BASED CUCK HERE

Gender, race, sexuality - I understand and accept liberal-progressive ideology. Ask Me Anything.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism
translate.google.com.au/#auto/en/shi shai mai zhung
youtube.com/watch?v=33xMRpMQGrA);
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

...

Emus.

how did you get your cursor in the screenshot?
what manner of wizardry is this?

Did you already fucked a Canguros?

the Australoid fear the Emu

What are the potential ramifications of destabilizing and/or dismantling the brave police forces which protect black communities from themselves?

Does getting rid of (or defunding) the police open the possibility of lynch mobs becoming active again?

How can you believe the races have significantly different physical characteristics, but absolutely no difference in mental characteristics?

How can you believe male-female differences are entirely socialised when gender roles are essentially universal in every human society, and in most apes, and significant physiological differences exist?

Just because you think the police are being destablized; doesn't mean they are. The police are funded just fine almost everywhere.

What kinds of animals/things should I NOT be allowed to marry or cum in?

Social constructionism is actually a fairly uncommon viewpoint to take in the left. Most people with eyes acknowledge that sexual organs differ biologically.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism

...and whilst racial characteristics appear different there's no proof that race determines ultimate potential. With enough time anyone can learn to get a job and not be too much of a bother to society.

>I understand and accept liberal-progressive ideology

It´s not a coherent ideology. It's just virtue signaling and white guilt.

>t liberal-progressive ideology

It´s not a coherent ideology. It's just virtue signaling and white guilt.

Will you let me fuck your wife?

You can't marry any of them; and technically you can't cum in any of them because they can't be proven to show consent. However; if you want to do studies into animal-human consent - that's none of my business but it's unlikely anyone will ever support you (other zoophiles might but no one mainstream) and you'll most likely be tracked down and arrested for you efforts.

One of the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement is to de-fund the police and replace them with 'community solutions' (i.e. inmates running the asylum.) Thanks for playing.

Are you an alpha cuck?

No ideology is coherent. No logical system is coherent, that's the point of Gödel's incompleteness theorems (and to a less relevant extent Heisenberg's uncertainty principle).

That aside; just because you say "It's just virtue signaling and white guilt." doesn't make it so; and you're free to hold this opinion.

No.

Just because one BLM anarchist says something doesn't make it a mainstream liberal-progressive policy position. But yeah; thanks for playing man.

It is however considered very bad to say there are biological reason contributing towards differences in male and female life choices; that has to be entirely socialised for some reason, despite sexual dimorphism.

>whilst racial characteristics appear different there's no proof that race determines ultimate potential

Anyone can become a sprinter, but the fastest sprinters will come from East Africa far more often than anywhere else.

>With enough time anyone can learn to get a job and not be too much of a bother to society

What about the discrepancies in this time with respect to race? That's pretty much the bare minimum standard, too. It can be an arrestable offence in some countries to say we shouldn't expect to have the same rate of measurable success among the races.

How much amphetamine are you currently on?

New Zealand, I choose you.

Cuck this Aussie bitch boi with your emu cock.

>It is however considered very bad to say there are biological reason contributing towards differences in male and female life choices; that has to be entirely socialised for some reason, despite sexual dimorphism.

...and that reason is because the liberal-progressive standpoint is one of directed 'empowerment'; and the things you're discussing are the equivalent of asking a right wing Christian Conservative about evolution. It's not a necessary topic for the left's practical and political ideas about empowerment and improvement of all peoples. The rate at which people and hence society improve doesn't matter; as long as they do improve.

Insomnia, and I have 3 or 4 hours to kill before having to do anything... and the internet has been boring me lately. SO I thought I'd do this for a few hours instead.

It's a big mix of codependency, self-loathing and virtue signalling.

>Ask Me Anything.
Stopped reading right there.

Same here mate

You're free to hold this opinion; and those on the left are free to hold opinions about the true nature of right-wingers.

What is the meaning of shi shai mai zhung?

Both are correct.

If you guys really believe the liberal-progressive standpoint is incoherent or contradictory; feel free to post a question that highlights this incoherence, or contradictions.

translate.google.com.au/#auto/en/shi shai mai zhung

but I asked u , not google m8

Why do they have to lie about it being socialised then?

Wouldn't they be more successful in their aims if they tried to find any barriers against their goals?

What is the inherent value in equality of outcome across identity groups?

In that case it's relatively meaningless to me.

>Why do they have to lie about it being socialised then?

Most lefties will acknowledge that there's an interaction between biology and gender or actions when pushed. An extremely small amount of people will argue that the differences between the sexes are solely a matter of social construction; but you're right - it is a hot topic that in public people will veer towards socialization over mentions of biology. This is in part due to human nature and an attraction in humans towards easy answers; but also in part due to the historical deprivation of rights to women; no one wants to be called a sexist - but the left are currently growing out of that taboo due to receiving right wing criticism on the topic. This is why I am a leftist, because the left listens to criticism and adapts.

