Is excessive freedom of speech just an excuse to be able to say degenerate things?

Is excessive freedom of speech just an excuse to be able to say degenerate things?

Case: Singapore, where there are tighter controls on speech that bans saying inflammatory things towards other religions and ethnic groups.
Consequence: multiple religions, cultures and ethnicities live harmoniously there. There are no tensions creating by people inflaming each other under the guise of freedom of speech. It's also probably the least degenerate and more Sup Forums approved country on Earth.

Maybe we need to subdue an obsession with freedom of speech if it means harmonious society. Literally the concept Sup Forums espouses about degeneracy is that some acts while it might feel good to have the freedom to do also are destructive to civilisation. It could equally be said that some speech might feel good to have the freedom to make but is destructive to civilisation, and it's why all the so-called free western countries have to suffer religious, cultural ethnic tensions and violence.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15624786
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

You sound like a mudslime.

>safety over freedom guys!!
You're literally no better than the gun grabbers

Then why do you care at all about homosexuality, abortion, and others that are considered degenerate on this board? Who cares if spread of degeneracy leads to civilisation destruction and the lack of order and safety for you and your family that results from that destruction? As long as we're all free it's worth the danger of harm right?

I don't care about any of that stuff, not everyone on pol does either.

And yes, freedom over safety EVERYDAY OF THE WEEK

You made the classic mistake of assuming that Sup Forums is one person.

You should probably just kill yourself

Freedom of speech is different because it's a control on governmental tyranny. If you can't speak freely, you can't correct problems in the government. It's maladaptive to civilization.

Freedom> safety. Everytime.

i only support restrictions on freedom of speech if it is in the favour of right wing White Christian culture.

i have no qualms about oppressing the left wing.

eg V for Vendetta, where owning a Quran is a capital offence and gays are jailed

>Order>Degeneracy

Freedom allows gays and muslims human rights.

For example: if your government is planning on spending a bunch of money to help the children of holocaust survivors, it would help you to be able to say "hey, wait a minute, that never even happened you lying kikes"

Unfortunately for you, you're not allowed to say that.

neither are you.

even trump supports israel

Singapore is also a city state sitting in the middle of the busiest sea lanes in the world that was founded by a genius with an iron fist and is run by his cronies and descendants with the sole aim of making money. Just because something works in an area that is 1) Rich, 2) Small, 3) Very centralized, 4) Very easy to become rich in again if a single venture fails.

It's like using Saudi Arabia as an example of a working absolute monarchy: They house of Al Saud literally bribes it's subjects not to riot with the fabulous oil money they have. It's not something you can just extend to everywhere with no regards for the circumstances that lead to it.

the only reason everything is peaceful in Singapore is because the banks use it as the last safehaven since Switzerland caved to the US government.

Remove the banking freedom laws there, and it will fall to Indonesia quickly enough.

I do love Singapore though, so I hope this never happens.

We may not have freedom of speech but I dont feel oppressed in the slightest desu

This is why the first and second amendments are the most important amendments and really the only ones most people care about

Thats basically what pc tries to do, but its just leftist drivel.
And the only reason censorship exists in singapore is so you cant talk about the GOVERNMENT, because the government has "secret" policies on race and religion of its own.

Just because freedom of speech can be abused does not mean it should not exist. Freedom of speech is essential to true freedom.

This. The governmemt could immediately stsrt mobilizing to do stupid shit, and without freedom of speech they xould just stsrt locking people up and broadcastijg propaganda to spy on your family and neighbors to make sure theh don't say anything "hateful"(pollitically incorrect) it's a slippery slppe tbat goes quite hard and fast once the floodgates opem. So make sure to defend your freedom over any kind of government security.


You'd have to make the assumption that THAT YOU TRUST THE GOVERNMENT 100% WHEN YOU ALLOW THEM TO TAKE YOUR FREEDOMS, AND THE FACT IS THAT HARDLY ANYONW TRUSTS THE GOVERNMENT, SO WHY THE FUCKING FUCK WOULD YOU GIVE YOUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOM AWAY TO THEM? LOOK AT APPROVAL RATINGS FOR CONGRESS, ETC.

