If Hillary rigged the DNC, what makes you think she won't rig the election?

If Hillary rigged the DNC, what makes you think she won't rig the election?

Other urls found in this thread:

wired.com/2016/08/americas-voting-machines-arent-ready-election/
reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4g3x5h/investigative_journalism_why_bernie_may_have/
drive.google.com/file/d/0B6mLpCEIGEYGYl9RZWFRcmpsZk0/view?pref=2&pli=1
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

She didn't rig anything, that's just a Republican funded lie to discredit her campaign don't fall for it

At the rate Trump has been shooting himself in the foot recently, she won't have to.

Shill detected.

Elections have bin rigged ever since 2000 when the US started using electronic voting machines.

She is rigging the election, thing is Trump isn't a conventional candidate that can be easily defeated because he actually has support despite the media & top goy politicians in his own party trying to throw him under the bus. We'll find out this November if money trumps genuine voter support.

20 NWO dollars have been delivered to your account

The primaries weren't "rigged". The party chair just favored one candidate over the other. It's totally legal.

nothing. she will

If I say the words "12%", does that mean anything to you?

You do a sincerely shitty job of hiding your political ties. "Wasserman-Schultz was only fired because republicans!"

>U.S politics
>in perpetual state of rigged flux

choose two

FUCK YOU BITCH. THE EMAILS WERE LEAKED U DUMB FUCK. 100% PROOF IDIOT FUCK, FUCK YOU LEAVE OUR BOARD U SHILL

> It's totally legal.

That was actually illegal. They're not supposed to favor any candidate.

ghostbin.
com/
paste/
t9k7j

Rigged doesn't imply illegal you disingenuous parasitic insect.

Because rigging the DNC is a lot easier than rigging the generals.

>what makes you think she won't rig the election?
>implying
of course she's gonna try rig them, but hopefully she will still fail miserably.

Indeed. Committee chairs are supposed to be completely impartial.

>If I say the words "12%", does that mean anything to you?

Nope.

>Wasserman-Schultz was only fired because republicans!

She quit 4 days before her term was up. (Her term ended the last day of the DNC.) It's literally nothing.

Explanation for the increase of shill activity. Hillary's Correct the Record army.

[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] or [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] or [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] or [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

"Quitting" the morning of the email leaks. Yeah, that's not suspicious at all.

I'm 95% sure she's going to rig it.

And it kills me.

"My candidate is not winning. The only logical explanation is rigged elections"

wired.com/2016/08/americas-voting-machines-arent-ready-election/

Also, only a naive fool or someone paid off would believe that Clinton wouldn't stoop that low after the email leaks.

No matter how much you bullshit about how "great" she is, you're not going to change our minds.

Yeah but this time the elections actually are rigged, you know it and I know it.

Pasta

Who is rigging them? Diebold, who works for the Bushes and Cheneys?

Or the States? Which are who run the elections are pretty Republican atm.

Get your conspiracy theory together before you start shit posting. Then I'll give your b8 a higher r8, m8.

throughout the course of the Democratic primary, every... well, read it for yourself

reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4g3x5h/investigative_journalism_why_bernie_may_have/

wherever unsecured and opaque voting machines are present, Clinton outperforms exit polls by ridiculous margins vs Sanders

yeah yeah it's written by a Bernie cuck. please keep your response based in the realm of fact

>Who is rigging them? Diebold?

yes.

see: Stanford University study

drive.google.com/file/d/0B6mLpCEIGEYGYl9RZWFRcmpsZk0/view?pref=2&pli=1

> Trumpfags and their conspiracy theories.

Rigging a primary is 100% legal. Its a private organization.

care to reply to this post? or maybe this study?

Just like bernfags and theirs amiright

> It's not really a theory when it's proven to have happened. At that point it's fact.