Is it true westerns were the capeshit of the 50s?
Is it true westerns were the capeshit of the 50s?
Other urls found in this thread:
Whatevuh happened to... Gary Coopuh?
No because among the shit pile of the genre are some of the greatest films ever. Capeshit has never produced anything worth watching.
conan the barbarian you fag
Also the 40's
No because there are actually a lot of good westerns.
Some were
High noon is obviously not one of them
Just wait till Italians will start making capeshit on the cheap
Conan is adventure/fantasy, not superhero shit
Actually it was pirate movies
the wild west is a setting, not a formula.
No. There were more than five good westerns.
>some of the best movies ever are low budget Italian capeshit
Huh
It's too late
This
>spoof of cheesy 1970s Italian action movie rip offs
>never completed
>still better than any Avengers movie
No, because they are concerned with themes of masculinity.
no because some of them are actually great movies, the only comparison to be made between the two is the over saturation of the market.
Westerns and WWII movies
And, the 30s, the 20s, etc.
Well, there's like 100 times more westerns than superhero films.
No, because "Western" is its own setting/genre. Westerns can have an abundance of different styled antagonist and protagonist, living in different decades, and dealing with different societal problems.
"Super-hero" is a subgenre of Action/Adventure.
are you serious?
If you compare how many westerns were made during that time vs how many capeshit films were made/are being made there's like a huge gap between those two. It makes the capeshit plague look like a common cold and westerns a spanish influenza
>american movies have big budgets
You fell for the money laundring jew