Freedom should only belong to White Men.

that was always the true freedom.

and you can only be white if you are right wing

>even trump supports israel

So? Obviously it's an unpopular opinion, and a guy trying to win a popularity contest is generally going to avoid it..... But I'm not trump. I don't go to court for suggesting it publically.

It may one day BE a popular idea here, because I have the opportunity to convince people.

In the past, it was the US military. Now that singapore is rich, they can afford their own military which is the strongest in SEA. But youre right they got that money from all the banks that opened shop here.

This is true - It does pay handsomely to be a neutral financial party in this crazy world.

I truly love you guys, Singapore - Can't wait to visit there soon!

Your president was also shilling for the TPP recently because you guys would make a gorillion dollars being a major trading hub for Asia. He met with King Nigger and everything.

Order > Freedom

We are rabble, we need a father-figure to guide us.If this image doesn't make you feel tingly you're not human.

The main reason US exists as a world leader in global politics is simply because...
they have near total freedom of speech

It's a trade desu
Be the first to voice a hidden pressing issue and have instability (lead)
or wait for something to happen but have stability (reactionary, not lead)

None of us would be talking about eruptive nationalism without Trump
(and let's be honest, he may very well have saved the EU by relieving the pressure, if people have no voice for too long, shit happens)

This guy needs to go though:
Freedom of assembly

Err theres nothing much to see, just spend money and fuck sloots? Lol

>There are no tensions
Because Singapore is safe from inbred, low-IQ, MENA savages.

True. But id rather have less govt, than more. Id rather fight degeneracy on my own terms i guess.

Also this

>there are no tensions
On paper. The tensions are there I assure you that. If anything they're pressurizing and they will explode in an uncontrollable event. That's the danger of suppressing speech. You can create an illusion of peace for a short time, but in the end you'll devolve into reality and collapse. It's better to embrace reality than to pretend fantasies are true.

That whole shithole is one gigantic amusement park.

how bout you take your sharia shilling ball-licking faggotry back to whatever shitty whore that shat you out.

Freedom leads to chaos. That's why good intellectuals and good politicians have to weigh the risk of freedoms.

If freedom was a such a good thing, people would be advocating for everything to be free and removal of all laws but you'd find almost no one advocating for that.

Holy shit is that what Singapore really looks like? Fuck me I'm going there right now.

Muslim laws stamp down on degeneracy.

In fact when it comes to adultery, there aren't any nation today that has laws against it except Muslim countries.

If you want to bring back the Church on the state and Christian laws, go ahead. But you don't have a monopoly on stamping down degeneracy.

fpbp

He even mentions "multiple religions" as the very first thing of "consequence" for reducing freedom of speech.. It's so obvious.

Funny that it's just one religion in particular causing 99.9% of the problems, and we're not allowed to talk about it ofcourse because that's just saying "degenerate things".

Freedom of speech is best reserved in philosophy and science. The freedom of an idiot to make a joke is not the same as the freedom of a student of science/scientists to inquire on the origin of humanity (even if that displeases some religious people).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore

The reason singapore is good has a lot to do with ethnic homogenity (aka lack of diversity) aswell as lack of islam (which was what you were using singapore to protect) so your entire premise is wrong.. Singapore is not multiethnic multiculti central whatsoever if you take a look at their demographic..

multicultural and massive ethnic diversity doesn't work very well, has to be a majority ethnicity that holds the fabric of the nation together..

>causing 99.9% of the problems
Oh yes, bad economics, immigration in the US, global warming (man made or not), rampant degeneracy in the West, feminism, SJWs, etc...

All caused by Muslims! Close your eyes to problems and just blame Islam!

Yesterday you blamed the commie Russians, now it's the Muslims.

>inb4 Muslims do cause some problems!
No shit. Like terrorism. But to claim they cause 99% or even most of the problems is retarded. Not even 1% of your problems is caused by Muslims. Heck, even terrorism wouldn't happen as much had the US not invaded Iraq for example (but of course Americans are not the only one to blame).

It's has fewer tensions because people have money and don't care as much about religion as they would when they are poor.

Have fun in Singapore. I think it's time for you to leave.

