Best POTUS so far

best POTUS so far

Other urls found in this thread:

pcgamer.com/donald-trump-claimed-to-have-sold-fictional-call-of-duty-jets-to-norway/
nytimes.com/2018/01/11/world/europe/dutch-muslims-ambassador-trump.html
chicago.suntimes.com/news/dick-durbin-confirms-trump-shithole-comments/
cotton.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=866
postandcourier.com/politics/sen-tim-scott-graham-says-reports-of-trump-s-shithole/article_e99c2fba-f7a9-11e7-a381-d7950e17b81f.html
wbay.com/content/news/White-House-doesnt-deny-presidents-profanity-about-African-nations-468869173.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

it's not racist to call shit holes for what they are, but the guy obviously doesn't know with what people in the room he can use these words

he obviously wanted it to reach the press, he absolutely loves the fallout and attention. He was sitting in a room which included democratic congressmen

pcgamer.com/donald-trump-claimed-to-have-sold-fictional-call-of-duty-jets-to-norway/
He has no idea what he's doing.

>muh 4D chess
the guy has alzheimers, a few years after his term they make his diagnosis public like with Reagan

...

He's a fucking moron and a disgrace

I'd suspect the user meant that the Trumpotus really just wants attention, like a little child.

He thinks its a show.

But Haiti is a shithole. Out of the stupid shit he has said, this one thing is actually true. Shithole countries are a thing. Immigration wouldn't exist if some nations weren't shit to begin with.

The Spiegel's new cover

lmao

No he is just a racist and speaks whatever shit he wants since he has dementia

based

>people make fun of England for having bad weather, bad food, and ugly looking people. basically call it a shithole.
>no one bats an eye
>do the same for haiti and central america where the things are true, not banter
>OMG SO RACIST

>

I think he means Brits are first worlders with plenty of credibility. If I again for some reason insulted Britian ethnically or culturally, it would have very little significance or meaning for them because the flag reduces credibility considerably

If it were Germany, Australia, US for instance, it would be considered very offensive because they are comparatively doing very well

You can take Haiti immigrants into your country, if you want.

He's right though, it's the biggest shithole in the Americas and it's not even debatable.

People on Sup Forums say "shithole" all the time. Hell I've heard people call USA shithole, guess we better alert the presses.

It seems you missed the point that has been made 100x, almost like you've done so purposely.

the spiegel's is helping nwo

Because he said it. People throw the words "3rd world shitholes" all the time, but because Trump said it now all of a sudden it's huge.

Sorry I dont know what you mean. I'm not being dumb on purpose I just don't see where the "point has been made".

I know for a fact USA can be kinda shit, so can everywhere else. Haiti is undoubtedly probably one of the shittiest nations in the New World.

Yeah thats what I am assuming. People want to bash Trump, and I hate him too, but it gets kinda goofy sometimes "oh no he called HAITI a shithole! How could he!"

.......huh?? Pretty sure even Haitians can tell you Haiti is a shithole, they literally are eating dirt. Why do you think Haitians want to move here but not vice versa?

this

Is there any evidence that he said "shithole"?

>insult america/trump
>greek flag defends them

Unironic god amongst men

>he is just a racist
fucking retard

literally pic related

I like this Trump guy. Never been so entertained by Americans.
nytimes.com/2018/01/11/world/europe/dutch-muslims-ambassador-trump.html

That's the thing, he is a retard but even a broken clock is right twice a day. The reason why people accept immigrants is because the immigrants left their shithole country because it was a shithole. Haiti is a shithole, how can anybody defend that it isn't?

Is there any proofs that he said it?
I'm stupid a bit

To be fair you CAN beat a dead horse. What more than an apology do you want?

He's right, Sudan included, and I don't know if its informed by the incidents brought up during the election campaign (casino dismissal of blacks on floor, jews yarmulkas, mexicans, etc), to antagonise certain sets of people racially by him or the media

But he needs to be careful. There are probably people going through his properties (towers, courses), records, articles, former employees and looking for anything to call a s***hole as we speak

He didn't. He calls his own words fake news.

