Let's settle this once and for all.
Should women be able to vote yes or no?
Let's settle this once and for all
Gavin Nelson
Other urls found in this thread:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedaily.com
s000.tinyupload.com
sciencedirect.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pillse.bol.ucla.edu
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org
nytimes.com
ibtimes.com
theatlantic.com
youtube.com
psychologytoday.com
sciencedaily.com
news.bbc.co.uk
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
synergy-pr.com
emilkirkegaard.dk
psy.unipd.it
theguardian.com
spring.org.uk
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
web.missouri.edu
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
people.fas.harvard.edu
medicaldaily.com
gpi.sagepub.com
gpi.sagepub.com
dailymail.co.uk
eurekalert.org
bloomberg.com
tandfonline.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
psycnet.apa.org
pss.sagepub.com
sciencedirect.com
unz.com
nymag.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
news.utexas.edu
journals.plos.org
journals.plos.org
medicalnewstoday.com
sciencedirect.com
medicaldaily.com
journals.lww.com
evp.sagepub.com
faculty.washington.edu
strawpoll.me
theguardian.com
twitter.com
Evan Hill
No
Austin Turner
Why not just limit voting to primary property owners (not co-owners)? That would eliminate most irrational people outright without having to limit voting by race and gender, which would be helpful but ultimately unjust given the outliers in each category.
Dominic Harris
/Thread
Brody Davis
It's neck and neck.
Can pol really not agree on this?
Leo Fisher
maybe people don't like captchas
Also women's suffrage and then nigger voting is what destroyed this country.
Alexander Ross
They should be able to vote...
-ONLY if they're married.
Otherwise, no.
Carter Wood
>women's suffrage
woodrow wilson was the biggest faggot traitor of a president in this country's history
>established federal reserve
>gave women the vote
>allowed tsar nicholas and his family to be killed by commies
seriously fuck him. worst person to ever walk on this land.
Matthew Nelson
No
Robert Allen
Ok yes is getting btfo now.
I knew the people defending women were shills all along.
Gavin Morris
No. Only land owners and people who have completed civil/military service should be allowed to vote.
David Long
Yes they should.
Also, where did you find a pic of one of the new wifes of my neighbor who is a refugee?
>haram!
Matthew Cruz
Good job, the people who own everything already should now even be the only ones to vote?
Nice try Rothschild
Zachary Evans
thinly veiled /r9k/ thread.
Women hate belongs in
Please, if you are a bitter incel who hates women go back to and spread your disgusting vitriol there. Nothing about women hate is politics, which is the focus of this board. If you want to talk about how much those awful "mean ol' girls" are then please go the fuck back to We do not want you here, so I am giving you the link to the board where you can post all about feminism and how much you have women because they won't sleep with you. That board is called and it's full of bitter losers and virgins who also hate women. You will fit right in, I promise!
Once again, the board is called and it's just perfect for people like you. Alternatively, if you don't want to post your bizarre and rambling rants about how all women are in a conspiracy to emasculate you by not sleeping with you, while also conspiring to sleep with everyone else besides you (because you believe every girl is a "slut" even though you get no action at all which directly contradicts this claim, but whatever....) then please kill yourself immediately.
So there are you options friends:
1. Go the fuck back to or
2. Kill yourself.
Jace Ortiz
>>>/fem/
Nathan Robinson
Hell to the goddamn naw
Dylan Moore
...
Samuel Long
No the people with a vested interest should have a say. Its like Monarchy. A monarch will think about long term effects on his kingdom. So too will land owners.
Non-landowners are the underclass that keep voting in fucked up politicians based on nothing but gibs. They are parasites and they bring nothing to the table. Literally warm bodies is all they are. Natural rights is bullshit when we have a completely secular government that will not endorse where those "natural" rights come from.
Parker Morales
Fuck no
>>allowed tsar nicholas and his family to be killed by commies
What the fuck does this have to do with anything? Why should we give a shit about the affairs of foreign countries and who is in power in them?