>calls for nanny state laws
>cuck flag

Nigger faggot

no except i hate muslims too.

Muslims are hypocrites who dont actually stop degeneracy.

Ethnic homogenity? The biggest group was 74%. That's less than the percentage of Danes in Denmark or of Francais de souche in France.

In terms of religion, Islam is 14%, higher than any Western nation. The other religions have 4% more, one has only 4% less and the biggest religion isn't even a majority it's a third of the population.

TLDR; You're retarded for not even being able to read the facts you sourced.

>causing 99.9% of the problems
WITH REGARDS TO RELIGIONS..
Literally being that stupid to not being able to read that i was talking about religions..

>Yesterday you blamed the commie Russians, now it's the Muslims.

Communism was a major problem including for the russians.

Islam is a major problem and has been so for much much longer, only since the ottoman empire ended has there been a short pause for little under 100 years, and the libtards growing up are thus clueless about the history of these things.

>Oh yes, bad economics, immigration in the US, global warming (man made or not), rampant degeneracy in the West, feminism, SJWs, etc...

Did you forget what the OP was about before you started foaming at the mouth in your hyper emotional reaction to someone who said something about islam?

another peabrain trudeauclone detected.

Degeneracy can never be stopped you idiot. It can only be reduced. Faggotry, adultery, cuckoldry, and other viles will always exist. But they can be lessened.

Last I checked, there were far less Muslim swinger groups than Christian ones, for example. But the problem isn't Christianity, it's how degenerate the West has become.

i just want brown people and fags dead in the end.

beyond that i dont care so long as i have someone beneath my boot.

That makes no sense, you retard. Most problems aren't even caused by religions. Go tip your fedora somewhere else.

And you said, quoting you verbatim

>Funny that it's just one religion in particular causing 99.9% of the problems

Nothing there about problems toward other religions.

>Islam is a major problem and has been so for much much longer, only since the ottoman empire ended
You're an idiot if you think only Muslim empires can originate from the East. Middle Easterners have always made empires that have strive to dominate others. And that's not going to stop. Same goes for Europe.


>Did you forget what the OP was about before you started foaming at the mouth in your hyper emotional reaction to someone who said something about islam?

Your post has nothing to do with the OP. Keep deflecting, cuck.

Well at least you're honest, unlike the other inconsistent swine.

fuck you britcuck

go jail some more twitter users or something gtfo of this site

Islam is not given the special priveledge etc. in singapore that it is in other places.

>The biggest group was 74%
yes that's a substantial majority it's a bit on the low end but enough to have a solid grip on how the society functions..

Their next highest demographic is malaysians which are also asians but are a muslim majority nation, this is why singapore has a higher than normal muslim population and still works, since culturally eventhough they are tards that follow islam, the asian culture they share with the chinese singaporians is what binds them..

Multiculturalist multiethnic pipedream of yours have never been successfull at any point..

inb4 you mention the US

Wrong.. 89.5% white european till the 1950's Pretty much that level OR HIGHER for its entire existence till recently.

>Muslim laws
They encourage inbreeding and can't deal with rampant pederasty in some muslim conutries.

Singapore subjugates the fuck out of Islam because their dear leader (RIP) knew its true nature
It's also one of the most miserable places in the world to live longterm in thanks to the oppressive police state.

Spoken like a true brit, it's like you guys really can't handle freedom.

Generally you will only get thought police'd if you post racist comments on jewbook or pick a fight with some melayunigger for being a mudslime

Wow you really have mushbrain leaf.. 3 posts and you don't understand that when it comes to different faiths, islam create 99.9% of the problems related to that..

>nothing there about problems towards other religions
Oh you pathetic leaf, read the qur'an and sunnah and just look at global statistics of muslims killing random people for not being muslim etc.

>your post has nothing to do with the OP
Yes it has i'm the only one of us that has said anything relevant to the OP you've just foamed at the mouth in an incohesive manner trying to deflect away from islam causing any problems..

The OP clearly mentions limiting freedom of speech so that people of different religions etc. can live together easier.. Religions is the first thing the OP mentions in this regard you stupid cuckleaf.. This makes it very clear what the agenda is, ofcourse unless he like you knows nothing about what islam is and teaches.