>Washington Post: President Trump has shit himself!

>White House: The President would never shit himself!

>@realDonaldTrump: I'VE SHIT MYSELF ON PURPOSE!!

haha upvoted

I fucking LOVE Donald Trump IF he was not the president. We need a competent """normie""" to be the president who says pleasant, optimistic and PC stuff for our nation and the world to hear.

Make a new office "Meme Commander" and give to Trump. Then he can meme around on Twitter and someone else can govern the country. EZ PZ

So you don't deny Haiti is a shithole, you just don't like that Trump pointed this out.

The GOP is going to kill it in the next elections. This is some next level chess.

chicago.suntimes.com/news/dick-durbin-confirms-trump-shithole-comments/

We sent you a Dutchman would you prefer a Muslim Moroccan.

It is funny how he gets to complain about shithole countries when a LOT shitholes all over the world are third world hellholes result of the direct or indirect intervention of America, especially during the XX century.

It is like taking a shit and then complaining that the toilet smells like shit.

It's a shithole none the less? His description of Haiti is spot on is what you are saying?

How do you feel knowing most Londoners literally look like shit? London is the real shithole here.

Tú eres un puto sudaca de mierda. Ojalá te mueras pronto, mierda infecta, basura amerindia, indonegroide hijo de puta.

Yeah then you are an hypocrite.
Don't cry about the toilet smelling like shit if the turd floating in there is yours.

london mentioned

Sadly that only one of 12 people confirmed thet. The only one who is a Dem.
We need at least half of them to confirm

He left when he was four years old. He doesn't know anything about the Netherlands. He is a walking meme here. Everytime there is a slow news day some journalist holds a microphone under his nose and it is glorious.

The thing is this kind of rhetoric served him well in the elections. It stirs up the base, generates publicity, puts him closer to the House.
Now that he's actually in the House, this just does not fly. When you're Prez, you're by extension America's top diplomat. Diplomacy is all about saying the right things, being courteous and all that.
Trump is the definition of a bull in the china shop.

Mericans are not the smartest race

Either way though its a shit country? Also Trump didn't intervene in their country, he has nothing to do with it. Also why do Latinos act like they are the only countries on planet Earth that got intervened with? USA got intervened too in Revolutionary war etc.

What is the problem here? He called a poor and troubled country poor and troubled. Is there additional context that you're not providing?

If you read the article that you linked it says he was reading from a teleprompter. So either he misread it in the moment and was not corrected at the time, as it would have been deemed not significant to stop him from speaking, or there was a typo.

I'll quote you one of the first comments here, for your pleasure
>He mixed up the model number with quantity... whoopie. How is this news worthy?

Alright, here we go. Why couldn't this be the link in the OP?

>When told that Trump denied making the remarks, Durbin said: “It speaks for itself. There were witnesses. There were 12 of us in the room.”
>Two Republican senators who were also at the meeting Thursday — Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia — have since issued a joint statement, saying they didn’t recall Trump’s alleged derogatory remarks.

Pretty much what said. I don't see any reason to put Durbin's word over Cotton's and Perdue's. You would think that one of them would come out and say "yes this happened" if it actually happened, I don't think the fact that they are republicans should even be taken into account here as there have been plenty of instances where republicans have called Trump out for similar things in the past both before and after his inauguration.

Also, serious question. Why does the link read "Durbin Confirms Trump Shithole Comments" when it was Durbin himself who initially made the claim? Was that the original title of the article that's since been changed? If that's the case then do we just take someone repeating a claim that they made as confirmation that something happened now? If I said I have a footlong dick in passing and then said it again offically does that mean that the news media would say it is confirmed that I have a 12" trouser snake?

So many questions

tranquilo

Yes yes, of course it's all just fake news like always. There's NO WAY Trump would say such a thing.

I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm saying that saying it 100% did happen when the one person who is claiming it did is saying "ask the other people who were there" and then they ask them and they say it didn't happen.

