Dan Aykroyd is sliming the 2016 Ghostbusters reboot

Apart from die-hards who criticized the new direction of the film before it was released, the film garnered favorable reviews and went on to gross $229 million worldwide (with $128.3 million of that coming from domestic ticket sales) against a production budget of $144 million. Aykroyd earlier this week ripped Feig over his spending on reshoots. In the post, Aykroyd seems praises the cast.

>Paul Feig made a good movie and had a superb cast and plenty of money to do it. We just wish he had been more inclusive to the originators. It cost everyone as it is unlikely Kristen, Leslie, Melissa and Kate will ever reprise their roles as Ghostbusters which is sad.

While Aykroyd stayed away from addressing his initial claim that the film’s reshoots cost in the neighborhood of $30 million to $40 the focus of his latest message clearly is on the use of the original actors in the film. Murray clearly had the largest role of the remaining three actors from the original (Ramis got a nod with a golden bust bearing his likeness at the beginning of the film), followed by Hudson and Aykroyd – who arguably had the shortest and most thankless cameo in the film.

Sony Pictures has revealed to us that the cost of reshoots for 2016’s Ghostbusters reboot were $3-4 million and not the $30-40 million that actor Dan Aykroyd had previously claimed. Aykroyd recently laid into Paul Feig on the UK’s Sunday Brunch chat show, saying that the Ghostbusters director “spent too much on it”, thereby severely limiting the film’s ability to recoup its massive budget.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=w96oTapYTKk
youtube.com/watch?v=oVCd50LXPGY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

bump

heh...

nice source kid...

*teleports away*

He's a sell out though, the movie was a farce set up by Sony's dyke feminist bitch, Amy What's her face. All of them were forced to be in it because of some deal they signed eons ago. it's like the Shit Awakens, the cast were all made to sign contracts and then Disney took over. So them being in the new shit series was not at all by choice. That's why Harrison Ford in nearly every interview said outright, I don't care. Literally he said he didn't care. With GB the maxi pad edition, Murray's face during the press Junkets said it all.

Amy wasted money on this abomination and on the Steve Jobs film no one saw. She's a retarded dyke.

Nobody cared about the original ghostbusters they just wanted a reason to say "I hate women grr"

Is Dan being serious or he's just saying nice things to that atrocity to keep in the good light of Holywood?

Deadline and Aykroyds FB

Hollywood needs to die or we need an alternative to Hollywood. A bit of history. White men made movies in New York, the Jews were not allowed to play so they went west and did the Hollywood bit. The white man allowed the Jews to do their own thing, now the Jews won't allow the white man to do his own thing. Much like the liberals pandered for control of the narrative, now that they're at the helm,they're refusing anyone else a voice even a voice that's against theirs. If you'd remember, the establisment allowed punk and other genres that insulted them to freely do whatever, now that the Liberal Paradigm controls it all if you even say one thing against anything they're doing you're immediately ostracized and opposed.

If you believe that then you're retarded.

The Steve Jobs film no one saw was great and could have been better if Fincher hadn't walked away. He walked because she wouldn't give up $5 million more for the budget.

Yet spending $30-$40 million on reshoots for this turd is apparently money well spent.

A Konrad Zuse movie would have been awesome, or maybe even a movie about the Fall of Wallstreet, why another Jobs movie?

Well no one gave a shit about the embarrassing Ashton Kutcher one

youtube.com/watch?v=w96oTapYTKk

>the Jews were not allowed to play
>The white man allowed the Jews to do their own thing

you're an idiot

Not at all. The Jews were allowed to do their thing and they subversively took it all over and now no one else is allowed to do what they did. Irony.


in all Honesty i haven't seen Amy's version because of her emails and because I hate her. But Ashton version was so much meh. It was beyond him.