Cooper Gutierrez
>Should X group be able to vote
>Not political
K
Carson Bell
Owning property is not as important as it used to be when most people were farmers. You could be a successful lawyer/programmer/etc and still be renting because you are living in a very expensive city or something. You would limit voting to the middle class not living in cities and the upper class that lives in cities.
Daniel Reed
Anyone who disagrees with me shouldn't be allowed to vote
James Bailey
FIDF pls
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Following recall of a conflict involving direct aggression and role-playing a reaction to it, compared with men, women reported their anger would dissipate less quickly and they would take longer to reconcile. Women also exhibited increased heart rate, but little change in cortisol, whereas men exhibited little change in heart rate but increased cortisol production. We interpret the results as indicating that women are less prepared than men to resolve a conflict with a same-sex peer.
>sciencedaily.com
Why do we choose the partners we do, and why do we get flak about it from our parents? A professor says it comes down to simple genetics.
>s000.tinyupload.com
>sciencedirect.com
The paper cost Professor H. S. Nyborg a long legal battle with his university, which began with his suspension under trumped up charges and ended with a full acquittal on appeal, with the university forced to reinstate him (of course they never stopped going after him and he had to do the whole charade again with another paper in 2011):
The article tested four hypothesis:
Inadequate analysis explains why researchers have been having incosistent results on gender-based differences in intelligence
The adequate method proposed will identify a male lead in general intelligence
The male lead is mostly explained by larger male brain size
Because males have a higher average intelligence and a wider distribution, there are exponentially more males at the top end of the distribution; that translates into a significant numerical superiority of highly intelligent males as opposed to highly intelligent females, explaining male dominance across society
Colton Mitchell
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Study shows that women are attracted to selfish guys that are full of themselves, yet guys are not attracted to those qualities in women.
>pillse.bol.ucla.edu
UCLA research compiles women's dualistic mating strategy across all cultures
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Dominance has been suggested to honestly reflect male genetic quality.
Some researchers have suggested that the high mating value of dominant men is a result of their tendency to reaching higher socio-economical status and, therefore, gaining the resources that they may invest in their mate and offspring
There is also evidence that males of high genetic quality have a tendency for lower parental investment (Waynforth 1998). In response, a mixed mating strategy may have evolved in females: they prefer genetically superior males as short-term or extra-pair sexual partners while, at the same time, they seek males who are more willing to invest in their offspring as long-term or social partners
Matthew Ross
>rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org
Here, we develop and explore the hypothesis that the norms and institutions that compose the modern package of monogamous marriage have been favoured by cultural evolution because of their group-beneficial effects—promoting success in inter-group competition. In suppressing intrasexual competition and reducing the size of the pool of unmarried men, normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses.
By shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, normative monogamy increases savings, child investment and economic productivity. By increasing the relatedness within households, normative monogamy reduces intra-household conflict, leading to lower rates of child neglect, abuse, accidental death and homicide. These predictions are tested using converging lines of evidence from across the human sciences.
Kevin Murphy
>nytimes.com
A study which trained female freshman college students to avoid rape SUBSTANTIALLY lowered their odds of being sexually assaulted
>ibtimes.com
The study of 170 college-age women revealed that unattractive men earned a “negative double bias” upon violating a social norm.
However, handsome men did not earn a negative bias if they broke a social norm or did something wrong.
>theatlantic.com
Women engage in indirect aggression and slut-shaming, even in clinical research studies. Why?
>youtube.com
"In a series of studies, more than 1,000 adult participants rated the sexual attractiveness of hundreds of images of the opposite sex engaged in universal displays of happiness (broad smiles), pride (raised heads, puffed-up chests) and shame (lowered heads, averted eyes).
The study found that women were least attracted to smiling, happy men, preferring those who looked proud and powerful or moody and ashamed. In contrast, male participants were most sexually attracted to women who looked happy, and least attracted to women who appeared proud and confident." by Prof. Jessica Tracy of UBC’s Dept. of Psychology
>psychologytoday.com
The two groups of people who live the longest are those who stay married and those who stay single.
