Why are gays sociall accepted in the West but pedophiles are not? that's not fair

why are gays sociall accepted in the West but pedophiles are not? that's not fair.

>inb4 I'm a pedophile
I'm not a pedophile, but just curious

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_and_the_LGBT_community#Depression.2C_anxiety.2C_and_suicide
niams.nih.gov/health_info/Bone/Bone_Health/Pregnancy/default.asp
pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/4/e1229
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Piss off nonce

>no slippery slope they said
>pedos and animalfuckers will stay in their place they said

lmao post source

>age of consent

JUST CURIOUS ABOUT FUCKING KIDS?

FUCKING SICKO

men are pedophile

women are zoophyle

WHY ARE HETEROSEXUAL ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

text on the bottom says "how to identify", so I think its implying if you hold a childs hand in public you are a pedophile

WHY ARE LAUNDROMATS ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

Because pedophiles are rapists

>what is age of consent

WHY IS AN ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

pedophiles and homosexuals are the same in that they are both sexual minorities, boys

It is from wikihow clearly.

Gay people like people of the same gender. Being of the same gender does not form a clearly hierarchical and easily abused relationship.

This is different for a relationship between an adult and a child.

Now stop being a degenerate.

Never nuke a country twice

Who says we accept them?

WHY ARE MEN WITH LARGE PENISES ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

WHY ARE WOMEN WHO DO FAKE LESBIAN SCENES IN STRAIGHT PORN ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

WHY ARE PEOPLE WHO WOULD WILLINGLY HAVE SEX WITH YOU WITHOUT BEIN GPAID ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

WHY ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE FETISHES ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

WHY ARE MEN WHO DON'T MASTURBATE ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

WHY ARE MORMONS ACCEPTED IN THE WEST BUT PEDOPHILES ARE NOT?

Those aren't sexual preferences that were originally defined by multiple medical associations and psychology handbooks as mental illnesses.

Children aren't capable of making informed decisions and are easily manipulated. Sexual contact with children is also detrimental to their mental health and long term development.

Pedophiles disregard this and still do unspeakable things to them.

Broken argument given that history books also wrote that our world was flat and was created by a skydaddy however.

MASTURBATION WAS DEFINED AS MENTAL ILLNESS

SOMEONE DOESN'T KNOW HIS HISTORY

LOOK UP "PLAIN FACTS FOR OLD AND YOUNG" by Dr. JOHN HARVEY KELLOGG, MD

CUT OFF PIECES OF GIRLS TO STOP IT

SEW UP LITTLE BOYS' COCKS

BURN GIRLS WITH CARBOLIC ACID!

YES, VERY BAD.

ABANDON CHILDREN IN THE WOODS TO DIE IF THEY WON'T STOP "SELF HARM"

What does that have to do with all the retardation in , though, other than being a broken argument?

Also my argument is not broken, its why the two things are forever linked, plus the enormous pedophile population within the homosexual community and susceptibility both groups have to other mental illnesses.

Yes, that is why anime watching forever alone virgins who vote trump have a social value exactly in between gays and pedophiles.

THAT REPLY MAKES NO SENSE

oK

>Also my argument is not broken, its why the two things are forever linked, plus the enormous pedophile population within the homosexual community and susceptibility both groups have to other mental illnesses.

BLAH BLAH BLAH

I am saying they aren't NOT mentally ill and even gays are more functional in society and always have been.

I'm a pedophile and don't really think the AoC should be lowered to allow for legal sex with children. Which is a hard thing to say because I believe it's possible for adults and children to have sex without anyone getting hurt or traumatized, but on the whole I think children are too vulnerable to open them up to the predation of adults. They are too easily manipulated and exploited.

You have a massive inequality in reasoning, experience, and strength between two parties in a child-adult relationship. One person has virtually all the power. That's a very dangerous relationship that depends entirely on the benevolence of the person with power. It's similar to a monarchy or other autocratic state: sure it's perfect if the leader is a benevolent and competent, but what if he isn't? Then a lot of people are going to suffer.

Not all pedophiles are rapists and molesters, but enough of us are that it's better if we aren't given license to prey on children at will.

I think you're only imagining a situation where the two people don't love each other.

...

>I'm a pedophile
Kys

I AM REALLY FULL OF CARING ABOUT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING

Maybe when have thought about it for an hour or so you can come up with six more terrible metaphors that don't make sense.

I HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT IT

IT'S A MENTAL ILLNESS WHEN IT'S IN THE PAST BY 80 YEARS BUT NOT WHEN IT'S IN THE PAST BY 50 YEARS OR WHEN IT'S IN THE PAST BY 100 YEARS.

YES, MAKES SENSE!!!