>excessive freedom of speech

Does not compute.

It's not given special privilege anywhere in the West. Heck, in Singapore you cannot insult Islam. In the West, you can.
>yes that's a substantial majority it's a bit on the low end but enough to have a solid grip on how the society functions..
Lower than Danes in Denmark. It's also lower than whites in America or almost the same.

Lower than native population of any European country.


>Their next highest demographic is malaysians which are also asians but are a muslim majority nation,

Now you just proved yourself wrong, what an idiot.

>he asian culture they share with the chinese singaporians is what binds them

There is no such thing as "asian culture". Malay culture is very different from Chinese culture.

And Asians tend to be very divided and politically against each other. Chinese poll lower in favorability in East Asia than Americans do.

>Multiculturalist multiethnic pipedream of yours have never been successfull at any point..

You already conceded otherwise.
Cousin inbreeding isn't as bad as people claim. It has to be repeated throughout many generations and even then the genetic problems are in less than 1% of the population even in middle eastern countries were cousin marriages are common.

When it comes to pederasty, it's only part of one country that has no functioning state, thus no functioning laws.

That's how I know you've never been to Singapore, you retarded faggot

It works in Singapore because they are rich and happy you dingus

>when it comes to different faiths, islam create 99.9% of the problems related to that..

You didn't claim that in your first post I replied to. You're moving the goal post.

>just look at global statistics of muslims killing random people for not being muslim etc.

Oh look a deflection.

>Yes it has i'm the only one of us that has said anything relevant to the OP
You haven't. You were arguing against a strawman based on bullshit interpretation of facts, the same facts that when analyzed properly (as I have) shows your sniveling claims to be complete nonsense.

>Religions is the first thing the OP mentions in this regard you stupid cuckleaf.. This makes it very clear what the agenda is, ofcourse unless he like you knows nothing about what islam is and teaches.

And the facts OP presented proves you wrong. But for an idiot like you feelings matter more than facts.

inb4
>MUH ISLAM
>MUH ASIAN CULTURE

I'll give you the sea lanes but other than that we have nothing. Zero natural resources, farmland or minerals. The bulk of our industry is high tech industry like semiconductor chips and crude oil refinery or financial services like banking. Our port is just useful for shipping out the stuff. Saudi Arabia has a shit ton of oil controlled by the government.

A trend worldwide for all democratic countries is towards socialism. Not communist teir but where you cannot say certain things anymore, more government regulation, and government providing stuff like health care.

>excessive freedom of speech

>Is excessive freedom of speech just an excuse to be able to say degenerate things?
Are you talking about government? Because you know government always can speak any degeneracy they want. Limitations of freedom of speech only applied to citizens who don't agree with government.

You're not even checking what i'm saying simply lying to yourself..

Nations that are successfull and thriving are not massively multiethnic they have an ethnicity that is a massive majority that is holding the culture and the way of doing things in a certain way..

In a multiethnic and multicultural society that shit is destroyed..

This is precisely why minorities need to stay minorities or not be there at all..

>you already conceded otherwise

No i haven't, you've just made up in your mind that multiculturalism and multiethnic societies work great.. when that's not at all what makes them effective.. the majority ethnicity and their culture is what makes the nations effective..

If you took singaporians today and replaced them with let's say africans, i can guarantee you that singapore would be a shithole within 10-15 years tops. Because it's a diferent culture and different ethnicity with different traits, and not what made singapore good.

Would you consider the freedom to libel as excessive?

Freedom of speech or the lack thereof has little to do with the success of a nation in short term. Freedom of speech is a western value and should be handled a precious part of our heritage as it was the catalyst for all the technological advances that allow us to live in our modern world. In more rigid societies like China or Japan or Singapore where censorship was/is a means of silencing political opponents the age of enlightenment and industry didn't start till they were forced open their ports to western traders.

The great leaps Singapore is experiencing today are due to their extremely foreign investor friendly tax system and ideal location.

>Cousin inbreeding isn't as bad as people claim.
It's literal degeneracy.

>It has to be repeated throughout many generations
It was and resulted in lower IQ and higher prelevance of genetic diseases among affected populations.

