David Irving and the Holocaust

As you know, David Irving is a first-rate researcher and historian of the Third Reich who relies exclusively on primary sources and original research. His career has been destroyed by the usual brigade of free speech haters and Israel shills who have publicly denounced him as an antisemite, Holocaust denier, etc. At one point he was a Revisionist as well and was an instrumental figure in the that movement.

Presently, he is working on a Himmler biography, and to be honest I don't think that it is going to be very good.

I recently watched this video: youtube.com/watch?v=97L_SJrPl6g

Skip to around 1:36:00, and David Irving starts talking about how Jews were in fact gassed but on a "small scale" in "little rooms." He starts referring to documents implicating Himmler in murdering Jews, misunderstanding "sonderbehandlung", and buying into the Holohoax narrative.

It's a shame that this man, who has nothing to lose at this point, is succumbing to pressure rather than standing his ground and refusing to conform. Revisionists have debunked gassings logically, scientifically, analytically, and even conceptually. This whole topic has been paved forwards and backwards with scholarship. What audience does Irving think believes him? He rejects the propaganda of Auschwitz gas chambers, therefore making him a Holocaust Denier in the eyes of the world, yet he then turns around and promotes the idea of "gassings on a small scale," therefore making Revisionists laugh him off.

What is he trying to prove?

Why David why?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_responses_to_David_Irving
rodoh.info/forum/
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=28
fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Aumeier/100845.html
nazigassings.com/nizkorlies.html
ww2history.com/videos/Western/Area_bombing
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

He was caught out lying.

Got fucked up for it.

And rightly so.

The killing of jews during ww2, real or fake, is a little unimportant fact. Stop teaching it, wipe it out of the history books. It don't deserve attention.

The Holocaust is to the third America what the Declaration of Independence was to the first. Something has to make them devalue it.

A kangaroo court where David Irving took on dozens of shills paid to say or do anything to maintain the Holocaust narrative found that in his 30-some books he had made about 17 errors, 9 of which supposed errors the judge threw out. The court had to prove that David Irving was aware of the facts and deliberately distorted them. The court therefore had an impossible task to prove.

The trial against David Irving is an embarrassment to justice and only demonstrates how vicious and evil the Holocaust lobby is.

This isn't about that.

This is about Irving's bizarre claims about the Holocaust.

It is an important fact. Every single innocent Jew that died or was inconvenienced because of the antisemitism of the Third Reich ought to be remembered for what they lost. But they should be remembered alongside every other person that perished in that event.

@

>It's a shame that this man, who has nothing to lose at this point, is succumbing to pressure rather than standing his ground and refusing to conform.

It's not a shame. What's a shame is that it took years for people to work out that he was manipulating/misrepresenting his sources.

Bottom line is when they looked into ALL HIS SOURCES there was no denying that he was lying.

There are no excuses - he was treated extremely fairly in the trial.

Look into Richard J. Evans and how he BTFO of Irving.

If you're into fan-fiction, continue reading his works.

You must remember the people who died, but jews are not people. Western civilization must stop caring so much about lesser species or face self-extinction.

you just said he was a first rate researcher and historian, and now you're shitting on his book (which you haven't read) because it didn't say what you wanted to say?

sometimes research leads to new conclusions, to deny the research would make him a bad researcher and historian (which you likely are)

What do you have to gain South Africa? Richard J Evans is a class A shill for Israel. In his trilogy he tries to diagnose the Germans with a genetic predisposition towards wanting a leader like Hitler and of how they are so evil a people. He's a quack, not to be taken seriously.

Irving wasn't treated fairly in his trial at all. Have you read the transcripts? Have you read into the background at all?

Yes, I do believe that he is, or at least was. But now I do not think so. I know what his Himmler book will be like based on his videos and the fact that he is now apologizing to the Holocaust lobby.

It's not that it "isn't what I want it to say," it's that his claims are ridiculous and lousy. Since he has already stood by the Leuchter report he cannot endorse the main Holocaust propaganda, but since he is giving in to pressure he is trying to denounce his previous Revisionism by saying "there were some gassings."