>sciencedaily.com
A woman would rather be TERRIFIED than disgusted by a man
Evan Moore
>news.bbc.co.uk
Study shows that once a women 'bonds' or knows she has fully secured her mates commitment she will lose interest in sex.
But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner.
But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.
The rational for why a woman's sex drive declines may be down to supply and demand. If something is in infinite supply, the perceived value would drop
>onlinelibrary.wiley.com
A new study has shown a correlation between birth control and decreased thickness in the brain regions responsible for "responding to rewards and evaluating internal states/incoming stimuli".
Self-awareness - Evaluating internal states
Self-control - Responding to rewards
Solipsism - Inability to process incoming stimuli
Not only does the pill have an effect on the mindset of women by changing the way we reproduce (and thereby how the genders interact), but now we know it also has a physical impact on the brain.
>synergy-pr.com
>emilkirkegaard.dk
>psy.unipd.it
Women prefer taken men with attractive partners especially during the low-fertility phase of their cycle
>theguardian.com
Kevin Wilson
>spring.org.uk
Study of 3,000+ finds men and women process emotions differently and this affects what they remember
Women rate emotional images as more stimulating and are more likely to remember them than men, a new study finds.
While strong emotions tend to boost memory for both men and women, this neuroimaging study may help explain why women often outperform men on memory tests.
The results come from a very large study of 3,398 people who took part in four different trials.
Both men and women were asked to look at a series of pictures, some of which were emotionally arousing and others which were neutral.
They were also tested on their memory for the pictures.
The results, published in the Journal of Neuroscience, showed that women found the emotional pictures — and especially the negative pictures — more stimulating than the men (Spalek et al., 2015).
Jason Roberts
>onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Using nationally representative data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, I estimate the association between intimate premarital relationships (premarital sex and premarital cohabitation) and subsequent marital dissolution. I extend previous research by considering relationship histories pertaining to both premarital sex and premarital cohabitation. I find that premarital sex or premarital cohabitation that is limited to a woman's husband is not associated with an elevated risk of marital disruption. However, women who have more than one intimate premarital relationship have an increased risk of marital dissolution. These results suggest that neither premarital sex nor premarital cohabitation by itself indicate either preexisting characteristics or subsequent relationship environments that weaken marriages. Indeed, the findings are consistent with the notion that premarital sex and cohabitation limited to one's future spouse has become part of the normal courtship process for marriage.
Carson Powell
>web.missouri.edu
Ahem
>Only women are picky in regards to both short & long term relationships, but men are ONLY picky in regards to long term relationships
>Women just sit back and pick
>Men have to compete
>Everything is based on reproductive potential >The individual's ability to invest in the growth, development, and later social and reproductive competencies of offspring and/or the potential genetic benefits a mate would confer on offspring
>Despite what the kike media says, women try to avoid short term relationships and casual sex unless the man is alpha
>Most westerners ignore this shit
>Women want men who are considered successful within their given culture
>Culturally successful men's children have better psychological and physical health, also a longer life.
>Women prefer husbands who are better educated and earn more money than they do.
>When women are forced to make trade-offs, a prospective marriage partner’s cultural success is rated as a necessity and other characteristics as a luxury.
>Hero in romance novels is always an older, handsome, socially dominant, and wealthy man who ultimately marries the heroine despite having his pick of dozens
>Women who marry older and better educated men have more children, are less likely to get divorced, and report higher levels of marital satisfaction than women who married younger and/or less educated men.
>Culturally successful men are often arrogant, self-serving, and better able to pursue their preferred reproductive interests than are other men. These preferences often involve pursuing multiple mating partners rather than investing in a single woman and her children.
>Women prefer men who are physically strong and make them feel physically protected.
>Intimacy and emotional satisfaction from partner is more of a luxury than a necessity for women.
Cooper Morales
No. Women don't go through all the hardships men do, so therefore, they do not deserve to be of superior or equal status to men. It's that simple.
Owen Parker
Continued
>Women rate a kind, understanding and intelligent husband higher than a purely culturally successful one with none of these traits.
