Marxist Occupation of the Western Mind

How did it get to this point? I understand a lot of it has to do Jews over representing in politics, banks, and the media most of all but how did they end up having a strangle hold on those jobs in the US?

It seems to me that the 1950s were the last decade in which traditional conservative American values and beliefs were still held. The 1960s is when the hippy movement starts and it's all downhill from there.

How did it get started though, all of it? Can someone post a timeline of events from say WW1 to now?

Other urls found in this thread:

academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Good question OP.

This is a wild ride, and you shouldn't listen to me, you should do your own research. I'm still studying Marxism and what has happened, so feel free to critique me as much as you'd like.

Lets go back awhile.

>ancient Israel

Rome has destroyed Palestine and the Israelites go into diaspora.

>Khazaria

Was a Kingdom that converted to Judaism, most modern Jews descend from these people.

>Kabbalah

This is a form of Jewish mysticism. It's important to distinguish Mysticism isn't throwing fire balls, it's more of understanding what the spirit realm is.

Kabbalah goes back to biblical times, and much of the Apostle Paul's writings are borderline plagiarized by Kabbalaistic philosophy.

>Sabbatai

Relatively recently, I believe it was in the Napoleonic era - a man founded a cult called and they were called the Sabbatean-Frankists.

You see in Kabbalah Jews believe that man actually goes beyond God in terms of power. But they need to slowly take steps up the ladder to get there.

What the Sabbatean-Frankists believed is that man had to overcome all physical boundaries to get there, including sin.

By plunging society into decadence, man-kind would ascend to God-hood.

>The Frankfurt School

The institute for Marxism was based in Frankfurt and was linked to the Sabbatean-Frankists. These people believed that because Marx's envisioned proletariat Revolution failed, and only Feudal Russia revolted in WW1 and not the more advanced countries, they decided a new tactic was needed.

The Bolsheviks would go on to use the Communist International's to spread Marxism, but the Frankfurt School had another plan.

By destroying Western society's culture, they could break all the barriers that stand in the way of Marxism. Before the modern era, it was perfectly normal to admit, that Marxism was nihilistic, and a substitute for religion.

So they made their plans to subvert society and create a land of degenerates. This weak society would be conquered.

Actually simple: Conservatives and right-wingers behaved nuts and scared the people. This made Joos easier to sell Cultural Jooism.

I mean, come on, the Nazis did invade a lot of countries in Napoleon style and pissed off a lot of people. The Comies did the same in Eastern Europe. East Europeans hate commies, West Europeans hate nazis.

This was simple game for Joos. With their media help and guilt cult, they brainwashed a lot of Whites.
* If they teach feminism, simply put scaring pictures of Aryan women cooking
* If they teach racial denial, simply put scaring pictures of Nazi teachers
* If they promote degenerateness, simply put scary pictures of denegerate art exhibitions
and so on...

At least in Europe it's all like this. In America it's a bit more different: You had cold war hysteria which helped Joos brainwashing disaffected suburban kids that you should rebel.

Once people started to reject religion, they started to believe more in Cultural Jooism (=secular religion). Once they believed in that, parents didn't care about their child and only for money and sex. Once the child had no parents anymore, he start watching the electric Jew.

The fat's in the fire.

>continued

>The Spread of Marxism

When you think of the KGB, you probably think of some tough Russian James Bond wrestling bears, and assassinating capitalists. This was not the KGB's main job.

75% of the KGB's Government was spent on subversion. This went to Hollywood, Western Europe, Japan, and everywhere else on the planet. There was a saying that a single generation could make a country Socialist. This was true, look at what a single Socialist generation did to the United States. We went from essentially Libertarians to Social Democrats.

>Capitalism Vs Marxism - a false spectrum

Most people will put Political views into a left-right spectrum, this does not work, however.

What if someone wants guns, but likes welfare? What if someone wants to protect private property, but prevent social inequality? This spectrum simply does not work.

There are faults in both Marxism and Capitalism, and I'll start with Capitalism first.

>Capitalism

This ideology is clever. It appears harmless, and why wouldn't it? It lets people do whatever they want, and the Government does nothing. A very liberal and free ideology indeed - or so it would seem.

