Why is the 2004 Crash so well known why the 1996 version is relatively unheard of

Why is the 2004 Crash so well known why the 1996 version is relatively unheard of.

Are the general public plebs?

...

So... Yeah?

The real question is why doesn't Grand Canyon get the credit it deserves for being the inspiration for not only Crash but Magnolia too?

>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.
>Crash 1996: Let's crash cars and have sex!

Because grand canyon wasn't the first movie like that

>a complex story

>the 1996 version
it's a totally different movie, it's not a "version" of anything

>>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.

It's a film version of the script. Idiot

>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.

It was. There were various storylines, some of which crossed over.

Compared to Crash 1994 it was a fucking masterpiece.

>>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.

same fag

Yup, I'm not even gonna respond to the prick kek

>same fag
:thinking:

ok.kid

>a complex story

nah

>

this one doesn't mean anything

>Crash 2004: a complex story about race, morality, guilt and relationships.

Yes they are. 2004 Crash was decent, but not Oscar worthy, not that that means much anyway. 1996 Crash is pure kino, maybe Cronenbergs best

im not a samefag. you're a fucking pleb

...

Perfect ending

I genuinely can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you think that more storylines == more complex