>Women prefer taller than average athletic symmetric men with 0,9 waist-to-hip ratio and shoulders wider than hips.
>facial features that women like: large eyes, large smile, prominent cheek bones and chin.
>Asymmetric men are less physically active, manifest more symptoms of depression and anxiety, and report more minor physical problems (e.g., colds, headaches). They also have a lower IQ, higher basal metabolic rate and fewer sex partners.
>Handsome husbands not only give beautiful, but also healthier children.
>Women's ratings of the physical attractiveness of men are moderated by the ratings of the women’s peers, especially if the peer ratings are negative.
>Women’s ratings of the physical attractiveness of men are influenced by the men’s perceived social dominance and by the age of the women’s fathers when they were children.
>Women's preference for physical attractive men rises around the time of ovulation.
>Men are deceived by their partners into raising the children of another man, that is, cuckolded, about 10% of the time.
>Nonpaternity rates are higher than 20% in low socioeconomic settings.
>Women are attracted by the smell of pheromones around the time of ovulation.
>Women prefer extra-pair partners with whom they have a level of emotional intimacy as contrasted with a stranger.
>Men like variety.
>Men benefit from sex, women pay.
>Women do STR to achiece a LTR or to cheat their husband.
>Men masturbate more often.
>Women strongly endorse the double-standard that pre-marital sex is less acceptable for women than men and feel guilt and anxiety after sex.
>Men fantasize more about sex and group sex.
Jason Wilson
fpbp
Grayson Scott
>Women fantasize about personal and emotional characteristics of their partners.
>Men focus their fantasy on physical characteristics.
>Almost only men use prostitutes and that's why they have more sex partners than women.
>Men value the intelligence, kindness, understanding, personality, friendliness and sense of humor of their partner just as highly or even more than physical attractiveness.
>Men, especially socially dominant ones, are more jealous.
>Infidelity (or the suspection of it) and desertion are common motives for a man killing his wife, seminal study of homicides indicate.
>Men like youth, symmetry, low bmi, 0,7 waist-to-hip ratio (cues of fertility).
>Women’s fertility is low in the teen years, peaks at about age 25, and then gradually declines to near zero by age 45.
>The most attractive dating partner for teenage males is a woman about 5 years older than themselves, that is, a woman with higher fertility than females of the same age or younger than these adolescent males.
>Ovulating women smell sexier.
>Oversupply of women results in liberal sexual mores, high divorce rates, out of marriage births, single mothers, increase in women’s participation in the workforce, and lower levels of paternal investment.
>Oversupply of men results in increase in the level of commitment of men to marriage, declining divorce rates and greater levels of paternal investment.
>In societies in which polygyny is not constrained, culturally successful men (about 10-15% of men) will typically marry several women, which results in male-to-male aggression and many men with no children.
>Men, but not women who engage in serial monogamy get more children than their married peers.
Caleb Cooper
Only if they are a property and/or business owner.
Colton Ross
No, women think with their pussy too much.
Lincoln Perry
TL;DR
Sebastian Reed
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Men are over represented in every type of fetish and perversion except masochism
>people.fas.harvard.edu
Allowing women to vote INHERENTLY increases the size and scope of government
>medicaldaily.com
Wide hipped chicks are whores
>gpi.sagepub.com
>gpi.sagepub.com
Women LITERALLY hate their own nations and actively seek their destruction with immigration
dailymail.co.uk
Women really DO love bad boys: Females are more likely to lust after people with criminal records than males, study finds
Jonathan Moore
>eurekalert.org
Women are more likely to be sexually fluid than men because evolution historically required them to have sex with co-wives in polygynous marriages
>bloomberg.com
Shocking, look who marries whoo
>tandfonline.com
Basically, female rape victims often go on to enjoy sexual relationships with their rapists
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Men dream of many things
Pounding a teenager, getting seduced by a MILF, footjobs, autistic girls, pegging, brazilian scat orgies, grannies, BBW, choking themselves while dressed as batman, etc.