SPECIALLY WHEN COMBINED WITH AUTISTIC INABILITY TO SEE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CATEGORIES

Sex is complicated guys! the base act of sex that has been the reason life has made it to now and is done by almosr everything is too hard to understand! Forget that we make a big deal out of most of the stuff around sex (outside of STDs,pregancy,and people using people(which happens reguardless of age)) and cause most of the issuse with our love of sysmpthizing with vicims instead of actually carring about those spposed victems that might not feel that way untill it's beat into them after hearing about how damaged they are now, instead of moving on. Love it!

in all of human history pedophilia was probably never less accepted then it is now. theres literally no chance that it will be legalised any time soon.

Mental illness is just more nuanced now, retards like you can't be called retards to their face or they go retard crazy and quit being productive, but the doctors and cops will still try to lead gays, fedoras, and pedo to the same kinds of therapy and medication they would have before.

Looking at the prison population, you could say the same thing about marijuana, but most everyone agrees that legalization is imminent.

OH YES. WHAT YOU SAY MAKE SO MUCH SENSE

TOO BAD IT DOESN'T

BUT, OH YES. WHAT YOU SAY MAKE SO MUCH SENSE

THANK YOO FOR POSTINGG!!

Do you know any gay people, just compare how many are in therapy and on anti-depressants and anti-psychotics compared to the general population, its like half and they think half of all people are crazy gay and depressed instead of it being around 10% in the general population who are too busy raising kids to worry about that shit.

YESSSSS

THEY'RE ALL CRAZY

I MADE A VENN DIAGRAM OF IT

ALL A ARE B

BUT ALL A WEREN'T B

SO I FUDGED IT

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_and_the_LGBT_community#Depression.2C_anxiety.2C_and_suicide

DSM doesn't call anyone mentally ill anymore, it just presents shades of disorder and preference, so you can see for yourself that people with a homosexual, pedophile, or animal preference tend to be at risk for more other disorders.

Also why did you post your mom instead of that diagram you worked hard on?

THE VENN DIAGRAM PUT LOTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF PEOPLE IN WITH PEDOPHILES BECAUSE OF SUPERFICIALLY SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS

I ALMOST FOUND YOU IN THERE BUT IT WAS A DIAGRAM OF HUMANS NOT CREATURES THAT INHABIT THE UNDERCARRIAGES OF STONE OVERPASSES

You don't need to understand what an undercarriage is, but at least you understand how gay pedophiles are now.

Sympathy for pedos is going up I think. Normies think abstaining from sex is the worst thing ever, so they really pity us. Unfortunately they also think anyone forced to go without sex will inevitably turn into a rapist. Maybe in a few years we won't be total pariahs, but we'll never be as accepted as trannies.

UNDERSTANDING IS NOT FOR ME

I'D RATHER POST NONSENSE LIKE YOU, MY NEW GOOD FRIEND

>we

YES, WE BELIEVE YOU

GO BACK TO YOUR BRAZZERS BOOKMARK

(PAY FOR SUBSCRIPTION SO THE GIRLS CAN TAKE FOUR COCKS)

Yes, I picked up on your preference for nonsense way back here, the caps are a major tell as well, cuckoo bird.

>BRAZZERS
Why do you think they push the mother/son angle so hard if they aren't trying to push the boundaries of sympathy for adult/children relationships?

AD HOMINEM FALLACY

ALSO, BIG MEANIE

>Why do you think they push the mother/son angle so hard

IT'S TRENDY, DUH

ESPECIALLY IN RED STATES

STEP SISTER PORN IS BIGGEST SEARCH TERM IN SOME OF THEM

you can't even compare these things when the general perception of weed basically is

>muh dank herbs. ayy lmao 420 blaze eet

on the other side you get weird looks for just talking to a child, even if it's your own.

>muh poor chilums

two things being sexual minorities does not necessitate the acceptance of one just because of the acceptance of the other. I know this is b8 but it's not very good, you can do better.

To me, pedophilia is more acceptable than homosexuality.

How do you figure?

pedophilia is completely different to homosexuality.

Homosexuality is with two adult men forward slash two adult women in a mutually consenting relationship.

Relationships with children is always 100% un consenting due to the fact that children, especially ones under the age of 14 can't consent due to them being less educated and less knowledgable about the world and social activity.

Witnessed.

Brave confession, user. Sincerely wish you'll grow out of it. I wouldn't want to be in your shoes.

>children can't consent
where did this meme come from. I remember at 11-12 years old being quite mentally competent to make rational decisions.

If you don't agree with 12 year olds being able to consent than you could at least explain why the hell aren't 14-17 year olds are also in the category of not being able to consent?

why the hell are*

You probably have some kind of severe anti-social disorder then.