It's not fake news as much as it is misleading headlines. It could read something like "Senator Durbin Doubles Down After Trump Denies Shithole Comment" and that would be far more representative as to what is actually be reported on. But no, instead both in what I assume was the original title of the article and the update title we see a direct implication that Durbin's words have been confirmed when we have absolutley no confirmation.

Do you understand what I'm trying to say here?

>and then they ask them and they say it didn't happen.
they said they "didn't recall" if it happened, not that it did not
very important distinction

>then they ask them and they say it didn't happen
They said they didn't recall. The White House didn't really deny it last night either. Fox News even confirmed he made those comments.

Do you really expect these GOP senators to through their own President under the bus?

>through their own President under the bus

We're gonna need a bigger bus.

pls no bully. I admit my mistake. Fuck.

I wasn't making fun of your spelling error, I was making fun of Fat Donny's morbid obesity and utter lack of dignity.

He's wh*Te, what do you expect? The dude wants to fuck is own daughter. There's a reason he won the conservacuck voters.

"President Trump brought everyone to the table this week and listened to both sides. But regrettably, it seems that not everyone is committed to negotiating in good faith. In regards to Senator Durbin's accusation, we do not recall the President saying these comments specifically but what he did call out was the imbalance in our current immigration system, which does not protect American workers and our national interest. We, along with the President, are committed to solving an issue many in Congress have failed to deliver on for decades."

I had to google this. This is the full statment from both Senator Cotton & Senator Perdue, which can be found cotton.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=866

This is kind of what I'm talking about here. There isn't any confirmation here, and yet they are treating it like it is confirmed. We have the word of one man against three men. You ask me if I expect republicans to throw Trump under the bus when he makes a gaffe, I would say yes to that actually, as they have done so before on numerous occasions on far more trivial matter both before and after his inauguration. As such if this accusation is true then their silence on this matter is quite strange.

I'll ask you both the same question here. You expect both of these Senators to lie on behalf of the President, right? That's what I'm hearing here? So by that very logic would it not be unreasonable to say that Senator Durbin, a democrat and thus a political rival of Trump, an indirect one but still someone who would likley see him voted out if he had the choice, has the same incentive to throw the President under the bus that the republican senators have to lie to protect him?

Why do we implicitly trust Durbin but distrust both Cotton and Perdue? Can you explain this to me because I would LOVE to hear your rationale behind this logic.

>but they are shitholes, he's right!
of course they are, but do you not realise the difference between your average guy saying it and the leader of the free world saying it, not least a man whose words can literally shift diplomatic relations with these countries?

I'm not them but i remember yesterday that the white house and aides werent denying it before i even heard about the Illinois senator claiming he did.
So he probably did.
In the end what does it matter if he did or didnt say it. The republican base will eat that kind of sentiment up and the democrats will criticize it.
In other words, it doesnt matter.

>We have the word of one man against three men
It would be really helpful if you at least read the articles on this matter.

>You expect both of these Senators to lie on behalf of the President, right?
They don't even have to lie, their statement and the White House statement are what's called a non-denial denial.

Oh, and then there's this:
>Sen. Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told the Post and Courier that Sen. Lindsey Graham, a fellow South Carolina Republican, had told him the reported comments were "basically accurate."

>I'm not them but i remember yesterday that the white house and aides werent denying it before i even heard about the Illinois senator claiming he did.
Source then please

>It would be really helpful if you at least read the articles on this matter.
Source then PLEASE, I've looked at everything in the thread so far, if you're looking at something else then please tell me where it is. I would like to have a conversation with you but it becomes more difficult if you expect me to have information that you have not shared with me.

>They don't even have to lie, their statement and the White House statement are what's called a non-denial denial.
Which to everyone else is what is called a lie by ommision. Can we define this please? If they were asked "did this happen" and it did and they don't say yes then that is a lie. Alright, moving forward with that established do you think they are lying?

>Oh, and then there's this:
>Sen. Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told the Post and Courier that Sen. Lindsey Graham, a fellow South Carolina Republican, had told him the reported comments were "basically accurate."

