1066

>1066

;))

>1066

>normans were french

>1918

Why are you complaining about an event that defines your history? You wouldn't even exist today without it

>2014

>Why are you complaining about an event that defines your history? You wouldn't even exist today without it

>711

>ayo whyte boi whyz you mahad dat we destroyed ya bootaiful anglo crapson language?

>French people weren't part of the invading force
>Normans didn't mix with the native Gallo-Romans and Franks
>Normans weren't culturally French

>1453

>966

>Old English is forever dead
>never ever again will english be a true and pure germanic language

>1809

>1815

Stop larping, you also descend from the Normans at least culturally if not genetically

Kek

>1931

>Stop larping, you also descend from the Normans at least culturally if not genetically

>grog reject mine 1000 years of norman culture, grog pure anglo/briton

Daily reminder Liberia is a country entire made from and intended for abolished slaves. Meaning this: If Lincoln wasn't assassinated all of our black population would've been deported back to Africa.

What an insanely different country this would be - for the better.

He's too dumb to have FRENCH blood desu, he must be 100% pure Anglo

100% pure anglo celtic genetically.

Why did black Americans enslave the natives then?

>476

>1515

>711
>1520
>1714
>1808
>1898
>1917
>1931
>1939
>1975

Ironic.

>7th century AD

>1984

>100% pure anglo celtic genetically.

>1515

This might surprise you but whites back then didn't enslave anybody, we just bought them from Africans pre-enslaved.

>the entire first 2 centuries AD

Don't you EVER post my waifu again!

>January 26th 1788

Well, that's still slavery. But that's not what I'm asking.
You're saying Liberia would have been better had Lincoln not been assassinated, but the first thing black Americans did after settling there is enslave the natives, effectively dooming the country by making it unstable and ensuring future civil wars. What would have changed if more black Americans were sent there?

damn that's rough

lol I'm not saying Liberia would've been better. I'm saying America would've been better.

Oh, okay.

>1889

>1997

>43BC
>383
>1043
>1066
>1453
>1589
>1783
>1914
>1939
>1956
>1997
>2005

i'm dumb, had to search half of these

>960

>1896

I know that feel all too well

>normans were not french
>I AM an Australian :)

>1917

>1809

>1511

>1792
>1889
>Le current year

>1940

717 - 718

>germaniggers
>pure

Isn't France Germanic?

It wasn't that bad

No. We're a celt people cucked by latins

>1806
>1914

>1865

>1632
>1709
>1718
>1721
>1743
>1809
>1905
>2015

It was tho. Aside from losing all of finland and åland our king was deposed by his childless uncle who then gave the throne to a swarthy basque whose descendants rule us to this day

>1861

>1337
>1488

the normans invading the british isles basically laid the foundations for modern england, and took it out of being some backwater shithole ran by local german warlords

>1789

>75BC, 407AD
>50BC
>>(insert Dutch/Belgian flag)
>496
>>(insert Hun flag)
>451
>1631
>1644, 1688, 1792, 1797, 1918, 1945
>1620

Geez, can you just kindly fuck off everyone? There's nothing to gain here in this sleepy backwater anyway

>2018

>52 BC

Yea?

>2019 A.D.

?