THE TRUMP DECEPTION

How plausible/believable is this story? Found this posted on another site, don't attack me just the messenger.

Does anyone have research backing up or debunking what is being claimed here?

> The year was 1988, and things were looking grim for the future of the Democratic Party. George H.W. Bush had just cruised to a crushing win over Michael Dukakis, becoming the first sitting Vice President to be elected President since Martin Van Buren in 1836. Following two landslide victories by Ronald Reagan, the future appeared to be all but hopeless for the American left.

> Meanwhile in New York, a young Democrat governor, Bill Clinton, pitched what must have sounded like an insanely audacious plan to a small of circle of ultra-wealthy financial backers. Clinton's thesis was that Democrats were now stuck in a permanent minority and could only win by rigging the election itself. His idea: run a false flag candidate to exploit divisions within the conservative movement and allow Democrats to win with a plurality of the vote.

> With his friend, the Texas billionaire H. Ross Perot who had become a major enemy of Reagan, Clinton brainstormed a platform that would serve as a wedge to steal support from the GOP. Influenced by the rising popularity of populist conservatives such as Pat Buchanan, Perot and Clinton settled on a mix of nationalism and opposition to free trade. It worked perfectly, getting Clinton elected twice. So well in fact that in one point in 1992, Perot was actually leading both Bush and Clinton in the polls. However Perot “fixed” this by temporarily dropping out of the campaign and torpedoing his own credibility, a tactic that would be emulated by another candidate decades later.

> Trump and the Clintons first made contact in 1993, when a young Donald Trump invited Bill Clinton to a casino networking event in New Jersey back in 1993 under the pseudonym “Tony August” (the letter he sent to Clinton is still viewable in the Clinton library archives online). They quickly became good friends, united by their interest in the science of marketing and specifically in analyzing the psychology of the average American. Trump often incorporated this into his various marketing initiatives from Trump Steaks to Trump University.

> Trump, a liberal Democrat and globalist with views similar to the Clintons, became a frequent White House visitor and wrote admirably of the Clintons in his books. He became one of the chief “fixers” for the Clintons from the outside, defending Bill in the press over the Monica Lewinsky scandal and attacking Republicans.

> In the mid 1990s, Trump joined the Reform Party in anticipation of becoming Perot’s successor as the Clinton's spoiler candidate. However this never panned out due to timing and the Clinton's abandonment of Al Gore in the 2000 election. It wasn’t until much later when Hillary prepared to run for the Presidency that Bill and Donald began discussing a revival of this plan during their frequent phone calls and golfing trips together. This time however the plan would be even more audacious, with Trump running not as a third party candidate but for the Republican nomination itself.

> The thinking, fleshed out during a series of golf trips to Scotland and late night meetings at Mar-a-Lago, was that Trump would leverage his fame and dominance of the media, established during decades as a TV celebrity, to generate wall to wall coverage and drown out his rivals. He would run on a nationalist “America First” agenda in the tradition of Perot, but would also push the envelope on racial issues in a way that would make the eventual GOP nominee toxic even in the event that Trump ultimately lost the nomination. Trump and Clinton even agreed on the use of a catchphrase that Bill Clinton had used several times in the past: “Make America Great Again.”

> What they never gambled on, however, was a black swan event: the rise of Barack Obama and his eventual defeat of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 primary. Obama represented a different faction of Democrats, backed by a cabal of ultra-wealthy Chicago financiers and powerful Congressional Democrats who resented the Clintons and thought they would have more influence with the inexperienced Obama than with Clinton. Following Clinton’s defeat, Trump remained the loyal Clinton foot soldier, using the birth certificate issue to simultaneously establish credibility with conservatives and also blackmail Obama into anointing Hillary Clinton as his successor.

> In 2012, Trump gave an interview with Greta van Susteren of Fox News where he became the first to announce Hillary’s candidacy for 2016. Immediately Trump himself began making preparations for a run of his own to help Hillary, having tested the waters in 2012 and seeing very promising poll numbers in a potential primary race against Mitt Romney. Leveraging Trump's connections to the major networks, he and the Clintons quickly reached a secret agreement for them to push Trump’s candidacy at the expense of other Republicans. The networks would use the pretext of covering Trump’s controversial comments and actions to give him 10 to 1 coverage vs. other candidates, using extensive data collected over the years showing that if you mentioned a candidate, person or product enough times, people would vote for or support them.

> Similar to Perot, if Trump even got ahead in the polls, he would say or do something so unacceptable that all but the most brainwashed followers would drop their support. Another key part of the plan: destroy the careers of up and coming conservatives such as Marco Rubio, who were deemed the true threat to the Democrats’ dominance of Washington.

> As he prepared to descend the elevator at Trump Tower, even the famously confident Trump began to have second thoughts. In a last minute phone call with Bill Clinton, he aired some final doubts about the plan. Yes they had crunched the numbers, but were they overplaying their hand? Would a platform demonizing Mexicans, Muslims, immigrants and other minority groups really play that well in 2016 America? Would Americans simply ignore their well-documented, decades long history of friendship and Trump’s past as a liberal Democrat with a self-professed love for gun control and universal health care? Were people really that stupid?

> To be continued...

Why would Perot go through all that song 'n' dance just to lose? What does he get out of that?

>Oy vey, read this story Goyim, it's almost as good as the holocaust

Got a link to this, OP?

Also, I've been on the Trump Train since last summer, but I'm seriously starting to believe he is just a Clinton plant.

>having a us president owe you favors

I wonder how being on the right side of the government would help a businessman?

You're either a robot, shill or someone with a low IQ influenced by the shills.