What do women like?
Getting raped
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
There's a BIOLOGICAL reason cucks will defend women at all costs
>psycnet.apa.org
Women have evolved to seek an older mate
>pss.sagepub.com
Nobody wants to fuck niggers
>sciencedirect.com
Women love facial scars when they're fertile
>unz.com
Women will follow any totalitarian fanatic regime with even more savagery than men
>nymag.com
European queens waged more wars than kangz
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Women with high self esteem have the most frequent an intense rape fantasies on average
>news.utexas.edu
Men’s and women’s ideas of the perfect mate differ significantly due to evolutionary pressures
>journals.plos.org
Liberals are biologically cucked and a danger to us all
Nicholas White
journals.plos.org
Sexist men are literally winners on average
Dads with smaller testicles are better fathers, study shows
>medicalnewstoday.com
>Previous studies have shown that lower levels of testosterone in men have been linked to increased parental involvement.
Do women panic more than men? An experimental study of financial decisions
>sciencedirect.com
medicaldaily.com
How about that?
Women have less less gray matter in their brains than men do
Guess who also tend to have less gray matter?
PATHOLOGICAL LIARS
Letting women work is literally killing them
>journals.lww.com
Women like taken men
>evp.sagepub.com
faculty.washington.edu
Fascinating read
For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age 50. […]
Interestingly, a separate analysis (not shown) demonstrates that the interaction term between sex and age in a combined sample of all ages is not statistically significant, except for religion. It means that, at least for nationality and race, women do not gradually and linearly become more xenophobic over the life course. They suddenly become qualitatively more xenophobic sometime between the ages of 40 and 50.
Aaron Scott
I voted Yes. If feminist institutions were run by nationalists, women would fall in line with the nationalist project.
Logan Moore
>20th grade
wut is this
Eli Price
Fuck off
You're operating within the feminine directive
Luke Parker
C
U
C
K
Sebastian Adams
>feminine directive
What the fuck is that? Women are needed to build nations you faggot.
Brayden Ortiz
>if feminist institutions were run by nationalists
If the communist party was run by nazis they'd be nationalist too, what difference does it make?
Landon Foster
>women
>building nations
No. Women are needed to breed male children who build nations.
Samuel Williams
They wouldn't be harmful to the white race or nationalism.
Having children, raising, and educating them is part of nation building.
Eli Edwards
should they be able to? yes
should they? no
Parker Jones
>they wouldn't be harmful
You missed my point entirely. A nationalist feminist organization is a contradiction in terms, like a communist nazi party.
>the other stuff
Okay. They don't need to vote for that, and we've seen from history that the more politically enfranchised they get the less they do any of those things
Levi Ortiz
>What the fuck is that?
Oh you naive child
>Women are needed to build nations you faggot.
Prepare for the redpill, fucker
Whether it’s team sports (almost always a male-oriented endeavor), cooperative enterprises, cooperative forms of art (rock bands have almost always been male space) or just hobbies men share, it is a natural progression for men to form sub-tribes within the larger whole of conventional masculinity.
Because of men’s’ outward reaching approach to interacting with the world around him, there’s really no unitary male tribe in the same fashion that the collective ‘Sisterhood’ of women represents. One of the primary strengths of the Feminine Directive has been its unitary tribalism among women. We can see this evidenced in how saturated the Feminine Directive has become into mainstream society and how it’s embedded itself into what would otherwise be diametrically opposed factions among women. Political, socioeconomic and religious affiliations of women (various sub-tribes) all become secondary to the interests of ‘womankind’ when embracing the collective benefits of being women and leveraging both their victim and protected statuses.
Thus, we see no cognitive dissonance when women simultaneously embrace a hostile opposition to one faction while still retaining the benefits that faction might offer to the larger whole of the Sisterhood. The Sisterhood is unitary first and then it is broken down into sub-tribes. Family, work, interests, political / religious compartmentalizations become sublimated to fostering the collective benefits of womankind.
Women are terrifying in this almost insectlike hivemind they share. The ultimate goal being to maximize hypergamy worldwide.