By and large young children and teenagers are easy prey to older adults who have more resources and experience. This is already the case at times at 18 but it would be even more so at younger ages if these children could consent.

>I remember at 11-12 being quite mentally competent to make rational decisions
The question is if you were mentally competent to make complex decisions about relationships, that may end in pregnancy, dependence, hardship, and exploitation. And even if you think you were(you probably weren't), do you think the general public at 11-12 is able to make such complex relationship and sexual decisions? Do you think a 12-year-old is wise enough not to be taken advantage of by a older, more mature adult with experience, when many 18-year-olds are not in that boat?

>children can't consent
neither can the mentally ill

14-17 y/o's can't consent in the US. Dunno about Canada.

AoC needs to be lowered.
Why was it set at 18 anyway?
It's not like I wasn't tapping ass at 15.

>neither can the mentally ill

and yet you're here typing away

>Why was it set at 18 anyway?

most common global age is 16

18 makes sense for women because the spine needs to be mature to prevent calcium loss (osteoporosis) from early pregnancy — and to give the hips enough time to widen

for males 18 makes no sense

>18 makes sense for women because the spine needs to be mature to prevent calcium loss (osteoporosis) from early pregnancy

Citation heavily needed.

The better question is why is incest not accepted.

>that pic
his face is perfect

Legally speaking, that is complicated. I speak from experience medically as someone who works as a nurse in an intense psychiatric rehabilitation unit(in Florida, which has some of the most patient-friendly psychiatric laws), and you must be deemed mentally incompetent to consent for medical treatment. That must then be reviewed frequently should your mental condition change so that if you are found to mentally capable, you may consent again. Consenting for healthcare treatment is not exactly the same as consenting for sexual intercourse, but it provides insights. You can be mentally ill and still be deemed by the state to be competent to consent or not consent for complex, informed decisions about what happens with your body.

tl;dr "mentally ill" is not the same as "mentally incompetent," legally speaking. Just speaking morally/ethically is different, but this is a perspective I figured would be interesting to look at here.

>it needs to be 18 because the spine needs to be mature to prevent calcium loss from early pregnancy
you can provide supplements in proper amounts to the pregnant woman of this demographic, that's a shitty metric to judge age of consent by. Many other demographics are legally able to consent and get pregnant even if they are in higher risk categories, the prenatal care is adjusted accordingly to prevent complications.

Its because faggots buy more cosmetic products and the payoff coming from the promotion is worth it. There is no commercial benefit in promoting other degeneracies, at least not yet, considering the amount of propaganda required for an extended market.

what kind of fucking retard would fuck and cum inside a 11-12 year old. im talking about just being able to enjoy their cute little bodies. I believe at 14 though you are DEFINITELY mentally and physically mature enough for sex

in all of human history pedophilia was probably never more accepted then it is now. theres literally no chance that it won't will be legalized any time soon.

>fixd

>Citation heavily needed.

The spine matures around age 18

The spine is made of calcium carbonate.

Babies leach minerals from the female body.

They're your citation, bucko.

>why is incest not accepted.
Birth defects, duh.

>what kind of retard would cum inside a 11-12 year old haha
the kind who wants to and is legally allowed to because it is legal for them to consent because one lawmaker decided that at 11-12 they would have been fine to so everyone should be too.

>I just wanna enjoy their cute bodies :P
your form of enjoyment is different from that of others. Pedophiles always want exceptions to the rules, or worse, complete changes to the rules for everyone because they consider themselves the exception

>I believe at 14 you are DEFINITELY mentally and physically mature enough for sex
and you would be wrong, generally speaking.

where are the proofs?

>you can provide supplements in proper amounts to the pregnant woman of this demographic, that's a shitty metric to judge age of consent by. Many other demographics are legally able to consent and get pregnant even if they are in higher risk categories, the prenatal care is adjusted accordingly to prevent complications.

I merely explained that there is a logical justification for 18 being the age when it comes to females.

>what kind of fucking retard would fuck and cum inside a 11-12 year old.

Maybe one who masturbated twice a day like some boys did at that age.

You're right, they should all be executed.

Your citation is shit and I'll bet you can't find evidence to support your claim.
Sounds like you're talking out your ass just because you were told that by mammy.

>>what kind of fucking retard would fuck and cum inside a 11-12 year old.

Maybe the same kind that doesn't even know what pedophilia is.

Pedophilia is sexual attraction, usually exclusive, to PRE-pubescents

not pubescents

so many morons...

>and yet you're here typing away
Children can't type, read, or write?
Some adults are illiterate even people like you who use the third person when typing things about yourself and takes dozens of posts before they find the caps lock button have a questionable capacity to reasonable consent.

