Former CIA Director calls Trump a national security risk and an unwitting dupe for Putin. Sounds pretty fucking rough

Former CIA Director calls Trump a national security risk and an unwitting dupe for Putin. Sounds pretty fucking rough.

>Mr. Trump has no experience on national security. Even more important, the character traits he has exhibited during the primary season suggest he would be a poor, even dangerous, commander in chief.

>These traits include his obvious need for self-aggrandizement, his overreaction to perceived slights, his tendency to make decisions based on intuition, his refusal to change his views based on new information, his routine carelessness with the facts, his unwillingness to listen to others and his lack of respect for the rule of law.

>In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.

nytimes.com/2016/08/05/opinion/campaign-stops/i-ran-the-cia-now-im-endorsing-hillary-clinton.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0

inb4 "shill" and "what does a national security expert know about national security?"

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8qV8K9FbtaA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No wonder he's a "former" CIA director.

>experience now matters

>Trump is a security risk because of "m...muh evil soviets"
>Support Hillary who actually exposed state secrets and got away with it.

Riiiiiiight.

>Two strongly held beliefs have brought me to this decision. First, Mrs. Clinton is highly qualified to be commander in chief. I trust she will deliver on the most important duty of a president — keeping our nation safe.

All the inb4's in the world cannot change the fact that both OP and Michael Morrell are shills of the highest order. Gee whiz, a career government worker who has probably been interacting with Hillary for decades is in full support of her. Nothing shady about that.

I don't know, man. I'd rather have dupe than nuclear war.

Dictators don't need no logic or intelligence, that's for the pleb generals and higher officials to handle.

>B-but I'm prepubescent faggot channer engage in identity politics I'm voting not for the country but to be part of a circle jerk

I support Putin more than Trump.

>anyone in intelligence
>supporting Hillary

I am fucking laughing.

>pinoy that knows nothing but dictatorships
>My opinion matters
AYYYYY

Trump is a security risk because he's a thin-skinned, easily manipulated, dangerously uninformed, narcissistic pussy, and that's not somebody you want to have in control a nuclear arsenal.

CIA for over 30 years, was there during 9/11 and the Bin Laden assassination. He retired.

>gay bashing is wrong
>haha trump and putin are homos
>left double standards

>

Well yeah, look how badly the community organizer fucked up being president.

>Trump is a security risk because he's a thin-skinned, easily manipulated, dangerously uninformed, narcissistic pussy, and that's not somebody you want to have in control a nuclear

And Hillary is worse.

I'm gonna need some aloe for that burn, you got me good.

Right? Just look at this smug fucker

No the problem is they don't want peace with Russia because having a constant stand off with them is a very lucrative business for the ELITES and their NATIONAL DEFENSE CONTACTS!

A guy with a bad personality for national security vs a woman who copied top secret info to an unsecured computer in her bathroom. Potential vs proven risk

Trump is a fool and will lose by being outwitted
Hillary is smart but loses on purpose

If the outcome is the same, I'll take the non cuck one

CIA made isis, their opinion means shit, they're a clear and present danger to our country.

Kill yourself faggot shill. Hillary blatantly circumvents data security policy and FOIA, gives away classified info yo who the fuck knows, including top secret and special programs info, and then lies about everything, and you think she's good for national security? And thats just the emails, she's also a huge warhawk and in bed with the saudis!

Actual security experts think she's more qualified than Trump. Not just armchair Rommels who think they know what they're doing. Try again, retard.

Why is this even being printed? How is this news worthy? Oh that's right, the news is just advertising now. Well that's it I'm a #skeledelegate now.

>GET THIS HOTHEAD OUTTA HERE

CIA is the culprit of most of USA fuckups and if they didn't exist america would probably be better off.
All the shit that happened in the world for the past 50 years is CIA fault.
Every single fucking conflict, every warlord, every radical group, every government destabilization, military coups, etc.

(THIS USER WAS KILLED FOR THIS POST)

>unwitting

Witting at least, but he sounds closer to an enthusiastic dupe for Putin tbqh.

Fpbp

That's because you're a terrible faggot.

>and that's not somebody you want to have in control a nuclear arsenal
That's not how it works, stupid nigger.

What would a CIA Director know about national security?