>it's only part of one country
No, it's happening in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan afaik and I wouldn't be surprised if that list was actually longer.

Muslim laws are clearly inferior and have dysgenic effects on populations.

>Islam is not given special privilege

Lmao. We have entire committees that can cock block bills if they disadvantage religions. What we do with extremists isn't imprison them but rehabilitate them. Talk shit about Islam in public and the police will show up at your door.

Same goes for any other race though. It's equality of oppression.

If there are restrictions on free speech then there is no free speech.

>You're not even checking what i'm saying simply lying to yourself..

Don't kid yourself, nothing you wrote is of any intellectual merit or follows any respectable logic.

>Nations that are successfull and thriving are not massively multiethnic they have an ethnicity that is a massive majority that is holding the culture and the way of doing things in a certain way..
>In a multiethnic and multicultural society that shit is destroyed..

And the example you provided proves you wrong.

>No i haven't,
You have the moment you brought up malaysians.

>the majority ethnicity and their culture is what makes the nations effective..

So Europeans are ineffective. That's the logical conclusion of your assertion.

You're so bad at arguing.

>If you took singaporians today and replaced them with let's say africans,

Maybe. It's not like Africans have had a city state that benefits a lot of trade, that's secular, has good leadership and isn't the target of foreign wars.

Maybe Singapore is unique but that doesn't render OP wrong.

Singapore is not developed because of diversity. If it was monolithic it would have been even more awesome.

Also lack of free speech is inexcusable.

There is literally no information, true or not, that should be criminal to say save military secrets. Even copyright infringement should be a civil matter.

>Case: Singapore,
Totally artificial country.
If Singapore and Malaysia couldn't launder arms dealer's money they suddenly wouldn't exist.

lying is not very nice thing to do leafturd.

My very first comment was

"He even mentions "multiple religions" as the very first thing of "consequence" for reducing freedom of speech.. It's so obvious.

Funny that it's just one religion in particular causing 99.9% of the problems, and we're not allowed to talk about it ofcourse because that's just saying "degenerate things"."

So thanks for lying your ass off idtirar/taqiyya muslim filth..

Pretty fucking stupid singapore, hope you actually read the texts you allow them to practice before they outbreed you as they're instructed to.

the op proves nothing, except that it has an asian majority with very strict clamp down doctrine about everything.. Maybe it helps them also stop islam, probably intimidates muslims there, but we see how they deal with islam when it does what it does..

The op isn't right.. that singapore is doing well has nothing to do with multiculturalism or multiethnicity..

>It's literal degeneracy.
Cousin marriages is done throughout the Bible and was common in medieval Christian Europe.

>It was and resulted in lower IQ and higher prelevance of genetic diseases among affected populations.

Asheknazi Jews have been doing cousin marriages for centuries and have one of the highest IQs in the world.

>Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan
Out of those states one is functionning Pakistan. And there is no evidence that it's rampant in Pakistan. And there's not much evidence that it's rampant in Iraq.

The only example is Afghanistan. And it's not much of a state.

>lying

I've been quoting you verbatim. You're just so retarded, you can't even defend your own bullshit so you resort to deflection, denial and moving the goal post.

>He even mentions "multiple religions" as the very first thing of "consequence" for reducing freedom of speech.. It's so obvious.
>Funny that it's just one religion in particular causing 99.9% of the problems

Except like I argued before (and you deflected in response) Islam is doesn't cause 99.9% of problems.

>The op isn't right.. that singapore is doing well has nothing to do with multiculturalism or multiethnicity..

That wasn't the point of the OP you retard. The point was that it's doing well with many ethnicities because it doesn't have too much free speech.

What makes Singapore work is not multiculturalism or multirelgiions. It works despite having many religions and ethnicity, because of anti-free speech laws .

Like I said, you're a retard who did a strawman.

You're projecting your inability to read and comprehend simple statements.

>fucking leaf defending inbreeding

it's very clear that it reduces iq points and increases birth defects.. and heart diseases and shit like that..

I didn't say that it caused 99.9% of the problems that exist in the entire world.. and only a retard like you would even suggest that i did since i specifically mentioned religions in that context..

