Drumpf wants to take away my right to marriage

>Drumpf wants to take away my right to marriage
Why does Sup Forums support this idiot again?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lSVLpzGseXw
nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/trump-transgender-issues-is-about-states-rights.html
ontheissues.org/2016/Donald_Trump_Civil_Rights.htm
dailycaller.com/2016/03/26/heres-where-each-presidential-candidate-stands-on-marijuana-legalization/
pastebin.com/yqQYL8h5
strawpoll.me/10912996/r
law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/388/1
law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/loving.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Fuck off faggot only rights you deserve are the right to be thrown in an oven. Gay=got aids yet?

>Drumpf
Fuck off shill.

We don't.
Trump can go fuck himself, what a fucking retard.

If you need a license to do it, it has become a privilege not a right.

because they're bitter and paranoid, and they lash out at others who achieve anything in life be it love or success

WTF, i love Trump now.

hillary is the one that wrote Doma you stupid aids riddled faggot

can you have children? no? so no future tax payers so why state sponsor your union?

Cuck alert. Wake up white man!

Based German. I respect Adolf Hitler, wish he'd won.

>Drumpf
WTF I hate Trump now. Looks like I'm a #HildoDildo

.02 cents has been deposited to your account.
Thank you for correcting the record.
Your contribution to the Soros "one world" had been noted.
Geeee, that really made me thunk.
Hey, would you red pill me on praying the gay away?
Conservashits.
Occupy demoblabs
> I'd bother to answer you, but your telling a false narrative, that you will repeat every three hours any way, while not carrying about honest responses.
Fresh off the boat from plebbit?
I like bread, it helps me poop.

Theres no such thing as ctr
I'm trying to make sure we end up on the right side of history

The shilling never ends, but I'll bite despite the fact that I'm going to vote Shillary.
Trump has not claimed anything like this, additionally, people forget that president isn't all powerful. Trump would have a difficult time passing things through the Congress. It would have been the same (if not even harder) for Bernie, which is why his running was nothing more than a joke. Hillary is the only mainstream candidate left, and no matter how much of a liar she is, it's really all we've got. Voting for the 3rd parties is the same as throwing your vote away. At that point, you might as well stay home and roast some weenies.

Nu/pol/ never ceases to amaze me, what's the fucking difference between the Alt-right and the SJW boogeyman at this point?`One calls you an emasculated cuck while the other calls you a sexist bigot.

Gay """""""marriage""""""

Full homo here.

Gay marriage is stupid. Marriage is a religious concept. Marriage has always been between men and women, for two of the same sex, it's forcing your beliefs on others.
Also, most homos are fucking degenerates. Honestly, if I could take a pill to make me straight, I would.

Marriage is not a right, moron

Says the kike

...

Oven yourself my man

>Trump wants to take fag marriage away

No he doesn't. He wants to leave it up to the states. This is how it should be.

Great argument sodomite

I'm nu nothing nor am I alt right I'm just a pro whit redpilled person who knows the holocaust was exaggerated. I'm not even racist, except against Jews

Based Israel. You Jews are the best Jews, diaspora Jews are cancer.

jews are Satan incarnate
>liking any jew
>ever
oy vey shlomo

what's the point? you'll still be blowing strangers in public parks and restrooms.

Implying that I like them. I respect them even though they're scum, I kind of like Hitler tho even tho he killed hella Slavs

I could just call you a butthurt faggot instead if it makes you feel more comfortable.

And faggots are satan worshippers, I don't get why you have to choose one or the other.
Fact is that marriage is a religious union and a privilege, not something that anyone who shoves objects into his anus has as a right to.
It's true even when a kike says it.

yes moishe

Marriage isn't a right.

The government benefits for marriage revolved around the fact that they wanted children in order to populate the country but last I checked homos can't reproduce with each other.