That's not how it works. Gassings aren't bullets, they're extremely complicated processes that involve high tech and rigorous safety procedures. Nowhere in blueprints for the camps or testimony from the people who built them is there anything about these "small rooms for gassings."

He is being irresponsible with documents. He is no longer a good researcher or historian. Now I cannot take him seriously.

Excuses cannot be made when looking into his sources.

Continue denying that fact.

Show me examples of his "lies"

lol how can you remember 6 billion people at one time tho?

what was his misunderstanding with "sonderbehandlung?" Did it just refer to the resettlement?

>Revisionists have debunked gassings logically, scientifically, analytically, and even conceptually.

Where? On fucking Sup Forums? Get a life

Show us examples in these sources?
Oh wait you're a paid shill because nobody from South Africa even gives enough of a fuck to even care who this guy is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_responses_to_David_Irving

Go through the list.

Deny the ones that don't go along with your narrative.

>Oh wait you're a paid shill because nobody from South Africa even gives enough of a fuck to even care who this guy is.

Triggered JIDF

>researcher
>historian

He literally doesn't even have a bachelor's degree in ANYTHING.

>researcher
>historian

He literally doesn't even have a fucking bachelor's degree in ANYTHING.

Arthur Butz shows how "sonderbehandlung" referred to just that: special treatment. The people that weren't fit for work were hospitalized in Birkenau which was referred to as a "death camp" because it's literally where old people were sent and quartered until they died a natural death.

I don't care if they done it or not desu. I know the story is grossly exaggerated. Jews are responsible for millions of deaths through communism. Fuck them. 14.

There isn't a list, that's an article of a bunch of a conformist shills talking shit about Irving without actually identifying the specific problems that he is committing. Their intent is to defame, not to dispute.

...

You guys do know that the South African works with the guy who starts these threads yeah? And the Austrian too. They're probably the same person using a proxy.

I think you're right.

Also, remember that they even got an apology out of the might Henry Ford as well. Everyone has something to lose.

>the guy who starts these threads
I hardly ever make threads and when I do people usually troll me in them.

Ahh, so it's one of those scripted conversations. I hear about this shit all the time.

Well sorry then m8 if you're legitimate. I'm just tired of this jew working overtime to protect his shoah narrative while his kind fuck us over.

I was watching The Godfather- another jewish movie about the Italian mafia. All the mobsters were Italians. Look up the richest men in Nevada- they're all jews, the richest being the kiek Sheldon Adelson. Jews lie man.

Murder Inc. was Jewish

he is a great man and important historian. he should have a classical bronze statue so we may honor him.

When is isis gonna take on the Jews for everyone?

I don't know, maybe he found the truth.

Never, they're definitely a proxy for the kikes
>destroys Islamic sites and centers
>attack's Israel's enemies
>sell black market oil to Israel
>acts as a bogeymen for Israeli politicians and sell-outs for more western intervention in the Middle East

I seriously believe him. Shouldnt you be running from niggers? Unless....

He's never been a denier and he got mind-raped like the harmless nut Wilhelm Reich, a sex-obsessed Jewish pseudo-intellectual who had all his books seized and burned by the American government. The more he was wrongly criticized, the more he doubled down on his own righteousness.

>all this info
>nothing refuting his evidence directly
If you're going to project find something to project.

Well Himler did want to kill the jews, there's really no way around it. That doesn't mean that there were actual gas-chambers or genocidal camps, but there were more jew partisan fighters and prisoners beeing shot by wehrmacht instead of incarserated etc than needed be, because they were jews.

That beeing said the holocaust narrative of industrial killings is still a lie, however Himler was a lunatic.

The real jew-killings was however mostly done by eastern europeans who had been under the jews yoke for a long time and knew their kikes. They paid whichever jew they got their hands on back generously. To the point where Hitler told them to tone it down.