>Apart from die-hards who criticized the new direction of the film before it was released
We criticized it because Paul Faggot said he didn't want it to be like the other films and to be his own project. Which right off the bat would mean no electromagnetic twinkie, no psychomagnotheric slime, no Gozer, no Vigo, a shitty stay puft and slimer cameo, no nothing.
Just a couple of old hags who have no business making a Ghostbusters movie save for Melissa McCarthy because she had actually seen the other movies, joking about queefs and Leslie Jones playing some Sambo blackface racial stereotype which was an affront to Winston who was actually cool and played down the whole "I'm black" shit.
Maybe if they tried again without that talentless hack of a director and actually decided to use some of Ackroyd's ideas, and not shit on the established fanbase, it might actually make some money.
But no, Sony will shitcan it forever as a dead franchise because they put too much stock into a meme movie just to pat themselves on the back as such strong progressives! in this shitty shallow world that doesn't even give a fuck.

Remember it was announced before Feig even gave them a clue with what he was doing or had put pen to paper all he had was ALL FEMALE GHOSTBUSTERS.

>vehemently defend a film for MONTHS
>when it finally comes out, don't see it
what did feminists mean by this?

The best thing is, is that for better or worse, the success of Wonder Woman absolutely blows them fuckers out of the water.

It was always about the quality of the product

>the film garnered favorable reviews
No it didn't. Show me 1 review that was favourable

I think what was meant is that jews weren't allowed in white productions, while white producers didn't bat an eye to jews making their own production.

>what? the old closeted homosex is sorry he ruined his legacy for a few lousy shekels you say?

Of course he is

Ackroyd's main gig before the reboot was pretending they were gonna make ghostbusters 3

>Hating based Dan

Fuck off, his cameo was great

They mean they were doing pai propaganda and only fags and nerd boys were expected to show up, but they didn't. The handful of feminists alone can't make a $150 millions movie profitable.Who do you think made WW successful, male fags

youtube.com/watch?v=oVCd50LXPGY

>Sony Pictures has revealed to us that the cost of reshoots for 2016’s Ghostbusters reboot were $3-4 million and not the $30-40

Hollywood accountants making those zeros come and go at will

No, the reason people went west was to avoid copyright laws in NY.

that movies fucking great

reddit get out

fucking christ Dan, Ramis isn't even in the ground yet

What?

Aykroyd is literally autistic, and carries a police badge on him in wherever he goes.

Of course he's going to be triggered by a movie

SHUT UP FAGGIT DAN

>he WATCHED that garbage

enjoy your programming

yeah im sure it was totes safe to watch.. no covert cia brainwashing in it at all. and look here you are defending it..

hollywood will eventually collapse under it's own weight. ticket prices are exorbitant, and movie budgets are so bloated that it takes the entire global gross to make back the budget many times.

but there's still the occasional gem that shines through all the shit, and it's really easy to spot them too.

Del Toro is still a passionate director who actually puts effort into what he does, David Leitch and Chad Stahelski have so far shown lots of promise with John Wick as their first directing/producing role, you just need to filter out the crap and keep an eye out for potential gems, and then support those movies while ignoring the rest.

>thinking you can criticize a movie without watching it

That their hobby is actually complaining. They're born for battle. That's what keyboard warriors actually do.
>WE wuN DIVERSITy!!
>Diversity added
>RACISM!
>Diversity not added
>RACISM!
>Diversity added with just the right amount of political correctness.
>Whatever I didn't see the movie, HEY, THAT GAME I NEVER PLAYED IS SEXIST!!!!1111
Don't catter to these people's needs. It won't work.

>It was always about the quality of the product
No, Wonder Woman wasn't a Wonder Man turned into a Wonder Woman

Ghostbusters was about a crew of garbage men who shouldn't have been women at all.

Thank god Obama is out of office, maybe they will dial it back on this SJW cancer.

hah, with Trump in office? no chance. they are gonna ramp it up to 11 as they go into full on self destruct over "REEE RAPIST SEXIST BIGOT NOTMUHPRESIDENT REE""

that said, that will end up killing SJW shit, because people will get tired of the autism, and they wont have the federal govt openly pushing the sjw propaganda anymore

Eh, that's comparing apples to oranges.

The Ghostbusters remake shoehorned women into originally-male roles: it was forced diversity -- or what-have-you.

Wonder Woman is still fronted by a woman. If they changed genders and had a man playing Wonder Women, then you could compare it.