You're just the typical low iq motormouth that think you are correct for your much speaking.

Since you are so interested in having reduced freedom of speech, you might be interested to hear that you would probably have your head cut off for speaking in such a rude manner in an islamic country..

So with your proclevity to open your mouth before you think.. you might want to reconsider if you want to promote reduced freedom of speech.. Because the less you have of that the higher the likelelyhood is of you getting hurt extremely badly for opening your mouth about things..

>medieval Christian Europe.
And certainly that is a level of development muslim societies are currently in.

>Asheknazi Jews have been doing cousin marriages for centuries and have one of the highest IQs in the world.
They were lucky in that regard, but they still suffer from a myriad of genetic diseases and, doesn't change the fact that inbreeding leads to lower IQ and there are no studies to suggest otherwise.

>And there is no evidence that it's rampant in Pakistan. And there's not much evidence that it's rampant in Iraq.
It is rampant when compared to superior European societies.

>shilling for jews and the police state

>tryijg to make nazis look like a police state that was tsrgetting it's own citizens rather than jews and other subversive groups, which weren't the german people, who enjoyed many personal freedoms.

Pls shills either kys or join us instead.

>it's very clear that it reduces iq points
And yet Ashkenazi Jews (product of generations of cousin marriages) have the highest IQ.

>I didn't say that it caused 99.9% of the problems that exist in the entire world

You did:
>Funny that it's just one religion in particular causing 99.9% of the problems

Yeah you mentioned religions in the context. So in that context, you made the claim that one of the religions is the issue since it makes 99% problems in the world.

You can't even defend your own bullshit. Sad!

Now you're conceding that your first post was a strawman against the OP. What a failure you are.
>rude manner
Oh look, the cuck had his feelings hurt. Go find a safespace somewhere else.

>Because the less you have of that the higher the likelelyhood is of you getting hurt extremely badly for opening your mouth about things..

Considering how weak you European white nu-males are when it comes to foreigners in your own country, you sound like a sissy make threats. Grow some balls and get cock out of your mouth before attempting to sound tough.

Trying*, targetting*

The german people enjoyed many personal freedoms*

>And certainly that is a level of development muslim societies are currently in.
Christian medieval societies in Europe weren't as bad as the Enlightenment writers (and those who came after) made them out to be.

>They were lucky in that regard,
How convenient. When something proves you wrong, you appeal to luck. Face it, high IQ and interbreeding of cousins are not contradictory. There are other factors that matter much more, like making sure the smartest get to reproduce the most and have the most surviving children (which is what happened to Ashkenazi Jews).

>It is rampant when compared to superior European societies.
considering the age of consent in many European societies is between 14 to 16 and homosexuality is allowed, it's silly to say that adult men don't have sex with teenage boys. And again, pederasty is really an issue in Afghanistan since it lacks a functioning state.

>multiple religions, cultures and ethnicities live harmoniously there. There are no tensions creating by people inflaming each other under the guise of freedom of speech. It's also probably the least degenerate and more Sup Forums approved country on Earth.

>legislation stops people thinking things

>Singapore
>least degenerate and more Sup Forums approved country on Earth
No, Singapore is a Muslim shithole full of beta chinks.

bumpshill detected

It's very well established that inbreeding causes genetic defects and lowered iq, there's been many instances of it historically where people have attempted inbreeding aswell for the similar result.

>still claims that i said islam causes 99.9% of all problems in the world eventhough i was talking about religion
You really have no reading comprehension you obnoxious little degenerate.

You should look at a consanguinity world map and then map that with general intelligence there's an obvious correlation there

The negative impact of inbreeding becomes more severe the more aggressively it is pursued..

>go find a safe space
HAHAHA you're the one arguing for REDUCED freedom of speech.

It's true though you'd probably get hurt pretty badly if you were in a muslim country talking shit like that to a muslim..

But here you are calling for reduced freedom of speech and acting like a little lying cunt about it too. You really have no clue what's good for you.. too stupid yet thinking you're actually smart.

>Considering how weak
Why don't you go back to fixing your countries achmed instead of sitting in cucknada talking crap.

>inbreeding causes genetic defects
You mean makes their spread more likely. That's different than causing.

