Trump just announced American protection for Ukraine. Previously he said he will not defend NATO allies

Trump just announced American protection for Ukraine. Previously he said he will not defend NATO allies.

Where is his logic?

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/760095370185674752

Other urls found in this thread:

mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/politics/donald-trump-issues.html
washingtonexaminer.com/trump-would-leave-nato-as-president-if-countries-dont-pay/article/2588741
nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_67655.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Previously he said he will not defend NATO allies.
Gonna have to source that claim.

>ukraine

no such thing

mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/politics/donald-trump-issues.html

>NY times
I'm not even going to bother. Why don't you link me directly to what Trump said? Or better yet, quote it.

>I don't trust newspapers
Then google it, finish retard.

Literally no American gives a shit about Ukraine or can point it on a map

Just stop

You're the one making the claim. I'm not going to Google shit. Trump has never claimed to undermine NATO.

>Trump has never claimed to undermine NATO.

He did it repeatedly. Try paying attention to what's going on.

All I'm seeing is some Magyar scum making claims with no real sources.

washingtonexaminer.com/trump-would-leave-nato-as-president-if-countries-dont-pay/article/2588741

He would leave IF they don't pay their bills, presumably Ukraine does.

I gave you the source. You're not russian to act dumb so fuck off.

>"countries that do not pay their share won't be defended"
>Trump won't defend NATO allies
Thanks for Correcting the Record!
Also
>Ukraine
>NATO
Pick one you Hilltarded idiot. You can't shelve your plans to join the thing and then once you ALREADY got attacked decide to join.

...

You really don't know what you're talking about. Stay out of this, jungle monkey.

>the president of the united states will act in favor of the united states geopolitically
Whats wrong with that?

Where's the argument?

>Trump just announced American protection for Ukraine. Previously he said he will not defend NATO allies.

No he didn't. What is with all these anti-Trump shills/lies after the DNC convention. Guess the super PACs are finally spending their money.

>Previously he said he will not defend NATO allies.

Trump said NATO is a bad deal for the US

This Ukraine shit is an example of why

...

>in favor of the united states geopolitically
How is provoking a war in the baltics in his favor?

You know even less about Europe than I know about your shithole country. Just go away, retard.

>being rekt by a huenigger

boy, i bet you faggots really want to kill yourselves right about now, huh?

>still no argument
Was being retarded part of your plan?

He made some very good points.Why don't you try to answer?If what is saying is so retarded,it should be easy for you,right?

That's not what he said in either case

>You know even less about Europe than I know about your shithole country. Just go away, retard.
So you admit you're ignorant, and can't refute his claims
/thread.

>Ukraine
>nato

>Won't defend NATO allies

I like how he says this yet he hasn't really said anything about funding Israel. Right now they get billions in free shekels from America every year.

Another thing, it's mutually beneficial for America to defend NATO allies like Japan, South Korea, and eastern European countries. If they stop, it'd be pretty fucking easy for Russia or China to annex any surrounding countries at will.

Could you imagine if Russia annexed most of Europe and China annexed most of eastern Asia? Then they create a massive alliance between the two countries, dwarfing the rest of the world, even the USA.

America doesn't defend these countries because they care about them. They defend them to keep China and Russia under control.

A
FUCKING
LEAF

They're valid points, you retarded monkey.

This

before
>leaf
you have the burden of proof, you are the claimant, you stupid ass.

Ukraine is not on NATO
If a NATO country doesn't pay they are basically breaking the contract and should be expelled from it.
Stop leafposting while there's still time.

>I like how he says this yet he hasn't really said anything about funding Israel. Right now they get billions in free shekels from America every year.

Someone in a different thread just said all his children have married jews, so I guess the funding will increase. :^)

I didn't say anything about Ukraine in my post. It was about Israel, other European allies, and Asian allies.

>trump is inconsistent
More news at 11.

It's amazing that there are still people that don't realize that Trump has just been winging it in most areas. The guy is clueless when it comes to foreign policy.

>If a NATO country doesn't pay they are basically breaking the contract

Where should it pay you retarded monkey from the jungle? And it's not a contract but an alliance.