This is how your so called "traditional" women can claim to "hate" feminism n' shieet but still ENJOY the bennies of feminism.
David Clark
All my guy friends have various common interests like sports, hunting, music, vidya, art, etc. The best conversations I've ever had with my fellow men have occurred while we engaged in such activities. Even just moving around furniture or landscaping. It's that feeling of working together towards an accomplishment and relating over that shit.
Women, make time with the express purpose of talking between friends. Over coffee perhaps, but the act of communication is more important than the event or activity. Even a ‘stitch-and-bitch’ is simply an organized excuse to get together and relate. For women, communication is about CONTEXT. They are rewarded by how that communication makes them feel. For Men communication is about content and they are rewarded by the interchange of information and ideas.
It’s likely that our hunter-gatherer tribal roles had a hand in men and women’s communication differences. Men went to hunt together and practiced the coordinated actions for a cooperative goal. Bringing down a gigantic prey animal would have been a very information-crucial effort; in fact the earliest cave paintings were essentially records of a successful hunt and instructions on how to do it. Early men’s communication would necessarily have been a CONTENT driven discourse or the tribe didn’t eat.
Similarly women’s communications would’ve been during gathering efforts and childcare. It would stand to reason that due to women’s more collectivist roles they would evolve to be more intuitive, and context oriented, rather than objective oriented.
Whereas men tend to distribute rewards and resources primarily on merit (stubborn rock you get the liver for dealing the critical hit, wolfheart you get a leg for crippling it, faggot flower you get the cock), women spread resources collectively irrespective of merit. Again this predisposition is likely due to how women’s ‘hard-wiring’ evolved as part of the circumstances of their tribal roles.
Andrew Peterson
It's not in the interests of the "sisterhood" to flood Germany with Arab Muslim rapists.
John Ramirez
Women are as a rule inferior scum, and their influence on young boys is poison
They CANNOT feel loyalty to a country, tribe, nation or anything like that on a biological level'
You've seen all the research
To a woman the world consists of "my family & friends" and "other"
Whoever immdiateley gives her pleasure
Women have their place, but don't ever compare them to a man
Ayden Ward
Yes it is. Women invite invaders in to fight with their local men and fuck whoever wins. It's in their nature, and it's why civilized societies prevent them from doing that
Eli Ross
Shes got MAN HANDS
Caleb Bennett
Already settled 459668004 threads ago.
The women won.
Read the FAQ.
Owen Hughes
Au contraire, mon petite chou
Is it really that hard to explain?
The sexual appeal of strutting military age young men would be to whom? To women, both young and old. If the appeal is sexual it can’t be to anyone else. It is to women.
Does that mean an invasion of these Muslims is appealing to women? The smart answer seems to be No. But if the sexual appeal is not to women, then there is no sexual appeal, but we know and we feel there is a sexual appeal. Therefore the correct answer has to be YES. And the smart answer has to be wrong.
The sexy men are invading because the women want it.
And it’s stupid but it’s not false.
When men make a mistake, they invade somewhere they should not have–due to male desires blinding their reason.
When women make a mistake, they invite someone they should not have–due to female desires blinding their reason.
The reason we have not yet seen an explanation is that we assume politics are based on male desires. And second, women do not understand their own desires, so they would be less able to articulate this than I am. What woman would say, “I know it is stupid, but I need to see if these sexy, strong foreigners might make better lovers and rulers.”
But that’s part of the answer.
The people who crave the complete destruction of the european peoples like to say this – and it can be persuasive for people who look at alternative news sites because those sites focus on the military aged male aspect of the invasion – but the truth is the opposite and in plain sight when you look at the pictures used by the mainstream media to manipulate the public.
The pictures the MSM show are nearly always children and mothers in distress.
Another reason is the media are deliberately manipulating their sympathy for the children.
Just look at any jewish news since it started.
What was the major turning point in the media’s propaganda campaign – the dead kid on the beach.