This is from postandcourier.com/politics/sen-tim-scott-graham-says-reports-of-trump-s-shithole/article_e99c2fba-f7a9-11e7-a381-d7950e17b81f.html right?

So let me get this straight. We have a statment from Tim Scott saying that Lindsey Graham said that what Durbin was "basically accurate" which could have a variety of different meanings going everywhere from "yes that is what he said" to "that's not what he said but it sums it up" which might not sound like an important distinction to make but it really is. It could be argued that saying he "basically" said "Haiti is a shithole" in this tweet here for example.

Yeah Trump is responsible for earthquakes

America isnt responsible for Argentina not being white

>latinos are the only ones that say this

Clearly you've never spoken with Slavs

You guys literally fought a war over an island never inhabited by argentines.

>t do you not realise the difference between your average guy saying it and the leader of the free world saying it
they unironically don't, that's how he got elected in the first place

No. The left has given up the Russian scandal because it has been discredited to the point that it's a total joke. Now they're making up stories to make him seem unhinged, like that book with non credible quotes and now this.

wbay.com/content/news/White-House-doesnt-deny-presidents-profanity-about-African-nations-468869173.html

But like i said, it doesnt matter anyway if he did or not because in the end, conservatives are going to like his comment and dems are going to hate him for it.
Just more noise than usual on social media. Very entertaining.

Also dont know why spics think he'll pass daca in any way shape or form. Especially with stephen miller there, he'll torpedo any sort of agreement on that.

He is 100% correct but of course the media will attack literally everything he says so what you can do

Baloompf is a fat fucking fascist orange

>be whatever the fuck that flag is
>literally have a smaller economy than London

based

>people hate politicians always lie
>people get mad when one tells the truth

Economy of London is literally based on finances....it's the financial capital of the world. Without the jews London would be Detroit.

>but do you not realise the difference between your average guy saying it and the leader of the free world saying it, not least a man whose words can literally shift diplomatic relations with these countries?

Friendly reminder that this supposedly happened in a private discussion between Trump and other senators that was leaked by those part of said private discussion, not as an official statement by Trump, just like there's a difference between you calling your manager a cunt with your mates after work and you calling your manager a cunt to his face while at work

>da joooooooooooooz

lmao too true. illuminati is gonna get you real fucking soon.

difference is his and his mates dont run the country and he isn't the president

you do realize the world isn't an imageboard where nothing has any weight?

SHART IN PLANE

>a Sl*vene

People say this irl you NEET.

The only thing wrong with Trump is that is not the 1º Minister of Portugal

Have you listened to the Nixon tapes or LBJ phone calls? Do you really think backroom politics consists of West Wing style speeches carefully crafted and curated by spin doctors?

Anyway its mostly just manufactured outrage, you know those countries are shitholes, I know those countries are shitholes, people that live in those countries know they're shitholes, Trump just said what we all know

B-52s aren't on the export list for US aircraft, why do Trumptards always need to lie to support this dementia addled retard?

>people IRL
yes, and they are all heads of state.

I think there are basically two wings of trump supporters left
while all share racism to some degree, I think one wing deep down despises democracy as a whole and just wants a strong authority figure to tuck them in at night, the other one just wants ebbin habbenings and has long given up on achieving anything productive whatsoever

>I think one wing deep down despises democracy as a whole and just wants a strong authority figure to tuck them in at night

a kraut lecturing anyone about despising democracy and wanting a strong authoritarian daddy figure lmao

cucked out already, that was quick

We have enough "diversity™"

>he is a racist
Why do rebbitors think that this means anything ?
It's completely irrelevant, and frankly it's not that bad either.

Nothing about him surprises me anymore. He could strangle a baby and I wouldn't even be surprised, at this point.

>they're very poor countries
>they're shitholes

You honestly don't see the difference? If Junker or whoever straight up said "Britain has shitty weather" there would be fallout as well.

I'm not a leader of a country, I'm a random fuck on an anonymous Estonian potato growing website.