ITT: shitty and/or obscure sequels and spinoffs
ITT: shitty and/or obscure sequels and spinoffs
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Ignoring the obvious fetish fuel in the original show, is this actually worse?
I honestly can't remember. It was more boring/forgettable than anything imo.
Speaking of fetish, Totally Spies didn't have lolis with big butts covered, right?
youtube.com
I wonder if this show would've been successful if they were all girls.
FUCKING
T H I C C
Took til this show to get body inflation.
... Power Pack?
This p much.
Aside from the fuel, it also didn't have the campy charm of TSpies. which I guess is why they decided to make another actual season than sink more into this.
Is that girl voice by Sugar?
Wasted on this show on a shit character.
I think the thing that ruins Amazing Spiez more than anything is the fact that it only has one female main character(well that and barely having any fetish material), actually that might not be a bad thing to suggest next time we have a Rule 63 thread around here, have someone do gender bent versions of the Male Spiez
sounded more like that one girl from.. that other thing.. to me
Havent watched since season 4 but i cant stop masterbating to that huge sun goddess ass
>it only has one female main character
what? i only see one male
>actually that might not be a bad thing to suggest next time we have a Rule 63 thread around here
Seconding this suggestion.
only the one furthest to the right is a girl, the others are all guys
So, Totally Not Spies?
huh. you don't see a lot of boys wearing beehives. or girls for that matter.
well in that case i agree, that's definitely what held this back.. i'd even go as far as to say i wasted my time in my thread
so are they related tot he totally spies girls or am i just seen things?
No relation
The originals cameoed a few times. Kid in yellow had a crush on Clover and she kind of lead him on.
So I guess /ss/ is the other fetish they kind of hit.
...