Socialism doesn't wo-

>socialism doesn't wo-

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rZRw7HmXV_8
numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_cities.jsp?country1=Russia&country2=Sweden&city1=Moscow&city2=Stockholm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Not socialism.

social democracy, so partially socialism

you don't have to repeat every lie you hear

the nordic model only works in countries with small slavic/m*Doid/nigger population mate

This shit is over hyped.

If your economy is rich, you can do full blown capitalism or full blown socialism and you will have a decent economy regardless.

The fact that you declare yourself to be one or the other doesn't automatically make you rich or poor.

>Not socialism

But the most socialist of the market economies by any metric you can throw at me.

proofs?

Also, the key is to have low wealth inequality. If you have low wealth inequality, you have have either and it works wonders.

If you have lots of inequality, you have a mess either way.

...

Not exyu.

Socialism is the first phase of the communist formation(C)Lenin

In Nordic state - Capitalism, because, there is private production, not public production.

The Nordic countries were a way less developed when they were starting out with the nordic model, and that didn't hinder they growth at all. Quite the opposite, actually.

Social democratic model takes care of income inequality.

i have observed our slavic blue collar workers for long enough to know it. incompetence would be the best word to describe them all. and m*Doids are too lazy for it to work and niggers aren't even human

>Social democratic model takes care of income inequality.

Not always. You need to have low inequality for politics to not be corrupted. Otherwise you end up like Latin America, where despite declaring themselves to be socialists, they are so corrupted, that in effect they are not working towards socialist ideals.

>there is private production, not public production.

Norway and Sweden both have a huge chunk of GDP produced by government owned enterprises.

Thats like saying im part dinosaur cuz we both have teeth

it's actually disgusting how incompetent the poles and lithuanians are, but atleast they're cheap and don't whine

Those buildings where build a long long time ago. True socialist buildings are just some slabs of concrete.

Nordicks are capitalist as can be, they just have a stong social safety net.

>Stockholm
income 3000 euro, liter of gasoline 1.5 euro
>Moscow
income 1400 euro, liter of gasoline 0.7 euro
But people believe in """""rich"""" Nordic countries.

if norway is socialist then so is the UAE.

almost everyone there is a rich oilnigger, and since so few people live there, they can afford to provide for the like 2 people there who are poor.

now compare some rural town of sweden to yours

youtube.com/watch?v=rZRw7HmXV_8

>Moscow
Fuck off m*scovite.

The difference is that UAE is monarchy and the people have no rights.

Whereas in Norway people technically own the state assets by virtue of being citizens.

nah, a vast majority of us are comfortably middle class who uses most of our paychecks after taxes on bills, insurance and food.

>Fuck off m*scovite
...paздaлcя вcкyкapeк из жoпы миpa.

>government owned enterprises
State property and the public are different concepts.
Only a small part of people control the state property like the government, and not the masses of the proletariat.

In his defense, Infrastructure is expensive as fuck.
Russia is almost 40 Sweden, but only 14 times more people.

Also, Sweden is homogeneous as fuck (besides refugee noways). And Russia is multicultural. This allow several internal conflicts and the grow of corruption.

Even Moscow doesn't have the GDP (PPP) per capita equal to that of Sweden in general. There's more to life than gasoline, retard.

Fuck m*scovite

There is no proletariat in Europe. European proletarians work in China and India. European "masses" mostly consist of Middle Class (petty bourgeoisie) and they won't accept the responsibility like that. So, classic XX century socialism isn't possible even in theory in Europe. By the way, it isn't possible anywhere because world has changed.

socialism IS democracy

>now compare some rural town of sweden to yours

Why 'rural towns'?
You can compare the very same the Moscow shithole.

I agree

national sosialism, so basically sosialism

northern europe is not socialist. having big welfare programs for muslims and huge taxes on combustion engine cars doesn't make you "socialist"

kinda 70% higher prices and 85% higher income they have in Stockholm

numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_cities.jsp?country1=Russia&country2=Sweden&city1=Moscow&city2=Stockholm

not that impressive but still... I'd prefer Stockholm because of many complicated reasons.

That awful income disparity in modern day Russia is a direct result of you dropping the socialist policies altogether. It's true that liberalization allowed the economy to grow, but it mostly benefited the oligarchs, and the largest cities, for a significant part of the Russian populace the standards of living haven't considerably changed since the USSR. It's sad that in '89 you proportionally had more Communist Party members than China, yet no one showed courage to stand up and fight.

t. animechild

The proletarians of India and China are working for the bourgeois from Europe and America (like Apple)
They simply transfer production to the country where it is profitable for them and where they take more surplus value.

>socialism is not possible

The security net in Sweden is also 1000x better than in Russia

Again, those buildings where made a long time ago. Socialist buildings are just concrete slabs.

that was not built by socialists

Only Fascism, monarchism and feudalism work in reality.

...

My Polish friend, this is not socialism.
This is capitalism with social benefits

don't forget about how distribution of income works in russia.
mr.Sechin has $450 000 monthly, Vasiliy Poopkin has $500, on average they have $225250, so Russia is stronk and rich.

...

...

With such knowledge about the "social economic formations" like this Polyak, we will never reach the world revolution.

Shit thread.

>Only Fascism, monarchism and feudalism work in reality.
Russia has all three today and it doesn't work.

whats with the ugly roof

Socialism does work, and it helped us get rich, but what we are doing today is not socialism. We are far more American than we are socialist, and the structures in society that ensured that socialism would work and be sustainable have been removed. Namely, an awareness of foreign currency and the need to keep it in balance, a functional tax system, and the overall culture. All of that's removed, and our current society is run only on oil. There's also the wishes of people, most people today do NOT want wealth distribution, and most want to take away workers's rights too.

I do not recognize you in makeup.

>The Nordic countries were a way less developed when they were starting out with the nordic model, and that didn't hinder they growth at all. Quite the opposite, actually.
Not true. Scandinavians are just better than others, socialist policies(which by nature are weakness worshipping and degenerate) are keeping the people down, and even corrupting them (through memetic and genetic dysgenics).

Not true, all people are equal.

Die, waste of space.

lmao, gb2 reddit underage.

>Scandinavians are just better than others
Other peoples do not have the same protestant background of sharing and hard work so mentally a social democratic system would never work with others.

These garages are gone by now.

We have a free market.

U MAD?

Mr Sechin is smart man who deserved his pay, Poopkin was always a retard so he deserved his pay as well.
Russia is indeed stronk, rich and fair.

>socialist policies(which by nature are weakness worshipping and degenerate) are keeping the people down, and even corrupting them (through memetic and genetic dysgenics).

>Unironically third worldist
Proletariats exists in Europe. And more to the point, there is still an oppressed working class in Europe that makes up a super majority of the population. Just because they don't all work factory jobs in manufacturing doesn't make them any less of an exploited working class. Same with their higher standards of living.

Not sure about that. UK and Americans are also Protestants (or had that background), but they have almost always rejected social equality or real measures to reduce poverty with the exception of the NHS of the UK and the Social Security of the USA.

Your country's population is about 15% immigrants and you still manage to have low murder and crime rates, Americans had black population since the 1700's and their poverty, crime, and inequality has persisted. So I don't think that race has too much to do here.

But then again, I'm not going to "tell you about your country".

I just want a fucking job

It's more about race than the specific model. Having a high-trust society with an intelligent and honest population that is hard-working (essentially the Nordic race) is essential.

You can't re-create this in other countries. If you believe that, then you believe in tabula rasa and then you just ought to gas yourself.