I don't get it

I don't get it.

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/11/22/black-activist-punched-at-donald-trump-rally-in-birmingham/
motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/trump-violence
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

dumb trumposter

This comic tries to allege that men are voting for Trump because of his hot wife.

This was one of Kelly's weaker cartoons

Make as much sense as anything this election cycle I guess

People need to get some taste

Fuck, I have failed my Advent overlords

Cuz it makes fun of Trumpfags isn't it?

>kepler
What?

Honestly, it's because it doesn't make fun of the actual problems that Trumpfags cause.
It could be a comicstrip about then being uncultured rednecks but portrayed as patriotic. But you know what? Whatever he would have done, they'll probably take it as a compliment.
This one wasn't very clever eitherway.

>DeGrasse Tyson
Kek

Serious question: Is Xcom 2 still popular? I lost interest after a few hours. It was imho not as good as the first one.

This isn't even a serious political strip.

It seems to me that the xcom community kind of rejected it a bit, it's coming to consoles soon though so there will probably be an influx of new players.

xcom 2 is better than xcom ew in every single way

Too many meelee enemies without a proper counter and powerful AoE attacks. Too many aliens don't even bother taking cover so majority of tactical play is gone.

Timer on global map can ruin your day in a most frustrating way.

>People actually tried using Trump's wife being a sexy supermodel as a negative against him during the primaries

That reminds me, I haven't played XCom 1 in over a week. One of my friends keeps raving about Long War, but I want to finish EU and EW first - crawl before I can walk, and all that.

Zhang is the best

>the problems that Trumpfags cause
Causing leftists to attack them?

Would be the 1st legit reason to vote for Trump

It's funny because obongofags actually fapped over his sheboon all those years.

ADVENT IS LOVE

ADVENT IS LIFE

Being able to save my lovingly customized action figures and have them show up at random in future playthroughs is the best thing ever

Trump said it's okay to beat up people who disagree with you when his rally slammed on that one black protester while yelling "nigger" a few months before that event you're referencing.

It's fair game, Trump said so.

You're not going to disagree with Trump, are you? Like a loser?

Remove kebab

kind of loosing your touch there kelly

still one more reason than to vote for hillary i guess, except maybe if you want mcdonalds running the country

>Bringing up companies or corporations of the opposite side
>While defending Trump
There isn't a difference.

I'd like to see some actual evidence of Trump condoning the beating of a black man. Since there's 0 chance of you ever actually doing it, I'm going to assume some asshole decided to disrupt a private event and then cried like a bitch when he got thrown out and mocked.

You know like what happens when you make a scene at any private event.

>Is Xcom 2 still popular?

Seems like an odd question to ask regarding a game that has no multiplayer.

Black protester started shit at rally and was getting physical. As he was escorted out, someone sucker punched him. Trump said the guy probably deserved it.

Truly the opposition has the high ground

Daily reminder

Trump supporters were the ones starting out with the physical assaults on people they disagree with.

Except in San Jose
And Chicago
And Albuquerque
And vast majority of Trump rallies

Not that that excuses the ones who did get violent first, but at least they're not attacking their own side

Keep lying and eventually it will be the truth right user?

>doesn't make fun of the actual problems

That's the fucking joke of every Kelly strip. It blows ridiculous, non-existent things out of proportion and never tackles real issues.

Seems to be working out alright for Trump

Not an argument

>Choosing from a billionare redneck, a female warlord and comrade
GG america

And?

I'd argue that the joke is generally the cartoonist himself is the joke, (in this one being that Kelly votes with his dick) but otherwise right. Kelly comics are generally not actual political satire, they're jokes about self-important and out of touch cartoonists with inflated egos.

Why are political cartoons allowed in Sup Forums again? All they seem to do is attract the Sup Forumstards

Someone suggested that we only allow joke political cartoons like Kelly and older cartoons like WWII and before. I'd be for it, but I don't think it'd stop all that much.

If you stick to old ones, Asay, and (usually) Kelly, it's fine

Who would you vote for? Merkel?

She will get reelected in 2017 (and probably 2021) because there is little competition.

wait do old xcoms not have that? i got a shitty computer but that + fun looking game had me interested in checking out old versions. well fuck that then

Except it's true.

washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/11/22/black-activist-punched-at-donald-trump-rally-in-birmingham/

>“Maybe he should have been roughed up, because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing,” Trump said on the Fox News Channel on Sunday morning.

Hey, if I'm disgusted by what you're doing, then maybe I should rough you up.

>0 chance
lol He covered his ass a little, of course, but what he said is what he said.

>daily reminder that Trump's budget for his campaign is so low is because his campaigners do it FOR FREE

The old ones are safe because no one is mad if you make fun of Teddy Roosevelt.

Kelly is a bit like Colbert because you can enjoy it even if you disagree.

Asay is batshit insane so who cares?

in that guys defense Trump changes positions so often he probably just had old data

Or he just doesn't give a shit and forgets that memes are just jokes.

Pretty lame for a Kelly.

