Modern Art

>picked
meant pickled. Anyway, Hirst's formaldehyde slaughterhouse is a disgrace. Some art...

>steinberg

Like this?

Point taken. And your preferences of food, like those of art, are subjective. But we know what food IS. The definition of "food" is a matter of fact. Same for art.

So you cannot say that a particular piece of art is "not art" just because you think it's shitty. Bad art =/= not art. Of course, the definition of art is unclear. But that's a debate that should be left to artists, who are more informed about their craft.

See stuff like this is neet. But its nothing that a graphics designer couldn't do

Art is a dialectical process. The art of today is the collective response of (mostly) liberals against traditional values and social norms of today. Now it's up to the right to respond- you can't just start aping romantic painters because you like them, because it won't work as a response. You have to respond directly, in a language they understand. Think of Sam Hydes comedy, or eary black metal (made to sound terrible intentionally to piss off people who liked bourgeois commercialized metal).

So whatcha gonna do, young conservative artist?

>Degenerate art is degenerate.
This, art that uses poop and pee, and accept openly to homosexuals, it is the pinnacle of degeneracy

>sometimes people prevaricate

wow, such meaning, very depth, wow.

don't be obtuse.

artrenewal.org/pages/livingartists.php

>subjective
>moral and artistic relativism.
>all can be untrue, so anything can be true

You just goofed.

The art world can be very political, almost always leftist

The CIA felt promoting abstract art was beneficial, since it was meaningless and didn't arouse leftist passions.

They were basically trying to drown out radicals in a sea of abstraction.