>lowered iq
Again Asheknazi Jews prove you wrong.

It's not established fact when one of the most inbred population has the highest IQ in the world.

>You really have no reading comprehension

When you say "of problems" it means all problems unless you're being specific.

If you could write well in English, you'd have written
>Funny that it's just one religion in particular causing 99.9% of the problems that are caused by religions

The "that are caused by religions" specifies. Of course, you're incompetent to not only understand what you're writing, defending what you wrote and writing well.

>you're the one arguing for REDUCED freedom of speech.

I am only noting the benefits. Just because I'm saying X has benefits, doesn't mean I support X.

But of course, an intellectually inferior vermin like you is incapable of arguing for things they may not agree with. That's because you function based on emotion, like a woman.

>It's true though you'd probably get hurt pretty badly if you were in a muslim country talking shit like that to a muslim..

Good thing I'm not a pussy like you.

>Why don't you go back to fixing your countries

I enjoy traumatizing feminine imbeciles like you.

When is your menstruation going to end?

>abortion
>"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

>be deprived of life

B-b-but fetus isn't a living thing!

>Christian medieval societies in Europe weren't as bad
Doesn't change the fact they were much worse then the current ones.

>How convenient. When something proves you wrong, you appeal to luck.
There is no basis to suggest that Ashkenazi Jews are smart thanks to the inbreeding rather than despite it.

>Face it, high IQ and interbreeding of cousins are not contradictory.
I know, but inbreeding does lead to lower IQ and works against those other factors that matter much more. As I said, literal degeneracy. Also I don't see any of those other factors among many muslim societies, they strike as rather anti-intellectual

>considering the age of consent in many European societies is between 14 to 16 and homosexuality is allowed, it's silly to say that adult men don't have sex with teenage boys.

>and homosexuality is allowed, it's silly to say that adult men don't have sex with teenage boys.
I'm not saying that European societies are perfect - just vastly superior to the muslim.

>And again, pederasty is really an issue in Afghanistan since it lacks a functioning state.
It's also an issue in Pakistan jugding by the attitude of the savage in this webm.

>Is excessive freedom of speech just an excuse to be able to say degenerate things?
Says the 1984 Country

>It's not established fact when one of the most inbred population has the highest IQ in the world.

It is though. Nothing suggest that Ashkenazi Jews are smart thanks to the inbreeding rather than despite it.
Meanwhile there are studies showing that inbreeding leads to being a dumbass.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15624786
>An overall significant (p

So for multiculturalism to work we have to enslave everyone. OR we could just fucking making every race live in its ancestral home and not move into other territories.

Gee, I guess we have to be able to look at niggers when we go outside so we'll go with option A.

You don't even understand why you country was so successful.

>Doesn't change the fact they were much worse then the current ones.

In certain areas sure. But not in all. Current European societies are much more degenerate.

>There is no basis to suggest that Ashkenazi Jews are smart thanks to the inbreeding rather than despite it.

If inbreeding is such a detriment like you claim, than heavy inbreeding could never result in a high IQ population.

So the options are either inbreeding does benefit or that inbreeding does nothing significant to IQ . But of course, as an idiot you confuse correlation and causation with studies and it's why you're projecting that mentality. I never claimed that inbreeding caused high IQ. I'm saying the Ashenazi example proves you wrong.

>I know
And now you concede.

Only to contradict yourself.

>works against those other factors that matter much more

So you're saying it's the biggest detriment and yet you agreed that high Iq and interbreeding of cousins is not contradictory. You can't even do simple logic.

>Also I don't see any of those other factors

Again, correlation does not imply causation. Leave science to those who are more competent than you.

>just vastly superior to the muslim.
When it comes to gay teenagers having sex with adults? No.

>It's also an issue in Pakistan jugding by the attitude of the savage in this webm.

Some parts of Pakistan are lawless. Hence my point about functioning state and functioning laws.

Isn't Singapore a dictatorship? Why the fuck would we want that?

Also most of their income comes from selling prostitutes and being a shipping hub. The income disparity is so large there, because the market is so narrow.

So fuck Singapore. The only good thing I found there was a sexy Thai DJ.