And it doesn't even matter because you basically got all those benefits though civil unions but no, that wasn't enough you fucking just had to have the "marriage tag" along with it and get it by getting the overly involved government to do it for you. The you have the audacity to get mad and claim that people shouldn't give a shit about you wanting to get married because it's not a public matter but did you idiots not stop and think that maybe once you decide to legally change the definition of a centuries old tradition then maybe just fucking maybe that would be a public matter?

Honestly I have really no problem with fags but when they start talking about gay marriage and how great it is it just serves to show how hypocritical they are.

Postin in homo thred that is also weeb thred wew

I'm not even american

>believing (((their))) lies
youtube.com/watch?v=lSVLpzGseXw

short but effective.
BTFO
T
F
O

summerfags.

implying israel isn't the solution to the Jew problem. Kek

>OUTRIGHT DENYING THE EXISTANCE OF CORRECT THE RECORD
you shills never cease to amaze me

It really isn't a public matter. Gay marriage doesn't effect your life at all. You just think gay people are icky and don't want gay relationships to be seen as equal to straight relationships. You can go on and on about breeding but we have a lot of kids that need adopting, we have an overpopulation problem on Earth not the opposite.

tl;dr my sex life and marriage are none of your business, straightfag

it's a cuck fantasy to send all jews to israel

>..STATES TO DECIDE
THANK YOU FOR CORRECTIFYING MY RECORDING STUDIO

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ROT IN FUCKING HELL YOU FUCKING FAG

we love trump you do too retard

Then why did you make it a matter of public discussion, faggot? No one cares what you do in bed till you bring it up in public.

Israeli Jews are based, diaspora Jews are traitors. Granted id prefer Israel not exist but it does so might as well make the best of it, it's a good way to subvert Jews and make th nationalists instead of (((socialists)))

Trump wants gay marriage to be decided by the states. Trump wants a lot of things to be left up to states because what is good for New York is not necessarily good for Texas and vice versa. Minimum wage, gay marriage, pot decriminalization, transgender bathrooms, he wants many things to be determined by the states for themselves. SCOTUS's job is to interpret the constitution. It's pretty bizarre that they suddenly decided the founding fathers were pro gay marriage some 200 years after they had died.

Trump is actually learned on how America is supposed to operate. The federal government has way too much power right now. States rights in 2016 are a joke. Trump recognizes that states rights have been totally stripped away.

A man running for president who intends to uphold the constitution and be true to the founding fathers' intention. Trump is against the federal government having supreme power over the states. This, of course, is the globalists' worst nightmare.

that's totally fake guys, gay people are just like everyone else
i know because i met a gay guy once and he didn't try to give anyone AIDS

>jew trying to jew a gay person
kill yourself shill
>not being bisexual masterrace
pleb
Marriage is both originally a religious concept, but it has been taken over by society because of the monogamy that follows from it, which is advantageous to society, as monogamous couples have a higher chance of breeding succesful children and provide a better foundation. Thing is, gays don't need marriage, as they cannot breed...they can't create a future, so marriage is useless in a social context for them, as marriage generally comes with tax benefits for future children and such. I would however, support a partnership for gays to reduce the bullshit hedonism that goes on in the gay community
>tfw bisexual
>tfw want to give up girls because girls are fucking incapable and incite so much drama
>tfw don't want to search for a cute bisexual bf because the gay community is so fucking disgusting
>tfw i'll die without ever kissing a cute guy
reasons to purge the world.

>right to marriage

but you don't have a right to marriage, no one does

>Israeli Jews are based
fuck off kike

I do think tradition and culture are public matters.

>You can go on and on about breeding but we have a lot of kids that need adopting, we have an overpopulation problem on Earth not the opposite.
>implying we need to adopt the scum of the earth called africans
>implying we need to help them and not let nature take its course so that only succesful africans stay alive
>implying we need to undermine our racial and cultural homogeneity and thus undermine social homogeneity because of your feelings
>implying this is a sound idea
>implying you're not baiting hard

>muh states rights

Would you, user-san, please provide sources for this? I'd love to read them.

Not an argument.

What do you want sources on? Trump's positions on pot decriminalization, gay marriage, etc.?

Or sources on the founding fathers' intent with states rights?

