>continued
>Marxism
Marxism is often slurred with rhetoric, so that its members don't have to actually stand up for its values. (unlike capitalism, there is very little arguments in favor of communism).
Let me explain it this way. Socialism is the control of the means of production by the workers. The reason they want this is because companies and employers take a portion of what the laborer produces. To the Marxist this is exploitation.
A Socialist wants to give the workers control of the means of production, and that is all. It's fare game after that.
But Communism is considered the next stage of Socialism. Communism is a society without money, class, government or property.
(note: Marxism is a Government which utilizes socialism to move towards communism)
The concept of no property goes all the way back to Plato. The Minoan Greeks even had a Redistributive economy.
This process is flawed, because in making a Government to oversee this process - the Marxist has created a new class system. Government over Worker. There is no longer a middle class.
(The rise of the middle-class is what ended Feudalism, the middle-class is always the one that protects the workers and themselves from the Government, as the lowest classes are too weak and uneducated to revolt.)
All of the wealth has been put into the hands of just a few people, and just like Capitalism (((they))) have gained complete control.
>Hegelian Dialectic
The Hegelian Dialectic can be best described as having a
Thesis
Then having the opposite, or Antithesis.
Then these two are combined to make a Synthesis.
This fits in with the Capitalist-Marxism spectrum.
Capitalism naturally emerges from Society, and starts building a lot. Then banks start forming and workers start getting the raw end of the deal
Then the reaction to Capitalism is immediately assumed to be Marxism, as it is the exact opposite or Antithesis.
Notice the synthesis is oligarchy.