capitalists will defend this

> capitalists will defend this

you've got it all wrong

>Hey pal, I noticed you're in need of a bridge - I'll build you one... for a price.

No thats a libertarian

>not charging people to cross the bridge
How is that retarded image capitalism?

WITH WHAT?

no i wont

>Please return saw and rope when done
He's clearly breaking some law, so no, nobody would defend this made-up scenario.

Oh boy, another simplified childish cartoon used to deconstruct a complicated issue with many facets into yet another strawman to beat up to reinforce pre-conceived notions.

>remains of broken bridge on his side
>tree stumps on his side
>Who knows what materials lie off panel
>Can still build his own bridge
>Could just walk around
>Would rather complain
Sounds accurate

Capitalism is a commie meme.

The answer to oligopoly is removing artificial barriers to work like bad licensing and having not retarded shareholders.

Stumps.

>Free saw and rope
>Someone stole my saw and rope

>Free stuff
>Someone took all the free stuff

only a socialist could have made this image..

> having not retarded shareholders
You are battling thermodynamics here.

that* image

pretty sure thats communism.

1 ruling party crosses the bridge then makes sure nobody else can cross.

Capitalism is more like

>get loan from the Goldblatt brothers
>buy materials for bridge
>hire wageslaves to build bridge
>charge people to cross bridge
>start paying back loan
>bridge builder gets richer and so do the Goldblatt's

Real capitalist would just charge people to use his bridge and make a profit

This and nothing but this.

>WITH WHAT!
I dunno, maybe take a nice tug on the fucking bridge hanging the hell down the gully and recycle it like you fucking hippies love to preach about.

>Not knowing how the free market works

No thats a librarian

I don't get it

How is this capitalism?

Even in this scenario, this guy would go to a bank or to the Small Business Administration and get a loan, buy his tools, labor, and supply of wood, build the bridge, and then charge people crossing it

>inb4 loans are Jewish

he said HE WOULD build him one. Just for a price

It's like a 10 foot gap, just jump it faggot.

I can dream can't I? Tbh there's no reason people shouldn't be more knowledgeable about the market, almost all the info is right there, in front of them.

>le economics is a zero sum game maymay

Third post best post

That's not capitalism.
Capitalism would be to build a bridge then charge the locals if they want to use it.
>don't like it? use a boat!

A real example from Scotland, btw.

Underrated

Wouldn't the guy on the left just develop a new and more efficient bridge building technique?

this is just low creativity

People are right there in front of you, yet you cant grasp the basic humanitarian knowledge.

I gotta admit you're confusing me. Can I get an explanation on humanitarian knowledge?

Humanities. Knowledge about humans.

>Implying economics is zero sum

Shiggy, my friend.

>"evil" guy on a suit with money screaming at a "poor" guy without
Every time

>Don't be a dope
>Bin that rope

Actually, in capitalism, the guy on the other side wouldn't have cut the bridge, and would be charging money to cross it to the guy who came later.

>Who knows what materials lie off panel
kek'd

i agree, thats why 15 dollar minimum wage is fine

Trees are a renewable resource

Pic is the border of Haiti and Dominican Republic.

Why 15? Why not 150? or 1500?

That filthy communist probably destroyed all the rope and trees on his side and was about to cross over until that brave soul cut the bridge.

madden muh think

1 post by this ID

Keep on slidin

i dunno, economics isn't zero sum so apparently it doesn't matter

Haiti needs to import some Indians to fertilize their soil

>The world is small enough to fit in a frame.

Ok commiefag, fuck off.

Looks like Keynesian Economics to me

really makes me go "huh, that's a very valid point sir"

This. Liberal still complaining even though 90 percent of the work is literally already done for him.

You are the reason why Dilma got elected and our country is shittier than ever.

If this is an analogy for well-off entrepreneurs vs low-class entrepreneurs it should go more like this

>upper class business owner lives on a forested flatland
>cuts down all the trees near him
>builds bridge across canyon
>owns it and charges everyone to cross it

>lower class BO lives in the mountains
>has to climb up and down the mountain to get lumber
>also builds a bridge and charges people

Hes just keeping the niggers out.whats the problem here?

wtf i hate socialism now

really makes you think

A capitalist will charge a toll for crossing the bridge.

An entrepreneur will find another way across, then undercut the capitalist with the new method across.

Lol

>only a socialist could have made this image..
Was Churchill talking about the poublic sector of the economy like roads and bridges?

Or was he talking about nationalized industries, a centrally planned economy and no private ownership of anything.

If it's the former, then you're a retard for thinking that roads a bridges are somehow a "shared misery"

If it's the latter, then you're a retard for thinking that any well-performing capitalistic economy would be at risk of becoming socialistic.

Either way...

>please return saw and rope
>communal goods
>commie

Also why'd he push the giant spool of rope across? To sell it back? Oh no just to be a dick
>seems legit

>Spend days of work to build bridge.
>Cut rope cause "lol no one else uses my bridge
>Anyone with half a brain would understand that they could benefit from that hard work by providing a service for a price to others
I'm just convinced leftist have no concept of business management even at this basic level so they'd rather destroy what they cannot understand like savages

...

>>All the people have a bridge that didn't exist to use for various reasons bettering their existence
Everyone wins here

*youre

the other guy should say
WAIT WHAT??