THE TRUMP DECEPTION

How plausible/believable is this story? Found this posted on another site, don't attack me just the messenger.

Does anyone have research backing up or debunking what is being claimed here?

> The year was 1988, and things were looking grim for the future of the Democratic Party. George H.W. Bush had just cruised to a crushing win over Michael Dukakis, becoming the first sitting Vice President to be elected President since Martin Van Buren in 1836. Following two landslide victories by Ronald Reagan, the future appeared to be all but hopeless for the American left.

> Meanwhile in New York, a young Democrat governor, Bill Clinton, pitched what must have sounded like an insanely audacious plan to a small of circle of ultra-wealthy financial backers. Clinton's thesis was that Democrats were now stuck in a permanent minority and could only win by rigging the election itself. His idea: run a false flag candidate to exploit divisions within the conservative movement and allow Democrats to win with a plurality of the vote.

> With his friend, the Texas billionaire H. Ross Perot who had become a major enemy of Reagan, Clinton brainstormed a platform that would serve as a wedge to steal support from the GOP. Influenced by the rising popularity of populist conservatives such as Pat Buchanan, Perot and Clinton settled on a mix of nationalism and opposition to free trade. It worked perfectly, getting Clinton elected twice. So well in fact that in one point in 1992, Perot was actually leading both Bush and Clinton in the polls. However Perot “fixed” this by temporarily dropping out of the campaign and torpedoing his own credibility, a tactic that would be emulated by another candidate decades later.

> Trump and the Clintons first made contact in 1993, when a young Donald Trump invited Bill Clinton to a casino networking event in New Jersey back in 1993 under the pseudonym “Tony August” (the letter he sent to Clinton is still viewable in the Clinton library archives online). They quickly became good friends, united by their interest in the science of marketing and specifically in analyzing the psychology of the average American. Trump often incorporated this into his various marketing initiatives from Trump Steaks to Trump University.

> Trump, a liberal Democrat and globalist with views similar to the Clintons, became a frequent White House visitor and wrote admirably of the Clintons in his books. He became one of the chief “fixers” for the Clintons from the outside, defending Bill in the press over the Monica Lewinsky scandal and attacking Republicans.

> In the mid 1990s, Trump joined the Reform Party in anticipation of becoming Perot’s successor as the Clinton's spoiler candidate. However this never panned out due to timing and the Clinton's abandonment of Al Gore in the 2000 election. It wasn’t until much later when Hillary prepared to run for the Presidency that Bill and Donald began discussing a revival of this plan during their frequent phone calls and golfing trips together. This time however the plan would be even more audacious, with Trump running not as a third party candidate but for the Republican nomination itself.

> The thinking, fleshed out during a series of golf trips to Scotland and late night meetings at Mar-a-Lago, was that Trump would leverage his fame and dominance of the media, established during decades as a TV celebrity, to generate wall to wall coverage and drown out his rivals. He would run on a nationalist “America First” agenda in the tradition of Perot, but would also push the envelope on racial issues in a way that would make the eventual GOP nominee toxic even in the event that Trump ultimately lost the nomination. Trump and Clinton even agreed on the use of a catchphrase that Bill Clinton had used several times in the past: “Make America Great Again.”

> What they never gambled on, however, was a black swan event: the rise of Barack Obama and his eventual defeat of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 primary. Obama represented a different faction of Democrats, backed by a cabal of ultra-wealthy Chicago financiers and powerful Congressional Democrats who resented the Clintons and thought they would have more influence with the inexperienced Obama than with Clinton. Following Clinton’s defeat, Trump remained the loyal Clinton foot soldier, using the birth certificate issue to simultaneously establish credibility with conservatives and also blackmail Obama into anointing Hillary Clinton as his successor.

> In 2012, Trump gave an interview with Greta van Susteren of Fox News where he became the first to announce Hillary’s candidacy for 2016. Immediately Trump himself began making preparations for a run of his own to help Hillary, having tested the waters in 2012 and seeing very promising poll numbers in a potential primary race against Mitt Romney. Leveraging Trump's connections to the major networks, he and the Clintons quickly reached a secret agreement for them to push Trump’s candidacy at the expense of other Republicans. The networks would use the pretext of covering Trump’s controversial comments and actions to give him 10 to 1 coverage vs. other candidates, using extensive data collected over the years showing that if you mentioned a candidate, person or product enough times, people would vote for or support them.

> Similar to Perot, if Trump even got ahead in the polls, he would say or do something so unacceptable that all but the most brainwashed followers would drop their support. Another key part of the plan: destroy the careers of up and coming conservatives such as Marco Rubio, who were deemed the true threat to the Democrats’ dominance of Washington.

