Why is this so good?
Why is this so good?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
What is it?
Kids today make me sad...
The history is interesting enough that a bare bones production is probably the best way to present it.
Cant you read?
It clearly says I-CLAVDIVS
I Clavdivs is one of my favourites
en.wikipedia.org
I, Claudius follows the history of the early Roman Empire, narrated by the elderly Emperor Claudius, from the year 24 BC to his death in AD 54.
Filled with a ton of great British actors, great writing, directing. Perfectly executed.
This.
I'd argue it really needed more Caligula though, I feel like a lot was left out there and seemed rush, plus John Hurt was great in that role.
Thank you.
who /livia/ here?
No fuck caligula
/you/
I read the book by Graves, is there any reason to watch the show?
you may kiss me and leave
LiteraIIy
>Reddit: The Miniseries
How about you go back there kiddo?
No fuck you.
haha imagine being such a cunt you deny yourself the pleasure of art.
what a fucking faggot you are.
>70s/80s British historical dramas in general
But yeah, I Claudius is the best one
Please recommend others.
ask on reddit you cuck
Fall of Eagles
Elizabeth R.
Edward VII
Poldark, there's an old one and a new version, both are really good
The Cleopatras
How to download it though? I've been sitting on a dead torrent for it for about five weeks now.
I have read the books and loved them. How is the miniseries?
I Claudius is the first historical novel and deserves its place as a grandfather of the genre.
The miniseries is quite good despite its age, although the first and last episode are trippy.
Narrating from the toilet, still great.
>great British actors
essential insufferable cunt-kino
who's this cute country bumpkin?
Because Patrick Stewart has hair.
By jove the dubs dont lie.
It, like "Jesus of Nazareth", was made at the peak of dramatic English-language kinotography.
the series is actually better than the book(s). I like them both but the series played up some more interesting angles that were not thoroughly explored in the books.
> the parallels between the life of Caligula and Jesus
> quoting Talmudic heresy when describing historical Jesus
> "the man who dwells by the pool shall open graves"
Unless you're a big Graves fan, skip the book
>watch The Caesars
>Tiberius was a tragic hero
>Claudius was a sympathetic fool
>watch I, Claudius
>Tiberius was a sympathetic fool
>Claudius was a tragic hero
Who should I believe?
Don't tell me to believe both, or else I'll go watch a movie where Caligula is a tragic hero too, because that's the power of fiction.
Wow, is this really the apex of the BBC's so-called """high-brow""", """"high-class"""" and """""high-culture""""" entertainment?
Tiberius was disliked by a large segment of the Roman population and while a lot of historical accounts paint him in a negative light it's hard to say how much of it is accurate vs. sensationalism
Homeboy was definitely kind of a paranoid creep though
Claudius wasn't necessarily a hero but he was definitely the best of the Julio-Claudian family to come after Augustus
t. studied Roman history and both read and watched I, Claudius in high school
>dat discordant discomforting theme tune
literally anti-cozy when you're binging the series at three in the morning alone in a cabin in the woods
It's almost like good writing and acting do more to make something good than splosions, blood and sex.