Most Libertarians and other hyper-capitalists fail to recognize that a free market is international. This means that a single Government could tax its citizens and then buy industry in other nations, and create an international monopoly. Another problem is usury.

The definition of Usury was always lending money on interest, but that was changed in the last few hundred years. Go read the old testament, it's very clear that it's bad to let a bank loan money on interest to your own people. This along with Fractional-Reserve Banking allows a bank to essentially create currency from nothing. They give imaginary money to someone to go buy something, and then collect real money in return. This system ultimately leads to an oligarchy.

It disguises itself as freedom, but sucks the blood out of nations.

>continued

>Marxism

Marxism is often slurred with rhetoric, so that its members don't have to actually stand up for its values. (unlike capitalism, there is very little arguments in favor of communism).

Let me explain it this way. Socialism is the control of the means of production by the workers. The reason they want this is because companies and employers take a portion of what the laborer produces. To the Marxist this is exploitation.

A Socialist wants to give the workers control of the means of production, and that is all. It's fare game after that.

But Communism is considered the next stage of Socialism. Communism is a society without money, class, government or property.

(note: Marxism is a Government which utilizes socialism to move towards communism)

The concept of no property goes all the way back to Plato. The Minoan Greeks even had a Redistributive economy.

This process is flawed, because in making a Government to oversee this process - the Marxist has created a new class system. Government over Worker. There is no longer a middle class.

(The rise of the middle-class is what ended Feudalism, the middle-class is always the one that protects the workers and themselves from the Government, as the lowest classes are too weak and uneducated to revolt.)

All of the wealth has been put into the hands of just a few people, and just like Capitalism (((they))) have gained complete control.

>Hegelian Dialectic

The Hegelian Dialectic can be best described as having a

Thesis

Then having the opposite, or Antithesis.

Then these two are combined to make a Synthesis.

This fits in with the Capitalist-Marxism spectrum.
Capitalism naturally emerges from Society, and starts building a lot. Then banks start forming and workers start getting the raw end of the deal

Then the reaction to Capitalism is immediately assumed to be Marxism, as it is the exact opposite or Antithesis.

Notice the synthesis is oligarchy.

Thanks for the thought out posts.

>continued

>The Third Way: Nationalism

After reading this you might be saying "but user, if both Capitalism and Communism are bad, how do we free ourselves?", the answer is to focus on your own people.

By limiting economies you can make sure that your people are the strongest.

You can tax importation of food, so that your nation can grow its own food and survive by itself. You can end Usury, and your people will have more capital to invest in the economy. You can ban the payment of Dividends, so that a company must spend its money on itself, and not give it to the people who have already gotten their reward off of stock price speculation. You can ban land speculation, as this does not actually produce anything, but instead allows people to take land from someone else and gain money from it. This is wrong for the same reason insider trading is wrong.

Some free-market advocates might come and say "Stop! You're going to kill the economy!".

Well I say, what have any of these systems produced? Did banks build the cars? Did speculators grow our corn?

These systems produce nothing, and are merely a parasite. They can be destroyed.

A nation should put itself first, and must always put itself first. And here's the kicker.

>The Jews are Nationalists

If earlier in this thread you took my advice and looked up in the old testament about interest.

You'll notice it says that you can't charge interest to anyone IN THE TRIBE. Meaning that you could go loan money on interest to the Goyim, but not to another "Chosen One".

The Jews know that this is the best system. That's why Israel is the most National-Socialist country today.

I see no reason that we cannot end this menace and unite as a nation. We have been divided by democracy, so that we blame each other, and not our oppressors.

Finding our leader is in God's hands.

Putting that leader into power is in ours.

Just some food for thought.

Oxycontin is destroying white communities.
Oxycontin was developed in Frankfurt Germany.
Frankfurt School is another name for cultural Marxism.

Thanks. I'm still researching all of this, but this is what I've gotten so far. I've been detouring a lot more into the occult aspect of this.

It's a bit of a wild ride, and you might have to tone it down if you talk with someone IRL about politics. Most people don't appreciate getting told their ideology is kike engineered mind control.

You right wingers seem to think that its a problem with us.

