A second Stanford study comparing voting machines to pre-election polls shows extreme discrepancies in many states where electronic voting machines were utilized. The study compared 337 pre-election polls, representation about 140,000 voters across 34 primary states. The pre-election polls were successful at predicting Clinton’s numbers in states with paper trails. However, Clinton over-performed an average of 9% in the states that use electronic voting machines but fail to provide paper evidence of this vote. Simply speaking, Clinton beat expectations ONLY in states with unaccountable voting machines. What’s more, two of the three companies that control the electronic voting machine market, Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. hart Intercivic) are on the list of big money donors that donated to the Clinton campaign, as shown by the DNC documents leaked by Guccifer 2.0. For example, in Louisiana, Clinton performed 12% better than the pre-election polls showed. The Republican primary didn’t show any deviation.
>two of the three companies that control the electronic voting machine market, Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. hart Intercivic) are on the list of big money donors that donated to the Clinton campaign
How the fuck is this legal?
Austin Lopez
This is what's being slid.
Chase Smith
damn russia pls dont try to do the Jew Stuart show. The jewmerican media industry itself could not put that lightning back in a bottle, so why would you think you can out jew the final-boss over jews of this game?
Obama said today those numbers would be evidence of election fraud.
...he was referring to the election in November
KEK
Michael Baker
bump
Isaac Watson
post link to study or youre a faggot
Liam Bailey
An older article, (Oct/2013) but worth reading. Apparently Diebold has been sued.
Diebold: the controversial manufacturer of voting and ATM machines, whose name conjures up the demons of Ohio’s 2004 presidential election irregularities, is now finally under indictment for a “worldwide pattern of criminal conduct.” Federal prosecutors filed charges against Diebold, Inc. on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 alleging that the North Canton, Ohio-based security and manufacturing company bribed government officials and falsified documents to obtain business in China, Indonesia and Russia. Diebold has agreed to pay $50 million to settle the two criminal counts against it. This is not the first time Diebold’s been accused of bribery. In 2005, the Free Press exposed that Matt Damschroder, Republican chair of the Franklin County of Elections in 2004, reported that a key Diebold operative told Damschroder he made a $50,000 contribution to then-Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell's “political interests” while Blackwell was evaluating Diebold's bids for state purchasing contracts. Damschroder admitted to personally accepting a $10,000 check from former Diebold contractor Pasquale “Patsy” Gallina made out to the Franklin County Republican Party. That contribution was made while Damschroder was involved in evaluating Diebold bids for county contracts. Damschroder was suspended for a month without pay for the incident. Despite the scandal, he was later appointed as Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted's Director of Elections
How old is that? Looks like its from around when the dieblod digital machines were first being rolled out nation wide (2004). If that's the case and absolutely nothing has come of the revelations in that video in the intervening 12 years we might as well stop talking about elections in the United States entirely lol
On the Youtube page it says it was published Apr 7, 2016. That doesn't really tell you how old the video is though, so to be completely honest, I dunno.
Brody Diaz
Huh?
Dominic Cox
Up up up. I know American democracy is a joke, but can't you at least try to fix this?
Alexander Taylor
Citizens United bruh you can't limit the free speech of those private citizens just because they as an entity represent 1/3rd controlling ownership of all elections results in the United States.
I suppose you'll want to take Hillary's free speech right to purchase control of all state and local election systems just because 'she's the president', too, right?
Benjamin Hill
It's beyond obvious that the DNC rigged the primaries up and down the country for Clinton. They already broke the law with the HVF. Why not with the voting machines.
Brayden Roberts
>[USER WAS RENDITIONED TO CUBA FOR THIS POST]
Nicholas Garcia
Let Trump and Alex Jones know about the risk with electronic voter boxes.
Kayden Fisher
Who doesn't know man? Any person who isn't the lowest information voter should already be electing to use non-digitized forms of voting at their polling stations (assuming alternatives are still being offered where you vote).
The question is how far can the establishment go with ignoring illegitimate election results before we have a government full of (((elected))) officials with a >98% incumbency rate and a total unwillingness to initiate legal action verifying the legitimacy of our elections?
Once we are there it really will be down to the american people to decide whether anything will be done to preserve american democracy or let it die. There will be no alternative, vicarious solutions to the problem.