Obviously nothing. But a reality TV star and casino tycoon? He's definitely a pro. No question. The BEST.

they shit their pants because it would mean the end of them if trump became president

so it comes down to things such as assassinations and civil war, they will not give up power

A "security expert" is an armchair Rommel you low test newfriend

So what is hitlary, accepting millions from Saudi and other mudslimes countries? A mudslime spy?

But Hillary's mishandling of classified information is totally okay and exemplary behavior for a future president? Fuck off.

(((CIA)))

Stop this, you are going to trigger these babbies.

>keeping our nation safe
>is calling for an increase of 550% of """syrian refugees""" who we cannot possibly vet and who ISIS said they will sneak terrorist along side
>wants World War 3

Yeah, fuck this guy and fuck clinton

>CIA for over 30 years, was there during 9/11 and the Bin Laden assassination.

Ooh wow he was there for the two most suspicious events in American history, jee golly he sounds so trustworthy, he's totally someone with the best interests of the normal Americans at heart totally

>lowest unemployment in 7 years
>if i write it on this picture it must be true!

Running the CIA for 30 years isn't some made up fantasy like shitposting on Sup Forums. That's actual strategy and coordination right there, shit-for-brains. Stay mad, retard.

And the blow hard billionaire who literally made money off cheating people out of money in Atlantic City and lives in an actual golden tower, yep, he's definitely got his finger on the pulse of regular Americans.

>Actual security experts think she's more qualified than Trump.

If you are CTR, I'll actually have a modicum of respect - hell, a guys gotta feed his family, right? If you are an actual criminal Hillary supporter and will vote for her, as far as I'm concerned you are aiding and abetting a criminal, a traitor to the United States, and you fucking disgust me.

Now, I'll need multiple sources for your claim unless one news story lists all of these "actual security experts". I'll wait.

>corrupt presidents for the last 30 years
>CIA director for last 30 years

(((Cohencidence?)))

But unemployment in the US is at its lowest in more than 7 years. There's comprehensive statistical evidence.

This board is beyond hope.

>Former CIA Director calls Trump a national security risk
Interesting statement considering nearly everything the CIA has done since its inception has either directly or indirectly put us in war or gotten US citizens killed.
>Vietnam
>Bay of Pigs
>Central American puppet govts
>Arming cartels
>Mideast puppet govts
>Arming extremist groups or just outright creating them (eg Al Qaeda, ISIS)
>MKULTRA and other psyops on American citizens (which produced Ted kazcynski)
Not to mention domestic spying and the other usual shit.
Takes one to know one I guess.

Nobody cares. We're just testing out the strength of our memes.

I can't wait until CTR gets hacked and we can trace the payment records to these fuckwad shills

>(((statistical evidence)))

>This board is beyond hope
Then leave.

>(((CIA)))

>CIA man worried about the Soviets to a silly degree
Did we go back in time?

>another shill comes out of no where to back up another shill

Obama is full of shit, unemployment is closer to 35% and no amount of cooked statistics will change that. If you stop looking for work you are considered statistically employed FFS

If he's so fucking smart why didn't he see 9-11 coming you faggot?

>CIA calling anyone dangerous

irony

I honestly don't understand why the Democrats pulled the Russian Boogeyman back out of storage
It's such an obvious ploy, only an extremely weak minded individual would fall for it

Don't Forget ISIS Those peace loving libtards sure have their HEROS in them!

>Former CIA Director calls Trump a national security risk and an unwitting dupe for Putin.
was he asleep 2008-present?

Implying he wasn't in on it

We had a B-actor for President you mongoloid shill harder

Because they desperately want World War, as Russia is the last obstacle to destroying the West and going forward with their plans of NWO

You mentioned ISIS

I sorry

How do I get some CTR $$$ myself, willing to troll the shit out of Sup Forums also have significant experience upsetting people on this board.

Please provide link how to get CTR $$$, will shill for hill if paid to do it.

And only strong minds fall for the Muslim Boogeyman ploy, right?

>Iran-Contra Scandal
>Voodoo economic bullshit
>Spends 8 years being a dickhead

How'd that work out, shitkicker? Not too well.

That's funny because the July numbers came out and there are now over 94 million out of work...

Kinda makes you think.

>clinton had 40 years of experience
>called careless because even after this long she couldn't notice the fucking (C) in secure mail.

>>These traits include his obvious need for self-aggrandizement, his overreaction to perceived slights, his tendency to make decisions based on intuition, his refusal to change his views based on new information, his routine carelessness with the facts, his unwillingness to listen to others and his lack of respect for the rule of law.

