Will we ever get an honest WW2 movie?

One that shows how things really played out?

Other urls found in this thread:

westerndigs.org/t-rex-didnt-have-feathers-new-study-of-fossil-skin-finds/
theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/07/feather-furore-trex-may-not-have-been-fluffy-after-all-skin-study-suggests
washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/06/06/tyrannosaurus-rex-had-scaly-skin-and-wasnt-covered-in-feathers-a-new-study-says/
combinedfleet.com/economic.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=CxE68c9rYa0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Why does one of the dinos have a Mexico flag?

World War 2 had dinosaurs?

why does one of the jurassics have a mexican flag?

Mexico restrained itself from annexing the southern US. It deserves an honorable mention.

That's the old Italian flag

>american education

>Dinosaurs don't have feathers
dropped

>Americans
>remembering Italy was part of the war
Top image needs adjusting.

I thought those things went extinct 200+ years ago

...

How come none of you fucking retards have ever heard of Lend-Lease?

Stop learning all your history from memes.

The american dino and nazi dino should be reversed in size.
because of the best ww2 quote:
1 German tank could take down 5 allied tanks, but the allies always had 6.

USSR just threw as many untrained retards as possible to fight the nazis

That's WW1 and they didn't restrain themselves they knew they would get massacred once the US turned their way.

>In some alternate timeline this happened and America annexed all of northern Mexico.

THESE

ameritards dont even realize we fought Italy, we think we liberated Italy with the help of the mafia

...

America should have nuked the shit out of the Soviet Union after the war was over.

slapping the shit out of them was just a warm up really

Shouldn't the Russian Raptors be attacking Nazisaurus from the other side while TyrannUSAurus and some heavily beat-up Britanodon and Francephalosaurus attack it from the right? Meanwhile Japanosaurus gets nuked back to the Cretaceous.

If The Russians didn't have US trucks they would still be walking to the front.

The world would be a very difference place if Patton got his wish and attacked the Soviets. And if MacArthur had gotten his wish and we attacked the Chinks. Eastern Europe never would have fallen under communist oppression and Korea would have been united under capitalism.

Would watching thousands of Russians retreat and get slaughtered until the German armies get tired and freeze to death be exciting?

they would have had a tough time without all that shit, especially if japan had won at midway and halted deliveries. people don't realize how close world war 2 actually was to having a different outcome.

>Burger education.

Didn`t you know that mexico was part of the axis during WWII?

God damn.

I wish that had happened.

The USSR should not be commended for having poor tactics and a lack of supplies/medical care.

Also, Nazis thought commies were subhuman, and they treated them like such. Probably not all that different from how the USSR's military leadership felt about common soldiers.

>hollywood portray us soldiers more instead of usrr soldiers

SHOCKING! Yes, that' very fucking shocking

Do you see russian films portraying us soldiers more? No? Then shut the fuck up.

axis of who gives a fuck

...

>another clueless featherfag

westerndigs.org/t-rex-didnt-have-feathers-new-study-of-fossil-skin-finds/

theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/07/feather-furore-trex-may-not-have-been-fluffy-after-all-skin-study-suggests

washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/06/06/tyrannosaurus-rex-had-scaly-skin-and-wasnt-covered-in-feathers-a-new-study-says/

>being this dumb

WARNING: if you have said
>burger education
in this thread you need to leave Sup Forums this moment

Britain did more than America in WW2.

Would you like some fries with that?

>The USSR should not be commended for having poor tactics and a lack of supplies/medical care.
Well the Nazis blew up a lot of factories and such when they started their invasion and besides what other tactic was available but to throw people at them at the beginning of the war? If anything they did great stopping the bliztkrieg and holding up as much ground as they could.

This is a Japanese website dedicated to Chinese cartoons. GTFO Americans, we're FULL

they had like 2 guys in the pacific theater

Sadly no, maybe Dunkirk will be a little closer but that's still iffy

>Commieboo historical revisionism

America needs to be smaller, they didn't even show up until the final act.

>Do you see russian films portraying us soldiers more?

Russians have more justified reasons to portray their forces than "Let's get to the end of war, because Soviets might take all the Europe and let's conspire to strike them just afterwards because".

No, and why should there be one? Since when are movies factually accurate? It always was about telling a story. Unless you are taking about a documentary movie. Then maybe.

Midway would have at most delayed the Japanese defeat by a 6months to a year at most. The Essex class carriers were still going to be built and the Japanese still would've been overwhelmed in the Phillippines.

