This looks great

This looks great.
youtube.com/watch?v=om9YCk7ufHs

too bad they chose a nigger rap song

He was a simple man, never wanted no trouble, the IRA gave him trouble, and this time it's personal.

I am so happy to be able to see another Jackie Chan blockbuster film.

why did it take so long for jackie chan to get this type of movie treatment?

It's not, New Police Story was a more serious type of movie for him, also Shinjuku Incident

so is this "based on a true story" or why did they go with the IRA
that really is the weirdest part about the whole film for me

>tfw there will be no more films where he does ridiculous stunts since he's just too old now

it was probably more fun for him to play goofy roles when he was young.
He is after all a very goofy person in real life as well.
Bruce Lee would have probably had a similar movie career if he had lived longer since he was also a goofball

Palatable group of terrorists. For all the talk of Representation, whites are generally inoffensive in most roles.

He's done serious movies before but the likes doing action-comedy. Now that he's old I guess he wants something a little more somber.

It's based on a novel called the chinaman written in the 90s, like 2 seconds in google.

>tfw you will have to tell your future kids stories about this cool dude's movies, but he's dead now

ok I guess that makes sense but weird that they didn´t feel like updating it with isis to make it more relevant.
there even are real life cases of British politicians trying to protect Islamic terrorists

>2017
>the word "Chinaman" is considered too politically-incorrect to be in a movie title
Just fuck my freedom up.

>da IRA dindu nuffin

lol

That or keep the 90s setting.

oh right they did update the time
wft?

What the fuck is going on with the framerate in that trailer? It looks like they took it from 24 down to ~18FPS, or like it's skipping every 3rd frame or something. How do they fuck up something this important?

Update it to ISIS and you have to deal with death threats, #NotAllMuslims, and more articles from the Guardian written by Muslims saying "portray us better on tv or we'll kill you".

You faggots will cry about anything. Movie about Jackie Chan fighting terrorists? Another conspiracy to diminish white men.

lmao when almost 95% of terrorism is committed by Muslims, it's a little odd when you choose to make your movie centered around non-Muslism terrorism.

The movie is adapted by a book which already exists. Cry more, faggot.

>Jackie Chan vs. James Bond

Nice

...

I'm not saying it's a conspiracy or that it's about white people. I'm saying that despite updating the setting to modern times, they didn't also update the type of terrorist, and imo this was just to avoid controversy.

yes, a book written in 1992, when the IRA was more relevant and that was the terrorist group that would be most likely to attack in London. Times have changed, and now it's Muslims. Are you that dense?

>From the guy who made Goldeneye and Casino Royale
>Punished Jackie Chan
>Pierce "d her buns" Brosnan

Are you ready for kino?

>not a Trabbled legend

>It's anachronistic REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Do yourself a favor and kill yourself.

spotted the mudslime. You seriously can't tell me you don't see why it's fucking stupid and inaccurate.

Do you really have a folder specifically made for when you go toe to toe with those alt right baddies?

where the fuck were you a week ago when I made that pic?

It's a movie about Jackie Chan fighting terrorists.

Sup Forums certainly goes out of its way to get triggered at everything, including a god damn movie starring jackie chan. It's hilarious and impressive at the same time.

This, I'll take my dad with me and enjoy the fuck out of seeing one last Jackie Chan movie with him

It's still pretty good since it fits the theme of the movie, don't worry about it.

yes. I'm glad you got that part. Good work. Now lets continue to talk about why the terrorists chosen make no sense in today's world.

Why the strawman?

And they say Sup Forumseddit isn't infesting this place.

>point out how you think it's odd that a modern day terrorist attack film has the IRA and not ISIS
>HURR TRIGGERED

Dude, MGS is true kino.

Amerifat detected.

>Sup Forumseddit's videogames made them start believing this shit and explains why they're Sup Forumstards
That explains everything.

That's a dumb thing to want to talk about. And you want to talk about it every time this movie is mentioned. And immediate cause and effect, like a trigger or something. I want to talk about Jackie Chan. What if the IRA terrorists hole up in a ladder warehouse, taking a bunch of babies hostage. And to breach the warehouse, Jackie drives a truck full of wooden chairs through to wall. Could he survive this situation?

I do take the meme war very seriously.

not as badly as Sup Forums is infested in this place

well you don't have to respond to people talking about that aspect, do you? If you want to talk about Jackie, make a thread about Jackie. This thread is about this film in particular so of course that topic came up.

Politically correct because of white SJW's, I literally do the slant eye thing in front of my Chinese gfs family and everyone thinks its hilarious.

Remember that Westernization and America was a mistake.

Will it be on netflix?

Name 10 things that aren't in this movie.