I don't care what you think

bye

you want a citation? get it yourself lazy asshole

quit babbling

confirmed virgin

the brain is not done developing until after 18, and we are talking about age of consent here, not age of safest pregnancy. medically speaking, there are a great deal of women who are not optimal for pregnancy but are within their rights to attempt. The calcium leeching can be mitigated by vitamin supplements, just as iron and folate supplements are the norm for most any pregnancy.

Because inbreeding causes:
Reduced fertility both in litter size and sperm viability
Increased genetic disorders
Fluctuating facial asymmetry
Lower birth rate
Higher infant mortality
Smaller adult size
Loss of immune system function
Reduces IQ by alot

Translation: I'm a child who can't even source their shit in a debate and will whine when people don't believe me.

kys

niams.nih.gov/health_info/Bone/Bone_Health/Pregnancy/default.asp

this took 5 seconds

you are an idiot. many girls these days jump on the cock carousel at 14

Was that so hard?
No it wasn't.

the brain doesn't fully develop until mid 20s-30
not an argument

>this took 5 seconds

Shh.. You're not supposed to give in to the citation troll.

They pull this shit in every thread.

1) Post puerile bait.

2) Get truth in response.

3) Respond with demand for citation.

4) Bitch that citation is inadequate or

5) Cherry-pick bits of citation out of context

Same BS over and over.

Because pedophila is never fair to the child. Being a loli is only temporary and no person can choose to remain a loli. Unlike with other preferences which can be controlled to some degree.

Until Science can give us Eternal Lolis, pedophilia must remain a taboo.

I don't remember the question being about whether or not they do this, but whether or not it should be legal and encouraged. You may want to work on your English before posting here again

>I don't like your argument because of this, so it's not an argument
again please work on your english. You can say it's not a good argument and we can talk about that, but is, in fact, and argument.

No, it wasn't, so why didn't you just fucking google it instead of bitching? It is a basic medical fact, you don't even need to get past pay walls to find it.
>"Teen pregnancy and bone health. Teenage mothers may be at especially high risk for bone loss during pregnancy and for osteoporosis later in life. Unlike older women, teenage mothers are still building much of their own total bone mass. The unborn baby’s need to develop its skeleton may compete with the young mother’s need for calcium to build her own bones, compromising her ability to achieve optimal bone mass that will help protect her from osteoporosis later in life. To minimize any bone loss, pregnant teens should be especially careful to get enough calcium during pregnancy and breastfeeding."

>the brain is not done developing until after 18

The mind is capable of reaching the final phase of Piagetian development in early adolescence, depending upon education and IQ.

>The mind is capable of reaching the final phase of Piagetian development in early adolescence, depending upon education and IQ.

And, some adults don't reach that phase yet they're allowed to fuck and breed.

We used to sterilize them with Eugenics

It's customary that if you're going to debate something you need to cite your shit. You obviously never did a bibliography for any paper you've ever written.

>may be at especially high risk
Yet nowhere is there information on how much at risk they are. Seems like one of those puffed up statistics made to enforce a certain agenda.

I can accept that line of reasoning.

>you've obviously never did a bibliography if you think people can take 5 seconds to google basic facts
you're just being stubborn that this point.

>it's probably puffed up statistics made to enforce a certain agenda
do you have any citations to prove that one? I provided the Nation Institute of Health, you provided "well it's probably puffed up yeah that makes me right."
pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/4/e1229
>approximately 40-60% of bone mass is accrued during adolescent years

Can you answer me how much you know about basic medicine and healthcare before we continue with this? Do you have any formal training or experience? Am I wasting my time here or can I get through to you and teach you some things?

Or what? You will get all up in my undercarriage?

>work on your english
>"and argument"
wew lad, since you're autistic let me know why I told you that your ""argument"" is not an argument: the ground for your argument is that the brain is not fully developed before 18, but that is verifiably false as stated before.
Now in light of the new evidence that the brain is fully developed at mid 25-30's, Should we prohibit sex until the mid 25's? Of course we shouldn't, that's fucking retarded, yet the brain isn't fully developed before that, hence - it doesn't fucking matter whether or not your brain is fully developed or not.

I've already conceded that it was not a good argument with the person I was arguing with. But a bad argument is, in fact, an argument. To say that it's not an argument because it's not good is just incorrect. And your first post about how girls have sex at 14, as if it has any bearing on whether or not they SHOULD, is retarded.
fight me danish pastry

You're right japan, it's not fair. Few things are.

At least we can enjoy our loli porn.

>I admit its a bad argument but its still an argument!!1
cry more burger

I can accept when I've made a mistake daneboy. I see you can't do the same