I was moreso comparing the marketing and media hype regarding both films before hand.

Both were similar and both ended in very different ways

The shills cited misogyny as the reason male nerds where hating their shitshow, NOT that it was forced diversity / sexchanged. Wonder Woman proves male nerds WILL go see a movie fronted by a woman (actually Alien proved this way back in 1979 but still...).

I wouldn't really call him a sellout since he had no choice in the matter. He had to give into the studio because he was contracted to do so.

Amy's leaked emails revealed their intent well enough.

>people

Jews are people? I said the White men stayed in New York and the Jews went west.

>HURR I R SO EDGY XD

But that's the thing though, the only reason why a better taker isn't out there is because the Jews has tied up everything. You can't make a movie without certain prerequisites, chief among these distribution of which the Jews has tied up. You're not going to use any theater that shows jew Programming. The Jews threatens them all the time in fact Disney threatened several IMAX theaters to have only The Shit awakens omitting guys like Quintin Tarantino, even. These people are evil. Just remember the emails of Amy and her entourage of evil, and notice how threatening they were, "If the Original Cast of Ghostbusters doesn't do it then we'll ensure they never work in this town again."

>Paul Feig made a good movie

Not really. He made a bad movie with a very positive and marketable brand name.

Steve jobs is actually an amazing movie and really ripped into what a piece of shit he really was

Figures that a CUNT like Amy Pascal would be good at making a hit piece.

Yes, the Jew knows how to threaten you into a do or die situation. They did the same thing with Hamil. They insisted that George bring the original cast in before the deal was sealed all the while dyke Kennedy and her harem of liars reassured George they'd give his sequel a try, so of Course George reassured Harrison and Mark and Carrie all was well, not knowing that dyke Kennedy was a piece of shit disguised as an actual human being.

These ones aren't. And the ones who controls the EU and are forcing the immigration invasion aren't. They're the ones Hitler, although a Jew himself, warned us about.

>DURR I R TEH EDGIEST EVAR XD

You're an odd ball. I'm being serious and you're just posting nonsense. Come on man, we're being serious here, at least try to understand how the world works. See why Dan was trapped into loving this ghastly film.

.HURR Y U NO TAK ME SERIOS WHAN I SEY JOOS ARNT PEEPLE???

>Nobody involved with the production of Ghostbusters (2016) cared about the original ghostbusters they just wanted a reason to say "FUCK men and FUCK drumpf"
Fix'd.

That's one triggered merchant replying to you, boy howdy.

>DURR ANY1 WHO THINK JOOS ARE PEEPL MUS B A JOO!

it got favourable reviews because anyome who went to see it had already decided to like it

I haven't seen the originals, saw the trailer, looked like utter shit, didn't go see it, didn't review it, didn't discuss it on the internet.

>didn't discuss it on the internet

Until now

ironically so. I might've also a posted a misogynistic racist manbaby comment when I originally saw the trailer

>You will not post any of the following outside of Sup Forums: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases, macro image replies, indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?"

Remember the jew's posts are reportable

Murray was pretty much forced to do it wasn't he? Anyone have the leaked email with the details?

but how is this? is it worth binging?

>100 KB JPGbut how is this? is it worth binging?

Yes, but only the season 1/syndicated season (first 78 episodes).

Once the voice cast changes, bail out.

>That episode where they fight a Kthulhu worshipping cult and then squidface himself
yes, you should.

Yeah Sony threatened to sue him

>100 KB JPGbut how is this? is it worth binging?

While not all episodes are as good as others in terms or writing and especially animation, it has aged miles better than pretty much any other 80s cartoon. It can be really funny and, when it wants to be, the animation can be very good/spooky.

It'll surprise you, at least for the first season or two (when it become Slimer and the Real Ghostbusters, the show goes full retard and becomes unwatchable).

>watching 78 episodes of a kids cartoon show intended to sell toys from a recognizable franchise
I bet you're the type of person who has movies playing on the 2nd screen then claims to have seen them

thanks. it just landed on netflix

These people are autistic, user. Only autists watch toy-shilling 80s cartoons past the age of 10 and consider them objectively good by any measure.

