Yes, yes, well done Slytherin, well done Slytherin

>Yes, yes, well done Slytherin, well done Slytherin.
>HOWEVER
What exactly was running through Dumbledore's mind at this point?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=351Aa5q_S98
independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/jk-rowling-reveals-harry-potter-character-hagrid-could-not-produce-a-patronus-10475057.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Fuck Slytherin and FUCK racist snake people!

We may never know for certain, but it had to be something DULL

>Lel I'm about to fuck with these kids so hard. I hope they don't all grow into psychotic edgelords because of this. I wonder why that always seems to happen to this house? I guess we'll never know.

Dumbledore was a biased moron with a hard-on for Harry. Tom Riddle did nothing wrong, he just wanted to get rid of all the mudbloods in school.

why did JK rolling feel the need to explicitly reveal Dumbledore's sexuality when he's a decrepit, 500 year old, wrinkly, hairy wizard man who is the principal at a magic school for children? it seems like an irrelevant detail and something nobody would ever want to visualize regardless of his sexual preference

Covering his own ass for being so useless he couldn't figure out what squirrel guy kept under his turban

To sell more shit; people like you make it happen, congrats.

I'd stick my slytherin in Hermione's gryphindor, if you catch my drift.

but i never bought harry potter?

I'd like Hermione hufflepuff my slytherin if you know what I mean ;)

>I want to fuck Harry's sweet boipussy

google "Witch Trainer"

Quick easy way to score social brownie points.

big wizard cocks according to Rowling

this dude is just whining about people he doesn't like. He's a bigot and will say anything to try and insult you.

FUCK DRUMPF AND FUCK WHITE PEOPLE

Best meme on tv rn desu.

Reminder that Slytherin did nothing wrong and Gryffindor is only the good guy because POOR PEOPLE ARE SO BRAVE XD

>this meme is already 1 year old
youtube.com/watch?v=351Aa5q_S98

>no stephen king pasta

SAD'

People who are once popular typically feel the desire to stay as popular as that through whatever means.
Arbitrarily changing minute details that have no impact on your completed creative work is just low effort pandering and nothing more.

give it time

Images of Grindlewald's BWC

I don't remember this happening

I haven't seen all the films but I've read the books

Fuck Pansy Parkinson, that bitch who the author based on bullies and hates so much that she literally made them replace the actress because she was too good looking.

There was a line written in to one of the movies said by Dumbledore making a comment on some pretty witch or some shit and Rowling said, "lol, no, he wouldn't say that, he's gay." She then said that she had always seen him as gay even though she probably only decided to make him gay at the last minute to win points with LGBT activists.

I'd Bondburger Ron if you know what I mean

She didn't reveal it through her creations. Just stated it.
Like she stated that her description of Hermione means she could well be black. Although the earlier books do indeed talk about how pale she is.

She probably said it after the fan theory that he was gay with the backstory wizard in the last book became 'popular'.

>Dumbledore
>stacking things unfairly towards his favored house
Should've joined up with the DNC.

Because she never said hermoine was white

I doubt there was much of anything running through his mind considering he is a part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>not watching japanese Harry Potter
litrary no excuse

>best creature in the series
>only appears for a few seconds twice in book 1

Why did she stop focussing on cool magical adventures and move towards grimdark neonazi edge bullshit?

told you

6/10 saw this yesterday

Rowling is an attention whore. Once she realised that her popularity was dwindling (you can only stay popular for so long once your magnum opus is complete) she started adding all this irrelevant shite to her stories to stay in the spotlight.
>Uhh, Dumbledore is gay! It was true all along!
>Ron was going to die, lol!
>Uhhh... Hagrid is depressed lmao!
>Hermione was always a nigger!
Not only does it get her some attention back, it helps the media diarrhoea websites like Salon and HuffPo write articles about how progressive the series is and how it blows the FUCK out of DRUMFLFPFLF.
Next she'll say Voldemort was always based on Donald Trump from when she first wrote the character.

Why does it matter?

If it doesn't matter, why change it? There is literally no need to retroactively do something like that outside of becoming more popular

You answered your own question you realize.

Good fucking lord, Pansy a CUTE

>the first OVA is good
>everything else is shit
What did they mean by this? They had a chance to make harry potter but with only the good parts of harry potter, but they blew it.

Second OVA is decent. Show approaches mediocrity but nearly all cartoons are mediocre these days and it has a unique charm and energy still that can be appreciated.

>make magic school
>clearly a quarter of them are evil kids. not just assholes, evil.
>teach them magic anyway
>GEE THERE'S SO MANY FULL FLEDGED EVIL WIZARDS IN OUR COMMUNITY. I WONDER WHY.

just like we are obliged to educate kids with retarded parents who grow up to become aggresive libs

>THARS NOT A SINGLE WITCH OR WIZARD THAT WAS IN SLYTHERIN AND TURNED OUT TO BE GOOD, ARRY
>Durmstrang exists
>Vladamir Putin from Goblet of Fire was a Death Eater

what
did
she
mean
by
this

Kek What? What did she look lile before?

Probably something like,
>"I love being a highschool teacher. I keep getting older, but the boypussy always stays the same age."

The previous Pansy Parkington actress from Prison of Azakaban grew up to be hot, but Rowling hated Pansy with all her soul and refused to let the Pansy character be attractive, so she insisted on a recast for the later films.

She didn't change anything, faggot. The movie gave him a glaring straight man trait and Rowling told them he's actually a queer, like you.

Get bent, whiny Drumpflet.

>Hagrid is depressed

Haha, what?!? Source?

Remember when Lavender Brown was brown?

>1 year

Pfft.

independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/jk-rowling-reveals-harry-potter-character-hagrid-could-not-produce-a-patronus-10475057.html

>Arbitrarily forbidden from what you adore by aristocrats but you're chained to a community that flaunt what you're forbidden from doing in your face. Also you're a lonely freak.
He's obviously depressed. Rowling making a point of him representing depressed people or however she may have framed it is a farce though, obviously.

What glaring straight man trait is that?

Remember when Susan Bones was the director's daughter?

I'd be too if I was stuck in one of the dullest...

Riddle was a mudblood. Should have started by killing himself.

Wrong dummy. Mudblood is wizard out muggle parents, Riddle's used goods mom was a witch.

Pansy in the books was a pug faced bitch. She was never meant to be attractive.

True. It just seems mean to kick her off the movie for being cute.

Read the thread, dumb faggot nigger?

Why do you feel the need to explicitly reveal that you care what Rowling says?

I'm really not seeing it. What did Rowling consider 'too straight' about the movie character where she pretended to feel the need to really make us think by saying he was gay?

He was going to tell Harru about his girfriedns and tips on how to hit on girls.

I'm not going to spoonfeed you. If you didn't read the entire thread before making a post I'm not going to waste time with your nigger ass.

...

>Kanye West