I'm not denying that partisans were killed. That's totally the case.

I'm denying that innocent people were systematically killed with an intent on exterminating the Jewish people. There is absolutely no evidence for that.

I've transcribed all of his talks and highlighted all the best parts. I can post here.

This is from op's video. It starts at 1:32:37
1:32:37
How many people did actually die in Auchwitz? It's a very interesting question. The figure has ballooned. It's much like the similar question "How many Russians died in WW2?" You ask any German and they say "20 million". Well some people would say that 40 million Russians died in WW2. Because President Richard von Weizsäcker said that 40 million Russians died in WW2. But the usual figure is 20 million. The actual figure is less than 5 million. How do we know that? Well if you go to the British archives there's a private record taken by the interpreter of a meeting between Joseph Stalin, the Russian dictator, and Winston Churchill on July 19, 1945 when they met in Potsdam. And they're talking in private over dinner about who should get what in the dismemberment of Germany. And each side is boasting about the damages they suffered and Stalin says to Churchill "We're entitled to far more, because you've got to realize that we lost in the Soviet Union many many lives, nearly 5 million Russians are dead or missing. He would've had no reason to minimize the figure, but he would've had every reason to exaggerate the figure, and he said 5 million. But you see how it has ballooned since then. 5 million to 20 million to 40 million. And it's exactly the same with the holocaust figures.

How many died in the holocaust? I hate that word "Holocaust". I mean you're falling for their salesmanship when you use that word. Well the answer is... a lot. How many died in Auschwitz? I think the best figure you can get is an estimate figure given by the Polish authorities. Poles, you see, in Krakow in 1947 put on trial all the Auschwitz top dogs. Rudolf Hess the commandante, Hans Aumeier his deputy, Arthur Liebehenschel the successor of Rudolf Hess. 22 of them were put on trial in Krakow and a lot of them were sentenced to death and there's a video showing the actual judgement being handed down on them. The judgement says "These people who are guilty today had been the principal officers of a camp, Auschwitz, in which up to 300.000 people of all nationalities met their deaths. It doesn't say they were killed, it doesn't say they were gassed. It says they died. Up to 300.000. Now these, you've got to realize were the Polish courtroom which had all the documents, they had all the Auschwitz prisoners to interrogate and the figure they used in their judgement as they sentenced these men to death was up to 300.000, so how suddenly did the figure balloon to 4 million on the memorial in Auschwitz in the 1970s and the 1980s? The communist director, the Jewish director of the Auschwitz state museum, Franciszek Piper, he eventually had that figure chiseled down and a new monument erected to the 1.2 million killed. It's rather like monopoly money the way they play around with these figures.

Can someone give me the Sup Forums approved recount of the David Irving trial that inspired the kike film coming out later this year.

You know what. nvm. just watch the video. We're talking about what he said about the holocaust. If you want to discuss something else that Irving talks about then I can post my transcriptions

I'm going to make this post every time a holocaust thread comes up.

I spent about 2 hours yesterday reading some holocaust debate forums and holocaust related websites.

It's a complete rabbit hole and you could spend your entire life researching this shit and it would still look vague and unclear.

rodoh.info/forum/
This is the premier holocaust debate forum I guess.

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/
This is a blog by some of the most prominent holocaust believers that supposedly debunk holocaust denier shit

BUT THERE ARE ALSO HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST BOOKS THAT ATTEMPT TO DEBUNK THEIR FUCKING BLOGS
holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=28
>Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Thomas Kues: The “Extermination Camps” of “Aktion Reinhardt”—An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust Controversies” Bloggers
A literal book debunking holocaust BLOGGER believer arguments... and its 1396 pages long. And there are even believer blog posts and arguments against that book as well.

Don't bother with this shit OP. Holocaust revisionism and research is a rabbit hole that you will never get out of.

The part that concerns me most is that he almost casually starts talking about how there were "small scale gassings in little rooms." My jaw dropped to the floor. Nobody talks about this. Not Revisionists, not Exterminationists. Nobody has heard of this.

