Hillary getting sued over Bengazi

okay hillarious you know i hate your dynasty but i got your back on libya.

let's correct this record and set the story str8. also fuck bush2/clinton2 & all career politicians. trump ftw 2016.

>>The lawsuit, filed by Patricia Smith and Charles Woods, blames the attacks in part on the current Democratic presidential nominee’s use of a private email server when she was secretary of state.

>>The server, which was the object of foreign government hack attempts, enabled the Islamic State allied terrorists to “obtain the whereabouts of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and thus the U.S. State Department and covert and other government operations in Benghazi, Libya and subsequently orchestrate, plan, and execute the now infamous September 11, 2012 attack,” the suit claims.

lol wut? much speculation. ISIL is capable of dns reroutes to hack twitter. they are not capable of actual hacking or cracking. especially since hillarys server was admined by people applying patches to 0day.

>>The lawsuit also accuses Mrs. Clinton of defamation and the infliction of distress, and seeks damages from her on that score too. It claims that “During her campaign for President, Defendant Clinton has negligently, recklessly, and/or maliciously defamed Plaintiffs by either directly calling them liars, or by strongly implying that they are liars.”

if you're claiming ISIL hacked a server, you're a liar. and, i speculate, they would have boasted about it.

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/maps/search/american embassy libya/@32.8728653,13.1799824,14z/data=!3m1!4b1
snopes.com/POLITICS/military/stevens.asp
freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>>Mr. Woods is the father of Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL working as a CIA security contractor at the time of the Islamist attack, which Mrs. Clinton and other U.S. officials blamed on an anti-Islam video.
the reasons and blame do not matter. no one is responsible for another persons actions. but since liberal retards read this, let's clarify: >navy seal/cia security contractor can't protect himself.
blame the training i guess.

>>Ms. Smith’s son, Sean Smith, was a former Air Force officer who became a U.S. Foreign Service information management officer. Ms. Smith spoke at the Republican National Convention and has repeatedly accused Mrs. Clinton of lying to her and other Benghazi families.
so you got lied to, but lying is not a violation of a “clearly established” statutory or constitutional right. (keep trying! i wish it was in america!)

>>In the past week, Ms. Smith has noted the news media’s solicitousness toward Khizr and Ghazala Khan, Muslim immigrants whose son was killed in Iraq, and their criticisms of Republican nominee Donald Trump and contrasted it with the media’s treatment of her.
shut up (((media))) you're worthless.

>>The case was filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA on behalf of the families.
time to pull your open secrets, traitor.

>>In a statement announcing the lawsuit, Mr. Klayman said that because Mrs. Clinton used her private email server to communicate with Ambassador Stevens, another of the four Americans killed in Benghazi, it is “clear” that Mrs. Clinton “negligently and recklessly GAVE UP THE CLASSIFIED LOCATION of the plaintiffs’ sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist attack that took their lives.”
LOL GUISE HE DIED IN THE EMBASSY. LOL HOW DID AN EMAIL GIVE UP THE LOCATION OF AN EMBASSY. AN EMBASSY. here's google maps telling ISIL where the embassy is: google.com/maps/search/american embassy libya/@32.8728653,13.1799824,14z/data=!3m1!4b1
but let's go one further: snopes.com/POLITICS/military/stevens.asp and then read the emails. christopher stephens et al. could have evacuated a week before the riots that ended his life. he is a big boy, a grown man, who chose to stay. that is his decision, do not take it away from him. yes, he asked for backup and was denied. at that point he could have abandoned post. but he chose to stay. his choice. not clintons. clinton did not send an email to ISIS/ISIL. ISIS/ISIL did not hack her server or do a MITM on the embassy. stop blaming other people for the responsible choices of a diplomat. the diplomat is more educated than any of us; we need to respect and honor his decision, not turn it into this shit show.

>>The actual lawsuit is a bit more circumspect, saying such leakage and causality were “highly probable, given Defendant Clinton’s history of reckless handling of classified information.”
they got nothin. they're trying to strawman fallacy.

>>Mrs. Clinton was accused by FBI Director James B. Comey of being “extremely careless” in her handling of classified information by putting it on an unsecured server. He also has refuted her claims that she neither sent nor received classified information, though he declined to press criminal charges, saying that perhaps the former first lady was too innocent of technology to know what she was doing.
another strawman. let me clarify please. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON ASKED THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY FOR THE SAME COMMUNICATIONS SETUP AS BARAK OBAMA AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY SAID NO IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE. SO SHE SETUP HER OWN FUCKING SERVER BECAUSE OUR GOVERNMENT IS HACKED 7WAYS FROM SUNDAY BY THE CHINESE. HRC did the logically smart intellectual thing setting up her own server, AND SHE'S NOT THE FIRST GOVT OFFICIAL TO DO SO.
none of that had anything to do with ISIS raiding an EMBASSY. al quaida has bombed many african embassies. did you care?

fuck you dynasty clinton, trump 2016 ftw.

Who's to say they're the ones hacking the server? Information can be bought and there are lots of sellers.

Here's a link:

freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf

This is all right wing smoke and mirrors to try and coverup the fact that the republicans have a bigot for a leader.

Republicucks will do anything to try to distract from drufmps racism

Because the e-mails indicated that she wasn't sending support to the embassy. They asked her multiple times, even up to a few days before saying that they needed backup and weren't safe and she never replied or sent approved the request.

Which lead to them knowing they were vulnerable.

your statement would carry weight if you could explain the difference between diplomats and gulf trench warfare.

i'm uneducated neet.

I never knew Reince was a bigot

The claim is going to get thrown out. They have to present a plausible claim not just a possible one.

define your memewords please if you want to be taken seriously

plausible you say?
i got somethin..............
..............nevermind, i hate directed energy weapons and (((central banks)))

pic related.

>plausible you say?
Yes. A Robert Ludlum-esque story is possible but not plausible. A claim has to demonstrate something more than mere possibility. That can be something like opportunity + intention + capacity. Just having the opportunity alone is insufficient.

agreed.
my posts have some seekrets in them. the tldr is you're right and there's more to her defense than i'm willing to volunteer.

stop the bengazi attacks

trump ftw

She doesn't even need to defend herself. The court will toss it out sua sponte.

For Trump it's a win/win/win all around
Shows that Hillary attacked the "gold star" families, called them liars and is likely going to dig herself further down with her statement on the lawsuit

that kind of politics is not honorable

i should run for politics, i may not like hillary but i'll stand up and represent the truth.

>For Trump it's a win/win/win all around
How so? She doesn't even need to respond.

what does ISIL have to gain by advertising they know how to crack servers? If I were in that position I would keep my mouth shut until I knew for certain my man in the middle shit wasn't gonna work anymore

strawman. hillary is not sec.state.
isil always advertises for teh propaganda
they're like a shitty kim jong