>Trump says "I will do anything I can to make sure LGBTQ is safe"
>Hillary was against gay marriage until 5 years ago when she realized that it got more voters
>Hillary also gets money from various countries that support the killing of gay people

If you're gay, you'd be much better off voting for Trump to actually protect you than have Hillary disarm you and pretend to care while she let's you get thrown off the roof by Muslims

...

>>Hillary was against gay marriage
wtf i love Hilldawg now

wtf i hate trump now

Faggots shouldn't even be allowed to exist.
I would say you should be lucky your not forced to hide you disgusting lifestyle, but you shouldn't feel lucky, you should feel ashamed of being gay at all.

Gays deserve death.
One thing islam got right

Both would be best. I'm not too acquainted with the intentions of the founding fathers.

calm your tits faggot. it's not like you are usefull to society anyway

Nope.

Just go find a woman to marry.

Gay male here.

Obergefell was a shit decision, a 14th amendment overextension, a 10th amendment infringement, and terribly argued and opined.


Marriage at the expense of the Republic is not OK.

Tripcode is so you can look at my previous arguments. While on break I may come back to this thread.

age?

Fpbp!

Get off my continent you fucking degenerate Sodomite

Fascists like Donald Trump are retard, bro. Stay safe.

but Hillary has yet to support my RIGHT to marry myself, and then claim tax deductions.

why is Hillary so anti-everyone?

Please see Loving v. Virginia 1962 and note the Substantive Due Process analysis.

Marriage is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

If you want to understand how the founding fathers intended this country to be run and why, you should start by reading The Federalist Papers.

For Trump's positions on states rights and the implications for things like drugs, gay marriage etc, you can just use a search engine. He's talked about it in various interviews and rallies.

trans bathrooms:
nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/trump-transgender-issues-is-about-states-rights.html

gay marriage:
ontheissues.org/2016/Donald_Trump_Civil_Rights.htm

> Q: You say you would have liked the states, rather than the Supreme Court, to decide on gay marriage. Is this a dead issue for the GOP at this point?

> A: Some people have hopes of passing amendments, but it's not going to happen. Congress can't pass simple things, let alone that. So anybody that's making that an issue is doing it for political reasons. The Supreme Court ruled on it.

pot:
dailycaller.com/2016/03/26/heres-where-each-presidential-candidate-stands-on-marijuana-legalization/

> “I think medical should happen — right? Don’t we agree? I think so. And then I really believe we should leave it up to the states,” Trump said told a Nevada in 2015. But the Republican front-runner disapproves of the Colorado model of legalizing marijuana for recreational use. MPP gave Trump a C+.

But I don't support trump
life sure fucking sucks as a cruz missile

>am i fitting in yet?

Can CTR pay you already so you fuck off

He wants to make same-sex marriage a state issue. But, he's came to terms with gay marriage being a reality after the Supreme Court vote.

Cancer

23.

Have a home and partner. Live in based TX currently doing work in shit NY (where I'm originally from).

tinyurl
/polfaggot2


pastebin.com/yqQYL8h5

She was also for The Wall.

Yes, the states are one of the final checks on Federal Power. It would be as if the Magna Carta stated that the component members of the UK may do everything not explicitly stated has to be done by the King.

The states formed the federal government- they are its parents- not the other way around.

>but you don't have a right to marriage, no one does
Tell that to fucking Justice Kennedy, pulling a 'Right to Intimacy' out of his ass as an overextension of Loving v Virginia into this arena.

The 'Right to Intimacy' itself is murky, because it may be applied to poly-amorous/polygamous relationships, and we know how slippery the slope is from there.

