>The basic premise of the unskewers is wrong. Most pollsters don’t weight their results by party self-identification, which polls get by asking a question like “generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a….” Party identification is an attitude, not a demographic. There isn’t some national number from the government that tells us how many Democrats and Republicans there are in the country. Some states collect party registration data, but many states do not. Moreover, party registration is not the same thing as party identification. In a state like Kentucky, for example, there are a lot more registered Democrats than registered Republicans, but more voters identified as Republican in the 2014 election exit polls.
he literally said "Trump has no chance of getting the nomination" for an entire year
Ryder Thompson
Prepare to get shot if Hillary rigs the election, because Trump has 67% to her 19% and hes completely unelectable.
Mason Green
>Party identification is an attitude, not a demographic absolutely delusional
Cameron Wood
...
Lucas Scott
>commentary on the state of a race in November is the same as a linear regression model based on a glut of data
If you actually went back and saw how he called almost every single primary state about a week before voting you'd stop repeating this meme. It's just burying you just like you buried yourselves in 2012.