It's like he's trying to find a middle ground. He's found a document whose authenticity he believes is "80% certain" that allows him to once again claim that gassings did in fact occur, which ignores all the established evidence about the complex and expensive process it takes to safely gas people. It's beyond just documents. It's not because there's a lack of documents that we can discredit the shower chambers of Auschwitz as being used for gassings is that there was a wooden door, two of them actually for an entrance and an exit, as well as windows. Not only that, but in the fumigation chamber where gassings DID occur, the machinery to actually grind and disperse the pellets is totally absent from the shower chamber.

It's these technicalities that make the whole thing obviously ridiculous, outside of all the arguments that Dr Butz makes in his seminal work. For Irving to claim that there were "small scale gassings in little rooms" is absolutely absurd and ignorant.

this same fucking kike with a south africa proxy. die you fucking jew demon.

>ITT:

>Controls IMF
>Controls Media
>Jews
They're not Jews they're Satanists using Jew victim-hood to further their agenda. Fuck them and all the people I know who use deceptive manipulation. They're not human. They deserve to be dead. They deserve no human compassion. NOTHING.

Why would Aumeier say that they gassed them in the little rooms then?

Irving's position now is that he doesn't claim anything. He just tells us what all the documents written by people who were in a position to know tells us about what happened.

I don't know, because I have no access to whatever convenient document he is talking about and I have no reason to believe him about it when I understand the reasons why Revisionists dismiss gassings and see no reason to believe that gassings were taking place in some other area.

It's preposterous to believe that if gassings were actually occurring somewhere that the exterminationists would have to go to such great lengths to lie and destroy people for denying that the Auschwitz shower chambers were gas chambers. It's inconceivable.

If gassings were done in these "small rooms" then I want another Leuchter report conducted on them.

Here you go. Pretty much all the documents are on his site fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Aumeier/100845.html

The numbers he claimed for Dresden were really orders of magnitude off. I'm not sure what could be a worse sin for a self-professed historian.

>Gassed in little rooms
I love the captured soviet tank engine gassings at Treblinka. That's my favorite hall of hoax.

nazigassings.com/nizkorlies.html

>10 AUG 45
Trashed. I had no idea this was a document produced from one of the (((interrogations)))--for fairness sake, I could barely hear Irving for most of the video and it was extremely quiet.

I've seen enough BS like the Gernstein document to know better.

Irving really is a turntail then.

Whatever, I respect him for his early courage and will read the Himmler book with a grain of salt.

He was captured by Norwegian Officals and imprisoned at AKERSHUS PRISON. The interview took place on 10 AUG, 1945

It should be remembered that Jewish plutocracy caused it all.

Woah woah woah.

Let's not forget that it was Irving who filed suit against Lipstadt and her publisher. No one went after Irving.

Irving got his shit wrecked though by Richard Evans in that trial. Richard Evans had to spend a literal year looking at Irving's "sources" only to discover how full of shit he was.

He wrote a book about it. Hitler on Trial. Damn good read. The part where he destroys Irving's revisionist idea of what really happened at Dresden was the best. He proved that Irving's casualty figure (that you homos like to spew) was nothing more than conjecture from a guy that wasn't even there which was attributed to a guy who was there and didn't say it. It's law and order type shit.

Not Hitler on Trial. Lying for Hitler. Whoops.

>Let's not forget that it was Irving who filed suit against Lipstadt and her publisher. No one went after Irving.

That's the best part of it all.

Let me get this right
>Dresden, a purely cultural city with no military connection was firebombed and everyone killed was a civilian
>But the number put forth is wrong so Nazi's BTFO

Let's not forget who started killing civilians and refused diplomacy ww2history.com/videos/Western/Area_bombing

does anyone know what Mr. Irving's position is on the substantial theory that AH made it to South America by sub and lived into the 1960's?

He firmly believes Hitler killed himself and was cremated.

kek

I know exactly who you are talking about. They are the beginning of the end.