Quick unbiased poll here since msm polls can't be trusted(please share to get an accurate idea) strawpoll.me/10912996/r
Please share On ALL CANDIDATES pages, articles, stories, threads and videos to get an accurate and unbiased result HELP ME FIND HILLARY SUPPORTERS I CANT SEEM TO FIND THEM ANYWHERE, AND IVE POSTED THIS ALL OVER

>STATES TO DECIDE
THANK YOU FOR CORRECTIFYING MY RECORDER

0/10

>right
Marriage is not a right. Rights can't be given or taken.
t. gayfag

Actually trump has no issue with gay marriage, he believes that whats important to deal with are far more pressing matters than putting rings on fags fingers

implying he wont flip flop on that if it gave him more votes

Trump doesnt need more votes though, theres bo way Clinton would be able to win fairly in November.

Why do you even want to marry?

I can't even understand how an atheist couple would like to marry, why would a gay couple want to marry?

Tax benefits etc.

Ceremony, status, tradition, etc.

gays confirmed for cultists of nurgle

Kek.

For reference, here is the the opinion for anyone wanting to take a look

law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/388/1

law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/loving.html

>Same content, just different site design depending on your readability preferences

The crux of Warren's argument was that

>The Equal Protection Clause requires the consideration of whether the classifications drawn by any statute constitute an arbitrary and invidious discrimination.
Yet it specifically states
>the equal protection of the laws

The state's argument that this only applied to penal laws seems sound- as this seemed to have been intended to stop fining Blacks for loitering $100 dollars and Whites $5, as a simple example.

I know the Court reads the text of the law first, reasons out the implications of the interpretation second, and intent a distant third.

Let's go through the entirety of section 1 of the 14th Amendment though, in context of that specific clause.

>No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
>nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

then let's isolate under which marriage may fall under

>privileges or immunities
- never outlawed, never enforced against
>liberty
- never deprived without due process of law
>equal protection of the laws
- never denied

Wrong. He won't take fags rights away. He is just empowering governors since they had no saying when Obongo and the White House just did it, even though this were state issues, not national ones.

But m-muh Civil Rights!

Legal and financial benefits.
Spouses get a third to half the estate- wills be damned- except when a trust is utilized. There is also a lowered tax rate for married couples fling jointly, which originally was used for Whites to reproduce. There is also the matter of access to children- a cohabiting Jeanne and Jacques may find out that the state may take away the child more easily, or Jeanne may leave Jacques in the dust, or Jacques and Jahan may find it more difficult to adopt without a marriage or civil union to show the adoption agency there is stability in the household.

Napoleon helped codify this in much of Europe. I thought you would know a bit more about it.

>Old people shouldn't be allowed to get married
>The infertile shouldn't be allowed to get married
WEW
E
W

Yet with privileges, we see that this is not without limit. One can argue the privilege of viewing pre recorded CP - which doesn't specifically harm anyone, can be outlawed and enforced against at any time by any state.

With liberties, never denied without due process of law, when they tried to deny the right of felons to marry while still serving their sentences, this was obviously not accepted. Due process was administered, a liberty deprived, seeming something other than a mere liberty.

So we exhausted the first two parts of section 1, and people still wanted to push this meme that it was a violation. What do then? Go to equal protection. Argue that it wasn't equal protection of the laws since there was one set of people that were allowed to do something, and another set of people not allowed to do the same thing. However this gets murky and philosophical.

What is a
>"thing"
?

>Does the "thing" called marriage mean partnering with one person of the opposite sex of one's own race?
Not if that was thrown out.

>Does the "thing" called marriage mean partnering with one person of the opposite sex?
Not if that was thrown out and civil unions not equated to marriages.

>Does the "thing" called marriage mean partnering with one person?
Well partnering with more than one person under a 'marriage' is still outlawed, so we will have to see.

The point is even this part of the 14th Amendment- unequal application of the same laws- has pitfalls, that if one wants to be legally and intellectually consistent would have to accept things far outside its purview.

What is the point of marriage if you're not going to reproduce?

>Old people shouldn't be allowed to get married
There's a range of contracts those judged not to be of sound capacity- a good portion of them elderly dementia patients- are not allowed to make or be party to.

>The infertile shouldn't be allowed to get married
>Infertility
>Relating to the bearing of children

Do you know what else relates to the bearing of children? Incest, and incestuous marriages are highly regulated, and thus a better example than your strawman.