>Wouldn't they be more successful in their aims if they tried to find any barriers against their goals?

They would be; but ultimately it's the liberal-progressive left's job to criticize the right side of politics and vice versa. So whilst some leftists ARE looking for those barriers (youtube.com/watch?v=33xMRpMQGrA); most are targeted at criticizing the right.

>What is the inherent value in equality of outcome across identity groups?

In short: Social cohesion. Under other ideologies such as fascism for instance; social cohesion is easy; you just beat anyone who disagrees with you. But under secular democratic progressive-liberalism you have to argue unity until it sticks.

"Feminism is about equality"

Yep.

(you might have to phrase this as a question if you want me to answer it)

>mfw someone was "progressive" near me

Is there any proof the progressive approach will ever lead to greater social cohesion?

It seems to be going to opposite way.

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." Andrea Dworkin

"The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men." Sharon Stone

"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future – If There Is One – Is Female

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." Catherine Comins

"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women…he can sexually molest his daughters… THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE." Marilyn French

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it." Barbara Jordan, former Congresswoman

"Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release." Germaine Greer

"I do want to be able to explain to a 9-year-old boy in terms he will understand why I think it’s OK for girls to wear shirts that revel in their superiority over boys." Treena Shapiro

Feminism is sexism.

But as you know "seeming" and "being" are two different things. It's widely accepted that violence and crime have generally been trending down for the past century or so; and more so since the end of WW2 (when new-deal liberalism really started to kick in).

However; this effect has been counter-acted by the fact that technologies around global communication have been increasing - to the point that what used to be the "nightly news" is now available any time on any smart phone. In short; the world is more peaceful; but our exposure to the most violent events of the world is now greater than ever.

This has it's pros and it's cons. One pro is that we're unified against any violence any where. The biggest con is that we're addicted to being right, and moral, and aware, and good - when perhaps it's not that great for our mental health.

Systematic racism is it a math problem science problem or a environmental problem ??

Photoshop

>based cuck
Literally like claiming to be able to draw a square circle.

Do not reply to threads made by pic related
They are usually trying to bring the bants

>The biggest con is that we're addicted to being right, and moral, and aware, and good - when perhaps it's not that great for our mental health.

Hence the outrage culture of crazy virtue-signalling SJWs.

If OP says it's a society then he/she is implementing the destruction of western society

Crime rates rose massively until the 90s, when abortion caught up with it and the criminals weren't even born to commit the crimes any more.

this thread made me realize that Sup Forums doesn't care about ideas at all, you just find people who disagree with you annoying. I mean really, if you gave a shit
these wouldn't be the most substantial posts in the thread, posts basically describing a strawman and not addressing stance in anyway.

One thing I will say is that it's my personal belief; that these quotes come from a place of pain and suffering. These 8 quotes come from women who have had some bad experiences with men.

However liberal-progressivism isn't represented by these 8 quotes at all. Radical far-left misogynistic feminism is represented here; due to your selection criteria. You're free to believe that "Feminism is sexism"; but that doesn't necessarily make it so.

A sample size of 8 quotes from a near-infinite amount of quotes within the past 50 years of mainstream feminism doesn't say that much. Yes; feminists and particularly radical feminists are capable of saying some erroneous and off colour things; just as members of the far-right are. Just as anyone is. That's equality for you. It doesn't necessarily define the core mainstream doctrines of the ideology; one of which is that "Feminism is about equality". The motivation, prevalence and continuance of such sentiments need to be considered in determining the current landscape of mainstream liberal-progressive feminism; which is rather banal and reasonable if you ask me; especially compared to your selected quotes... but people like to go towards the most outrageous examples. That's just our nature - however it's not the reality.

>Systematic racism is it a math problem science problem or a environmental problem ??

It's a problem of government; and so becomes a problem of gaining accurate information on the genuine causes and motivations behind racism. But in my view systematic racism is on the way out; so I guess all the PC thugs and left wing academics have to a large extent done their job.

Are you from byron bay, by chance?

Nice proxy

Abortion laws aren't universal; nor are crime rates. Crime rates are trending down; it's a general "trend" (the mean regression line is in decline). It won't be true of every interval of measurement in every place on earth. But in general crime has been trending down.

Nope, but I hear it's a lovely hippie town.

Yeah I've always wondered how accurately Sup Forums can be used to measure political viewpoints. I know Sup Forums rushed onto GamerGate; and a lot of "red-pill" conservatives started to appear elsewhere - but the deeper they go into Trumpism the more I suspect are getting off the Trump train and looking for a more reasonable realpolitik.

More than likely Melbourne. Place needs to be nuked.