Holy shit Hillary is projecting hard through this puppet...

>And only strong minds fall for the Muslim Boogeyman ploy, right?
Interesting point considering I never said anything about that
Can't move these goalposts mate, they're set in history books

>unemployment is closer to 35%
BAHAHAHAHAAHA
you guys seriously live outside of reality

We've reached North Korean levels of propaganda now I think I'm gonna be sick

40 years' experience should equate to knowing the difference between knowing the difference between classified and unclassified, yes.
Unless we're putting unqualified people in every government position now.
>Makes u think

I've had the mispleasure of working with the agency on a few occasions. My standard when dealing with them is, do the opposite of what they suggest.

After your unemployment period ends you're no longer considered in the statistic brother.

>If you stop looking for work you are considered statistically employed FFS
the percentage of people in America working is very low but has increased in recent years.
This can be partly attributed to an aging workforce and partly attributed to structural unemployment. Either way, the way they measure unemployment hasn't changed since Obama took office, and he certainly doesn't "cook statistics" or have any involvement whatsoever. unemployment is absolutely down no matter how you try to twist it. What news are you watching/reading that you can possible think unemployment is at 35%? Seriously.

You didn't know Russia is in Ukraine? I guess that's another thing you have in common with the Donald.

>"He’s not going into Ukraine, okay, just so you understand, He’s not gonna go into Ukraine, all right?"

Source: 6:20 in
youtube.com/watch?v=8qV8K9FbtaA

People who simply give up looking for work are considered employed dumbass.

Trump is absolutely right on that point.

Retired people are also considered employed.

>Democrats pulled the Russian Boogeyman back out of storage
maybe it was when they annexed Crimea, but who knows

>structural
You're not even trying at this point are you

Speak Finnish.
Right now.

Real Americans don't actually believe this kind of narrative do they?

Remember when we all thought it was Bernie who would be exposed as the secret USSR sympathizer

You're talking with morons who don't really follow events and don't even realize how extraordinary a thing Crimea was for this time, say, the last 30 years.

Haista vittu vitun ryssänkullinlutkuttaja, ota iivanan kyrpä pois poskesta ja tuu tänne vittuilemaan niin saat voita leiväs päälle, läskimooses

who in the fuck would listen, let alone TRUST the fucking spooks???

So you're accepting that the majority of the American voting population will fall for it then?

There is a reason he is "former" cia.

>Retired people are also considered employed.
according to what? Are children unemployed? Are housewives unemployed? The point isn't how unemployment is calculated. It's the trend. If they calculate it the same way now as they did in 2009 (and they do), then there is a notable decrease in unemployment. Sorry to burst your bubble. Unemployment is down. Housing market is stronger. Economy is better than when Obama took office. I'm not saying he did any of these things, but to say they aren't true is just ridiculous.

structural unemployment: unemployment resulting from industrial reorganization, typically due to technological change, rather than fluctuations in supply or demand.

You made a really good point though, dude. Keep it up!

Nice pic

>CIA concerned with national security
kek

This place is literally 75% Russian trolls and SJW shitposters. They all ready know all of this.

>"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
>Lenin

>A bunch of people who aren't employed are considered employed

>You're living in a bubble user and imma burst it sorry!!!111 Unemployment is DOWN!

Literally how can anyone be this delusional.

I know, right? But if you're going to infiltrate somebody, you're disguise is going to be what people are least likely to suspect. Thus, communist infiltrators would disguise themselves as anti-communist conservatives, ISIS would dress like secular, non-arab looking people, etc.

more psychopathic psychobabble

>i actually am/did X Y Z
>i will say this other person is/did X Y Z
>everyone is looking at other person now la

CIA is a natural security risk

this.

>how can anyone be this delusional
irony

>who aren't employed are considered employed
they aren't considered employed. Like I said, look at the trend, not the numbers. The trend shows unemployment is down. To not understand this, you must have been seriously misled by whatever news source you use. Oh wait, you get your news from a Japanese go cart racing forum

Do you mean "national" security risk, genius?

relax

How exactly would it be a bad thing for the President of the USA to be besties with Putin?

Seems to me like having the USA and Russia working together could only make the world a better place.

>How unemployment is calculated doesn't matter

>People who literally give up finding a job that isn't there are considered employed

>this is perfectly fine

Right.....