Aaron Brooks
If you think the average German woman wants to risk being raped so she can have sex with the winner you have been reading too much /r/theredpill. Women hate conflict. Brown manlets on welfare are not something desired by women.
The rapefugee crisis is happening because of elites, not the average female voter.
Asher Baker
The average female voter is the reason merkel is in power and has been allowed to so wound western civilization.
The average female voter is why Hillary may become president, and destroy western civilization forever.
Nicholas Campbell
You didn't think this through for more than 10 fucking seconds, did you? Your idea is retarded, and so are you.
Lincoln Torres
approval for being a cuckold?
Connor Gray
>No got more votes than yes.
Can't wait until summer's over.
Liam Powell
I think their votes should be screened, if for Trump then yes and their vote will go though. If not, then they get ole' yellard.
Landon Gomez
Women are instinctively attuned to selective pressures, and when a woman sees foreign people flooding in and people seemingly powerless to stop it, her limbic system starts to presume that selective pressures favor some gene or genes in the former and starts to think about acquiring those genes for her own offspring, especially since those genes are going to confer immunities to diseases and pathologies that the foreign people are likely to bring along with them that the natives aren’t going to be immune to.
Women are aroused by male strength and dominance above all other considerations. If the wider culture and ruling classes are arranging society so that Muslim migrants have the run of the place, and the native White men are hindered from expressing their displeasure and acting on it, the native White women will begin to feel desirous of those migrants, feeling in their bones that these are the tribe leaders they are looking for.
If the sisterhood had their way they'd all be the wives of a fucking demi-god who just finished subjugating all other men on earth into cucked eunuchs to raise his harem babies
Samuel Jones
>thinking woman should vote
>posting MLP
Juan Smith
>"risk" """rape"""
Those poor women
>Mentioning reddit
You need to go back
James Price
Yeah, they should. Go back to Iran Achmed, or go back to school Johnny.
Owen Murphy
reCaptcha is very ridiculous !
Here on Sup Forums, without javascript enabled, the reCaptcha does not molest me, simply click checkboxes, use "Verify" and copy code by clipboard... 7 clicks by mouse and clipboard transfer.
The version with "I am not robot" button, having to click all houses, switch new houses, having to click more images with houses, switching new, having to click more images with houses - is very annoying and humiliating.
I am not a robot to solve their stupid and annoying reCaptcha...!
The strawpoll does not work without javascript enabled...
Landon Sullivan
>he doesn't see the irony here
I think I just replied to A1 bait
Ian Cook
The CDU is mainstream. I doubt there is much difference in gender support.
That's only because they have been brainwashed by Marxist feminists.
Enjoy your ban.
Nolan Reyes
I just read that rule. . . Fuck. See ya in 3 days I guess. . .
Isaac Robinson
Are you reading the same thread as I am?
Women LOVE rape, and rapists, and conquerors
This is science, tradcuck
Easton Cox
I can't believe i used to watch this show and like it, what was wrong with me.
Chase Thomas
>Women LOVE rape
Confirmed for redpill retard.
Jackson Reyes
Should women have any rights?
Brody Thompson
can children vote?
So why should women vote?
Women cannot survive without men. They are weak and helpless. Why should they vote?
Charles Perry
kek'd at the result
Carter Myers
You post like you're underage.
Owen Davis
Yup, just read any shoujo manga and you'll see it.
Carter Gonzalez
Unfortunately, the traditionalist operates within the feminine imperative as well.
Watch his fawning attitude towards his lovers, he pets and preens her like she's a gift from heaven, she's his Traditional Feminine Conservative girl (tm)".
As far as the traditionalist is concerned? Women have no INHERENT sense of entitlement, but at the same time should be catered to.
Much like his blue haired trans-whale SJW counterpart, he fails to realize men and women have different sexual desires, goals, and strategies.
He despises his own sexuality. He denies that men are visual creatures when it comes to sex, he becomes ANGRY when you imply men are naturally polygamous. And it's understandable, your average traditionalist couldn't last 10 seconds in a world of hypergamous cunts, thirsty betas, and alpha breeders. Note: I said average.He acts as though men are lesser beings for having the level of lust God gave us.