Don't be an autist.

I saw him on Kimmel and he looked totally out of it. He waited like 3 seconds after the clip they showed to laugh,that was the funniest part of that shit.

*tips*

So it really comes down to the white man creating his own problems, again. How are whites superior?

*tips fedora*

how deluded are you from reality if you think rewatching 80s saturday morning cartoons, not 5 minutes from youtube as a gag but for 78 episodes, isn't the epitome of neckbeard fedora basement behaviour?

No opinion any celebrity expresses is ever worth listening to, especially regarding a product or studio they are legally tied to.

[Tipping intensifies]

He might be a prick

But he makes some good vodka

they should have just made it a sequel.

>2 women tired of their jobs at silicon valley company. decide to take on a Ghostbuster Franchise in San Jose.
>they don't have the start up capital or the technical expertise. though fortune smiles on them when they meet a female engineer who just sold her start up to google.
>they open up and bust some ghosts. Though they are working even more than they were at Initech
>they get Hemsworth, disgraced internet CEO, to be their receptionist and general business manager.
>then leslie jones is an iraq war veteran, looking for work. she was the only one willing to do something so dangerous for so little pay.
>the antagonist is the ghost of an ancient dead sorcerer for ming dynasty chinese emperor. his remains brought into the US by accident inside a sealed vase. he stirs up ghosts all over the bay area.

That was the plan until Ramis died wasnt it?

sure, why not. better than what we got.

I had the idea that it should be a a group of women who know one another in a building, and one of them is this chick that believes in ghosts and begins to detect them. Her skeptical friend becomes a believer one night when she and her encounter a ghost and after this they try to convince the other two, one who is an engineer and the other just a teacher at the local highschool. they build their own ghost catching devices out of vacuums and other junk (with the engineer's help.) and try to capture all the ghosts in the building even when people in it and the land lord think they're crazy.

That is such a "The studio demands you retract that" statement.

The insane budget is well known. They spent at least $5million on a scene they cut and most of the cast were massively overpaid.

Fuck you, Dan, nobody was talking about this hogwash until you brought it back up. It sucks, we get it.

>5 gorjillian on a scene

this is hollywoods biggest fucking problem. Look at wonder woman, it cot them at least 150 million to make, and it's going to be profitable sure, but thats probably 40 million more than they needed to spend. If you cut that end fight/light show, how much would that have saved? and I understand the need for famouse actors in the movies (part of the reason Pirates did better financially in the world market than WW despite sucking hard) but do you need 10 different high paid actors in your movie?

>everything Jews do is a reaction to poi-secution
There were no "movies." Edison invented a little thirty-second Flintstones' Youtube, called a Nickelodeon because it worked on a nickel. NYC Jews set up arcades of them and showed porn. They were about to get in massive legal trouble, both for showing porn and for ripping off Edison. So they went West and built Hollywood from the ground up -- three (3) Jews who were originally from the same village in Russian-occupied Poland.

The Jews are just slippery. It's like they lull you into false security then bury you a handful of dirt at a time all the while giving you a hand job making you think you're in control when you're just dying slowly under their manipulative control.


Don't know what he's so sensitive about. If anything he should be proud.

>the film garnered favorable reviews

Not here.

And now look what they've done, they've raped it all to hell, haven't they. So Thomas Edison showed something purposeful and Mr Jew went with pron? Sup Forums was right, Sup Forums was RIGHT! And now Dan Aykroyd's too afraid to say anything contrary to what they're selling. Hey, who owns the rights to Nickelodians? The flintsone thirty second thing, not the channel. I know Jew owns the channel.

There are certain actors who do bring in numbers though in fairness.

Could you imagine for example, a Pirates movie without Johnny Depp in it? If such a thing ever happened, the box office return on that movie would fucking tank, so they pay Depp absurds amounts to tie him in.

The anons in this thread are more fucked than Dan

What did he mean by this?

>Pirates movie without Johnny Depp in it? If such a thing ever happened, the box office return on that movie would fucking tank

i hate that you're right. there should really be no more pirates movies, and if there are, they should have just been about Geoffrey rush as barbosa AKA the best character in the series.