Who the fuck are these guys?Are they more of the same neo-con supply-side economics kikery?
Also
>(((Howard Lorber)))
Who the fuck are these guys?Are they more of the same neo-con supply-side economics kikery?
Other urls found in this thread:
thinkprogress.org
twitter.com
I see many kikes in there, unfortunately.
He needs more jews on that team
Never heard of them.
Which ones are the economists?
I don't know who any of them are, OP. Know how I'm going to solve that for myself? I'll fucking google their names and come up with some concrete information, maybe make a thread about it with some actual substance.
>Jews are the best people at making money (Jewing) on the planet
>Hurrr why are there so many jews on the economic advisory panel
Here's some info on each and every one of them, courtesy two Google searches. Bonus: article is written by some SJW who is super pissed about the panel being all white males.
thinkprogress.org
>I know the really REALLY bad ones, the ones no one has ever even heard about.
Steve Roth, a fellow real estate investor and the billioanire CEO of Vorando Reality. Roth and Trump reportedly co-own a Manhattan office tower together.
Harold Hamm, an oil and gas billionaire and chairman and CEO of Continental Resources. He served as an energy adviser to Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign and as a major donor to the pro-Romney Restore Our Future super PAC.
Howard Lorber, president and CEO of Vector Group — a company that owns both real estate and tobacco companies.
Steven Mnuchin, a hedge fund investor and co-CEO and chairman of Dune Capital Management, he is a longtime friend of Trump’s despite the candidate’s public criticism of hedge fund investors. In May, Trump appointed him national finance chairman for the campaign.
Tom Barrack, another real estate investor and CEO of Colony Capital. He founded Rebuild America Now, a pro-Trump super PAC. During the Republican primary, Trump denounced super PACs and requested the return of all donations to any supporting him, but he hasn’t rejected their support during the general campaign.
Stephen M. Calk, CEO and chairman of Federal Savings Bank. He has been a critic of the Obama administration’s banking regulations.
John Paulson, another billionaire hedge fund manager and president of Paulson & Co. Paulson, made billions of dollars in profit from shorting the market during the 2007 housing bubble.
Andy Beal, a billionaire investor and founder of Beal Bank. In addition to making a huge profit buying up undervalued assets during the 2008 recession, he has made waves as a mathematician and high-stakes poker player.
Steve Feinberg, the secretive CEO of Ceberus Capital Management, a private investment firm which specializes in “distressed investing.” Among the firm’s assets: Remington, the manufacturer of the AR-15.
David Malpass, founder and president of Encima Global, a economic consulting and research firm. He held positions in the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations and unsuccessfully ran for the New York Republican U.S. Senate nomination in 2010.
Peter Navarro, a business school professor and anti-China author. He has praised Trump’s “peace through economic and military strength” strategy as “right out of the Reagan playbook.
Stephen Moore, the Heritage Foundation scholar, former Wall Street Journal columnist and founder of the anti-tax Club for Growth. His economic predictions have been wildly inaccurate.
Dan DiMicco, the former president and CEO of steel giant Nucor Corporation. DiMicco authored a 2015 book urging a return to American manufacturing.
There's just one academic. These are all businessmen with zero experience in macroeconomics or government. They're all deeply connected to Wall Street as well.
This basically removes Trump's one huge argument that Clinton is in the pocket of big business.
One of them used to work for a George Soros fund, but I am too lazy to look it up. Someone on Sup Forums posted the link the other day, but I don't remember which guy it is.
>This basically removes Trump's one huge argument that Clinton is in the pocket of big business.
Does it? I thought trump's argument had something to do with how politicians get funded.
Would you prefer he hired people who never had any achievements in the real world?
Trump is just a practical guy who respects actual results.
Where's Carl I. Kahn, the great businessman?
STEPHEN MOORE
You can't make this shit up
Information I like about these guys
>A critic of Obama administration's banking regulation.
>A mathematician and high-stakes poker player
>An investor for fucking REMINGTON, the manufacturer of the AR-15
>A business school professor and anti-China author
>The former president and CEO of steel giant Nucor Corporation, who authored a 2015 book urging a return to American manufacturing
This looks like a team of people with actual knowledge of economic principles, who believe in the return of jobs to America, urge protectionism and prioritizing domestic manufacturing industries, including those that create firearms with an intent that law-abiding American citizens buy them due to being valuable customers. This sounds like a team I'd get behind.
Trump also often argues, like Bernie used to, that Clinton is in the pocket of Wall Street and other globalists. He himself used to be entirely self-funded, but now also quietly accepts donations from big firms.
I would prefer advisers who have experience in government, not business. Government should not be run like a business, because of one huge difference: a businessman can always dump an undesirable client or employee, the government cannot dump undesirable citizens.
>the government cannot dump undesirable citizens.
Do you know what board you're on?
Except these are businessman who make their business through channels that assure they view every citizen as being desirable.
>he thinks the government cannot dump undesirable citizens.
He argued that Hillary is in the pocket of wall street BECAUSE she relies on their funding. Trump doesn't rely on their funding. He's not a career politician.... and the amount of funding he's actually gotten reflects this fact.
>implying you're at all familiar with who's who in the economic world