>Saying that someone who started shit and got his ass kicked deserved it it the same as condoning his own supporters to go out and start shit.
Again, why are you always lying?

>Splitting hairs this hard
F O R

F
R
E
E

How is it splitting hairs at all?
they are entirely different things you are just being blinded by you bias.
You are accusing him of perpetuating indiscriminate violence when the most he could be considered guilty of is encouraging people to actively stop violence when they see it.

>Snek tail

Monfans need to go back to Sup Forums.

>mini Kelly not making a pun
Absolute trash

>Expressing opinions High Fuhrer Trump disagrees with is worthy of having violence committed against you

>He didn't condone it, he just said maybe it should have happened
>Not splitting hairs
For free

I think the real problem is it's too explicit. It's funnier if it's only implied that Kelly masturbates to Melania Trump.

Expressing opinions like this?

"Red Blooded Americans" is exactly that


It literally means only Kelly

>Kelly voting for Trump because he wants to bang Trump's wife

I see nothing wrong here.

>Disagreeing with me is exactly the same as being violent and destructive

News flash, Bill of Rights under fire

He said that the guy that started shit at his rally should have gotten hit.
He did not say that his supporters should go out looking for trouble and starting fights as you are claiming.
Your claim is flatly incorrect him saying that a guy that started a fight getting hit is irrelevant.
Are you starting to understand yet?

>Someone actually drew that picture
>For no monetary compensation

In all these cases, there ARE being violent and destructive.

Because we don't need a specific rule.

If threads go full retarded, or individual shitposters get fully triggered, we can deal with it without a full topic ban.

There's no need to try and make this a safe space.

No, what I'm saying is that actually drawing the guy jacking off isn't as funny as implying he's about to do it.

Show me where it says the black guy started the fight.

Oh wait, it doesn't. You just assumed.

>Expressing opinions in support of Trump is worthy of committing numerous violent protests, assault and pepper spraying women and children
>But if even one anti-Trump protester gets hit back...

see

>this astroturfing

The guy was being led out by security when a guy suckerpunched him out of nowhere.

If that's not looking for trouble I don't know what is.

>He said that the guy that started shit at his rally should have gotten hit.
Which is condoning violence, thanks for agreeing with me.

You're just making excuses for a statement that should have never come out of a presidential candidate's mouth.

But I'm sure you and your co-workers are hard at work to spin that into a positive quality. And you're not even paid for it! You're so charitable, user.

>Anti-Trump protesters dindu nuffin dey was gud bois...

>he said the guy should've gotten hit
That's condoning violence. Trump,a presidential nominee, condone the use of violence by his supporters.

>Not an argument
Not an argument

Is that a dog whistle I hear?

See Shill harder why don't you

>If threads go full retarded, or individual shitposters get fully triggered, we can deal with it

no we can't!

Now now, user.

It's not shilling if they're not getting any money for it.

>billionaire so desperate for friends he pays politicians to come to his weddings
>crafty politicians make easy money

i see no problem

see

That's a badly made imitation

>you have to be paid to discuss things

>Billionaire
Pfft

But Trump is not responsible for the actions of others any more than Hillary and Bernie are responsible for their supporters committing acts of violence nor did Trump tell or ask his people to go out and attack people, what he said was that the guy that got punched was a asshole.
>Which is condoning violence, thanks for agreeing with me.
By that logic Bernie supported his supporters committing acts of violence by encouraging them to protest Trump's rallies and sweeping them into a frenzy by implying that Trump wants to commit a holocaust.
So is Hillary responsible for Trump?
He was one of her constituents how deep does the rabbit hole of blaming others go?

strange how google image searching this brings up a bunch of crazy right wing sites like stormfront

>He greentexted
>For free

>He's defending Trump
>For free

Congrats, you just saved a multi-billionaire so much money! His campaign funding is an all-time record low, and it's all thanks to you! Doing all this work for him, F O R F R E E

Where's the crying Statue of Liberty?

So?

>wants to be the leader of the free world
>can't control a crowd
Why should he be president again?

>you have to be paid to discuss things

It really brings it validity into question if you can't provide a proper source.

i'd like one or two legitimate news sites backing up your well made screencap

So maybe that's not a trustworthy source of information.

No, I believe what he said was
>“Maybe he should have been roughed up, because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing,”
Which is saying that maybe someone who's been detained and led out by security should be assaulted without provocation.

Because that's what happened.

>He's proud that he's shilling Trump for free
As well you should be. Make America great again, friend. We'll have our first meme president yet.

>Saying a guy deserve getting hit
>telling people they should protest an event
One of those protected by the first amendment.

>"These are not people." A month later, at an event in North Carolina, Trump was interrupted no fewer than 10 times by different protesters, many of whom shouted, "Black lives matter." Trump responded by waving them off and dismissing their concerns, as boos rained down from his supporters.

>"These are not people," Trump said. "Just remember that."

lol, holy shit i forgot they beat up a Breitbart reporter. (that doesn't count as a legit news site btw)

motherjones.com/politics/2016/03/trump-violence