Julian Assange Confirms Seth Rich was Source

Julian Assange brought up Seth Rich while discussing the risk that wiki leaks sources face. This is within the same 24hrs that wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for details linked to his murder. Tons of slide threads but this news needs to keep getting talked about. The implications that would follow the verification of Rich as a source would mean the DNC or Hillary camp would be the ones responsible.
Article related and link to interview with Assange in article: openmedianews.com/murdered-dnc-staffer-wikileaks/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/T1E6ndmZatM
youtube.com/watch?v=rYna6r0R1hQ
youtube.com/watch?v=NI1MFbvAETc
youtube.com/watch?v=5-EJAIXdGp8
youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Have a bump. Also, your link is broken.

can't wait for the media to spend days on this story and these threads to not be replaced by black dick spam on pol.

> Seth
> Rich
> Democrat

We're upset he's dead?

yes

>be young kid
>hate the way the Bush administration pisses all over transparency of government and is corrupt
>become a democrat
>find out the democratic party is exactly the same, if not worse
>expose their corruption
>get murdered for it

Assange is a clever guy, and he's not going to out one of his sources even if they're dead.

What Assange said in the interview I saw was Seth Rich's death was the sort of danger faced by *any* potential WikiLeaks source.

This way Assange gets mileage from associating HRC + DNC with murder, and yet he doesn't reveal whether Rich was a source or not.

This sort of detail is important because even though sources for WikiLeaks might be willing to face death themselves, they also have families - and that means they might not be willing to become a source unless Assange guaranteed their anonymity, including posthumously.

he tried to purge the corruption from his party and died for it

to me he is a hero

bump

This man should be venerated, not hated. Although I'm most likely responding to a fucking kid on an anime image board, go fuck yourself.

This. Assange was very precise with his words. The reporter, who clearly was trying to get Assange to back down, was the one making direct connections.

That man was an american citizens
So the political parties can just go around and MURDER people without due process?

What the fuck has the USA turned into

We don't know what his exact motives might have been. Could have been some kiking we don't understand.

Assange bringing it up unprovoked is the thing, though. If he isn't implying Rich was a source, it makes it look politically motivated and/or Assange look like a conspiracy-head.

>Assange is a clever guy, and he's not going to out one of his sources even if they're dead.

Why not? This is a shit tier misleading thread and you faggots will complain about it being ''slid'' when in reality there's no substance.

The only ''mileage'' is the mileage Assange is gaining by associating himself with salacious rumor mongering.

Shills please go.

Assuming he really was the source of the leaks... he should be commended no matter what his political leanings. He exposed corruption and unknowingly gave his life for it.

I think this subject is 2spooky for people to even wanna talk about.

This makes the DNC claiming Wikileaks got their information from Russians look worse in my opinion. If they knew it was Seth Rich and he was murdered for his actions then claiming it was the Russians is the ultimate attempt at a cover story because they know nobody could ever truly prove it one way or the other.

Yeah they silenced him. It's not like this is first. Maybe you should listen to Trump, because it's clear judiciary won't persecute old witch, even if they pretend to investigate some cases.

More of the same

youtu.be/T1E6ndmZatM

That it looks to *anyone* that Rich was killed by the DNC means that to all *potential* WikiLeaks sources their own murder looks like a possibility.

And while the longer it drags out the worse it might be for the DNC, it's also worse for WikiLeaks, since until the case is resolved it appears that WikiLeaks sources can be killed with impunity.

So if Assange doesn't say Rich's death should be investigated, to those future sources it looks like he might not be willing to protect them.

People will leap to whatever conclusions they will from Assange making that statement, just as they'll leap to whatever conclusion they prefer whenever Trump says anything. Assange can't be swayed by that.

This is all independent of whether the Clintons and DNC killed Rich. While those might intersect - and it's *worse* for WikiLeaks if they do, better if giving WikiLeaks info isn't a death sentence - right now they're separate.

Assange is working to protect WikiLeaks sources - including future ones - and whether or not Rich was intentionally silenced or he was just killed in a botched robbery, those sources want as much reassurance as they can get.

Seems likely that he was just killed by niggers desu

I get it, but I guess I didn't see speculation about why he might have been killed before the Assange comment. That would have contextualized Assanges comments. Of course yesterday Assange printed what looked like a clarification/denial. But I guess we may never know.

Niggers who decided not to take anything from him and his house when they killed him? Of course, shill.

We learned it from watching you, Uncle Fritz.

I can certainly understand that.

And I was also writing in general to all those who've now leaped onto the "DNC killed Seth Rich! Assange said it!" wagon, so if I came across as pedantic it wasn't at all personal to you, yours was just a good place from which to add those extra thoughts.

Good goy, it's totally a (((coincidence))).

Why of course - Russian hackers have payed them to undermine the democracy.

I think there was two more victims prior to that. Seems like they trying to find and cover the souse of leaks or at least scary them into hiding. As expected from (((democrats))).

Russia did it! is the (((narrative))).

Watch two of our top, totally uncontrolled, "journalists" in action:

youtube.com/watch?v=rYna6r0R1hQ

youtube.com/watch?v=NI1MFbvAETc

And this asshole

youtube.com/watch?v=5-EJAIXdGp8

It's preparation for when WL drops the bomb. They'll use Russian interference in our election as a war pretext if they can't have Hillary to start it as planned.

Great answer, you're a deep thinker.

>Julian Assange Confirms Seth Rich was Source

No he didn't.

hahhahaha the list just keeps growing a trail of fucking dead people

nothing suss at all

hahahahaha can you imagine this crazy bitch being president

Requesting a pic I saw yesterday with 5 guys including Rich, detailing their relation with Clinton / DNC and suspicious dead conditions.

*rattling on the background*

the clintons are killing again stop the presses politicians never do this

You're right, but it was a heavy implication.
youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg