Reduce a director to just muh

muh ellipses

muh surrealism

muh hands

>muh tight framing
>muh dearth of horizontal motion within frame
>muh front-back motion
>muh composition at the expense of continuity
>muh tatami

muh "BBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!"

muh 'splosions

>muh Stones

>muh long takes with much camera movement

>muh bokem

>muh crying

>muh austerity

muh close ups of my actors faces as they speak incredibly slowly about nothing in particular

Muh grass
Who em I ?>

how can he be so fucking wrong

Iwai?

...

malick

Shamalamadingdong?

Muh long shots

>Liv Ullman cries about existentialism or family drama. Sometimes there's ghosts
That's every Bergman film

Good guesses but wrong
You two are just fucking stupid

tarkovsky

Far better sequence you could have used.

DING DING DING DING
Finally someone ITT who is not a complete uncultured swine

First off, wew lad.
Second off, grass is not even the first thing you think of for Tarkovsky.
this guy had a better idea, but I'd just say his use of elements in general is very trademark to him. Moreso thank Kurasawa, even, especially his use of water.

long shots were used by almost every director in 60's, 70' i wouldnt say its a tarkovsky thing

>60's and 70's
try 10's and 20's, pleb

i don't watch amateur cinema

I didn't say it was a uniquely Tarkovsky thing. I said it's more a Tarkovsky thing than grass is. My point is is that he had a firm emphaisis on all nature, and his best use of it was water.

>muh niggers

HANDS OFF BRESSON HE IS THE GREATEST KINOMAKER ALIVE!

he died the year you were born
fucking pleb, watch more films

literally fuck off
bet you even didnt watch any of his movies

tarkovsky or bresson? i've seen all of their films and like them a lot desu

bresson. oyeah, then whats you favourite?

>muh filming in harsh conditions

he's livinig tough life

(for you)

lancelot du lac or 4 nights of a dreamer
i dont dislike any of his films

>muh klaus kinski

muh
my absolutely fav is au hasard balthazar. don't see the point of moviemaking after that

>muh can't make a decent movie without kinski

delet this and watch even dwarfs started small

Search your feelings, user. You know it to be true.

Herzog without Kinski is just distilled boredom.

really like that one too as well
a lot of people dislike the devil, probably but i think its because they don't agree with the main character, which imo is a dumb reason not to like it since that's not what the film is about

so what about enigma of kaspar hauser, even dwarfs started small, stroszek, heart of glass, his documentaries?
you're just pleb being pleb
personally i was more impressed by bruno s acting. and would trade kinski for him,

>muh different time

>so what about enigma of kaspar hauser, even dwarfs started small, stroszek, heart of glass, his documentaries?

>meh chekhov&dostoevsky&tolstoy

>muh close-ups
>muh racism
>muh historical fantasy

this place deserves to die

>muh long takes

>muh models

actually watch his films you mongoloid

>muh low bass rumble

more like pseudo long takes solely for spectacle

>muh helicopters