> As he prepared to descend the elevator at Trump Tower, even the famously confident Trump began to have second thoughts. In a last minute phone call with Bill Clinton, he aired some final doubts about the plan. Yes they had crunched the numbers, but were they overplaying their hand? Would a platform demonizing Mexicans, Muslims, immigrants and other minority groups really play that well in 2016 America? Would Americans simply ignore their well-documented, decades long history of friendship and Trump’s past as a liberal Democrat with a self-professed love for gun control and universal health care? Were people really that stupid?

> To be continued...

Why would Perot go through all that song 'n' dance just to lose? What does he get out of that?

>Oy vey, read this story Goyim, it's almost as good as the holocaust

Got a link to this, OP?

Also, I've been on the Trump Train since last summer, but I'm seriously starting to believe he is just a Clinton plant.

>having a us president owe you favors

I wonder how being on the right side of the government would help a businessman?

You're either a robot, shill or someone with a low IQ influenced by the shills.

"Time to exchange hotel keys, Bill!"

What Hillary gets out of it: The keys to the world

What Trump gets out of it: The advertising campaign of a lifetime.

Makes sense I guess.

the shills have learned how to proxy, my how fast they grow up

So let's say that Trump is actually a Hillary plant. What am I going to do now? Vote for Hillary?

Serious question.

...

It's amusing that so many Trumpcucks deny this theory. They take all his retard comments and twist them into some "good for publicity" argument.

Face it cucks. You all got duped. You're $hilling harder than actual $hills lol

...

It hurts to consider you've been so deceived by someone you viewed as a last, great hope. But it's worth considering, seriously. His longstanding connections to the Clintons are well known. Remember months ago when conservashit PACs were making video compilations of Trump interviews over the years, highlighting his consistently liberal, democrat friendly underpinnings? Have you noticed how he cannot stop sabotaging himself, especially when he's starting to gain the upper hand, like right now? And of course we're all aware of how dirty, corrupt, and conniving the Clintons are.

Write in Pat Buchannan? I dunno.

Regardless of his status as a plant, or not. His campaign has birthed a nationalist, anti-globalist movement in America that won't go away, win or lose, plant or not. And that's a good thing.

People should never passively live their lives with the expectation that some politician will swoop in and save them. All anyone can do is try to gain the upper hand themselves.

Yep!! Predicted this shit ages ago as soon as he started deliberately talking shit. He's never done so before but now he's all out extreme. It's s fucking act /pol

Id like to think if he was a plant he has seen the people cry out to him and then the chessening began after they realised what was going on

>implying that wasn't the plan all along. it's an easier way to paint that crowd out as retard, hillbilly racists. It's the same thing that $hill Alex Jones is doing. It's all a game. You're easier to take out that way.

It's not about you right wing true believers. It's the swing vote

o-oy vey goyim! don't vote for Trump! that would be anutha shoah!

>$0.02 has been deposited into your account. Thank you for correcting the record.

And OP doesn't post again

10/10 shill thread OP. good job. no source, no replies.

Source or GTFO

Going to vote for him anyway.
I'd take my chances playing russian roulette with a minigun over voting for Hillary or throwing it away on a third party controlled opposition candidate.

So why would he talk about Clinton Cash? Why would he talk about Bill abusing women? Why would he bring up Hillary's terrible record as Sec of State? I only see this as a tinfoil hat theory from a "principled" conservative that is a #nevertrump guy. I just don't see this being legit. Plus, he'd demonize this brand for life with all the useful idiots thinking that he's "racist" Plus, his message has been fairly constant for the past 30 years or so. Give or take a few things like his old view on gun control.

>this
When the last bastion of hope is a political party or person shits gone real bad

This makes Perot sound a pawn to Clinton. Perot was straight forward and vile to each of the candidates policies. They treated him then as they're treating Trump now in the media. Everything he warned about has happened, along with time frame of it happening.
Couple years back, maybe a decade now, Buffet put out a book about what was happening to America currently, and it was exactly what Perot was saying back in the 90's. Buffet still made a pretty penny off that old info.

if he's a plant, and he manages to win, the Clintons will be in his ear throughout the presidency, so it'll be identical to a Clinton presidency - which will ultimately kill of the GOP for the foreseeable future.

All 3rd party candidates are controlled opposition right now. Jill is clearly a plant. Gary likely is too - he's not an actual libertarian and he blurs the line between left and right-winger waaay too much to gain a stable following.