50 Forints have been deposited into your account.

They are obliged to pay 2% of their GDP, and any alliance is a type of contract. You break the terms you break the alliance.

>The guy is clueless when it comes to foreign policy.

That's what I'm starting to think. His zombie followers can't justify what he's been saying lately. They are in deep denial.

>They are obliged to pay 2% of their GDP
Who will get that money ? Paying implies they pay someone.

You think the organization, because there is an organization will get the money to coordinate a fuckload of countries just out of thin air?

Think about it for a minute. Just think about it. Do you think everything done in the name of NATO comes from representatives of member nations pulling out their pocketbooks? Or do you think that maybe, just maybe, a large organization can set up a bank account or two in its own name?

Isn't the 2% supposed to be the military budget? Isn't that the point?

Countries can also contribute directly

nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_67655.htm

>Second post is already from a butthurt Olgino bot
Simply beautiful

> You think
As I told you, you think wrong. The organization doesn't need 2% of the GDP of every developed country to "coordinate". And the 2% is just a guideline and that's why almost nobody reaches it.

not defending a nation purely because shes in NATO isnt the same as defending a state that happens to be in nato

The most reasonable of his supporters have believed that all of the crazier things he said during the primaries was just to stir up shit to get media attention for free and he would pivot to a more measured and rational approach for the general but the opposite is happening. He's making gaffe after gaffe and engaging in pointless unwinnable battles.

His strongest supporters haven't come to terms with the fact that the guy we saw during the primaries wasn't some master strategist troll yet. We've seen all the depth the guy has to offer already and what we saw was what he is.

>Gives Putin a complement
>OMG HE'S PUTIN'S PUPPET
>Gives Putin admonishing
>OMG HE'S STARTING WW3

he said he won't defend allies who don't fulfill their part in the NATO

>The organization doesn't need 2% of the GDP of every developed country to "coordinate".
Either every country pay their share or else the countries with big armies which will put fourth most of the power used in any combat won't gain anything out of this.
>And the 2% is just a guideline and that's why almost nobody reaches it
Every country that enters NATO has to sign up a contract, what's on the contract is no "guideline" it's a set of rules, you break the rules you should be out.

>gives a source claiming something was said without quoting what was said
Gee fuckin whiz you Hungarian faggot. I wonder why nobody takes your "source" as credible.

Trump said that if they're not paying their fair share, then they won't be defended. Countries like Hungary for example who don't even put 1% of the GDP into defense. Furthermore, Ukraine is not a NATO member. We have not obligation to defend them

Based leaf understands how conversation unfolds.

Those are all your ideas monkey. It's not reality. No one is paying 2% to others, that's not how it works. The 2% is a guideline and it's relatively new.

NATO is more than a contract, it's an alliance of developed, democratic states. Somehow Turkey is still in it but that's a different subject.

Go talk about something that you understand.

>mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/politics/donald-trump-issues.html

Just posting a link and saying its proof is not actually proof you despicable liar. Whats worse is the article even says that he would defend NATO allies...

Do you guys get paid to act like complete retards ?

I'm getting suspicious.

kill yourself my man

> I am triggered
That makes me happy.

>magyar cuck shill getting btfo left and right

>His strongest supporters haven't come to terms with the fact that the guy we saw during the primaries wasn't some master strategist troll yet. We've seen all the depth the guy has to offer already and what we saw was what he is.

More of you cucks should read this.

I don't think NATO works solely on the concept of alliance. Everyone has to contribute in a meaningful way other than good will. What are you exactly on about, I don't follow.

>hurr durr, let's make a claim
>I won't provide you a reliable source, you can google it yourself fuckers!!!!!
that's where you fucked up, you retard

He's having to change his tune because people won't give the Republican Party any money

Uh no. You literally were proven wrong

>reliable source,
When you say that an refuse to even click on the link you're just a butthurt troll.

Ukraine isn't NATO

>We are both huns.
I know nothing of this, but Trump is an idiot. And the people endorsing him are either delusional or desperate. However he is the better option.

>but Trump is an idiot. And the people endorsing him are either delusional or desperate. However he is the better option.
What I don't get it's all the overly enthusiastic supporters. You think Trump is better, that's alright. You don't have to eat every ounce of his shit though.