses the term ‘neomaterial desituationism’ to denote a self-supporting totality.
Gabriel Bennett
How does it feel to overanalyze retarded quotes? Nice copy pasta, now explain it with your words.
Charles Phillips
I am still waiting for a master thesis on Manhattan's huge blue dong
Jack Bennett
pure kino
Jayden Ortiz
What the fuck?
Dominic Brown
If you can't recognize that BvS is about all the above, then you have no merit in any of your criticism
Bentley Carter
What do Jolly ranchers have to do with 'Attack on the media'?
Henry Watson
you fucking dicklet, the lists arent correlated.
holy shit
Owen Morgan
Did you catch it when Alfred referenced The Phantasm?
Levi Stewart
What do jolly ranchers have to do with anything on that list?
Jeremiah James
>The Greatest Movie Mankind Has Ever Created
Joshua Morgan
The Greatest Film* Mankind Has Ever Created
Angel Kelly
Plz
Andrew Gray
DChads, you're the only good thing about this board.
WW was fun, but it just felt like a good marvel movie.