Bernie was literally the only hope. All of you Trumpfags should've put your energy into preserving Bernie's candidacy

Good for you dude but it's not about you. You've probably always been conservative. It's about scaring off swing voters or making dems motivated to vote for her

Trump donated a lot of money to the Republican party as well.

I agree with everything you said up until Bernie. Bernie doesn't have a backbone.

There is nothing we can do. Checkmate, we're done for. 20 more years this tranny loving generation will hold political office and this country will burn to the ground.

This. This is where we're at.

That's also true. As early as Bush Sr, if I remember correctly. Not to mention his hotel revenue is down. I can't imagine he would tarnish his brand for some political favors.

>> Trump and the Clintons first made contact in 1993, when a young Donald Trump invited Bill Clinton
>young
He was nearly fucking 50

Thank you for Correcting the Record.

>Have you noticed how he cannot stop sabotaging himself, especially when he's starting to gain the upper hand, like right now?

You mean when he's getting the upper hand or not getting the upper hand, the media spins up fake controversy? Yes, we know.

Bernie cucked to Clinton and you're sitting here acting like he's somehow better than Trump?

Fuck off you stupid faggot, Bernie had no hope from the start. not only was he up against the entire DNC, but he had no policy besides "B-BUT THE MILLIONAHS AND BILLIONAHS"

Bernie is confirmed to be a lapdog of the Clintons, though, as opposed to one that you have to take purely on faith is bad.

If true the point of that story is you never had a real option. Bernie was a plant to ensure DNC nomination, and Trump a plant to throw the opposition. I never trust anyone in politics 100% anyway. I'm going to vote Trump no matter what because if anything the RNC will ride the wave to congressional power and at worst we get a better country.

Bernie was a plant you moron. he listed himself an an independent the whole time. Why would the DNC ever give it's nominee slot to someone who doesn't even consider himself a Democrat. That would be easier for a Republican as the RNC has always been a coalition party, unlike the DNC which has always been an identity politics party.

that would make literally no sense though. I don't see how him calling out Hillary and the establishment that protects her is doing her any favors. If anything, Bernie's candidacy has fucked her big time - if it weren't for him, they anti-Clinton sentiment would only be perceived as ring-wing, sexist rhetoric.

He was cornered. Not sure if he was threatened like some of you say, but something is up. He probably came to the conclusion that he with leverage, he could make slight progressive changes in congress.

Trumpfags should've seen his fake candidacy from a mile away. Why would a billionare take the biggest pay cut of his life, which is what being the president would entail.
>"he cares for muh americas"
keep telling yourself that

>implying shillary isn't a trump plant

The problem is that Trump is doing too well, yes even now, he's doing too good a job.

Though personally I think Trump's running to set Ivanka up for a later run.

She'll use her father's populist appeal with her "Common sense" and "Muh Vagina" to get in.

Wouldn't be surprised if she's working iwith Cheslsa Clinton.

Anyone can write this stuff after Trump has already done all these things.

If this theory had been postulated before Trump ran for the nomination, it might have had more credibility.

This.

A combination of Trump being smart and the media whores being retarded means that whenever he throws out bait (purposely or not) they fucking eat it up and blow it up to ridiculous proportions.

For gods sake, a joke about a crying baby? Saying a man seems nice despite being a dickhead to him personally and asking what his wife has to say? EATING CHICKEN WITH A KNIFE AND FORK?

Every single time, it just proves him right that the media is so dishonest and trustworthy, which is hugely important considering how fucking deeply they're owned by the same (((donors))) that own Hillary. Everybody knows the emperor isn't wearing clothes.

That's literally the first thing all the cuckservatives were saying about him. The Democrats started out calling him literally Hitler, and the Republicans started out calling him a Democrat plant.

>increasingly_nervous_man.jpg

This is making a hell of a lot of sense

Clinton clash is a hilariously shallow documentary that doesn't even have a clear narrative. Its just a stream of consciousness-like montage of scary music and newsreels. I found the documentary to be boring and incoherent, and not even scratching the surface of Clinton corruption, let alone packaging it in a way that would be appealing to thinking people.

>that would make literally no sense though.

Of course it would, if it wasn't for Bernie there would be no one for HRC to be fighting, and she wouldn't be in the news at all.

>I don't see how him calling out Hillary and the establishment that protects her is doing her any favors.

He doesn't, he's a huge white knight of HRC and has fought for her from the beginning, offering only the faintest of criticisms.

>Trumpfags should've seen his fake candidacy from a mile away.

Just because your candidate was confirmed to have been a shill from the moment he said "enough about those damn emails" and has bent the knee to everything he despises doesn't mean anyone's going to listen to your faith based assertions of Trump being a bastid.