Will Hollywood ever make a movie about how badly the Soviets fucked up Russia and other countries around them?

Only if the Germans and Russians make it together.

No, the Flood that wiped out the dinosaurs was app.10,000 years ago.

The holohoax lie will never die so a true WW2 movie will never happen.

no nukes though. They only had the two for quite awhile. I think they never even tested the Nagasaki bomb. just prayed it would work. Just think if that jap sub had sunk the Indianapolis on the way to Trinian. The U.S. would have had to invade from the southern end of japan and then meet up with the Russians after they did the same from the north.

not a chance

What is "Come and See" for 1000 Alex?

Russia all but started WWI and hitler wanted revenge. WWII was all an anti-russia war, but hitler knew he needed to take out france/britain to freely get russia. Seriously though....fuck russia.

combinedfleet.com/economic.htm

the allied victory was absolutely inevitable.

???

denzil has aged so well

that must be why Hitler signed an alliance with the USSR weeks before invading Poland with them

Germans didn't even inflict a 2:1 kill ratio on the Soviets on the battlefield, they just killed a lot of civilians and POW's. Fortunately for the Germans, the Soviets were more merciful

their strategy was to shut out out of the western pacific and make it too costly to get at japan and they were spookily close to succeeding. imagine fights like okinawa but on guam, and wake island and hawaii and every other little island they could lodge themselves into.

>le german super tank
Nice meme

>european sense of humour

Even 6 months would be bloody, every day with the Japanese occupation would be bloody, iirc the POWs on the Japanese mainland were slated to be executed Palawan style a little bit after the atom bombs were dropped. And no, it would definitely delay well over a year. Imagine with Japan with four extra fleet carriers going in, their bigger ones. There would be no Guadalcanal. Even with your Essex class carriers, do recall the Essex herself really only got to the Pacific in May 1943. By then, the Enterprise had been the only US functioning carrier in the Pacific for nearly a year after the Hornet was lost at Santa Cruz.

Ghosts of the Ostfront miniseries when?

> In another documented case, the Soviets put German POWs on in a field, and made them lay down shoulder to shoulder. They then sprayed them with a water hose and froze them to death. They created an ice road out of their bodies in order to drive trucks over.

You forgot the pacific theater and supplying the allies?

>and they were spookily close to succeeding.
Not at all. Okinawa/Iwo Jima were exceptions to the rule of the island hopping campaigns.

One way or another the Japanese merchant marine fleet was going to be at the bottom of the pacific and the Japanese weren't adding tonnage anywhere near replacement levels. They never developed a proper ASW doctrine and you could argue that it was the only successful submarine campaign in history because the nation it was waged against didn't believe destroyers should be used to escort supply ships.

The Japanese were a sad joke in WW2 that got lucky and bit off more than they could chew in the first 6 months of the war.

Rabaul was the most fortified position in Japan's defensive island line and it was completely bypassed and starved out by the end of the war.

Got BTFO more

the eastern front was decisively won in 1944 and the pacific campaign would've been decisively won in 1944, go look at "In other words, even if it had lost catastrophically at the Battle of Midway, the United States Navy still would have broken even with Japan in carriers and naval air power by about September 1943. Nine months later, by the middle of 1944, the U.S. Navy would have enjoyed a nearly two-to-one superiority in carrier aircraft capacity! Not only that, but with her newer, better aircraft designs, the U.S. Navy would have enjoyed not only a substantial numeric, but also a critical qualitative advantage as well, starting in late 1943. All this is not to say that losing the Battle of Midway would not have been a serious blow to American fortunes! For instance, the war would almost certainly have been protracted if the U.S. had been unable to mount some sort of a credible counter-stroke in the Solomons during the latter half of 1942. Without carrier-based air power of some sort there would not have been much hope of doing so, meaning that we would most likely have lost the Solomons. However, the long-term implications are clear: the United States could afford to make good losses that the Japanese simply could not. Furthermore, this comparison does not reflect the fact that the United States actually slowed down its carrier building program in late 1944, as it became increasingly evident that there was less need for them. Had the U.S. lost at Midway, it seems likely that those additional carriers (3 Midway-class and 6 more Essex-Class CVs, plus the Saipan-class CVLs) would have been brought on line more quickly. In a macro-economic sense, then, the Battle of Midway was really a non-event. There was no need for the U.S. to seek a single, decisive battle which would 'Doom Japan' -- Japan was doomed by its very decision to make war."

