How true is this quote from Samuel P. Huntingdon?

"The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion (to which few members of other civilizations were converted) but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do."

>I'll take things butthurt niggers say for $500

Butthurt primitive dindus hate the west like a chimp who instinctively attacks an older alpha who appears weak. Freeing and integrating slaves them offering them limitless gibs appears, to them, to ne a sign of weakness. They attack weakness.

What's shameful about being better at war? That's practically a compliment.

>applying organized violence
Daily reminder it was the muslims and other niggers that sold the slaves.
Daily reminder that the first slave owner in the US was a nigger.

Wasnt Europe being invaded for most of its recorded history?

It's stupid as fuck. The most obvious mistake is the underlying assumption that ideas/values/religion has no effect on the effectiveness of applying violence.

Not in the least. The numbers converted to Christianity were worlds greater than "few".

Otherwise, if you want to classify "rule of law" as "organized application of violence", then sure I guess it is pretty accurate.

Ignoring that our 'superiority in applying organized violence' stems from the superiority of our ideas and beliefs, so what? Cry more, conquered bitch.

guiz this is compliment

huntington is based

>superiority in applying organized violence.
A result of superior political organization, military organization, weapons development, logistics and industry, and exploration.

Get fucked.

> Africa still has slaves, sex slaves, and other forms of slavery. But they like to say that others made it further because of slavery.

I like excuses being made without even thinking.

half true. We were the best at fighting, but all these third world nigger shitholes still try to emulate western governments because they know they are the best.

Superior methods of achieving violence,yes, but superior violence? How the fuck do you quantify that? Blacks in Africa murder eachother like it's going out of fashion.

It's true.
niggers chucking spears and stones would never be able to face white people with intellectual discussion alone though.

Sour grapes from inferior peoples.

It's bullshit

Britain's Empire wasn't built on slavery

Time to explore our roots again in these shitty times

Guys I have a question. If Africans really were the "original" humans how come they've always been behind technologically in almost every sense?

Africans are like the alpha version of humans. We got more refined as the bugs got sorted out.

>Britain's Empire wasn't built on slavery

For one thing, it's a self-contradictory statement. Superiority in applying organized violence is proof of superior ideas, as military tactics and strategies are, themselves, ideas.

It's also an incomplete assessment. The West established its dominance not simply through superiority in organized violence, but by superiority in organized EVERYTHING. We were better at politics, manufacturing, trade, science, agriculture, etc. Look into a field of organized human endeavor, and you will find that the West was demonstrably superior in that field for much of the past 500 years.

>literally every civilisation in the world didn't have slavery until Britain almost stopped it entirely throughout the world

Relative to every other civilsation, we were fucking saints.

Destroyed by Thomas Sowell,

“Slavery did not die out quietly of its own accord. It went down fighting to the bitter end – and it lost only because Europeans had gunpowder weapons first.” … “Ironically, the anti-slavery ideology behind this process began to develop in eighteenth-century Britain, at a time when the British Empire led the world in slave trading, and when the economy of most of its overseas colonies in the Western Hemisphere depended on slaves …While slavery was common to all civilizations, as well as to peoples considered uncivilized, only one civilization developed a moral revulsion against it, very late in hits history…not even the leading moralists in other civilizations rejected slavery at all….Moreover, within Western civilization, the principle impetus for the abolition of slavery came first from very conservative religious activists – people who would today be called ‘the religious right.’…this story is not ‘politically correct’ in today’s terms. Hence it is ignored, as if it never happened.”

10/10 mah magic negro

How else was anyone gonna win?

Cultural victories are for cucks.