Have you ever thought it might be a problem with you?

Maybe Marxism is the way forward, and its just retards like you that dont realize it yet. Dont worry though, its only going to get stronger and stronger till nothing stands in its path.

The 1950's was a time of socialist policies married with the peak of American social capital. It was a pleasant anomaly, not the way things always were before.

I live in the Northeast of the United States so I am very familiar with the effects of oxycontin and heroin

I did a quick google search and found this article written in 2000. It reads like it was written yesterday though.

academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/

Have you considered that there's a reason both Capitalism and Communism lead to a "Chosen" oligarchy?

Ever thought that Oxycontin was being pushed onto white people to turn them into addicts, which could be used as slave labor in the prison system, because cultural Marxists don't want the US prison system to seem too "racist"?

Looks great.
This whole system has been in place for nearly a hundred years, and the concepts they've been using for over a thousand.

No. What I think is that the United States has a very powerful pharmaceutical sector, powerful in the sense that it makes a lot of money and therefore has a lot of influence.

This is not only why there are so many drugs available here but also why drugs are prescribed so frequently. The drugs being prescribed also may have very adverse effects, sometimes to the point of being worse than the condition they are supposed to be treating.

I can tell from things I've seen first hand because I live in a place that was hit very hard by this. What happens is someone gets an injury, maybe it's serious maybe it's not. The doctor prescribes a painkiller, the patient becomes addicted. The patient then has to resort to getting more. This can be achieved through a number of ways; getting from friends/family (buying or stealing), robbing pharmacies, moving to heroin.

Other times what happens is say I'm some 18 year old kid, my dad got hurt on the job, he got some oxycontin or percocets, I take some to get high on because I'm a dumb 18 year old. I share it with my friends and the same cycle I just mentioned happens.

I have friends and family who have all been affected by the heroin epidemic here. It's truly sad. Anyway I don't want to derail too much but I will say that in a Nationalist country this kind of thing wouldn't happen because the pharma industry wouldn't have that type of power.

Communism will alwyas lead to corruption due to its centeralised nature. When a government has everything in its pocket, it will turn sour.

Capitalism is unfair on the less fortunate in society

So the best is middle ground. Something were the essentials (healthcare/water...etc) is supplied, monitored and/or at least regulated heavily, by a government elected by the population and everything else will be in the hands of free market.

But people think if you advocate for some socialism, you're literally a jew.

Middle ground is the best.

I think most people can agree that you NEED some "socialism"

roads, police, fire, etc those are all parts of socialism.

The reason why true libertarians and ancaps get roasted so hard on this board is simply because they refuse to acknowledge this simple fact.

There absolutely needs to be a balance of socialism and capitalism. Unrestricted capitalism leads to globalism and monopolies. Unrestricted socialism leads to the destruction of the middle class and a ruler/worker society.

Neither one in their unadulterated forms works. I think most arguments when boiled down aren't really about one being better than the other but what ratios of each work best.

Just think about this for a moment. Judea declared war on Hitler and nazi germany in 1933. A group of wealthy powerful people, without a military, without a country, without anything resembling a nation status. And they used their power and influence to mobilize puppets to fight their war against Nazi germany. And they won.

How powerful must these people be now? How comedic does it look to have a dictator of an incredibly powerful and economically booming nation, address a small group of wealthy influential people who are nationless. It SHOULD seem like goliath holding a huge lenghty speech about the dangers coming from david.

The amount of influence and power they cemented for themselves out of winning that war can only be unmeasureable. It's no wonder they put many mechanisms in place to protect themselves. At this point, they are undefeatable. We are already slaves.

its been an effort to predict and control human behaviour started with the Macy Conferences, 1950's, they were particularly interested in a report called The Authoritarian Personality released by Frankfurt IISR. The outcome was the concept that to destroy fascism/racism (particularly where jews were the target) etc. it was necessary to alter humanities cultural patterns (values) so that humanity would not gravitate to authoritarian figures like it had in ww2. This destruction of values makes everything a lot more 'fluid'/'relative' and from this an 'anti-authoritarian people' would be programmed/manufactured. The methods were particularly successful in west Germany.