Soviet tank were better user

>Russia started WWI
So very wrong.

American tanks were even better.

Yup. Hitler was lying his ass off. He broke that same pact a couple years later. Hitler hated russia that much. Keep your enemies closer type thing.

Nice meme

>Soviet engineering

The biggest problem the Japs had was oil supply. The Japs were always short of bunker fuels, gasoline and tel aviation gas, and the U.S. never was. When a naval organization like the U.S. 5th. Fleet was at sea it consumed millions of gallons of ship fuel per month. Carrier planes of the time needed tel av gas to function properly and none of the combat planes were fuel efficient.

The other Jap problem was that their submarine strategy, tactics, and boats were substandard. The U.S. was first class in all categories except maybe torpedoes. The Japs anti-submarine tactics were also substandard. Har! I made a pun.

>Japs win midway
>they occupy Australia and take their steel
>Americans forced to wait a year by laying down four new carriers to compete
>Japs lay down four new carriers
The numbers don't make sense here. Japan would have forced American to back out at this point.

>material
Like I said the times after Midway were still rough for the United States. Yes defeat was inevitable for Japan. But victory in America comes in all kinds of colors. If you read anything I wrote (Japan lost 4 fleet carriers but America was down to 1), Guadalcanal (way before your September 1943) wouldn't have happened. The war would have definitely dragged on at least a year. With Japan not staggering by the time the USN achieved parity, they wouldn't have collapsed as quickly. Imagine Iwo Jima or Peleliu or another bloody island with several more months to prepare, and that all stacking up. It didn't matter how many carriers the US would've had, it mattered in how many they had then.

No because you can't condense an entire war down into a 1-2 hour long film

>Burger education

the talk of numbers and ships seriously underestimates japanese gorilla resistance; classic underestimating of an enemy. they were going to hole up and fuck us every step of the way if we had given them just a year to prepare. good thing we won fast.

You do know thay Japan was only facing %10 of Americas forces. If America turned her full attention to Japan, Japan wouldnt exist today

...

>tfw top dog M4s eating top dog T-34s in Korea

ya poor bastards, at least long lance was very nice compared to shitty mk 14

>i play world of tanks

>10% of American forces
Nigger, the Japanese fought (and annihilated) a combined Pacific fleet (ABDA) in addition to fighting the total output of American fighting ships. If you're going to say the shitty ASWAA escorts in the Atlantic would have made a difference at places like Savo island then you're a retard.

>occupy Australia
do you realize how impossible that is? Japan couldn't even keep their troops in the Solomons supplied.

I know it's easy just to armchair general it but Japan's high water mark was reached by mid 1942.

Again, America would have cranked out ships from East Coast ports like Philly, Baltimore and Newport News in numbers the nips could never match. War is simply a matter of number and the Americans had them beat everywhere

to be fair some of your baby flattops did make a difference at Samar Island, even took down some of the dreaded cruisers that participated at Savo

American tank were the worst in the WW2

They couldn't supply their troops because they were being bombed by American planes that wouldn't be there without carriers that would have sunk at midway. The Japanese were prepared to occupy Australia from the start.

This, A jap victory at midway would have resulted in a capture of Midway, and maybe american samoa. Japan had no plans to shut down the port cities of the west coast or even invade alaska.

Fuck US had NO operational carriers after the balttle of Santa Cruz in 1943 for 6 whole months while the Japs had 6 carriers and they could do jack shit with this advantage, having the same advantage in 1942 would have meant little

Japanese manufacturing standards declined throughout the war, but especially after 1943, in most categories except torpedoes and fuses. Everything else had every corner cut possible in order to replace losses, and rarely had enough left over to consider expansion of their forces.

>German scientists thought nukes were impossible
Truly the "master" race

>he doesnt know Germany tried to recruit Mexico into the bad fight to distract us from the european theatre
If Mexico joined the war against us, Germany would have won.

No they couldn't supply the troops because they were stretched between supplying tiny outposts thousands of miles apart with very few convoys or supply ships that were being constantly picked off by submarines.

Okay Midway gets captured, what now? You can't take Hawaii. It'd be much easier for America to retake Midway than it would be for Japan to invade Hawaii.

Wrong

>another clueless fantasyfag
youtube.com/watch?v=CxE68c9rYa0

LOL
Go home retard
American torpedoes were the most flawed weapons in world war two besides Soviet gun trucks

good meme, historylet

>if things went differently the outcome would have been different

D A M N

Wrong world war fagtron. Also lol.