Mrenter?

I'm new to Mrenter and from what i've heard he's kind of asshole. What does Sup Forums think of Mrenter

>e-celebs
Fuck off.

His standards of what makes a cartoon "good" or "bad" are ridiculous and based entirely on his obsession with karma and feel-goodness.

I get that he's on the spectrum and all but Jesus Christ he's irritating.

He's great. Absolutely "based" as this board puts it.

Excuse me? Where is your work if you think you're so much better than him?

Pan's better

I'm not saying I'm better than him dude!

I just find him quite irritating. His content isn't even that bad.

wew lad, a defense force already out on patrol

autistic manlet

>Absolutely "based"
The only people that say that are cancerous cross boarding shitposters. You people are exactly what is wrong with Sup Forums.

Him, Pan, bobsheau, there are plenty of good animation critics on YouTube.
The important thing is to be able to separate their opinion on a thing from your enjoyment of their content. You can not agree with a person and still like what they do, and you can absolutely agree with someone but hate their guts.

I don't think it's that. I think it's the narrative and what it is suggesting. In his Rick and Morty review, he basically says that the show knows Rick's an asshole and they run with it. Meanwhile with Family Guy or something like that, the people are complete cunts but we are meant to feel sorry for them when the camera zooms in.

I mean, I'm the same. I get absolutely furious when I read stories where characters either shit-talk another character and the audience is supposed to agree with the shit-talking. It's why I hate reading Bendis, Aaron, Millar and Ennis... A lot of their characters act like complete asshats, but the narrative makes it clear that we are supposed to agree or sympathize with them, because their the protagonist. Meanwhile, if the 'villains' of the story can do the exact same thing, but be treated like absolute monsters and we are supposed to agree with that.

>cartoon reviewers
I wish Sup Forums would stop falling for this shit

He's shit panders to Majority. He's asexual and is automatically biased again to valentines episodes

>this is not a b8 thread, I am srs!

He's literally autistic.

He sucks and we hate him. Only people as autistic on as him on this board like him.

Isn't there one single proper animation reviewer on the entire web?

Does anyone else remember when we started to spam his DA page with porn of that cartoon he made? Good times.

guys tell Pan to make this happen PLEASE i beg of you

Fuck off Mr. Eenter, we aren't your personal army.

Can we raid his DA again?

But Family Guy and TTG don't pretend the assholes are sympathetic.

fine. we will fight

>Implying you have to agree with them soley because they're the protagonist

Asshole protagonists are the best. Especially when they have a cynical nature. Pic related.

>Family Guy doesn't try and make us like the Griffins.
Thanks user, I needed the laugh.

As for TTG, There are plenty of reasons to hate that show aside from the characters.

while his standards can be strange, I still enjoyed my time watching his videos. I didn't have to agree with him, nobody has to, but it's nice to see someone really care enough about cartoons to make a review and expend the energy to get upset/happy about them. I'm not saying he's a good reviewer, but he does his thing and that's nice to see.

The joke in FG is what assholes the characters are.

Oh, I agree that asshole protagonists are the best. But only when everyone knows that they are an asshole. However, quite a few of the writers I mentioned have no self-awareness and don't realize that their protagonists are dicks.

But it doesn't. Do you even watch the show? Everyone else hates the Griffins and they're all seen as terrible people. Even Meg who's typically the butt of the joke is shown as an awful person most the time.

About as autistic and insufferable as anyone in the internet.

His conception of what makes art good is unfounded, entirely predicated on his own hangups, and is actively damaging to a serious discussion of animation as an art form.

The world would be a better place and the conversation surrounding animation would be more sophisticated if he were dead.

Hes got some interesting things to say and viewpoints but a lot of his reviews are strongly influenced by his own opinions. Specifically anything mean spirited and episodes that don't have a moral or teach a lesson.

He thinks that MLP is the greatest example of animation. Enough said, this guy is too retarded to be doing reviews.

Are the Griffins shown to be terrible people? Yeah, they are. But we are still supposed to like them. I mean, let's take a look at a better example of an asshole protagonist, Homer Simpson (Up to Season 8). He was a dick. But he had self-awareness and so did the show. They showed him at his worst, but you knew that there were lines he would not cross. He also had a lot of meaningful moments and showed that he did care about the people around him.

With Peter and the rest of the Griffins, they always sink to lower and lower depths,with no end in sight. Yet, we are still suppose to sympathize with them. Like when Brian is killed, we are supposed to feel sad, despite the fact he is Brian.

>that filename

>With Peter and the rest of the Griffins, they always sink to lower and lower depths,with no end in sight.
Yes, that's the set up for the jokes.
>Yet, we are still suppose to sympathize with them

This is factually wrong. Except for maybe Brian since he's suppose to be a voice of reason, but he comes across as a self insert if anything. They should have kept the Itallian dog.

Demolition D.

my nigga

>Yet, we are still suppose to sympathize with them.
That's blatantly untrue, though. We're supposed to "like" them in the same way we like the cast of Always Sunny or Seinfeld.

Hes hardly proper, just funny to watch

That is some gross ass DA-tier coloring

Can someone who understands that shit better explain why the fuck it looks so nasty and why my eyes instantly tell the colors are shit, but my brain can't pick out exactly why it looks off?

His analysis of the Evangelion rebuilds vs the show is easily his most in depth and serious set of videos and it's what got me to subscribe to him.

I think it's because they're using black for shading which is never a good idea.

That depends. Is he an actual critic who analyzes and offers recommendations for cartoons, or is he a "TGWTG" critic who yells at a shitty, obscure cartoon for twenty minutes?

from what i've seen, the latter, unfortunately.

Pieguyrulz is pretty good

I find his content very good for when you need something to fall asleep to

you can fall asleep to whiny high-pitched voices?

He's a faggot, and if you like him, you're a faggot too.

Those are some of the worst episodes though

Yeah, but the difference with those shows is that they usually get what's coming to them, or at the very least, they never attempt any kind of serious moments that assume you have some kimd of sympathy for them.

Not to mention, in those kinds of shows like Always Sunny, you root for the characters not because they're sympathetic, but because they're funny. And Family Guy simply hasn't been funny for a very long time.