They utterly deny hypergamy as well. Commonly heard phrases "you just attract these sorts of women", "not all women are like that", "good traditional women (tm) are out there", etc.
They tend to be ex-betas and like feminists deny the dark, depraved urges women have. They can't imagine their traditional feminine conservative (tm) princess honestly considering a gangbang, facial, nipple clamps, eating ranch dressing out of a guys asshole (sorry George, if you're reading this), bathroom quickies, etc.
Traditionalists are quick to call other men entitled, selfish, high standards, etc. for daring to want a good quality mate. But pats women on the back for the same thing, even if her standards are absurd for her value and efforts
Traditionalists act as though men and women share in the sacrifice of marriage. I addressed this point earlier. A man COMPLETELY ignores his programming and sticks with one woman to care for her and their babies. That's painful.
Hunter Green
Are you going to keep calling names or refute the sources?
>redpill
You mean the kike run hedonist reddit board?
Or reality?
Cuck
Jayden Reyes
You're MRA/MGTOW scum. You will be hung on the day of the rope.
Jackson Sullivan
Your retarded theory so far:
>The women vote runs society.
>Women love rape.
>Women haven't legalized rape yet.
Cooper Carter
Nice blog, TRP faggot.
Aiden Nelson
Even shoujo manga aimed at middle school girls are full of rape fantasies.
Jeremiah Bell
No. Male only suffrage means that each vote actually represents the interests of a household. And women are generally retarded when it comes to political views. They are much less likely to be a rightwing misfit. They like to fit in and have conventional opinions.
Joshua Butler
okay, def a vaginal holder.
Xavier Wood
Absolutely fucking not
Matthew Reyes
>MRA
They're whiny egalitarian cucks
>MGTOW
Cucks who took their ball and went home (as if anybody wanted it)
>The women vote runs society.
No, but it has a staggering affect
>Women love rape
A fact
>Women haven't legalized rape yet.
Are you daft?
No, you're a strawmanning woman
Kevin Roberts
I'm not a redditor
And blogging means you're talking about your personal life
Nolan Lee
No.
Owen Sanders
The faggots really do think men and women are equal
They're liberals
>racist
>sexist
>homophobe
>islamophobe
WOMEN DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT POLITICS AND HAVE NO PERSONAL INVESTMENT ASIDE FROM COMFORT
theguardian.com
Dominic Williams
Because it's not the 1800's anymore.
IT'S CURRENT YEAR
Voting should be limited based on criminal history and welfare consumption though, as should it be based on employment. If you're a criminal, societal leech/don't have a job, you shouldn't be trusted to vote competently.
Justin Campbell
Aside from battle mangas, one of the most popular stories is the harem.
A guy with an army of girls who all want a piece of him.
Shit starts early
And people act like there's nothing biological about it
Shoujo
>Social relationships are the big focus
>Edgy, asshole, charismatic love interests are #1
Shounen
>Fightin and armies of big titty sluts
Gee golly
Adam Perez
>I doubt there is much difference in gender support
Actually the difference is massive. With single women voting overwhelmingly left.
The AfD(being the only party against national suicide) had about 4:1 of men to women.
Women's vote is a disaster and nothing good has come of it.
There are decent rational women, but they have equal vote as the retards, and there are many more women that believe dumb shit than men.
Josiah Hall
CDU is a center right party.
Liam Reyes
>center right party
They can call themselves whatever they want, they're not conservatives.
The only relevant party in Germany that isn't far left is the AfD.
Gavin Carter
>There are decent rational women
Kek
Like the fabled genius nigger?
Anthony Stewart
>all these single 20-something faggots voting "no"
Y'all don't know the love of a conservative wife, it's like I get two votes while all you retards only get one.
There's still enough time for mudslimes/BLM to pull another major tragedy before the election. If they do something in similar nature to the Orlando club shooting, but perhaps with bombs instead of guns, it'll be sure to redpill some minds into voting for Trump.